Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Manchester United Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 11/12

1171172174176177334

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,235 ✭✭✭✭flahavaj


    I will try to clarify.

    There is indeed a perception that Mike Phelan is not an acclaimed coach, that we are even having this discussion is evidence of that.

    I would consider our previous coaches to be acclaimed. We headhunted them, and they were headhunted from us. Evidence of acclaim.

    Phelan was promoted from within as a stop-gap before being offered the job full time. I do not know of any high profile attempts to headhunt him away from us.

    Therefore, he does not match the level of acclaim of our previous coaches.

    Does he have acclaim from other areas? I have not heard of any, though this does not mean it doesnt exist.

    So accepting this, is Mike Phelan an acclaimed assistant manager?

    Is "acclaim" important? From message board users no less?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,114 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    flahavaj wrote: »
    A perception amongst whom? Your line of reasoning is laughably tenuous.

    You don't believe that there are people who don't rate Mike Phelan? There is even one in this thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,114 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    flahavaj wrote: »
    Is "acclaim" important? From message board users no less?

    I have no opinion on whether it is or is not. Its importance has nothing to do with anything I have said.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,235 ✭✭✭✭flahavaj


    You don't believe that there are people who don't rate Mike Phelan? There is even one in this thread.

    I don't doubt for second there are.

    Why is it so important to prove that?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,235 ✭✭✭✭flahavaj


    I have no opinion on whether it is or is not. Its importance has nothing to do with anything I have said.

    Why bother wasting time arguing over something you deem ultimatley unimportant or having an opinion on???


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,369 ✭✭✭UnitedIrishman


    Can I just point out in all this hullabaloo that people booed United off the field midway through playing Blackburn a few years ago when we played 4-5-1 - a tactic that was supposedly the brainchild of Quieroz - that eventually came to fruition and won us quite a few trophies. And then the credit went to Fergie.

    The point I'm making is, that the backroom team as a whole decides on how United play. Of course Fergie dictates how he wants to play, and who plays, and so on - but we read far too much into the specific role of assistant manager. Most sides have a goalkeeping coach, a defensive coach, a fitness coach, a strikers coach and other specialist coaches. They're all on the same wavelength in terms of what they want to achieve and how they want to achieve it.

    Blaming Phelan is just daft. I heard the same thing levelled at Pat Rice at Arsenal. It's f**king mental. Just because Koscienly can't use his brains to clear a ball, it's supposedly the assistant managers fault? Nobody said anything when Adams and co. were pissing their way to a title or two.

    Anyways, what have we done wrong? Our defence has been a bit all over the place but that's down to the loss of key players.

    Edit - also for whether he's 'acclaimed' or not, I'd rather a coach who knows the 'United Way' from start to finish, as Phelan does from working all the way up from the Centre of Excellence, than some flash in the pan coach that is supposedly innovative. He knows the club from top to bottom having played for us and coached the club.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    Again, it may be quite unfair to denigrate him, but this opinion of Mike Phelan is quite understandable.

    We had almost two decades of Kidd, McClaren, and Quieroz, acclaimed coaches within the game who had stellar reputations. For fans who hope for the best of the best, they could be confident that the men coaching their teams were as good as was available in the game. Kidd was there for that first title in 26 years, and McClaren and Querioz were the results of extensive headhunting for the best coaches around.

    Phelen on the other hand is who got the job when Ferguson could not find any suitable candidates. Dont forget here, Phelen was not first choice, he was only acting-assistant when Ferguson was publicly seeking a new assistant after Carlos left. Ferguson could not find anybody he liked, and so Phelen got the job.

    Rightly or wrongly, fairly or unfairly, it does appear that Phelen only got the job by default, and the fact that in the years since he has not built the type of industry reputation that the others did only serves to enhance the idea that he is not the best around.

    It may be inaccurate, but this perception does have some grounding.

    The first three certainly had better reputations than Phelan has. And Fergie has shopped around looking for the best he can get in the past. But all they are, like the majority of assistants in football, is coaches who are too shìt to be managers in their own right.

    Gary Neville and the general footballing community can say all they like about Kidd, McClaren and Quieroz's savant tactical powers, but I have no doubt that Fergie is twice the tactician of any of them.

