Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

[CoD MW3] General News and Discussion

11314161819150

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    Nitpicking and excuses IMO. I'm too focused in killing everything in sight than to overly care about the graphics and sound. It's not perfect sure, but to use in every single argument and have sly digs at BOPS is very tedious (and hypocritical) at this stage.

    Do this to MW2 and my god, get ready to face the same people who will defend it like no other :D Go figure heh -_^

    When it really comes down to it *for many* and I've also said this just after BOPS was released but some people cannot achieve the scores they regularly earned (Lol) in MW2 and replicate that in BOPS or at least to a consistent level and thus favour that game. I have zero doubts about that.


    hmmmm

    :pac:

    Im not some diehard MW2 fanboy who cant see its faults, its got plenty,mostly to do with the people who play it,and its horribly broken in places but I still enjoy playing it more than Blops,its just more fun for me, simple as. I enjoyed Blops for a time but just got tired of it really fast, its nothing to do with there being less explosions or air support or any of that, its just something about it I never clicked with, nothing to do with scores either I'm an average MW2 player who has some occasional great games, likewise on Blops.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,028 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    For all the bitching that has gone on and still does I guess regarding Black OPs, it delivers on so many levels.

    Firstly, Zombies - we have people on here who pretty much play that small portion of the game on its todd.

    Secondly, A completely new set of maps with two brand new DLC.

    Thirdly, theatre mode which is unprecedented in CoD and an amazing edition... its staggering to think your last 100 odd games are accessible to be viewed from any perspective.

    Fourthly, the wager matches - original and great fooking fun.

    They fixed the stackable kill-streak nonsense.

    Granted it may not look as polished as MW2 (having said that the customisation of guns etc is excellent) or indeed sound as polished, but in terms of what new aspects it brought to the franchise... If MW3 brings even half of that to the table.. I'll be happy..

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Creasy_bear


    everlast75 wrote: »
    For all the bitching that has gone on and still does I guess regarding Black OPs, it delivers on so many levels.

    Firstly, Zombies - we have people on here who pretty much play that small portion of the game on its todd.

    Secondly, A completely new set of maps with two brand new DLC.

    Thirdly, theatre mode which is unprecedented in CoD and an amazing edition... its staggering to think your last 100 odd games are accessible to be viewed from any perspective.

    Fourthly, the wager matches - original and great fooking fun.

    They fixed the stackable kill-streak nonsense.

    Granted it may not look as polished as MW2 (having said that the customisation of guns etc is excellent) or indeed sound as polished, but in terms of what new aspects it brought to the franchise... If MW3 brings even half of that to the table.. I'll be happy..

    It's miles ahead of the other cod's in fairness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    everlast75 wrote: »
    For all the bitching that has gone on and still does I guess regarding Black OPs, it delivers on so many levels.

    Firstly, Zombies - we have people on here who pretty much play that small portion of the game on its todd.

    Secondly, A completely new set of maps with two brand new DLC.

    Thirdly, theatre mode which is unprecedented in CoD and an amazing edition... its staggering to think your last 100 odd games are accessible to be viewed from any perspective.

    Fourthly, the wager matches - original and great fooking fun.

    They fixed the stackable kill-streak nonsense.

    Granted it may not look as polished as MW2 (having said that the customisation of guns etc is excellent) or indeed sound as polished, but in terms of what new aspects it brought to the franchise... If MW3 brings even half of that to the table.. I'll be happy..

    I actually agree with all that, like I said I did enjoy Blops briefly I just got tired of it, the maps arent as good as MW2 bar a few like Summit which is by far the best map in the game, its fantastic for any game mode, its Blops' version of Terminal.

