Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Arrested for murder after killing burglar.. England.

  • 18-09-2011 05:35PM
    #1
    Posts: 18,046 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/sep/18/suspected-burglar-stabbed-death-stockport
    A suspected intruder has been stabbed to death following a burglary at a house.

    Police were called to the address in Bramhall, Stockport, on Saturday night following reports of a break-in.

    A man in his late 30s was discovered with knife injuries and died a short time later. A 39-year-old man – understood to be the householder – has been arrested on suspicion of murder.

    Greater Manchester police said it was believed two men had entered the house in Midland Road and threatened the 39-year-old occupant. The man was alone at the time, at about 7.50pm, but his wife and 12-year-old son returned during the incident. They escaped unharmed.

    The second offender fled the scene and it is believed he may have driven off in a white Citroën van, registration MM02 XEY, that was parked nearby on Chinley Close. Detectives are urgently trying to trace the vehicle. The wanted man is described as being 6ft and of large build.

    Shouldn't he arrested for manslaughter? It was hardly premeditated.. And then he should be acquitted for it and given a medal.


«1345

Comments

  • Posts: 81,308 CMod ✭✭✭✭ Tony Full Lifesaver


    I suppose it depends if they were leaving or injured and then he decided to kill them or something, right?

    But yeah if there's nothing more to it, should be manslaughter and preferably acquitted


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,271 ✭✭✭✭johngalway


    and given a medal.

    Skip it all and just do the above.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,975 ✭✭✭W.Shakes-Beer


    Burglar deserved it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,581 ✭✭✭✭TheZohanS


    It's probably just procedure, I doubt he'll do any time over it. If he does the system over there is fecked.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,816 ✭✭✭✭galwayrush


    I don't see why a scumbag burglar should have any law on his side .
    Man defends his property, thankfully he's ok.
    No sympathy for the scumbag.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,303 ✭✭✭Temptamperu


    I think you should be allowed protect your property by what ever means neccessary, like in the states.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 670 ✭✭✭Naomi00


    It's not even murder anyway.

    Murder has to be pre-meditated, that burgalar was obviously in the wrong. It's unfair that the law is on scumbags sides as usual.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,653 ✭✭✭Ghandee


    Any cnut that enters my property (that I've worked bloody hard for) and threatens my wife, child and possessions probably could expect to be confronted by me too.
    I'm by no means saying it'd end up the exact same way as this, ie the intruder stabbed, but by christ, they'd soon realise that when protecting my family and home, I would certainly defend them to my death!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 670 ✭✭✭Naomi00


    TheZohan wrote: »
    It's probably just procedure, I doubt he'll do any time over it. If he does the system over there is fecked.


    It was the same here, but I think they changed the law a bit so that you can defend yourself if they have a weapon or something, not sure. It still isn't enough though really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,836 ✭✭✭Sir Gallagher


    Ghandee wrote: »
    Any cnut that enters my property (that I've worked bloody hard for) and threatens my wife, child and possessions probably could expect to be confronted by me too.
    I'm by no means saying it'd end up the exact same way as this, ie the intruder stabbed, but by christ, they'd soon realise that when protecting my family and home, I would certainly defend them to my death!

    Gotta love Ironic usernames!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ResearchWill


    Naomi00 wrote: »
    It's not even murder anyway.

    Murder has to be pre-meditated, that burgalar was obviously in the wrong. It's unfair that the law is on scumbags sides as usual.

    While I understand the idea behind what you say, it can still be premeditated. Say for example a strung out junkie enters a house. You awake go downstairs armed with a poker, you see said junkie in your living room trying to lift your sky box, you shout, he puts box down and raises hands. You put him into a chair and tie him up. Then you start to hit him over the head until you kill him.

    Take the other side, when you get down stairs the guy turns points a gun at you he misses, you lunge forward and strike him, he falls and hits his head of the TV, which being a big one topples over and smashes his head in.

    The police do not know which it is, or where on the scale the death occurs. So they arrest for murder, investigate, if there is evidence to back up a murder charge or manslaughter charge it will be brought. A jury will decide after hearing the evidence if the person is guilty.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 809 ✭✭✭Ditch


    Shouldn't he arrested for manslaughter?


    As far as I know, it's just standard procedure. They make an arrest so that statements can be compiled and the whole thing investigated properly in the usual way.

    I'll bet ye those gavvers are telling this mush, " Bloody well done, mate! Ye got the b@stard! :D "

    Now it'll be up to the DPP to decide whether to actually prosecute the case. If so, it'll likely lead to a nicely staged show trial which will just allow the court to cement a legal precedent. That being that scum had better learn to accept what's coming to them when they try doing a Home Invasion ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    Killing another human being is not ok. Vigilantism is not ok.

    The only time it's ever acceptable is if you're directly saving someone else's life by doing so. I don't mean "he MIGHT have pulled a knife and stabbed me", I mean "I know he had a knife and he was going to use it."

    Material possessions are not worth a human life.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    I think you should be allowed protect your property by what ever means neccessary, like in the states.

    Yeah, because property = life :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,626 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Yeah, because property = life :confused:

    It's not just about protecting property.. it's about protecting your ease of mind and feeling of safety while residing in said property. Being intruded upon in your home and threatened is devastating for most people. Laws reflect that by allowing a certain degree of leeway to those who attempt to protect their property from intruders. And rightly so tbh.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,702 ✭✭✭squod


    Killing another human being is not ok. Vigilantism is not ok.

