Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Anyone not like The Beatles?

1468910

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 413 ✭✭The Left Hand Of God




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,191 ✭✭✭✭Latchy



    Why are they held in such esteem by such a broad range of highly accomplished musicians across virtually all genres from jazz to rock to classical?

    For primarily self taught guys, they are considered to have been abundantly blessed with a musical sensibility and literacy light years ahead of their contemporaries (Brian Wilson excepted) in terms of compositional structure, chord progression and use of rhythm and harmony.
    You have such a lovely way with words I had to highlight it and you more or less said it for me . These guys knew how to sing and harmonise together as good as any group you care to mention
    Alter-Ego wrote: »
    People who don't appreciate The Beatles should curl up and die or leave the planet.

    I mean that in the nicest way possible. :)
    Agreed

    I love and admire hundreds of groups and artists and far to many to include here ,ie, The Beach Boys ,The Doors ,Rolling Stones ,Roy Orbison to name a few and different generes , classical , soul , jazz ,rock .

    But the Beatles for me growing up have being a very important part of my musical heritage which goes byond all the hype ever written about them but rather than go into a big long schlong as to why , I think badgermonkeys post above say's it all simply enough for me .

    PS.

    Millions of YouTube Listeners ,many who are only in their teens , are delighted to discover and much prefer them over much of the crap out there that's called music today .The quotes on all their songs on YouTube speak for themselfs .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,447 ✭✭✭richymcdermott


    I like the b Sharps more ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,066 ✭✭✭Washington Irving


    Latchy wrote: »
    You have such a lovely way with words I had to highlight it and you more or less said it for me .

    Agreed

    I love and admire hundreds of groups and artists far to many to include here ,ie, The Beach Boys ,The Doors ,Rolling Stones ,Roy Orbison to name a few and different generes , classical , soul , jazz ,rock .

    But the Beatles for me growing up have being a very important part of my musical heritage which goes byond all the hype ever wrtten about them but rather than go into a big long schlong as to why , I think badgermonkeys post above say's it all simply enough for me .

    Thats what she said...


  • Posts: 1,455 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    ejmaztec wrote: »
    Their music was crap before they started using vast quantities of illegal substances. Paul McCartney and Ringo were crap no matter what they took, or didn't take, and still are crap.

    This whole "Ringo was a rubbish drummer" is something that gets trotted out over and over. He wasn't a showy drummer. People who don't know what good music is about equate showy with good.

    Listen to this for a tasty drum groove:



    As for Mcartney. I don't think many would deny he's a fantastic songwriter (e.g. Eleanor Rigby). But his bass playing was quite tasty too. Not flashy. Tasty.



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,191 ✭✭✭✭Latchy


    Thats what she said...
    ''Oh Darling ...please believe me .....I'll never do you no harm ''

    .......with my big long hard schlong

    Ringos drumming on most of Abbey Road is boss to ...


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,326 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Yet Strawberry fields/Penny Lane was beaten to numero uno in the UK by "release me" by Englebert Humperdinck. Mad. Well in reality it wasn't. Double A sides were unknown before that(another fab four first) so the charts judges counted the two songs as separate. Still got it to number two though. They did have a scary amount of firsts in media and music and helped to popularise others. They really changed the landscape like no others before or since.

    Not liking them I can understand, but not appreciating them I can't. Me? I don't like Pink Floyd. Well one, maybe two songs. The rest I personally find too middle england twiddling for me. However I do appreciate their huge influence and general quality and innovation. I much prefer the Stones but would rate the Floyd so far ahead of the Stones that Jagger would need the services of the Hubble to see Gilmore's artistic arse moving away from him. Zappa I don't rate. I like him, but musically he's the equivalent of a heavy duty coffee table book with a flash cover. Looks good on the shelf to show your cred, but you've never really read it. Mostly cos it's unreadable. Good man for a quote, the Wilde of wock :D but unlike Wilde not the giant he thought he was in the field he chose. Beefheart another on that score. My humble naturally. :o:P

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,326 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    This whole "Ringo was a rubbish drummer" is something that gets trotted out over and over. He wasn't a showy drummer. People who don't know what good music is about equate showy with good.
    I agree. Now I looove showy too. I'll fap to Hendrix or Moon all the day long. :) But yep the song was always the thing. Everything was subservient to the individual song.
    Listen to this for a tasty drum groove:
    AKA "Right John can you make up your fcuking mind as to what time this song is supposed to be in?" have a listen, it goes from straight 4 to the bar then 16ths then a fcuked up waltz. That's lennon though, timing all over the shop. Good Morning another example. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmOecBHVhLg I remember seeing an interview with McCartney AFAIR about ringo and his drumming. Lennon had waltzed in one day with a Motown record and said to Ringo "Here Richie can you do it like that?" He replied "but John there's two drummers on that track". John "Don't let that worry ya Rich you'll be grand". Sometimes they would lay down a track and then ask him to put a drum part to it afterwards :eek: just by feel as it could be all over the place. Ask any drummer today and he or she will be WTF at that. Being their drummer with their ever changing needs would have been a nightmare and he kept up.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 173 ✭✭kingtubby


    Its interesting reading people saying the beatles were great because of all the records they sold and other people saying they were populist boy band garbage.You can't measure a bands quality on album sales.The Beatles were great regardless of the amount of records they sold.