    I really,really hope they have theatre more in MW3, it'd be amazing. remove the stackable killstreaks as well, the other night in 5 games I got 4 ac-130's from getting a predator missile in each game (ground wars), its ridiculous how easy it is to let air support wreck the other team (unless me or Lee are on the team cos it'll get blown out of the sky before it fires a shot :pac: )


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,210 ✭✭✭hightower1


    I really dont see the issue with stacking killstreaks tbh?
    I mean even if you manage the air support its next to always shot down within seconds bar the one match a night when its not. The rest of the time its shot down very quickly so much so the best effect from air support these days is from knowing the majority of he opposition will head to the indoor areas (before its taken out that is)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,026 ✭✭✭docdolittle


    hightower1 wrote: »
    I really dont see the issue with stacking killstreaks tbh?
    I mean even if you manage the air support its next to always shot down within seconds bar the one match a night when its not. The rest of the time its shot down very quickly so much so the best effect from air support these days is from knowing the majority of he opposition will head to the indoor areas (before its taken out that is)

    I'm kind of in the middle about the stackable killstreaks... I played MW2 a while ago, all I had to do was get 5 kills, then I was pretty much guaranteed a harrier then ac-130 from the predator upwards... If you're anyway a decent player, it's no problem to do 2-3 times during a match. It's always fun for me, but not so much for the other team....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,028 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Once they add TDME back into the fold..

    I hate that waiting around when I wanna go kill people...



    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 470 ✭✭JoePie


    Yeah, stackable killstreaks aren't that big an issue. If your team have any sense, they'll switch class the next time they die and shoot the air support down. I'll normally have a Harrier down before it's even flown into position, like.

    Unfortunately, most people online are idiots and in it for themselves. hence, making a greater case for playing in teams.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    JoePie wrote: »
    Yeah, stackable killstreaks aren't that big an issue. If your team have any sense, they'll switch class the next time they die and shoot the air support down. I'll normally have a Harrier down before it's even flown into position, like.

    Unfortunately, most people online are idiots and in it for themselves. hence, making a greater case for playing in teams.

    this is COD we're talking about, people will happily run into the same room they just got killed three times in by the same camper or do stuff like run out the big windows on Highrise at the beginning of a match and get a Intervention shot to the eyeballs, every. fcuking.game. Playing with Johnny Public can be infuriating at times, any times a bunch of boardsies are on its pretty much a given we'll wreck the other team unless its a clan who play well, against a bunch of randoms its not even a contest. what was that epic game we had one night on ps3, the score was like 10000-1700 or something on a ground war, it was hilarious watching people quit the game, think it finished with 2 people on the other team :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 553 ✭✭✭redman85


    I hope they bring in the ability to cycle thorough killstreaks. For example you have uav, napam and attack helicopter(chopperblock) on. you've earned all of them and you press the down dpad to cycle through them and select the ones you wanna use first.

    heres treyfails developers thoughts on it

    Well it's more than just a question of if it can be done... The question is also, "Should it be done?" Gameplay balancing..

    bull**** I earned those killstreaks let me use them in the order I want.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,210 ✭✭✭hightower1


    I wouldnt say harriers guarentee your 11th killstreak , from what I see they get shot down 90% of the time after 2 or so kills so I just run pavelow. Even that only gets the full spin out of it around 50% of the time.

    I'd like to see stackable kill streaks in mw3 but just a bit more balanced. Harriers (if not shot down) are a bit over powered for a 7 kill streak tbh. Like so much in MW2 stackable killstreaks were a good idea but poorly executed. It seems to make sense with care package / uav / counter uav / sentry gun / pred missile / attack chopper... but then goes off the deep end with harriers, chopper gunner, ac130 etc.

    Seems like everything up to attack chopper seems to be fine, not too powerful and definitly relevant to the amount of kills needed but anything higher on the killstreaks are over powered bar the stealth bomber. Perhaps they shouldhave had the stealth bomber @ 9th and bumped the rest up a bit.

    As I see it if they had the same balance of kills vs rewards on the killstreaks as they do all the way up to attack chopper in mw3 it'd be a good idea to keep it stackable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    hightower1 wrote: »
    I wouldnt say harriers guarentee your 11th killstreak , from what I see they get shot down 90% of the time after 2 or so kills so I just run pavelow. Even that only gets the full spin out of it around 50% of the time.

    I'd like to see stackable kill streaks in mw3 but just a bit more balanced. Harriers (if not shot down) are a bit over powered for a 7 kill streak tbh. Like so much in MW2 stackable killstreaks were a good idea but poorly executed. It seems to make sense with care package / uav / counter uav / sentry gun / pred missile / attack chopper... but then goes off the deep end with harriers, chopper gunner, ac130 etc.