    The only time it's ever acceptable is if you're directly saving someone else's life by doing so. I don't mean "he MIGHT have pulled a knife and stabbed me", I mean "I know he had a knife and he was going to use it."

    Material possessions are not worth a human life.

    With you there. Still dunno how I'd react though. Certainly a murder charge is way OTT (it seems). If confronted or threatened then maybe I'd resort to killing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,816 ✭✭✭✭galwayrush


    Material possessions are not worth a human life.

    Mine are, i worked very hard for them.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Standard procedure to arrest him - partly I suspect to see that any politically correct start crying.

    Just for clarity:
    He might be charged with second degree murder if he had the killing weapon(s?) in his home and as such might have planned for such an eventuality as what happened.

    Manslaughter as a charge is more applied when something is done more in the heat of the moment BUT where in most cases, the killing weapon(s) haven't already been sought/bought and placed in an area as preparation for an eventuality.


    Personally, I have no sympathy for those that break and enter.
    Ye reap what you sow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,324 ✭✭✭tallus


    Pity he didn't kill the two of them. Dirty scumbags that they are.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,418 ✭✭✭✭hondasam


    Two men entered the house, owner was alone, how did he get a knife and stab one of them. The one that got away is over 6ft and large build, how did the owner overpower both of them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,816 ✭✭✭✭galwayrush


    hondasam wrote: »
    Two men entered the house, owner was alone, how did he get a knife and stab one of them. The one that got away is over 6ft and large build, how did the owner overpower both of them.

    I am very happy the house owner wasn't harmed. :cool:
    One less scumbag in the world, good riddance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,662 ✭✭✭RMD


    The story doesn't provide enough information on the death to confirm whether murder is justified or not. If he acted in self-defense which ultimately lead to the burglars death then manslaughter, but if he chased the burglar while he was trying to flee and ended up killing him that equates to murder.

    The arrest on suspicion of murder does not mean he'll definitely be charged with murder, the article provides no information on the death and that's the essential part to determine what charge he'll receive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,023 ✭✭✭Fukuyama


    The man should be knighted.

    If a scumbag enters your home you're no longer 'you'. The PC crowd can go on all they like - the caveman takes over. It's basic primeval instinct. Enter someone else's home without permission and expect to be greeted with force. Hopefully that force will be sufficient to either remove you from the property or even better, detain you. But like I said, in these cases, the red midst can descent.

    Hopefully it's just procedure and the medal is being minted as we speak.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,418 ✭✭✭✭hondasam


    galwayrush wrote: »
    I am very happy the house owner wasn't harmed. :cool:
    One less scumbag in the world, good riddance.

    We really don't know what happened, The owner may well know these people.
    It might not be a burglary, it could be something else.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,872 ✭✭✭strobe


    Material possessions are not worth a human life.

    It's not just about material possessions though is it? If someone breaks into your home they might just want to rob your DVD player but they might want to rape your daughter or slit your wife's throat or smash your brains in...

    I live alone so would have a certain amount of restraint should someone break into my gaff but if I had kids or if a girlfriend was staying over I would put anyone entering my home illegally down in a way where I was 100% certain that they would be completely out of commission for the immediate future without any hesitation. In my opinion someone is completely justified in taking that stance.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,818 ✭✭✭Minstrel27


    When you choose to break in to someone's home all rights should be gone.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,919 ✭✭✭✭Gummy Panda


    hondasam wrote: »
    Two men entered the house, owner was alone, how did he get a knife and stab one of them. The one that got away is over 6ft and large build, how did the owner overpower both of them.

    Maybe he was upstairs practicing his stabbing and they disturbed him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,889 ✭✭✭evercloserunion


    Here we ****ing go.

    There's nothing in the OP to suggest to me that he can't be charged for murder. If he intended to kill or cause serious harm to the guy, and he did kill him, then he is guilty of murder. He doesn't have to have planned the killing in advance for it to be murder, that's a common myth.

    It could be manslaughter, if the guy didn't intend to kill him or cause serious injury, or if he was provoked. And no, the fact that the victim broke into his house doesn't mean he was provoked (legally speaking); he would have to be so angry that he essentially flipped out and lost control of himself.

    Self-defence is an important part of our law and I would not hestitate to do everything necessary to protect a loved one, but self-defence does not extend to exacting violent retribution out on someone just because they messed with you and you want to teach them a lesson or prove your matcho credentials. No civilised society should allow that. (I'm not making any judgement as to what happened in this case, but people in this thread are defending the latter.)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,418 ✭✭✭✭hondasam


    Maybe he was upstairs practicing his stabbing and they disturbed him.

    Maybe he always carry's a weapon just in case. Would you have time to go to your kitchen to get a knife if someone broke into your house.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 135 ✭✭Contra Proferentem


    Reasonable force is the key, it has to be proportionate to the threat. Hence if someone is fleeing would hardly be proportionate.

    I imagine he has only been arrest to allow a proper and necessary investigation of what actually happened. There a tons of different circumstances which have to be considered before it can be judged to be murder, manslaughter or reasonable force.


Advertisement
Advertisement