Think this sums up the British 'royal' family.

Snakeblood · 14-11-2011 04:47PM

ejmaztec wrote: »

There seems to be more interest here in the royals, than there is in the UK.

I note how After Hours is regularly festooned with admiring posts on all the lovely goings of the Royals. It's good that one lone brave voice speaks out against the popular swell of opinion.

prinz · 14-11-2011 04:47PM

Tiocfaidh Armani wrote: »

Oh dear. Go away.

Are you trying it ignore me for some reason? Not smart enough for you?

who the fug · 14-11-2011 04:47PM

Tiocfaidh Armani wrote: »

Why? My family would never abandon someone because they were special needs. Why should the 'cream of society' get away with it without criticism.

The sad thing is, UK society does it on a daily basis, it is called care in the community, which is a great concept if you ever saw one of them Victorian nut houses

Only problem the money for the care bit never came through

So the cream are no different to Joe Public

ejmaztec · 14-11-2011 04:49PM

Tiocfaidh Armani wrote: »

No, only the British royal interest the Irish public. That hard for you to understand?

This must be what you're after.

http://www.theroyalforums.com/

Tiocfaidh Armani · 14-11-2011 04:49PM

al28283 wrote: »

The Irish public don't care about this, just you. You realize you are the one who started this thread right?

I was speaking in general terms about the British royal family. Read what you're quoting, son.

problemchimp · 14-11-2011 04:50PM

al28283 wrote: »

The Irish public don't care about this, just you. You realize you are the one who started this thread right?

Eh queens visit? No interest?

Tiocfaidh Armani · 14-11-2011 04:50PM

ejmaztec wrote: »

This must be what you're after.

http://www.theroyalforums.com/

No it's on here, check the dozens of sub-forums on here sonny, people talk about everything on here and here's what most people do when there's a thread on a subject they don't like.

THEY DON'T GO IN IT!:D

stewie01 · 14-11-2011 04:51PM

Shame on those dirty filthy royals, but i dont expect anything else from a bunch of inbred mongs.

Tiocfaidh Armani · 14-11-2011 04:52PM

Fratton Fred wrote: »

In the same way closet gays are usually the most vocally homophobic, closet royalists often spout this sort of thing to cover their own secret desires.

Oh don't even start me on those fags:mad:

*Joke, before anyone starts;)

DublinWriter · 14-11-2011 04:52PM

Tiocfaidh Armani wrote: »

Hospital staff interviewed for a Channel 4 documentary said they were not aware of them ever receiving visits, Christmas cards or birthday cards.

In Child Abuse Top Trumps, that's always beaten by the "Systematically Buggered by a Catholic Priest" card.

Crazy Horse 6 · 14-11-2011 04:53PM

Clowns the lot of them.

sensibleken · 14-11-2011 04:54PM

We should really look at how we treated special needs people over the decades before judging other countries.

prinz · 14-11-2011 04:54PM

Crazy Horse 6 wrote: »

Clowns the lot of them.

Except for Bobo, the Viscount of Picadilly Circus.

al28283 · 14-11-2011 04:54PM

stewie01 wrote: »

Shame on those dirty filthy royals, but i dont expect anything else from a bunch of inbred mongs.

We're all inbred mongs, some of us are just too stupid to realize it

mattjack · 14-11-2011 04:56PM

prinz wrote: »

Except for Bobo, the Viscount of Picadilly Circus.

and Burger King in Blanchardstown

ejmaztec · 14-11-2011 04:59PM

Tiocfaidh Armani wrote: »

No it's on here, check the dozens of sub-forums on here sonny, people talk about everything on here and here's what most people do when there's a thread on a subject they don't like.

THEY DON'T GO IN IT!:D

You should sign up and start a thread on royal nutters through the ages, or royal locked in the cellar.:(

Tiocfaidh Armani · 14-11-2011 05:00PM

DublinWriter wrote: »

In Child Abuse Top Trumps, that's always beaten by the "Systematically Buggered by a Catholic Priest" card.

