Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Building regulation regarding window restrictors

13»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,547 ✭✭✭✭Poor Uncle Tom


    If you take a slightly different view point.

    What is the reason for opening a window?
    The predominent answer is for ventilation purposes, followed by, for cleaning and for access/egress.

    Take a look at a 'normal' window, ventilation is achieved while the restrictor is on, cleaning and access/egress is achieved with the restrictor off.

    Take a t/t window, ventilation is achieved while in the tilt position, cleaning and access/egress is achieved in the turn position.

    Do both windows comply with the Regs? imo, yes.


  • Subscribers Posts: 42,874 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    fair enough martin, we agree that we have different view points. :D

    thanks sas for bring this up....
    sometimes we just take things at face value and not really consider them. With a debate like this its good to step back and consider why things are actually asked for.... whats the purpose, whats the use, whats the aim......

    next question, disabled access.... (LOL NO!! not going there!!)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,282 ✭✭✭sas


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    next question, disabled access.... (LOL NO!! not going there!!)

    Probably better for us all...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,028 ✭✭✭Gulliver


    For safety, I'm going to make sure that there are three strands of electrified razor wire at the bottom 400mm of the window. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,300 ✭✭✭martinn123


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    fair enough martin, we agree that we have different view points. :D
    Suppose if we all agreed on everything, it would be very boring.
    thanks sas for bring this up....
    sometimes we just take things at face value and not really consider them. With a debate like this its good to step back and consider why things are actually asked for.... whats the purpose, whats the use, whats the aim......
    Actually I just got stuck in, because as MAC did'nt get back on his spray insulation that you guy's might be at a loose end on a Friday a'noon
    next question, disabled access.... (LOL NO!! not going there!!)

    for next week, I could suggest, triple v double glazed...........recycled v virgin uPVC........or maybe my personal favourite Architects Fees......Keep the childer away from windows.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,377 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    martinn123 wrote: »
    ObviouslyBecause the window has two seperate ways to open, either Tilt OR TurnI am not disregarding the tilt function, but I am stating its a seperate function.The Reg's state.....opening window...fit a restrictor...In My Opinion, Turn option selected....opening window...fit a restrictor
    I am debating the Reg's in relation to a product, not why the Reg exists, I fully understand why the regulation was introduced.........following too many bad accidents
    That's not what the regs state.
    martinn123 wrote: »
    My last word...............No......to all of the above........when the Turn ''function'' is selected.............Yes .......to all of the above......when the Tilt ''function'' is selected.....................Stupid adult opens window, on Turn......child enters room.....opens window fully and falls.......that's why they introduced the reg........................I thing we have done this to death ( obviously no pun intended ).
    the same thing could just as easily apply to a stupid adult opening a normal window and the restrictor off.

    Obviously there are two functions of a tilt and turn but the exact same applies to restrictor on or off. How do you see a difference? If the tilt is the initial movement then I don't see the issue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,300 ✭✭✭martinn123


    Hi Mellor, thought this was put to bed

    Mellor wrote: »
    That's not what the regs state.

    I did not quote, merely posted a very simple summary
    the same thing could just as easily apply to a stupid adult opening a normal window and the restrictor off.

    Unfortunately true.
    Obviously there are two functions of a tilt and turn but the exact same applies to restrictor on or off. How do you see a difference? If the tilt is the initial movement then I don't see the issue.


    OK, let me simplify my thoughts on this.
    A normal window has one function.......open/shut.

    To avoid accidents the Reg's require a restrictor to assist in avoiding accidents.

    A T/T has two functions......ignore for a moment function 1 Tilt......and consider function 2 Turn.....that operation is the same as a normal window,i.e open/shut so to assist in avoiding an accident should a restrictor be fitted. Its not an INITIAL movement, on Tilt, its a seperate movement, chosen by the operator

    Mention was made of signing off on these windows as meeting the reg's but in my opinion that relies on the fact that the window has a seperate and distintly other function, Tilt on which you are relying.

    So my opinion is that these windows do not comply.......but remember I am not providing Cert's so its up to those who do to make up their own mind, obviously.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,377 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    I think the problem is the way your looking at the regulation. You're looking at the it as if the child opens the window, which is wrong. An adult leaving the window in the turn position is just as irresponsible as opening a normal window fully


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,433 ✭✭✭sinnerboy


    bored+baby.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,300 ✭✭✭martinn123


    sinnerboy wrote: »
    bored+baby.jpg

    My thoughts exactly, can we leave this now.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,869 ✭✭✭✭muffler


    martinn123 wrote: »
    can we leave this now.
    No.

    sinnerboy started this so.................




    whacko_1.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,869 ✭✭✭✭muffler


    None of you have encountered regs to govern that ^ ^ :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,547 ✭✭✭✭Poor Uncle Tom


    I think he had to Tilt and Turn to get out of that one....:pac:


    I'd say he got some fright though, he's white as a sheet......:P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,869 ✭✭✭✭muffler


    I'd say he got some fright though, he's white as a sheet......:P
    :D:D

    Nein 11 ftw. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,300 ✭✭✭martinn123


    muffler wrote: »
    No.

    sinnerboy started this so.................




    whacko_1.jpg

    fair enough, on we go.

    Thats a Patio Door not a T/T Window.

    So what Reg's are in place to prevent a total gob-shyte gaining access to the balcony.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 565 ✭✭✭iwo


    Hi All, is it ok to instal balcony window/door which opens inside the house?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,869 ✭✭✭✭muffler


    iwo wrote: »
    Hi All, is it ok to instal balcony window/door which opens inside the house?
    Martin123 is the man to answer that :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,377 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    iwo wrote: »
    Hi All, is it ok to instal balcony window/door which opens inside the house?
    No problem there but the glass needs to be toughened


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,300 ✭✭✭martinn123


    muffler wrote: »
    Martin123 is the man to answer that :)


    You called..

    I presume you mean, open in, no problem, but it wastes space inside, why not open out?

    Toughened glass, yes


  • Subscribers Posts: 42,874 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    martinn123 wrote: »
    You called..

    I presume you mean, open in, no problem, but it wastes space inside, why not open out?

    Toughened glass, yes

    outward opening could quite possibly triple the costs of the balcony.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 565 ✭✭✭iwo


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    outward opening could quite possibly triple the costs of the balcony.

    BINGO...I spent enough on house renovation :D but wasn't sure if this type of window is allowed.
    Thank you All


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,300 ✭✭✭martinn123


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    outward opening could quite possibly triple the costs of the balcony.

    Quite Possibly so,if its a small balcony obviously open out is impractical, so a slider like the photo above is one answer. Open in is the other.

    If however the balcony is large enough, and without tripling the cost, personally, I would go for open out.


Advertisement