    I'm sure they have all been useful in their time with bringing in new ideas, but I'm not going to sweat when we don't have a ''acclaimed'' coach on the support team.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,114 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    flahavaj wrote: »
    Why bother wasting time arguing over something you deem ultimatley unimportant or having an opinion on???

    That wasn't what I was arguing about. Can you see why I feel you are not reading my posts?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,235 ✭✭✭✭flahavaj


    That wasn't what I was arguing about. Can you see why I feel you are not reading my posts?

    I'm lost tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,114 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Pro. F wrote: »
    The first three certainly had better reputations than Phelan has. And Fergie has shopped around looking for the best he can get in the past. But all they are, like the majority of assistants in football, is coaches who are too shìt to be managers in their own right.

    Gary Neville and the general footballing community can say all they like about Kidd, McClaren and Quieroz's savant tactical powers, but I have no doubt that Fergie is twice the tactician of any of them.

    I'm sure they have all been useful in their time with bringing in new ideas, but I'm not going to sweat when we don't have a ''acclaimed'' coach on the support team.

    I don't necessarily disagree, I have said three of four times now that Phelan could very well be an excellent coach.

    I would not play down the importance of having the best of the best coaching wise at United though. As far as I know Fergie does not get too involved in day to day training, so we do need the coaches to be as good as they can be. That support team is very important.

    Tactically and on match days, I agree that it would be all about Fergie.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    keane2097 wrote: »
    Wat?

    I'm talking about tactics from the early 90s!

    Eh... I'm confused. I thought you were talking about the famous (sort of) change to a more cautious approach in Europe after the Real defeat in the early 00's. Maybe there was a change from an even more gung ho style in the 90's, but I was too young back then to appreciate it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    I don't necessarily disagree, I have said three of four times now that Phelan could very well be an excellent coach.

    I would not play down the importance of having the best of the best coaching wise at United though. As far as I know Fergie does not get too involved in day to day training, so we do need the coaches to be as good as they can be. That support team is very important.

    Tactically and on match days, I agree that it would be all about Fergie.

    Yeah that makes sense. I was all focused on the question of who was the driving force behind the tactics because that was where the discussion started. But the ability to coach on the training pitch and the ideas for training sessions is important too.

    Still I would think Fergie is very good at this too with all his experience and knowledge. Even if he delegates all the work I'm sure he can set up and oversee a very effective training programme. Just bring in some new coaches now and again when we need to freshen things up would be my approach to the entire question of assistants.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,521 ✭✭✭Giggsy11


    Most debated topics.

    Berbatov is lazy
    Carrick is sh*t
    Phelan is Yes Man
    Evans is a liability
    Nani is/was useless
    Anderson is fat and his stamina is poor

    I have missed many, but these are very common topics not only on this board, but in any United forum.

    Good that O'Shea left so that we have one less topic to worry about :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭onemorechance


    Wellbeck and Rooney upfront for England; and Manchester United!!?? Smalling, Rio and Jones at the back!!?? Young on the wing! Hopefully soon Cleverley in midfield for both! pacman.gif It's looking well rosey at OT! England's best team is England's best team!

    Wednesday October 5,2011
    By Paul Joyce




    275627_1.jpg
    Danny Welbeck has crammed more into two months than many aspire to in an entire career

    FROM scoring in front of an ecstatic Stretford End and illuminating his Champions League debut with two goals, to being elevated into the England squad, Danny Welbeck has crammed more into the opening two months of the season than many aspire to in an entire career.

    Yet spend 20 minutes in the company of Manchester United’s young tyro and his hunger is so evident that it becomes clear he simply takes it all in his stride.

    The hurdles to come will inevitably become more awkward to vault, but Danny Welbeck shows no sign of tripping up.


    apostropheLeft.jpg

    “I’m not seeing it as, ‘Whoa, I’ve got to this stage’, or anything like that,” he said. “You just have to take it as it comes, like when you’re playing for the Under-18s. I want to keep improving because I know there are no limits.

    “In football, you don’t want to put a limit on anything. You don’t want to be happy with where you’re at.

    “If you think of players like Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo, they score goals and break records and they just want to keep breaking them. They don’t want to stop there.

