Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Does anyone still play records?

24

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,692 ✭✭✭✭OPENROAD


    Haven't for years, but Rabbits on The Run which is released in 30 minutes :D and was recorded by Vanessa Carlton on tape as opposed to digital is being released on vinyl,as well as the usual cd, iTunes so will be buying it on vinyl, thankfully I didn't throw out my record player :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,423 ✭✭✭cml387


    mike65 wrote: »
    nice and so far beyond my means I feel you have just insulted me! :pac:



    This sort of thing used to make me laugh back in the day, people worrying about lead piping in the walls near their amp or speakers or swearing they could tell the difference between 10 quid speaker wire and 100 quid speaker wire. Well maybe some can but the fridge humming in the next room will have a greater impact.


    I think of all the bullsh!t about consumer electronics,nothing beat audiophiles of the 1970's/80's.
    We had the valve freaks, who believed that valve powered (look it up kids) amplifiers were better than their transistor powered equivalents.
    We had a serious audio magazine which reviewed records by recording the sound on a graph and showing the results.
    I only qualified in electronic engineering in 1981,but believe me it took no expertise to recognise voodoo nonsense when you saw it.

    Records have no advantages over digital/cd (and I still have a Pioneer turntable stored away as a collectors item).
    The crackles and pops might be atmospheric,but don't much add to the
    listening experience.Most pop records were badly manufactured on inferior vinyl which wore out after two or three plays (and don't even mention K Tel records).

    Kids, you missed nothing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Only real DJ's only use vinyl. :)

    If anyone turns up at a gig with just a laptop they are not a DJ.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,683 ✭✭✭Kensington


    Only real DJ's only use vinyl. :)
    Christ, don't bring that one up :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,466 ✭✭✭Forest Master


    Kensington wrote: »
    Don't really understand the attraction of vinyl at all (although I've grown up in the "digital generation").

    It doesn't have better quality than a well mastered CD - CD's don't have that very annoying crackling.
    A well looked after CD will play for years - every time you play vinyl it wears it out slightly.
    A CD you can stick on the iPod, back it up on the PC, back it up on the internet *ahem* - one scratch or heavy knock to vinyl and you're snookered.

    Firstly, everything I listen to now is MP3 - iPhone in car, iTunes on PCs, Squeezebox in kitchen, Xbox media server in sitting room. I do have lots of vinyl, but haven't owned a player in around 10 years. I like technological progression, but..... Vinyl is better quality than any digital format - that's not subjective - it's a fact.

    http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/question487.htm

    I personally don't like the hiss & crackle off a record or tape either - but that does become inaudible when the music starts; especially on vinyl - cassettes are muck.... but the music on vinyl does capture more sound frequencies during the recording process, so the part in bold above is actually wrong.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,228 ✭✭✭epgc3fyqirnbsx


    I have actually never listened to a record but I do want to listen to Dark Side of the Moon in a smokey room


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,466 ✭✭✭Forest Master


    Only real DJ's only use vinyl. :)

    If anyone turns up at a gig with just a laptop they are not a DJ.
    Yeah, because being a DJ is really hard to begin with... :rolleyes:

    Yeah, it takes awesome skillz to play someone else's music. Wow - look at him take that record out of it's sleeve & put it on the turntable - what talent!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Kensington wrote: »
    Christ, don't bring that one up :eek:
    I must also include CDJ 1000's or else Ill get booed off :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 mick.m


    Found a few records in my nan's house a few year ago, the likes of Blondie, Brendan Grace and the Pope's visit in 1979. Threw them on a record player and fell in love with the novelty, the warmth of the sound and the physical "feel" of them!

    Recently pulled an old hi-fi from going to the dump and was given Daft Punk's "Discovery" by a friend (without the sleeve), which he found in college accommodation. One of my favourite possessions and hangs on my bedroom wall!

    Also, the DJing with vinyl argument is nonsense, would love to be able to afford a collection and a nice pair of technics, but the MIDI route is much more viable..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,326 ✭✭✭Scuid Mhór


    i've only read op's post but for the record guys, vinyl sounds ten times better than a cd does. it's all about sound compression.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭7sr2z3fely84g5


    Fawlty towers was released on vinyl.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,683 ✭✭✭Kensington


    Firstly, everything I listen to now is MP3 - iPhone in car, iTunes on PCs, Squeezebox in kitchen, Xbox media server in sitting room. I do have lots of vinyl, but haven't owned a player in around 10 years. I like technological progression, but..... Vinyl is better quality than any digital format - that's not subjective - it's a fact.

    http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/question487.htm

    I personally don't like the hiss & crackle off a record or tape either - but that does become inaudible when the music starts; especially on vinyl - cassettes are muck.... but the music on vinyl does capture more sound frequencies during the recording process, so the part in bold above is actually wrong.
    I wouldn't accept a HSW article as fact :)
    Nyquist-Shannon's theorem on digital sampling, on the other hand, is fact (and just so happens to completely strip the above article of any credibility).

    You're going on what vinyl can theoretically do, but realistically, most commercial vinyl pressings are muck (or questionable) quality and unless you've taken out a mortgage for a turntable and cartridge, you haven't a hope of reproducing these ultrasonic frequencies even if they did exist on the vinyl (and most production is done in the digital domain at some stage, but at far higher spec than audio CD).

    I can see one upside of vinyl possibly, and that's the package design and artwork that comes with a vinyl album. But sound quality wise, nah, digital is best particularly for the most accurate reproduction of the sound.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,933 ✭✭✭holystungun9


    cml387 wrote: »
    I think of all the bullsh!t about consumer electronics,nothing beat audiophiles of the 1970's/80's.
    We had the valve freaks, who believed that valve powered (look it up kids) amplifiers were better than their transistor powered equivalents.
    We had a serious audio magazine which reviewed records by recording the sound on a graph and showing the results.
    I only qualified in electronic engineering in 1981,but believe me it took no expertise to recognise voodoo nonsense when you saw it.

    Records have no advantages over digital/cd (and I still have a Pioneer turntable stored away as a collectors item).
    The crackles and pops might be atmospheric,but don't much add to the
    listening experience.Most pop records were badly manufactured on inferior vinyl which wore out after two or three plays (and don't even mention K Tel records).

    Kids, you missed nothing.

    Old guy, you've missed something.

    Maybe the old Top of the Pops albums you have from 30 years ago may have all the crackles and pops and be made out of poor quality plastic or it may have been the rusty steel nail you had as a stylus but this is not the case nowadays. I have about 2 to 2.5 thousand records and the oldest being maybe 15 years old. I'm not going to squabble about analogue vs. digital recordings as it is done to death and people just have different experiences and preferences, but I don't want people to read your post and think that vinyl serves no purpose and doesn't exist anymore. It certainly has its fans. Lots of electronic music, rap, r'n'b, soul, rock, metal, and lots in between is still released on vinyl and will continue to be for some time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    i've only read op's post but for the record guys, vinyl sounds ten times better than a cd does. it's all about sound compression.
    One is analogue while the other is digital, no comparison, even in hardware such as amplifiers etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,466 ✭✭✭Forest Master


    Kensington wrote: »
    I wouldn't accept a HSW article as fact :)
    Nyquist-Shannon's theorem on digital sampling, on the other hand, is fact (and just so happens to completely strip the above article of any credibility).

    You're going on what vinyl can theoretically do, but realistically, most commercial vinyl pressings are muck (or questionable) quality and unless you've taken out a mortgage for a turntable and cartridge, you haven't a hope of reproducing these ultrasonic frequencies even if they did exist on the vinyl (and most production is done in the digital domain at some stage, but at far higher spec than audio CD).

    I can see one upside of vinyl possibly, and that's the package design and artwork that comes with a vinyl album. But sound quality wise, nah, digital is best particularly for the most accurate reproduction of the sound.

    I did say I preferred digital. I was just pointing out that analogue can capture more frequencies than digital - it may be boll*cks though:

    http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-blogs/audio-designline-blog/4033509/Vinyl-vs-CD-myths-refuse-to-die


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,933 ✭✭✭holystungun9


    Kensington wrote: »
    Don't really understand the attraction of vinyl at all (although I've grown up in the "digital generation").

    It doesn't have better quality than a well mastered CD - CD's don't have that very annoying crackling.
    A well looked after CD will play for years - every time you play vinyl it wears it out slightly.
    A CD you can stick on the iPod, back it up on the PC, back it up on the internet *ahem* - one scratch or heavy knock to vinyl and you're snookered.

    This is really nothing to worry about at all for any regular user. The one and only time I have worn down a record so much that the sound was affected was from scratching one single sound back and forth for hours and hours and hours. That may be hard to believe but if anybody knows the 'aaaahhh' scratch sample they may understand what I mean. It certainly doesn't count as 'reasonable use' of the record.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,683 ✭✭✭Kensington


    I did say I preferred digital. I was just pointing out that analogue can capture more frequencies than digital - it may be boll*cks though:

    http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-blogs/audio-designline-blog/4033509/Vinyl-vs-CD-myths-refuse-to-die
    It can in theory. But analogue is completely random in real-world.

    At the end of the day though, it's personal preference. Personally, I have no interest in vinyl and see no merit in it for me, but there's no point in getting hung up on the geeky maths side of it, if it sounds good, just bloody sit back and enjoy it! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,113 ✭✭✭Lumbo


    Yeah, because being a DJ is really hard to begin with... :rolleyes:

    Yeah, it takes awesome skillz to play someone else's music. Wow - look at him take that record out of it's sleeve & put it on the turntable - what talent!

    :rolleyes:

    Clueless or should I turn on my sarcasm radar?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,466 ✭✭✭Forest Master


    Lumbo wrote: »
    :rolleyes:

    Clueless or should I turn on my sarcasm radar?
    Neither.

    Why don't you just explain how it takes skill to take a record or CD out of a case and play it?
    I'm not referring to proper DJs who can scratch & mix - that actually takes skill (when they can actually do it well, which most can't) - but 99% of DJs just play song after song - that takes no skill at all. It's not even their own stuff - they just bought it.

    For example, I saw this guy play a few years ago: he has skills, because he actually composes, scratches & mixes his own stuff, mixed with other records & samples:
    http://www.djkormac.com/listen-watch/

    Most "DJs" don't & can't do this. They just buy a record & play it, followed by another... 99% of DJs fall into this category. And don't try to claim "feeling the vibe of the people" is a skill. It just takes basic cop on how to bring people up & down with the intensity of music - every single band does this with their set-list construction - the main difference being they write the own sh*t...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,923 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    Pff, vinyl. Reel to reel is where it's at!

    I had one of these hooked up a little while back. Been sent to the attic for the forseable future until I get some space sorted out. Hypnotic to look at.



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭wild_cat


    Nearly every day. We've a very nice set of speakers so its the only way to get a decent sound. Playing music off of a laptop makes no sense once you hear the difference in quality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,067 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    The only music I buy nowadays is on LP. Not because I'm going to claim the sound is so much better, but because it provides a very convenient restriction on the amount of choice one has, as otherwise one could very easily spend all one's disposable income on music.

    One can still get record players, aye - Argos have a couple, for example, but I've one of those and am not terribly impressed with it. For those of you in Galway, the place opposite the Eddie Rocket's in town has a couple too.
    Charlie Byrne's has a small selection of classical music and music from musicals, HMV has some (overpriced) recordings of newer stuff, but the Bell, Book and Candle beside the Crane is definitely your best bet for LPs.

    Getting new styli seems to be next to impossible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭DublinWriter


    Ficheall wrote: »
    Getting new styli seems to be next to impossible.
    This crowd are based in Las Vegas, I've bought from them once or twice and they're very goodL

    http://www.lpgear.com/

    Forget those turnables you see in Aldl and Maplins....sheer rubbish and the styli will probably damage your vinyl.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭DublinWriter


    o1s1n wrote: »
    Pff, vinyl. Reel to reel is where it's at!

    I had one of these hooked up a little while back. Been sent to the attic for the forseable future until I get some space sorted out. Hypnotic to look at.


    I've got the exact same model Akai. The bass is really fat and warm.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 381 ✭✭INEEDANID


    Yes have a few records about 25-30.
    Some good like Black Sabbath and Thin Lizzy.
    Got my record player without speakers in argos for about €40 a few years ago.
    Plugs into aux socket on amp so it pleases me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭DublinWriter


    Kensington wrote: »
    digital is best particularly for the most accurate reproduction of the sound.

    Digitial is *not* the best because it has to first deconstruct sound from an analogue signal to a digital data stream in order to record (i.e. sample) and then reconstruct that digital data back to analogue in order to reconstruct the initial sound.

    Analogue is far more subtle because it's doesn't have to chop up and reconstruct sound based on very discreet numerical data.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Hard to believe anyone could think differently, one picture tells the story


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭discobeaker


    I listen to records all the time now. I have stopped buying CDs and buy all my music on Vinyl when i can. I was actually at a record fair in Dublin on saturday and there is such a great feeling when you find a rare gem that you have been searching for.

    Vinyl is back big time now and even look at the likes of Tower records and how its now half CDs in the store and the other half vinyl. The only bad thing is that they take up so much room but they really are more like pieces of art than just music.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,329 ✭✭✭bullpost


    I still play vinyl and have a big collection (400+ lps) .

    I needed to slim down recently due to storage problems and was amazed that I was able to sell over a hundred of them on for about 4 euros each to a secondhand shop in town.

    These date from late 70's to early 90's , when I switched to CDs.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,675 ✭✭✭hidinginthebush


    My dad has a nice collection, I remember he even had Monty Pythons "the life of Brian" on vinyl, the whole film, on vinyl. Might have to dig out his player, I remember seeing dark side of the moon and a lot of horslips in there


Advertisement
Advertisement