Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Anyone not like The Beatles?

1456810

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭Freddie59


    I think the Beatles were fantastic, but I also think Elvis was the most overrated singer in history. I don't hate his music, but there's very little of it that I actually enjoy ("Suspicious Minds" is a good song but the rest is very meh.) Also the fact that he never wrote his own songs and was basically a puppet being controlled by svengalis in the background annoys me. He had a decent voice and was pretty good looking but nothing more.

    Elvis was - by far - probably the most talented performer that ever lived. The ultimate showman and performer who could sing any type of song and make it look effortless. Only Freddie Mercury came close.

    OK - he didn't write - but by God was he some performer. Michael Jackson the King? Pffft. In his dreams!:D

    ELVIS Aloha from Hawaii is a music concert that was headlined by Elvis Presley, and broadcast live via satellite around the world on January 14, 1973. It was watched by over one billion viewers worldwide and remains the most watched broadcast by an individual entertainer in television history.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,145 ✭✭✭LETHAL LADY


    Freddie59 wrote: »
    Elvis was - by far - probably the most talented performer that ever lived. The ultimate showman and performer who could sing any type of song and make it look effortless. Only Freddie Mercury came close.

    OK - he didn't write - but by God was he some performer. Michael Jackson the King? Pffft. In his dreams!:D

    ELVIS Aloha from Hawaii is a music concert that was headlined by Elvis Presley, and broadcast live via satellite around the world on January 14, 1973. It was watched by over one billion viewers worldwide and remains the most watched broadcast by an individual entertainer in television history.



    I love Viva las Vegas and In the Ghetto.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,047 ✭✭✭Da Shins Kelly


    I listen to them quite a bit and I love them, but I know my mother hates them. She thinks most of their songs are too 'happy', and she didn't really like John Lennon.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,047 ✭✭✭Da Shins Kelly


    I think the Beatles were fantastic, but I also think Elvis was the most overrated singer in history. I don't hate his music, but there's very little of it that I actually enjoy ("Suspicious Minds" is a good song but the rest is very meh.) Also the fact that he never wrote his own songs and was basically a puppet being controlled by svengalis in the background annoys me. He had a decent voice and was pretty good looking but nothing more.

    Wouldn't totally agree with this reason for disliking Elvis. I wouldn't be a huge fan of Elvis, but I wouldn't knock him on the song-writing thing. Some of the best singers of all time didn't write their own music - Sinatra, Billie Holiday, Ella Fitzgerald. It doesn't really have much bearing on how great they were at singing. Singing is more than just writing your own songs and singing them, it's also about interpretation. The above singers were brilliant interpreters of lyrics without ever having to write their own songs. Billie Holiday, for example, so completely owned every song that she ever sang by simply turning it into a piece of autobiography and making it profoundly emotional. She chose to sing songs (written by other people) because they applied to her life. If she'd never written a song lyric in her life, she'd still be one of the greatest singers that ever lived, simply through her power to interpret and make the songs her own.

    For example, this is her last ever recording after battling alcoholism, heroin addiction and several men who abused her physically and mentally, and robbed her. In my opinion, it's one of the greatest recordings in music.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs9P-pfqF6Y


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 389 ✭✭LisaLee


    I don't like the first few records, but as they kept going I liked them more than more.

    I think Wings are better to be honest...*Hides from abuse*

    :eek:

    Well.... You think you know someone...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,565 ✭✭✭losthorizon


    Paul was waaaay more talented than his brother


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,240 ✭✭✭Iron Hide


    Rolling Stones, The Doors, Creedence > The Beatles


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,333 ✭✭✭RichieC


    Grew up with the red and blue compilations on record in my house! loved them

    Also Dark side of the moon record and war of the worlds... all things I will take with me in my heart to the grave.

    I much prefer the later Beatles myself, Abbey Road being my favourite.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,565 ✭✭✭losthorizon


    RichieC wrote: »
    Grew up with the red and blue compilations on record in my house! loved them

    Also Dark side of the moon record and war of the worlds... all things I will take with me in my heart to the grave.