    Seems like everything up to attack chopper seems to be fine, not too powerful and definitly relevant to the amount of kills needed but anything higher on the killstreaks are over powered bar the stealth bomber. Perhaps they shouldhave had the stealth bomber @ 9th and bumped the rest up a bit.

    As I see it if they had the same balance of kills vs rewards on the killstreaks as they do all the way up to attack chopper in mw3 it'd be a good idea to keep it stackable.

    what if it only stacked to a point? like say predator is kept in and airstrike/attack chopper are 6 and 7 kills, but they dont add to the next streak, so if you had predator/attack chopper/ac-130 for agruments sake, the predator could get you an attack chopper but you need gun kills to get the ac-130, best of both worlds really. that or have two tiers of killstreaks (using MW2's as example)

    Tier One:
    UAV/counter/care package/sentry/predator/airstrike/attack chopper

    all contribute to the next highest killstreak you've selected in that tier

    Tier Two

    harrier/stealth bomber/pavelow/chopper/ac-130/emp/nuke

    non stackable, tier one streaks dont contribute only kills you get with guns or equipment.


    best of both worlds? you could have 3 tier one stackable or 2 tier one and one tier two but need the kills yourself, an attack chopper or airstike may not change the course of a game, but a chopper gunner certainly can and does


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,732 ✭✭✭Magill


    I don't see why people would want stackable killstreaks(Unless you suck)... its not like its hard to get 11 kills fs and if you do struggle to get the 11 kills then you don't deserve a chopper or dogs... if killstreaks were stackable in blops... i'd easily get 3+ sets of dogs every single game and that is not balanced.

    IMO 11 kills is not enough for dogs or a gunship, and 9 is certainly not enough for a chopper gunner.

    Also hightower.... what lobbies do you play in ! The rare times i run chopper/dogs, it hardly every gets shotdown.. alot of people that play this game just suck in general.

    Either way, killsteaks unbalance the game. Even in blops, its retarded that people who are nowhere near as good as say myself or ade can do equally as good scorewise because of one thing... the killstreaks they use.

    They really just need to make the game a blend of MW2 and Blops. Theatre mode is a must !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,210 ✭✭✭hightower1


    Good ideas there. I think the simplest option taking mw2s killstreaks a an example would simply be to set the more powerful ones higher and space them out better. Having only 4 kills as a gap between harriers adn chopper gunner was a mistake imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,210 ✭✭✭hightower1


    Magill wrote: »
    Also hightower.... what lobbies do you play in ! The rare times i run chopper/dogs, it hardly every gets shotdown.. alot of people that play this game just suck in general.
    !

    Play mw2 team death , merc tdm, dom or express tdm.

    I dont mind too much when air suport gets shot down, ts a hell of a lot better to be up against a team that are playing as their class should be played and giving a good game rather than releasing air support5 times in a match against folks who just get mauled while trying to MLC or quick scope. Unsatisfying to say the least to have your air support get half of the team kills. Dont get me wrong I like winning but I wanna have my support be just that... support... not the reason I win.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    hightower1 wrote: »
    Good ideas there. I think the simplest option taking mw2s killstreaks a an example would simply be to set the more powerful ones higher and space them out better. Having only 4 kills as a gap between harriers adn chopper gunner was a mistake imo.

    definitely, especially on a ground war on an open map, you can get 1 or 2 kills alone with the bomb run and then hear the minigun going "bzzzz" "bzzzz" "bzzzz" and theres your chopper in seconds. The last time I got a nuke my harrier got me 13 kills, thats insane that the other team didnt bother shooting it down


  • Site Banned Posts: 26,456 ✭✭✭✭Nuri Sahin


    krudler wrote: »
    hmmmm

    :pac:

    Im not some diehard MW2 fanboy who cant see its faults, its got plenty,mostly to do with the people who play it,and its horribly broken in places but I still enjoy playing it more than Blops,its just more fun for me, simple as. I enjoyed Blops for a time but just got tired of it really fast, its nothing to do with there being less explosions or air support or any of that, its just something about it I never clicked with, nothing to do with scores either I'm an average MW2 player who has some occasional great games, likewise on Blops.