No sh*t, Shelock. This isn't really about that, there's umpteen threads about child abuse, this isn't one.

Tiocfaidh Armani · 14-11-2011 05:02PM

ejmaztec wrote: »

You should sign up and start a thread on royal nutters through the ages, or royal locked in the cellar.:(

No I shouldn't. I'm not interested in talking to royalists, I'm interested in talking to Irish people about everything and anything hence my membership on here:)

stewie01 · 14-11-2011 05:05PM

al28283 wrote: »

We're all inbred mongs, some of us are just too stupid to realize it

you sound like a right tit. i hope your not. do you like to lick windows as a past time

al28283 · 14-11-2011 05:08PM

stewie01 wrote: »

you sound like a right tit. i hope your not. do you like to lick windows as a past time

No, why would i do that?
The fact is that were all inbred, you don't have to go back very far in your family tree before you start seeing some overlapping. If knowing know facts makes someone a tit then i guess i am one

ejmaztec · 14-11-2011 05:10PM

Tiocfaidh Armani wrote: »

No I shouldn't. I'm not interested in talking to royalists, I'm interested in talking to Irish people about everything and anything hence my membership on here:)

Well, if you signed up on that forum, and asked those questions, you wouldn't be on there for long, so it wouldn't waste much of your time.:D

FetchTheGin · 14-11-2011 05:12PM

I think it is hilarious that Britain continues to finance the royal family.

problemchimp · 14-11-2011 05:13PM

ejmaztec wrote: »

Well, if you signed up on that forum, and asked those questions, you wouldn't be on there for long, so it wouldn't waste much of your time.:D

What exactly have you contributed to this thread aside from slagging off the op? If you have no interest in the subject then maybe you should consider another topic.

Wertz · 14-11-2011 05:14PM

One couldn't possibly have mongoloids running amok in the halls of the royal palaces, could one? Why they might frighten the horses.

Tiocfaidh Armani · 14-11-2011 05:14PM

ejmaztec wrote: »

Well, if you signed up on that forum, and asked those questions, you wouldn't be on there for long, so it wouldn't waste much of your time.:D

I spend my working day online feck it maybe it is worth a shot:D

ejmaztec · 14-11-2011 05:28PM

problemchimp wrote: »

What exactly have you contributed to this thread aside from slagging off the op? If you have no interest in the subject then maybe you should consider another topic.

I've probably contributed a lot more than you, and I don't think you know what slagging means. At least I'm not a moaning minnie.

hangon · 14-11-2011 05:32PM

As Irish People We would resent our president being constantly criticised by English people(even though the office has very little power)

The Queens role is mainly a figurehead to her Nation also.

on average approx 90% of people on the Island of Ireland voted YES to the good Friday agreement.

To hate her is ridiculous,to dislike her Govt is fine,to dislike the Royals because they were born into Royalty is like blaming your ancestors for the family they stuck you with!

We have to get over this,if nothing else the recent historic visit by her to Ireland and how proud we were of McAleese demonstrated how much most wish for a cordial relationship,and only the deepest of begrudgers would deny it was not easy for the Queen and our president to have tried to respect each others 'sacred' places.

Hopefully in the words of the Desiderata "No doubt the Universe is unfolding as it should".

FetchTheGin · 14-11-2011 05:36PM

Wertz wrote: »

One couldn't possibly have more mongoloids running amok in the halls of the royal palaces, could one? Why they might frighten the horses.

FYP

Fratton Fred · 14-11-2011 05:54PM

FetchTheGin wrote: »

I think it is hilarious that Britain continues to finance the royal family.

They probably aren't any more expensive than a president would be to be honest.

KeithAFC · 14-11-2011 05:57PM

sensibleken wrote: »

We should really look at how we treated special needs people over the decades before judging other countries.

Fully agree.

Think this sums up the British 'royal' family.

Comments