Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Gigantic Mesozoic bird found!

  • 10-08-2011 12:34am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭


    Ok, there's only a toothless jaw, but it has been identified as belonging to a HUGE bird. Paleontologists say that it could have been a flying bird, in which case it may have had a wingspan of around four meters- if it was flightless, though, it may have been three meters tall. A giant one way or the other.

    This, they say, proves that birds during the Mesozoic weren´t all diminutive and that they were much more diverse than we thought. The creature is called Samrukia, and it lived during the Late Cretaceous (83 million years ago) in Central Asia, along with ankylosaurs, tyrannosaurs and other saurs.

    samrukiazoom.jpg


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Hmm, looks like Thomas Huxley was right all along..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    First drawing ever of the bird! (Not counting the silouettes above XD)

    samrukia__the_giant_phoenix_by_hodarinundu-d461122.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Quick off the mark eh? Nice.

    Since it's based on such scarce remains I wonder if it is actually a bird as we know it. I'm sure if you travelled back to the Cretaceous you would see many dino-bird things which could be either or.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Galvasean wrote: »
    Quick off the mark eh? Nice.

    Since it's based on such scarce remains I wonder if it is actually a bird as we know it. I'm sure if you travelled back to the Cretaceous you would see many dino-bird things which could be either or.

    Yes, I agree. But the concept of a giant bird flying around is way to awesome to waste :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,551 ✭✭✭Rubecula


    Can you get it Southern Fried?:D

    (Thinking of my food again, sorry)

    Impressive sketch by the way, very impressive indeed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Rubecula wrote: »
    Can you get it Southern Fried?:D

    (Thinking of my food again, sorry)

    Impressive sketch by the way, very impressive indeed.

    Thanks :>


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Bad news folks... seems that Samrukia has been reinterpreted as a pterosaur, instead of a giant bird.

    Oh well... it doesn´t rule out the possibility of such creatures existing anyways :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Shame. A large pterosaur is somewhat less exciting by comparison..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Galvasean wrote: »
    Shame. A large pterosaur is somewhat less exciting by comparison..

    Yes, not that pterosaurs are any less fascinating, but... we already had many large pteros and very few giant birds...


Advertisement