Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

People caring about who the next President will be

  • 25-10-2011 04:45PM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,207 ✭✭✭


    Has anyone realised yet that it doesn't MATTER who the next president will be?

    All they have to do is meet the odd foreign dignitary, go to GAA games, turn a sod, cut a ribbon, meet old people and kiss babies.
    THAT'S IT!

    So it doesn't make a blind bit of difference who gets in. The president does what they're told, end of. Any decision they make has to be approved by the government, any real work* is done by the Taoiseach and ministers.

    It's purely a symbolic office, the same as the monarchy in England, so to all those saying the Gallagher is going to bring jobs, McGuinness is going to unite Ireland, Norris is going to legalise gay marriage, it's all pure sh1te.

    the term 'real work' may not actually refer to real work


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,818 ✭✭✭Minstrel27


    I'd be unhappy to see some of the candidates getting that job.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,688 ✭✭✭Kasabian


    Op are you aware we have a constitution?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    Has anyone realised yet that it doesn't MATTER who the next president will be?

    All they have to do is meet the odd foreign dignitary, go to GAA games, turn a sod, cut a ribbon, meet old people and kiss babies.
    THAT'S IT!

    So it doesn't make a blind bit of difference who gets in. The president does what they're told, end of. Any decision they make has to be approved by the government, any real work* is done by the Taoiseach and ministers.

    It's purely a symbolic office, the same as the monarchy in England, so to all those saying the Gallagher is going to bring jobs, McGuinness is going to unite Ireland, Norris is going to legalise gay marriage, it's all pure sh1te.

    the term 'real work' may not actually refer to real work

    No it isn't


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,418 ✭✭✭✭hondasam


    We still need a good person to represent Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,578 ✭✭✭DublinWriter


    orourkeda wrote: »
    No it is'nt
    Only in so much as our President doesn't wear a crown.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    Has anyone realised yet that it doesn't MATTER who the next president will be?

    All they have to do is meet the odd foreign dignitary, go to GAA games, turn a sod, cut a ribbon, meet old people and kiss babies.
    THAT'S IT!


    So it doesn't make a blind bit of difference who gets in. The president does what they're told, end of. Any decision they make has to be approved by the government, any real work* is done by the Taoiseach and ministers.

    It's purely a symbolic office, the same as the monarchy in England, so to all those saying the Gallagher is going to bring jobs, McGuinness is going to unite Ireland, Norris is going to legalise gay marriage, it's all pure sh1te.

    the term 'real work' may not actually refer to real work

    Another well informed view on the presidency.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,300 ✭✭✭CiaranC


    The really unfortunate thing is that simpletons like the OP get a vote just like the rest of us


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,461 ✭✭✭--Kaiser--


    It's all about who will be the least embarrassing President


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,351 ✭✭✭Orando Broom


    OP is proof that Sean Gallagher voters exist!

    Jesus, some serious heads out there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    Only in so much as our President doesn't wear a crown.

    My word


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,688 ✭✭✭Kasabian


    hondasam wrote: »
    We still need a good person to represent Ireland.

    I'll do it.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 7,944 Mod ✭✭✭✭Yakult


    orourkeda wrote: »
    Another well informed view on the presidency.

    Inform us from up there oh mighty sirrrrrrrrrrrrr!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,030 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    A.B.Dana.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,751 ✭✭✭Saila


    just let the current one keep it for another term, I know shes had her time but she did a grand job :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,418 ✭✭✭✭hondasam


    Kasabian wrote: »
    I'll do it.

    Will you really, how much?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,418 ✭✭✭✭hondasam


    Saila wrote: »
    just let the current one keep it for another term, I know shes had her time but she did a grand job :)

    No fcuking way, she has had enough all ready.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    Yakult wrote: »
    Inform us from up there oh mighty sirrrrrrrrrrrrr!

    Sarcasm really is the lowest form of wit isn't it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 264 ✭✭harrythehat


    To a small extent I agree.

    I think Fine Gael are laughing at the moment - They don't care about the fact that Mitchell isn't going to win because this election has gotten the economy off the headlines for weeks.

    My vote would be going to MDH, but I think he, David Norris, Gay Mitchell or Mary Davis would be perfectly competent. I would not like to see McGuinness, Dana or Gallagher in the position.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,688 ✭✭✭Kasabian


    hondasam wrote: »
    Will you really, how much?

    Are we still talking about representing Ireland?

    I will do it for bed and board.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,418 ✭✭✭✭hondasam


    Kasabian wrote: »
    Are we still talking about representing Ireland?

    I will do it for bed and board.

    Bed and board it is :p


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,207 ✭✭✭longhalloween


    To a small extent I agree.