    I'm not having a sly dig. I'm genuine, can't help but laugh at those who think they are a baws on MW2.

    To be blunt, I just found it all so comically bizarre how I was the told not to voice my opinions more or less, this despite always being detailed in my responses, because I bashed MW2 too much yet.. I go on to see the same people who typed/thanked those comments to me who continually hate on BOPS. At least I kept my disdain of MW2 to one or two threads, the megabitch and PS3 thread as well. I didn't feel the need to take it to multiple threads like a few here have done.

    I don't care if people prefer MW2, I did at one point but now I do not, but the constant nitpicking with BOPS to justify ones reasoning behind going back to the previous game is farcical. I said re: sound and graphics in BOPS, they aren't perfect by any means but I guess you can say I have tunnel vision when I do something and that's the case here. I'm all about the kills, sound and graphics is an after thought.

    I know you blame the community for all of MW2 faults, you said that before. That's a cop out! The community are headless chickens who will use any cheap tactic that is present to gain an advantage. It's up to the developer to fix the broken stuff. You're giving too much credit to the mindless numpties = the majority of COD players.

    Just want to also state, both MW2 and BOPS are nearly as bad /good as each other IMO. BOPS edges it due to reasons Everlast posted (good post btw).

    Anyway, I digress. Just had to point out the double standards is all :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    I'm not having a sly dig. I'm genuine, can't help but laugh at those who think they are a baws on MW2.

    To be blunt, I just found it all so comically bizarre how I was the told not to voice my opinions more or less, this despite always being detailed in my responses, because I bashed MW2 too much yet.. I go on to see the same people who typed/thanked those comments to me who continually hate on BOPS. At least I kept my disdain of MW2 to one or two threads, the megabitch and PS3 thread as well. I didn't feel the need to take it to multiple threads like a few here have done.

    I don't care if people prefer MW2, I did at one point but now I do not, but the constant nitpicking with BOPS to justify ones reasoning behind going back to the previous game is farcical. I said re: sound and graphics in BOPS, they aren't perfect by any means but I guess you can say I have tunnel vision when I do something and that's the case here. I'm all about the kills, sound and graphics is an after thought.

    I know you blame the community for all of MW2 faults, you said that before. That's a cop out! The community are headless chickens who will use any cheap tactic that is present to gain an advantage. It's up to the developer to fix the broken stuff. You're giving too much credit to the mindless numpties = the majority of COD players.

    Just want to also state, both MW2 and BOPS are nearly as bad /good as each other IMO. BOPS edges it due to reasons Everlast posted (good post btw).

    Anyway, I digress. Just had to point out the double standards is all :)

    good post, both games have their faults, and you're right, the developers need to take a step back and see what can be exploited, if it can, take it out. simple as. giving players a "helping hand" is just encouraging bad/noobish gameplay. we could all stand there and blast the map with noobtubes but thered be no satisfaction in it.

    I do agree that Blops improved on a lot of bullsh1t that was in MW2, but then it has its own bullsh1tty streaks and perks as well, but its getting there. I really, really hope whats left of IW makes MW3 work, I see it as the last chance to drag COD as a franchise out of the noob riddled, kiddie game its viewed as by people who play other franchises, not that it stops me enjoying being a COD player.

    When you get a good game going with two good teams it cant be beaten as an online experience, where teams are genuinely fighting and holding positions or whatever instead of some clown standing behind a wall sending grenades sailing across to random sides of the map and being rewarded for it with overpowered killstreaks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,732 ✭✭✭Magill


    krudler wrote: »
    good post, both games have their faults, and you're right, the developers need to take a step back and see what can be exploited, if it can, take it out. simple as. giving players a "helping hand" is just encouraging bad/noobish gameplay. we could all stand there and blast the map with noobtubes but thered be no satisfaction in it.

    I do agree that Blops improved on a lot of bullsh1t that was in MW2, but then it has its own bullsh1tty streaks and perks as well, but its getting there. I really, really hope whats left of IW makes MW3 work, I see it as the last chance to drag COD as a franchise out of the noob riddled, kiddie game its viewed as by people who play other franchises, not that it stops me enjoying being a COD player.

