paddy power poker

Jul3s · 09-11-2011 1:16am

Zacharyswan wrote: »

I agree, I have been playing for quiet some time now and PP tends to favor the lesser cards. I've had AA, AK, AQ etc stolen on the river so many times it's Fn unreal and within the same game. It can't be random, I have actually started running with lower, ****e cards myself and it works out I fill more often than not. I suspect some PP employees are posting here :mad:

Zacharyswan wrote: »

I am not saying PP is fixing them, I am saying the software is crap, looks to me liek it picks players randomly for a win rather than the actual hands, anyhow it's a real pain being beaten more often on good cards than bad/rubbish cards, hows that realistic poker!

Welcome to Retardville, population you!.

SlowJack · 09-11-2011 6:14am

Zacharyswan wrote: »

I am not saying PP is fixing them, I am saying the software is crap, looks to me liek it picks players randomly for a win rather than the actual hands, anyhow it's a real pain being beaten more often on good cards than bad/rubbish cards, hows that realistic poker!

I'm not mad about onlin poker also, but even in live poker it happens. Just last night, my AQ was beaten with A9, my QQ beaten with 88 all pre-flop all'in.

There are not such a thing as bad/rubbish cards, the cards is a very small part of the game in total.

Antikythera · 09-11-2011 7:45am

Jul3s wrote: »

Welcome to Retardville, population you!.

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTWhL-4dJ9LJdl3UAmS6Rv3KoFebtgRVPECMAFbIvwC7VcGGozw

HA HA HAHA HAHAHA HA HA HAHAHA HA HA HA

You're a comedic genius.

I haven't laughed so much in years!

Hank Scorpio · 09-11-2011 6:00pm

[ ] poker is dead

Zacharyswan · 10-11-2011 12:04pm

If you have nothing to say best not say it Juls! Fn AH...

My point is the software is just not up to matching a real game yet!
I am well aware of how hands work....but since you guys are more into one liners rather than debate.....blow me!

zuroph · 10-11-2011 4:55pm

cock sh1t b0ll0x ****.

nix · 10-11-2011 5:27pm

zuroph wrote: »

cock sh1t b0ll0x ****.

So true........ so true...

ArmaniJeanss · 11-11-2011 1:59am

Zacharyswan wrote: »

My point is the software is just not up to matching a real game yet!

Watttt, the entire game is effectively a RANDOM(52) function call.
Computers and software have been able to do this successfully since about 1956.

nix · 11-11-2011 5:03am

Nah its fixed and I'm basing that on absolutely nothing..

Antikythera · 11-11-2011 8:29am

ArmaniJeanss wrote: »

Watttt, the entire game is effectively a RANDOM(52) function call.
Computers and software have been able to do this successfully since about 1956.

Well that's as maybe, but where online poker is concerned, they are not doing it.

marco_polo · 11-11-2011 5:04pm

Antikythera wrote: »

Well that's as maybe, but where online poker is concerned, they are not doing it. [1]

[1] Citation needed

mark renton · 14-11-2011 8:03pm

Actually computers have always struggled with precise random number generation

and earlier hand example AA v 72 rainbow, 72 wins 12% of the time, if the 72 is suited the 16.5% - which is a 6/1 shot in a 2 horse race

AA is the best pocket pair but by no means a certainty every time

Antikythera · 14-11-2011 10:13pm

marco_polo wrote: »

[1] Citation needed

Just go and look for yourself. Open your eyes and you won't miss it.

john47832 wrote: »

16.5% - which is a 6/1 shot in a 2 horse race

5/1

SlowJack · 15-11-2011 1:38am

Antikythera wrote: »

5/1

6.06/1....;)

nix · 15-11-2011 4:06am

Antikythera wrote: »

Just go and look for yourself. Open your eyes and you won't miss it.

5/1

All we can find are idiots waffling on like you are without any actual "evidence", since it soooo easy to find, why don't you provide some credible sources?