    I think Fine Gael are laughing at the moment - They don't care about the fact that Mitchell isn't going to win because this election has gotten the economy off the headlines for weeks.

    And why would they even care who wins, anything the President says or does has to get the go ahead from Fine Gael/Labour first. It doesn't matter who gets in, if it is Mitchell it's just easier to pull his strings.

    From citizensinformation.ie
    The Government must approve all Presidential communications, messages or addresses, both to the Oireachtas (Irish houses of Parliament) and to the public.

    Many of the powers of the President can only be exercised on the advice of the Government. This means that if the President wishes to exercise a power, he or she must first obtain the advice and agreement of the Government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 302 ✭✭RubyRoss


    Saila wrote: »
    just let the current one keep it for another term, I know shes had her time but she did a grand job :)

    This is a prevalent sentiment but people seem to forget that Mary McAleese has made some outrageous statments - comparing Unionists to Nazis was simply embarassing (bridge building?) and her stand-off with the heads of the Catholic and Protestant churches about taking communion was pretty undignified.

    She did a great job during the Queen's visit but it's typical in Ireland to either idolise or demonise. She belongs in the middle.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    RubyRoss wrote: »
    This is a prevalent sentiment but people seem to forget that Mary McAleese has made some outrageous statments - comparing Unionists to Nazis was simply embarassing (bridge building?) and her stand-off with the heads of the Catholic and Protestant churches about taking communion was pretty undignified.

    She did a great job during the Queen's visit but it's typical in Ireland to either idolise or demonise. She belongs in the middle.

    There are very few politicians that can claim to have exemplary records in this manner. While one cant really condone comments like the ones you mention they were the exceptions rather than the rule.I thought she performed her duties with great dignity for the vast vast majority of her tenure in office.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭foxyboxer


    What exactly does the President do that a minister can't do?

    Meet foreign dignitaries? Minister for Foreign Affairs.
    Turn a Sod? Minister for Agriculture.
    Kiss Babies? Minister for Children.
    Create Employment? Department of Jobs, Enterpriseand Innovation, Minister for Enterprise Trade and Employment.

    And what's the story with all the debates? The US only have 3 debates normally. Whereas we have had 5 FFS.
    I guess, the whole thing fills the news and papers. When it's all over it's back to saving the euro etc etc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,347 ✭✭✭KTRIC


    Has anyone realised yet that it doesn't MATTER who the next president will be?

    All they have to do is meet the odd foreign dignitary, go to GAA games, turn a sod, cut a ribbon, meet old people and kiss babies.
    THAT'S IT!

    So it doesn't make a blind bit of difference who gets in. The president does what they're told, end of. Any decision they make has to be approved by the government, any real work* is done by the Taoiseach and ministers.

    It's purely a symbolic office, the same as the monarchy in England, so to all those saying the Gallagher is going to bring jobs, McGuinness is going to unite Ireland, Norris is going to legalise gay marriage, it's all pure sh1te.

    the term 'real work' may not actually refer to real work

    Do you mean shoot the odd foreign dignitary, steal some sod and molest some babies ?? It'd fit in well with some of the candidates that are in the running.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭foxyboxer


    Kasabian wrote: »
    Op are you aware we have a constitution?

    A constitution can be amended.
    Maybe they should have included an option of "I do not want a President" on the ballot paper. :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,293 ✭✭✭✭Mint Sauce


    foxyboxer wrote: »
    A constitution can be amended.
    Maybe they should have included an option of "I do not want a President" on the ballot paper. :pac:

    Or make your own box, with none of the above written beside it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    KTRIC wrote: »
    Do you mean shoot the odd foreign dignitary, steal some sod and molest some babies ?? It'd fit in well with some of the candidates that are in the running.

    Do you think its really necessary to castigate some of the candidates as child molesters?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    foxyboxer wrote: »
    A constitution can be amended.
    Maybe they should have included an option of "I do not want a President" on the ballot paper. :pac:

    Why would you turn and vote for "I do not want a president" when staying at home or abstaining serves the same purpose


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    foxyboxer wrote: »
    What exactly does the President do that a minister can't do?

    Meet foreign dignitaries? Minister for Foreign Affairs.
    Turn a Sod? Minister for Agriculture.
    Kiss Babies? Minister for Children.
    Create Employment? Department of Jobs, Enterpriseand Innovation, Minister for Enterprise Trade and Employment.

    And what's the story with all the debates? The US only have 3 debates normally. Whereas we have had 5 FFS.
    I guess, the whole thing fills the news and papers. When it's all over it's back to saving the euro etc etc.

    They only have two candidates.


Advertisement