    I much prefer the later Beatles myself, Abbey Road being my favourite.

    Pinks Floyds Dark Side of the Moon - Youre Right. Thats some some Class album. Not one weak track



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,526 ✭✭✭m@cc@


    bayern282 wrote: »
    Day in the Life, Best Beatles Song

    It wavers but this for me:



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,789 ✭✭✭Caoimhín


    Cant stand them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10 FiorCraft


    I wouldn't go so far as to say that they're crap but I've never liked their music. I've also never liked the music of Queen or Elvis Presley. I notice a lot of jaws dropping when I say that because I'm such a fan of music. For some reason though, I just never took to any of the above. The beatles in particular.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,333 ✭✭✭RichieC




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭7sr2z3fely84g5


    Queen was ok until the countless rereleases/reissues since.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭Freddie59


    FiorCraft wrote: »
    I wouldn't go so far as to say that they're crap but I've never liked their music. I've also never liked the music of Queen or Elvis Presley. I notice a lot of jaws dropping when I say that because I'm such a fan of music. For some reason though, I just never took to any of the above. The beatles in particular.

    Ah, everyone to their own. Who DO you like?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,526 ✭✭✭m@cc@


    RichieC wrote: »
    my fav :)

    The White Album?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,333 ✭✭✭RichieC


    m@cc@ wrote: »
    The White Album?

    Crap didnt see that was a bad link..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,382 ✭✭✭jimmyw


    Like some other posters on here, I could never see the attraction with Queen, Elvis or the beetles either.But everyone to their own, we cant all like the same thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,280 ✭✭✭✭Autosport


    Cant stand them


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,797 ✭✭✭KyussBishop


    I used to really like them, and listened to them loads, but back then didn't really pay much attention to the lyrics.
    Now whenever I listen to them I can't stand how some of their more bad-but-catchy songs get stuck in my head; I still like a lot of their stuff though, and the white album is probably also my favourite.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Used to dislike them, bar the odd song from the later period, when I was younger. Really starting to appreciate them now - but I do find some of their stuff pretty bland. On the other hand, some of it is spectacular, and then there is lots of stuff that's nice. Not earth-shattering, but still pleasant - e.g. Across The Universe kinda stuff.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 350 ✭✭skylight1987


    When I was young I never got any of their albums just to be contrarian, cos it seemed such an obvious thing to do, and lots of people said they were the best band ever just because everyone else did. Though I still liked all the songs I knew by them.
    Then when I got a little older and a little less immature I started to buy their albums here and there, and came to the conclusion that they are indeed fantastic. I'm no expert on music, but I can instinctively tell that their best stuff is in another class. I think.

    But I know a lot of people still say they're the best band ever just because most people do. It's very rare to hear someone say they don't like them.

    So, does anyone hear not like them, and if not, do you have a reason?
    i dont like them ,they do nothing for me


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,018 ✭✭✭Badgermonkey


    Nice Kinks Demo I heard for the 1st time today & an odd Beach Boys vid that showcases a great combination of killer bassline, backing vocals and multi-layered production.





  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,327 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    In a lot of ways I personally liken them to Picasso. The Picassos of 20th century popular music. I like a lot of Picassos work and I dislike a good chunk of it, but I see him as a genius nonetheless. I would look on the four Scousers the same. Like oul Pablo, they were influenced by many sources, but changed the game to become the main source themselves. They were as prolific as Pablo and could turn their hand to pretty much anything in their field like Pablo(these were guys in 62 who couldn't play piano or read music, that within a few years were coming up with piano progressions like let it be and Lucy in the sky with diamonds. Lennon in particular could conjure up the most sublime piano licks with so few notes...). They were also universally popular and commercial like Pablo, but still gave critics and pseuds the horn over the minutiae of their output. And like Picasso they never stopped changing.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,327 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    an odd Beach Boys vid that showcases a great combination of killer bassline, backing vocals and multi-layered production.
    Listen to with a little help from my friends off Pepper and lets play spot Macca ripping off that very song feel in the bass. :D He admitted it too. Without the beachboys I really doubt there would have been pepper or even revolver. Any interviews I've seen the Beatles rate them above all others, with a side order of respect for Dylan that quick enough turned sour(though they were blamed for Bobbie going electric). They don't rate the Stones except in a fatherly patronising way. They rate the motown and other black american stuff a lot more*.