    When you get a good game going with two good teams it cant be beaten as an online experience, where teams are genuinely fighting and holding positions or whatever instead of some clown standing behind a wall sending grenades sailing across to random sides of the map and being rewarded for it with overpowered killstreaks.

    I beg to differ :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,958 ✭✭✭Mr. Rager


    Lads, lets be honest. MW3 will not be the perfect game everyone is looking for. I hope it will, but thats nearly impossible.

    Even if the game appears amazing and perfect at the start, the bad side of the community (well about 70% of the community) will abuse some cheap function of it. I mean, even if they take out second chance and ghost, something harmless, like flak jacket, will get abused and no one will be able to get grenade kills. Everyone will complain about flak jacket, etc, and it will appear noobish.

    I can't wait for MW3, but that's not because i think it will be perfect and fix all off past COD's problems, it's because I want a newer game.

    I rage about all of CODs problems constantly, but maybe they have to be there. I mean, if COD was perfect, this forum wouldn't get as much traffic. The COD Megabitch thread trounces the Sunshine And Lollipop thread in post numbers. Why? Because people LOVE to bitch. Myself included.

    Every COD in recent years has had a gun/perk that everyone hated, eg Black Ops has Ghost and Second Chance, MW2 had OMA/DC, W@W had mp40 and Jugg. Hell, even COD 4, the game which many considered to be the most balanced and the greatest COD game ever, had Frags x3 and Martyrdom.

    What I'm saying is, COD wouldn't be COD if it was the perfect game. As much as I'd like if it was, MW3 won't be perfect. No doubt they'll have some superbitch perk planned to annoy us with, eg Noobtube x100 :D COD will always have some way to annoy us, and maybe that's the way it's supposed to be. I still will always bitch though ;)

    If you want a game to tear you to shreds, while getting you addicted and making you fall in love with it at the same time, thus making you fcuk up your education/love life/occupation, get a COD game.
    If you want to stay relaxed while gaming, may i suggest:

    Hello-Kitty-Game-1.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 856 ✭✭✭Battleflag


    @fourzerotwo

    Modern Warfare 3 world premiere gameplay trailer tonight on NBA Western Conference Finals around 6pm PT (2 am UK). I'll link HD here. #MW3


  • This content has been removed.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 14,782 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dcully


    I hope this time round its actually a decent multiplayer game.


  • This content has been removed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,673 ✭✭✭✭senordingdong


    Battleflag wrote: »
    @fourzerotwo

    Modern Warfare 3 world premiere gameplay trailer tonight on NBA Western Conference Finals around 6pm PT (2 am UK). I'll link HD here. #MW3

    In fairness, I remember the MW2 trailer, and the BOPS trailer, they weren't awfully reflective of the gameplay but more so of the cut scenes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    In fairness, I remember the MW2 trailer, and the BOPS trailer, they weren't awfully reflective of the gameplay but more so of the cut scenes.

    theres a lot of stuff in the trailers thats ingame footage though, MW2 doesnt have any cutscenes once the levels begin anyway, allt he stuff in the trailer like the snowmobile, fight in the favela with soap showing the guy out the window and the gulag attack is all ingame footage


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,673 ✭✭✭✭senordingdong


    Yeah but all that ingame footage that is shown is from a different perspective, so it was made for the trailer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,958 ✭✭✭Mr. Rager


    Im fooking excited :p I know this isn't the multiplayer trailer, but we will probably get a sort of feel from it anyways


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,673 ✭✭✭✭senordingdong


    fjsanchez wrote: »
    Im fooking excited :p I know this isn't the multiplayer trailer, but we will probably get a sort of feel from it anyways

    Well, I for one will be waiting for the single player footage.
    MW1 had an amazing campaign, utterly brilliant. And a great multiplayer too.

    Then MW2 pissed a single player campaign into the snow and made some slight adjustments to the multiplayer.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,958 ✭✭✭Mr. Rager


    Well, I for one will be waiting for the single player footage.
    MW1 had an amazing campaign, utterly brilliant. And a great multiplayer too.

    Then MW2 pissed a single player campaign into the snow and made some slight adjustments to the multiplayer.

    Don't get me wrong, ill still play the Campaign, its just all I can think of know is the MP. The Campaign is more of a bonus to me


Advertisement