You're not going too? I wonder why that is.... :rolleyes:

BeanbagBallbag · 15-11-2011 4:43am

SlowJack wrote: »

6.06/1....;)

16.5% = 165/1000
165 = ~ 1/6 * 1000

83.5% = 835/1000
835 = ~ 5/6 * 1000

83.5 : 16.5 = ~5 : 1 = 5/1

(5.06/1)

Mellor · 15-11-2011 6:56am

SlowJack wrote: »

6.06/1....;)

If you are going to most something smart at least make sure you are right.

16.5% is roughly 1 time in every 6 (1 in every 6.0600)
That means its a 5/1 shot, not a 6/1 shot.

1 time in 2 is an even money shot or 1/1, it isn't 2/1

This has to be one of the owrst threads on the forum.

Antikythera · 15-11-2011 8:28am

nix wrote: »

All we can find are idiots waffling on like you are without any actual "evidence", since it soooo easy to find, why don't you provide some credible sources?

You're not going too? I wonder why that is.... :rolleyes:

Thanks. If you're not seeing it, there's really nothing I can do for you.

Antikythera · 15-11-2011 12:01pm

nix wrote: »

You're not going too? I wonder why that is.... :rolleyes:

Going where too? Let me know where it is and I'll tell you if I'll go too.

nix · 15-11-2011 1:22pm

Provide links to credible sources.... thought that was obvious..

And oh look, I was right

Just you talking out your ass.......AGAIN

nix · 15-11-2011 8:26pm

Wait i think you may be right about it being rigged,

Source: http://www.billrini.com/2004/11/30/proof-that-online-poker-is-rigged/

:rolleyes:

mark renton · 15-11-2011 11:38pm

Mellor wrote: »

If you are going to most something smart at least make sure you are right .

Mellor wrote: »

This has to be one of the owrst threads on the forum.

:rolleyes:

lmao with the irony, i nearly fell off the chair

Mellor · 16-11-2011 4:21am

john47832 wrote: »

:rolleyes:

lmao with the irony, i nearly fell off the chair

The poster make a smart comment about it being 6.06/1
His whole point was wrong. He doesn't understand odds.

Mine was a typo. Quite common really. I am actually aware how to spell worst.

If you can't see the difference then its not surprising you have trouble keeping you balance while sitting in the chair.

Dave147 · 16-11-2011 5:12am

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

Antikythera · 16-11-2011 8:39am

nix wrote: »

Wait i think you may be right about it being rigged,

Source: http://www.billrini.com/2004/11/30/proof-that-online-poker-is-rigged/

:rolleyes:

Lol, you really are new to this aren't you.

Dave147 wrote: »

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

Depends on connection speed.

mark renton · 16-11-2011 10:53am

Mellor wrote: »

Mine was a typo. Quite common really. I am actually aware how to spell worst.
.

Yes typos are common - even happened to me once, but when you are having a go at the content quality of others posts then at least ensure you own is up to standard

mark renton · 16-11-2011 10:56am

Antikythera wrote: »

Depends on connection speed.

i was going to add confused to his comment - but which algorithm did you use to decipher that post

Mellor · 16-11-2011 11:14am

john47832 wrote: »

Yes typos are common - even happened to me once, but when you are having a go at the content quality of others posts then at least ensure you own is up to standard

If I was having a go at the spelling, then my own typo would of been quite ironic.
But I referred to the fact that the "correction" was completely wrong. So I don't think it's all that funny. A bit unfortunate.

You forgot the R in YOUR above. Again not massively funny, just unfortunate given the post it's in.

Mellor · 16-11-2011 11:15am

john47832 wrote: »

Antikythera wrote: »

Depends on connection speed.

i was going to add confused to his comment - but which algorithm did you use to decipher that post

Lol, my thoughts too.
I've read it a few times now and I'm still lost

Hank Scorpio · 16-11-2011 2:02pm

marco_polo · 16-11-2011 2:34pm

Still only quads though

http://kickasspoker.blogspot.com/2007/10/bogus-five-aces-stars-hand-that-wont.html

nix · 16-11-2011 3:27pm

Antikythera wrote: »

Lol, you really are new to this aren't you.

Depends on connection speed.

No, that's all i could find when i went looking for "proof that online poker is rigged", it just highlights my point that you're talking out your ass and YOU haven't got a clue what you're talking about with your claims.