    “That’s how everyone should feel. You play your football, you score a goal and you want to score another.”

    apostropheRight.jpg
    Danny Welbeck


    There are lots of reasons why Welbeck is emerging as a real contender, knocking Dimitar Berbatov, Michael Owen and maybe even Javier Hernandez down the pecking order at Old Trafford in the process.

    His eye for goal – he has scored five in eight appearances this season – and technical ability are underpinned by an outlook mature beyond his 20 years.

    Being schooled the United way has granted him a privileged upbringing. Part of his fearless approach, he says, is because he plays “the game, not the occasion”.


    But it was his willingness when younger to practice the skills religiously, as coaches such as Rene Meulensteen drummed into him their secrets, that has enabled Welbeck to stay ahead of his contemporaries.

    “I would be playing in the back garden or just going to a park with friends,” said Welbeck.

    “He taught us a few skills and a few drills and wanted us to go and practice them ourselves, at home, not just in the training sessions with him.

    “Wes Brown lived directly opposite me so we used to play football together – my big brothers, Wes and his brothers.”

    Sir Alex Ferguson always envisaged Welbeck would sport an England shirt one day, leading the attack in a major tournament.

    The only caveat to that is that he boldly informed Fabio Capello that the precocious young striker would be making his mark at the World Cup in South Africa.

    In many ways, Ferguson killed his own prophecy, unable as he was to grant Welbeck the playing time for United that he wanted to.

    Last season Welbeck went on loan to Sunderland, although he regards the time spent there as the making of him.

    “Just getting the minutes in the Premier League and to be playing week in, week out with the big boys, that was a really big step and I loved every minute there,” he said.

    “I can’t speak too highly of how it helped me going to Sunderland. I know how to go into a game situation, how to prepare during the week and all that stuff.

    “Even off the pitch, living on my own, I had to move away from home. As a whole, I’ve grown up from a boy into a man.”

    And the advice that is at hand within the United dressing room gives him every chance of fulfilling his potential.

    “I’m learning from the best,” he said. “Michael Owen has been to England at a young age and terrorised the world stage. We all know what Wayne Rooney can do. He’s one of the best footballers in the world.

    “They are so easy to talk to. It’s not like, ‘Wow, I’m going to talk to Wayne Rooney now’. He’s not like that at all, he’s not that type of character. I’m always watching them in training and how they act around the dressing room.”

    He could now find himself alongside Rooney in Montenegro on Friday.

    It would be Welbeck’s second cap having been rushed in as a late substitute against Ghana last March to prevent the Black Stars calling him up themselves. (He has Ghanaian parents).

    “When I was at Sunderland one of the guys [from the Ghana FA] came to watch Asamoah Gyan, John Mensah and Sulley Muntari, so I spoke to him once or twice after the games,” he said. “But there wasn’t any huge amount of pressure on me to play for them.”

    Ghana’s loss is undoubtedly England’s gain.


    http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/275627/Manchester-United-s-Danny-Welbeck-is-at-home-on-board-the-glory-train


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,153 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Giggsy11 wrote: »
    Most debated topics.

    Berbatov is lazy
    Carrick is sh*t
    Phelan is Yes Man
    Evans is a liability
    Nani is/was useless
    Anderson is fat and his stamina is poor

    I have missed many, but these are very common topics not only on this board, but in any United forum.

    Good that O'Shea left so that we have one less topic to worry about :pac:

    I also like the in-depth anyalsis of DDG, Phil Jones and Cleverly's extentsive United careers, from their early days (Charity Shield) through to their maturing/blossoming stage (highlights include Arsenal at home) to their latter days spent at United! :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,557 ✭✭✭VW 1


    This is a Manchester United discussion forum. This is where people will discuss things that are Manchester United related.

    It's understandable from time to time people will complain when one topic is being endlessly debated in circles.

    But moaning at people discussing Manchester related issues baffles me.

    If people dont like the topics being discussed then get something going on something you think worthy, or just dont read the thread in the first place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,557 ✭✭✭VW 1


    ajcurry123 wrote: »
    I also like the in-depth anyalsis of DDG, Phil Jones and Cleverly's extentsive United careers, from their early days (Charity Shield) through to their maturing/blossoming stage (highlights include Arsenal at home) to their latter days spent at United! :rolleyes:

    People can only go by what they have seen of Phil Jones in a United shirt because I doubt many were paying in depth attention to the 18 year old at Blackburn last year.