    As do I. What always grinds my gears about "best albums of all time" lists is the oft omission of What's goin on, by Marvin Gaye.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,784 ✭✭✭Superbus


    jimmyw wrote: »
    Like some other posters on here, I could never see the attraction with Queen, Elvis or the beetles either.But everyone to their own, we cant all like the same thing.

    Yeah, not too great.




    Anyway, they essentially define my musical taste. Everything else I like branches out from them (granted, it's a fairly convoluted tree). I was sung Beatles songs from the day I was born, they were always played, then I slowly discovered the depths of their work as I got a bit older. I was in a play in school revolving around their songs, really solidified how great most of it is.

    After 1965 of course. Before that, I admit, a lot of muck, but I think that clouds the judgement of too many people.

    Also, somebody mentioned earlier in the thread about people not liking The Beatles to stand out - I think that AH is essentially populated by that kind of person. Hell, I'm probably that kind of person, but I make an exception when it comes to JPGR.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,191 ✭✭✭✭Latchy


    For me the Beatles are up there. Norwegian Wood being my favourite Track.


    But this time period was a time of great creativity (mid 1960s - early 70s).

    You had the Stones, Love with possibly the best album of the 60s if not of all time,Cream the greatest trio of all time,The Who ,The Byrds ,Traffic ,Caravan ,Moody Blues ,

    Plus countless others like Pink Floyd, Deep Purple, The Small Faces, The Kinks etc. What I loved about the time was the mixing of genres - the Byrds for instance stared off as a pop group, drifted into rock , folk, psychedelic and ended up as a country rock band. It was a trip. Their music like all bands of the time was always evolving.
    ^ I'm a fan of them all and would be part of my music collection . All of the above and many more to boot were evolving and experimenting , which is what made sixties music so great .

    ''Ermans Ermits '' knocked out a good few hits such as No Milk today (4,545,278 youtube hits ) :cool:




    And the odd and slightly psychedelic ' Museam ' which showed them not afraid to explore away from the usual pop formula




    Wibbs wrote: »
    Listen to with a little help from my friends off Pepper and lets play spot Macca ripping off that very song feel in the bass. :D He admitted it too. Without the beachboys I really doubt there would have been pepper or even revolver. Any interviews I've seen the Beatles rate them above all others, with a side order of respect for Dylan that quick enough turned sour(though they were blamed for Bobbie going electric). They don't rate the Stones except in a fatherly patronising way. They rate the motown and other black american stuff a lot more*.

    There was mutual respect from both bands for each other and Brian Wilson quotes the Rubber Soul album as beinga turing point in his musical career . Mc Cartney is quoted on the inner sleeve on the Pet Sounds Box set saying that on hearing 'God Only Knows ' he was so blown away that he went of and wrote ' Here There and Everywere ' .And the ' falsetto harmonies' on ' Back In The USSR ' are also a tribute to the Beach Boys and not as some people thought a rip off ( the beatles had their influences like everybody but didn't need to rip anybody off ) and the admiration worked both ways .

    Paul Weller was influenced by the Beatles and it's evident on 'Start ' which is really 'Taxman ' in reverse ;)





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,059 ✭✭✭Buceph


    Who'd a thunk it. In between the rabble rabble there's a decent discussion of The Beatles going on in After Hours. :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,207 ✭✭✭The King of Moo


    In honour of our visitor..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,295 ✭✭✭✭Duggy747


    While I respect and acknowledge what The Beatles did for music I could never get into them, bar a slight amount of songs I don't like most of their stuff.

    I have a wide area of music I listen to going back decades but The Beatles just don't do anything for me, never have. Still, if I heard them in a pub / cafe I wouldn't throw a wobble about I how dislike them or anything.


Advertisement