And yet again you prevail in failing to support your claims, /golfclap

mark renton · 16-11-2011 5:31pm

That picture is not valid nuxx - how can twiceasright have won 24000 from previous pot when the blinds and ante combine to at least 34000

premierstone · 16-11-2011 5:47pm

john47832 wrote: »

That picture is not valid nuxx - how can twiceasright have won 24000 from previous pot when the blinds and ante combine to at least 34000

I doubt its validity either but not for the reason you have stated, twiceasright was the sb in the last hand so he obv raised , bb folded and he thus won the bb + 4 antes which equals 24,000

mark renton · 16-11-2011 5:59pm

premierstone wrote: »

I doubt its validity either but not for the reason you have stated, twiceasright was the sb in the last hand so he obv raised , bb folded and he thus won the bb + 4 antes which equals 24,000

so your saying the chips twiceasright has put in are not included in the win?

then in that case the win should be 23,000 - no?

zuroph · 16-11-2011 6:10pm

You’ve got to be kidding me. I’ve been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It’s just common sense

Hank Scorpio · 17-11-2011 12:11am

lol

Mellor · 17-11-2011 2:59am

premierstone wrote: »

I doubt its validity either but not for the reason you have stated, twiceasright was the sb in the last hand so he obv raised , bb folded and he thus won the bb + 4 antes which equals 24,000

That wouldn't of happened, the pot would of been bigger had SB of raised.

He was BB last hand. It was folded to him, so 10,000 was refunded (the extra in for the BB over the SB), the pot was 4 x 1000 antes, SB's 10,000 and his match of SBs amount = 24,000

john47832 wrote: »

so your saying the chips twiceasright has put in are not included in the win?

then in that case the win should be 23,000 - no?

As above, he was BB.
Antes are also separate to blinds so they would of counted.

Its a fake. But not for those reasons.
It's a screen shot of two tourneys plus a fake chat box

Dave147 · 17-11-2011 3:23am

Mellor wrote: »

Lol, my thoughts too.
I've read it a few times now and I'm still lost

Google it.

Antikythera · 17-11-2011 9:39am

nix wrote: »

No, that's all i could find when i went looking for "proof that online poker is rigged"

Why would you go looking for "proof that online poker is rigged" when you're so convinced it's not?

It doesn't make sense; it's a bit like someone who doesn't believe in leprechauns spending his time looking for leprechauns.

nix · 18-11-2011 2:10am

Antikythera wrote: »

Why would you go looking for "proof that online poker is rigged" when you're so convinced it's not?

It doesn't make sense; it's a bit like someone who doesn't believe in leprechauns spending his time looking for leprechauns.

To prove how wrong you are, thought that was obvious...

Again, you're making claims that are based on nothing and can't prove otherwise, take a hike wang broom..

Barry18 · 05-01-2012 1:34am

Ipoker is generally bad for giving bad beats. I think it is more suited for tournament players more than cash game players. You should try and change network like go and play with ladbrokes or stars or something

DuPLeX · 05-06-2012 1:25am

I pLaaaaaaaaaaa y paddddy power a lot and I've found that I get more Beats on good cards with live games ,I Cant see why they would rig it ? I would be more likely to beattt any of you online than I would in a live game .Go figure ,

(Extra letters for the anals )

jammyBastrad · 15-01-2013 7:05pm

I played poker on paddy power poker and it was the worst site on the planet for badbeats . if you lost 300 in 1 week give it up. You could go to your local casino spent 25euro to enter a real texas holdem game with an honest chance of winning good money. Take no notice of these assholes talking about forums or other internet poker ****e. Plus you get a great nite out and meet some great real people. It is a little nerve racking at first but after a few weeks its some crack. Stick to 2 nights a week max for first 12months and you will enjoy more. Best of luck.

mark renton · 15-01-2013 7:11pm

This thread died last year jimmy.

The OP has since won a fortune, however Mellors instinct for a joke is still muck.

TheGolfer01 · 15-01-2013 7:15pm

mark renton wrote: »

This thread died last year jimmy.

The OP has since won a fortune, however Mellors instinct for a joke is still muck.

It's jammy not jimmy and there's one born every minute, so I wouldn't try to reason with him/it.

paddy power poker

Comments