    DeOughnut, most people will be aware of him and probably watched him in some European games and some La Liga games so will have an idea of what he is capable of, strengths/weaknesses etc.

    Cleverley has been at the club for some 7 or 8 years and a lot of people have watched him at u18 and reserve level, before keeping an eye on him on his 2 loan spells as well as pre-season for 3 years plus his few games for us this season. So I would imagine a fair few posters would be in a decent position to comment on his game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,153 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    I'm pretty sure Giggsy11 was, as I was, having a bit of a laugh about it!
    No moaning, just maybe failed attempt at humour!

    Jeez VW1, you took that bone and ran with it :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,521 ✭✭✭Giggsy11


    VW 1 wrote: »
    This is a Manchester United discussion forum. This is where people will discuss things that are Manchester United related.

    It's understandable from time to time people will complain when one topic is being endlessly debated in circles.

    But moaning at people discussing Manchester related issues baffles me.

    If people dont like the topics being discussed then get something going on something you think worthy, or just dont read the thread in the first place.

    I dont have any problems with what people discuss. Its up to them and others who wants to join the debate. Just felt these are the common topics so I mentioned them. I dont know where I moaned about it. :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,557 ✭✭✭VW 1


    Giggsy11 wrote: »
    I dont have any problems with what people discuss. Its up to them and others who wants to join the debate. Just felt these are the common topics so I mentioned them. I dont know where I moaned about it. :confused:

    Bad morning, my bad for the grumpyness


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,153 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Has anyone got any decent links to articles on our Financial situation?

    I've been trawling through some fairly run of the mill stuff, would love something a bit more detailed. i.e Proper analysis of the financial statments rather than the newspaper articles...30% more shirts sold...kinda stuff!

    There was one or two really detailed blogs that I followed in the past but can't remember names for the life of me!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41,926 ✭✭✭✭_blank_


    andersred


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,521 ✭✭✭Giggsy11




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,295 ✭✭✭enviro




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,521 ✭✭✭Giggsy11


    enviro wrote: »
    Interesting indeed...

    All the Swiss ramble blogs are indeed intresting. This and andersred blogs are really worth a read.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,173 ✭✭✭✭kmart6


    Giggsy11 wrote: »
    Is that not the one that was posted here a month ago?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,521 ✭✭✭Giggsy11


    kmart6 wrote: »
    Is that not the one that was posted here a month ago?!

    Yeah, its a old one. ajcurry123 wanted blog where the financial situation is explained well, so posted that old link again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,043 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    I know it may be bit soon to be getting rid of Rio Ferdinand, but would any of you be willing to let Rio go say next summer if the rumours are true about him going to States?

    I mean with the likes of Smalling and Jones coming through is Rio's best days over or is it too premature?

    Personally I would still like to see him stick around, but after discussion with mate on my lunch he was saying that when was was over at game at weekend a few of the fans that he got chatting with would not be upset to see him leave.

    And after the Hargreaves situation is it worth a keeping a player that may now find himself on the bench as much as he is on the field of play?

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,610 ✭✭✭jaykay74



    I mean with the likes of Smalling and Jones coming through is Rio's best days over or is it too premature?

    I'd like to see how this season plays out both for the newcomers and Rio. Too premature to say definitively now.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,557 ✭✭✭VW 1


    I know it may be bit soon to be getting rid of Rio Ferdinand, but would any of you be willing to let Rio go say next summer if the rumours are true about him going to States?

    I mean with the likes of Smalling and Jones coming through is Rio's best days over or is it too premature?

    Personally I would still like to see him stick around, but after discussion with mate on my lunch he was saying that when was was over at game at weekend a few of the fans that he got chatting with would not be upset to see him leave.

    And after the Hargreaves situation is it worth a keeping a player that may now find himself on the bench as much as he is on the field of play?

    Yeah perhaps a little bit early in the season to judge, I know he hasnt looked too great but that could be a combo of rustiness in coming back from injury as well as all of the chopping and changing in defence. Not to mention Vidic not partnering him.

    I think he should get back to his best should he maintain fitness and not pick up any injuries.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement