Skip to content
  • Register
    • Advertisement
    If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
    Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
    Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
    If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

    Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

    Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

    More Obnoxious parking - ***READ FIRST POST BEFORE POSTING***

    1…150151153155156…221

    Comments

    • #4562
      SerialComplaint
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,644 SerialComplaint
      ✭✭✭


      January wrote: »
      Local Fire Limo company?

      Completely different livery; http://www.firelimo.ie/images/445O4501.jpg


    • #4563
      Victor
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,782 Victor
      ✭✭✭✭


      Beer Baron wrote: »
      (1) The car exiting the wrong way a few posts back. Maybe they didn't want to pay to park their car at a public amenity. I wouldn't like to have to pay for the area that my taxes pay for in the first place
      I saw an office car park for only a few space in Germany that had an entrance and exit right next to each other. Only the entrance had a barrier. The idea being nobody would dare go in the exit. :)


    • #4564
      Rick Deckard
      Closed Accounts Posts: 1,181 Rick Deckard
      ✭✭✭


      Beer Baron wrote: »
      The cars parked in that underground. Most apartments get two spaces. Those spaces are numbered. Maybe they only have one car.
      One space per flat, a lot of flats were empty for a long time so people got used to parking wherever. Habbits have not improved since the flats filled up


    • #4565
      EPM
      Closed Accounts Posts: 13,822 EPM
      ✭✭✭✭


      Slushfund wrote: »
      Jayas lads some of ye would want to get a life, most of the examples are not too bad, if they are not parked dangerously, not blocking anyone, or misusing a disabled space, who cares. I just ingnore other peoples parking and look about my own.

      If all you can do is post for the sake of it then don't bother. Post in this thread again and it's a ban.


    • #4566
      Marty McFly
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,222 Marty McFly
      ✭✭✭✭


      Sorry about the picture quality :o.

      But my god all four parked in disabled spots, and there certainly wasnt a lack of spaces in the car park. God forbid theyd have to walk a few metres in the rain arseholes.

      21072011169.jpg


    • Advertisement
    • #4567
      Cantona's Collars
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,709 Cantona's Collars
      ✭✭✭✭


      No pic unfortunately but spotted my old car today-whoever owns it now almost drove it through the doors of the local Lidl,they couldn't have parked in a more obnoxious place.


    • #4568
      E39MSport
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,721 E39MSport
      ✭✭✭


      Nice try ;)


    • #4569
      Reloc8
      Closed Accounts Posts: 2,857 Reloc8
      ✭✭✭


      What do we love ?

      Pictures of clampers on double yellows that's what we love. And on footpaths.

      Especially when there's two.

      And no the clampers are not just across the road promoting sensible parking. Something to do with the cafe 50 feet away maybe ?

      Although the second one is just about to pull away. There's no one in the first one.


    • #4570
      DanWall
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 509 DanWall
      ✭✭✭


      Luvbulmers01. How do you know that the cars parked in the disabled slots and not disabled people?


    • #4571
      -Corkie-
      Closed Accounts Posts: 10,021 -Corkie-
      ✭✭✭✭


      DanWall wrote: »
      Luvbulmers01. How do you know that the cars parked in the disabled slots and not disabled people?

      They most lightly had no badges on the dash to say so..


    • Advertisement
    • #4572
      Shane732
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,965 Shane732
      ✭✭✭


      Reloc8 wrote: »
      What do we love ?

      Pictures of clampers on double yellows that's what we love. And on footpaths.

      Especially when there's two.

      And no the clampers are not just across the road promoting sensible parking. Something to do with the cafe 50 feet away maybe ?

      Although the second one is just about to pull away. There's no one in the first one.

      Was the second one there to clamp the first one or did the have to call on to two vans for the lads to figure out how to put the clamps on?


    • #4573
      Merbhp
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58 Merbhp
      ✭✭


      Tesco Disabled Parking

      168164.jpg


    • #4574
      Chippy01
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 608 Chippy01
      ✭✭✭


      Yes, this guy is parked....
      Image0279.jpg

      He was there when I arrived, and was still there when I left 20 minutes later...
      Image0280.jpg

      Perhaps he thought that size matters....lol.


    • #4575
      SerialComplaint
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,644 SerialComplaint
      ✭✭✭


      Merbhp wrote: »
      Tesco Disabled Parking
      Is that the driver in the red jacket beside the car?


    • #4576
      Berty
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,179 Berty
      ✭✭✭✭


      Tesco Disabled Parking. Private Parking, unless signed, is only a suggestion. It cannot be enforced legally as private property. They just expect people to have consideration for others which is very unlikely in this world/country.


    • #4577
      NoQuarter
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,624 NoQuarter
      ✭✭✭


      Beer Baron wrote: »
      Tesco Disabled Parking. Private Parking, unless signed, is only a suggestion. It cannot be enforced legally as private property. They just expect people to have consideration for others which is very unlikely in this world/country.

      Thread is called "obnoxious parking" not "illegal parking".


    • #4578
      Berty
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,179 Berty
      ✭✭✭✭


      NoQuarter wrote: »
      Thread is called "obnoxious parking" not "illegal parking".

      Hmmm. Well I opened the thread originally A LONG LONG TIME AGO so I can possibly decide, to a certain extent, the direction of the thread.

      :D:D:D:D:D:D


    • #4579
      glic71rods46t0
      Closed Accounts Posts: 1,074 glic71rods46t0
      ✭✭✭


      Beer Baron wrote: »
      Hmmm. Well I opened the thread originally A LONG LONG TIME AGO so I can possibly decide, to a certain extent, the direction of the thread.

      :D:D:D:D:D:D
      we're not worthy, we're not worthy!!!! ... why dont you start a different thread for illegal parking instead of pulling a "its my ball so I'll decide the rules";)


    • #4580
      Berty
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,179 Berty
      ✭✭✭✭


      ecjsi50v98rodu wrote: »
      we're not worthy, we're not worthy!!!! ... why dont you start a different thread for illegal parking instead of pulling a "its my ball so I'll decide the rules";)

      Which is why I said "to a certain extent".

      Nobody was "ownership" over a thread but the concept of thread was to highlight arrogant parking, whether it be arrogant, obnoxious, illegal or petty.

      Originally the thread was called Abnoxious parking thread which rightly upset people. :D


    • #4581
      glic71rods46t0
      Closed Accounts Posts: 1,074 glic71rods46t0
      ✭✭✭


      Beer Baron wrote: »
      Which is why I said "to a certain extent".

      Nobody was "ownership" over a thread but the concept of thread was to highlight arrogant parking, whether it be arrogant, obnoxious, illegal or petty.

      Originally the thread was called Abnoxious parking thread which rightly upset people. :D
      Your command of the english language is upsetting me:D:D:D


    • Advertisement
    • #4582
      NoQuarter
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,624 NoQuarter
      ✭✭✭


      Beer Baron wrote: »
      Hmmm. Well I opened the thread originally A LONG LONG TIME AGO so I can possibly decide, to a certain extent, the direction of the thread.

      :D:D:D:D:D:D

      I was just lookin out for YOU! I wont stand by and watch people disrail your beloved thread! :D


    • #4583
      Berty
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,179 Berty
      ✭✭✭✭


      ecjsi50v98rodu wrote: »
      Your command of the english language is upsetting me:D:D:D

      Not bad being 5 pints in. :D
      NoQuarter wrote: »
      I was just lookin out for YOU! I wont stand by and watch people disrail your beloved thread! :D

      Added to my newsletter. :D


    • #4584
      McGrath5
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,499 McGrath5
      ✭✭✭


      Another fine attempt in Rathfarnham SC......

      img0290p.jpg

      img0291yk.jpg


    • #4585
      jacool
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,833 jacool
      ✭✭✭


      SerialComplaint wrote: »
      Is that the driver in the red jacket beside the car?
      If it is, perhaps it's because he has a huge bollard instead of a right leg. Couldn't walk too far with that thing weighing him down!


    • #4586
      TestTransmission
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,100 TestTransmission
      ✭✭✭✭


      Beer Baron wrote: »
      Hmmm. Well I opened the thread originally A LONG LONG TIME AGO so I can possibly decide, to a certain extent, the direction of the thread.

      :D:D:D:D:D:D

      *cough*

      back seat modding :pac:


    • #4587
      EPM
      Closed Accounts Posts: 13,822 EPM
      ✭✭✭✭


      TestTransmission wrote: »
      *cough*

      back seat modding :pac:

      There's always one.

      :p


    • #4588
      Berty
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,179 Berty
      ✭✭✭✭


      TestTransmission wrote: »
      *cough*

      back seat modding :pac:
      EPM wrote: »
      There's always one.

      :p

      [insert defence here]
      "to a certain context"

      I challenge thee!!! :D

      Do thy worst! :D


    • #4589
      EPM
      Closed Accounts Posts: 13,822 EPM
      ✭✭✭✭


      Beer Baron wrote: »
      I challenge thee!!! :D

      Do thy worst! :D

      For the love of God don't:)


    • #4590
      Berty
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,179 Berty
      ✭✭✭✭


      EPM wrote: »
      For the love of God don't:)

      I'd like to say........................too late....................

      but I'll call it a day.

      /awaits banhammer :D


    • Advertisement
    • #4591
      EPM
      Closed Accounts Posts: 13,822 EPM
      ✭✭✭✭


      Beer Baron wrote: »
      I'd like to say........................too late....................

      but I'll call it a day.

      /awaits banhammer :D

      Night night Berty.


    This discussion has been closed.
    Advertisement