Building 7 ???

davoxx wrote: »

then why would you mention that NIST should have looked for them? i'm sure you had a point in that metaphor? what was it again?


ps: still don't see your theory anywhere ... just like the Leprechauns?

pps: is the fact that you won't just state your theory because it involves Leprechauns?

You've run so far off topic this is almost getting funny.

You wanted a official quote from someone that Molten Steel was not found at the WTC.

I pointed out that it's incredibly difficult if not impossible to prove a negative, and used the Leprechaun metaphor as a allegory.

Rather than stand up and defend you argument and explain how the NIST or FEMA could conclusively say "No Molten Steel was found", you're engaged in the nonsense above.

So what if thermite exists in reality? Likes of chemical compounds exist is reality. Is there a particular reason the NIST should have looked for thermite, and what are those reasons, please.

And

Please give examples of what you claim is disinformation on the 911myths site. Or a deliberate omission. And how you know it is a deliberate omission

davoxx wrote: »

you mentioned Leprechauns, not me.
i'll say that again, you might have missed it,
you mentioned Leprechauns, not me.
you then said there was a connection between them and 911.
you won't type your own theory, even though you demanded others too.

so will you explain the Leprechauns metaphor (which you are now calling an allegory)?

yes i do find you highly entertaining, but that is just a happy coincidence

ps: still don't see your theory anywhere ... just like the Leprechauns?
pps: is the fact that you won't just state your theory because it involves Leprechauns?

Hmmmm it seems you seem uninterested in any discussion about 911 and instead want to meander the discussion onto any lose tangent rather than discuss the facts.

Please explain how you think the NIST or FEMA could conclusively say no molten steel was found at ground zero.

Please point out the disinformation you claim is on the 911myths. Please give a clear example of a deliberate omission from 911myths and explain how you can prove it was a deliberate omission.

Please explain why you think the NIST or FEMA should have examined the WTC remains for traces of thermite.

davoxx wrote: »

please just explain your Leprechaun connection.

simples, then we can move on.until then i'll ask you to explain why you think they should have checked for Leprechauns.

i really do not understand your Leprechaun comments.

(the 911myths tangent was fun, but i think we've narrowed it down to why is there no mention of Leprechaus on the NIST report)

ps: still don't see your theory anywhere ... just like the Leprechauns?
pps: is the fact that you won't just state your theory because it involves Leprechauns?[/QUOTE]

Pity and irrelevant.

Please explain how you think the NIST or FEMA could conclusively say no molten steel was found at ground zero

Please point out the disinformation you claim is on the 911myths. Please give a clear example of a deliberate omission from 911myths and explain how you can prove it was a deliberate omission.

Please explain why you think the NIST or FEMA should have examined the WTC remains for traces of thermite.

Any time you want to come back from Narnia and join the discussion please do.

You suggested other posters use metaphors, and yet when someone uses a metaphor with you, you seem disinterested in discussing the issue but getting very pathetically meta about metaphor.


Oh and heres a few points.

You made the very specific claim about 911myths engaging in disinformation before the word leprechaun appeared on this thread.

And the 911myths being a source of disinformation isn't a tangent.

You claimed the 911 was a source of disinformation or had deliberate omissions and you're doing everything to avoid proving concrete information to support your claims.

Well

So what if thermite exists in reality? Likes of chemical compounds exist is reality. Is there a particular reason the NIST should have looked for thermite, and what are those reasons, please.

Please give examples of what you claim is disinformation on the 911myths site. Or a deliberate omission. And how you know it is a deliberate omissio

Di0genes wrote: »

Can you find a official report that states no leprechauns or molten adamantium was found at the WTC.

<span style="font-size:200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000">no</span>

Di0genes wrote: »

You clearly can't find examples of disinformation on the 911 myths, or a single example of a deliberate omission.

You can't explain why the NIST should have searched for thermite residue.

You are incapable of explaining how the anyone "official" could have conclusively stated there was "no molten steel at ground zero."

Since you are unable to do any of the above you resort to obfuscation and irrelevant tangents to attempt to maintain a semblance of a argument.

is this metaphorically speaking? :pac:

see i'll break this down to you.

1) i do not know what your argument is at the best of the times, why anyone would mention Leprechauns when claiming to have a serious discussion is beyond me.

2) you claim there is a connection between Leprechauns and wtc7 and 911 in general. i have asked several times for you to explain it, yet you have failed to do so.

3) you are now trying to brush off the Leprechauns argument without explaining why.

4) since this is the crux of your whole argument as to why someone should have checked for thermite, i feel we should address your concern of Leprechauns seriously in order to move the debate forward on wtc7 in a positive manner.

if you really want to have a meaningful debate and learn from it, you need to explain the Leprechaun argument.

we can address any further points you have later.

Di0genes wrote: »

So what if thermite exists in reality? Lots of chemical compounds exist is reality. Is there a particular reason the NIST should have looked for thermite, and what are those reasons, please.

me now wrote:

So what if Leprechauns don't exist in reality? Lots of creatures in folklore do not exist is reality. Is there a particular reason the NIST should have looked for Leprechauns, and what are those reasons, please.

if you really want to have a meaningful debate and learn from it, you need to explain the Leprechaun argument.