    And also its a bit grating hearing people criticize them because of their musicianship.They are regarded as great songwriters not virtuoso musicans.If you want to hear a virtuoso musican listen to Yngwie Malmsteen.
    But for your own sake don't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,461 ✭✭✭--Kaiser--


    kingtubby wrote: »
    They are regarded as great songwriters not virtuoso musicans.If you want to hear a virtuoso musican listen to Yngwie Malmsteen.
    But for your own sake don't.

    Precisely - Malmsteen is rightly considered a genius technical guitarist. His music though, by and large, is tuneless drivel. Being technically brilliant has little to do with song-wring talent.

    One of my favourite Beatles songs, you can't get much simpler than this


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,080 ✭✭✭✭Big Nasty


    The Beatles? Who the fcuk are they?

    Find me a Beatles song even half ways as good as this:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,461 ✭✭✭--Kaiser--


    MCMLXXV wrote: »
    The Beatles? Who the fcuk are they?

    Find me a Beatles song even half ways as good as this:

    Done


    As Wibbs said earlier, the Stones created enough good songs for a couple of best of CDs but, from what I've heard, they made an astonishing amount of filler


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,039 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    Just nursery rhymes to me:D

    Rolling Stones 1969–74 is the high watermark


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,053 ✭✭✭Aldebaran


    The Beatles are probably my all time favourite band, and as a bass player myself Paul McCartney has had a big influence on me, when he was good he was really good:



    I have met plenty of people who don't like them though and usually (but not always) these people don't know much about them beyond things like Love Me Do and I Want to Hold Your Hand.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,080 ✭✭✭✭Big Nasty


    --Kaiser-- wrote: »
    Done


    As Wibbs said earlier, the Stones created enough good songs for a couple of best of CDs but, from what I've heard, they made an astonishing amount of filler

    That's drivel in comparison


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭emilyjmc


    I'm not that pushed either way - if their music is on in the background I don't mind it but I wouldn't go out of my way to listen to their stuff either. I don't have any of their albums, some of my pals used to play their stuff at parties as they were big fans but after a few songs I'd find the music a bit boring.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Not a huge beatles fan, massively overrated due to their commercial impact.

    Can't f***ing stand led zepplin (even though I was a hevvy kettler) mostly due to plants' vocal hysterics


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,164 ✭✭✭✭Mars Bar


    Meh.

    I'm indifferent to them. Have about 5 of their songs on my iTunes with Come Together being my favourite one.

    We had to study them for our exams too and I just skipped over them as their attempt at being innovative was too ****ing complex to learn!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,053 ✭✭✭Aldebaran


    --Kaiser-- wrote: »
    As Wibbs said earlier, the Stones created enough good songs for a couple of best of CDs but, from what I've heard, they made an astonishing amount of filler

    I remember watching that concert movie the Stones released with Scorcese and, honestly, every single song sounded the exact same, they can be an incredibly boring band at times. There is nothing to them beyond their greatest hits, in my opinion.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 48 Dogdaysareover


    I never got the Beatles, "We all live in yellow submarine"??

    How high were they?!:pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,495 ✭✭✭Mr. Presentable


    Latchy wrote: »
    Millions of YouTube Listeners ,many who are only in their teens , are delighted to discover and much prefer them over much of the crap out there that's called music today .The quotes on all their songs on YouTube speak for themselfs .

    Millions of Youtube listeners prefer Justin Bieber over your dinosaur music. Speaks for itself :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭Freddie59


    I never got the Beatles, "We all live in yellow submarine"??

    How high were they?!:pac:
    :D

    In fairness, they were a good band. But I was completely put off by John Lennon. Much like Bono in U2 or that Gallagher idiot in Oasis. Completely self-obsessed, while lecturing the rest of us. I liked the Beatles music, but preferred Wings. Like U2 but hate Bono.

    Can't stand Oasis. Remember one time they were on some American live show, and yer man Liam upended a can of beer on the stage. The Yank presenter took the piss out out him left, right, and centre. "Ewwww, he spilled a beer - wow!".

    I'm 52 now, so my musical tastes stretch from Queen to Abba to Status Quo to LZ/Uriah Heep/Deep Purple/Josh Groban, and even a bit of classical. I even like the Sound Of Music and some other musicals. Can't stand Jazz though.

    It does become academic as you get older. All that matters is what you enjoy yourself. But the Beatles (and many 60s bands) were on the coat tails of the greats like Bill Haley, Chuck Berry, Jerry Lee Lewis et al. But they did bring it a step further in the evolution of music.

    En:)joy it folks - don't argue about it. Expand your musical horizons every day. We're not here for that long in the overall scheme of things.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,032 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    Beatlles are way overrated IMHO. Half the things they were attributed to doing and changing the music scene isn't really true. They were just popular like saying Micheal Jackson "invented" the moonwalk when it was already about. The Rolling Stones are more interesting to me.

    Only music I really don't like would be dance and rap.

    Lennon was not a nice guy and a complete hypocrite when you consider his first wife.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,798 ✭✭✭karma_


    If you don't like the Beatles, then you should be shot.

    Seriously...

    Shot!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 784 ✭✭✭marzic


    Anyone ever noticed how you never see Paul McCartney and Pauline Collins in the same place?!?:confused:


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,326 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    MCMLXXV wrote: »
    That's drivel in comparison
    Gimme shelter is a great track and no mistake, but without that drivel I can pretty much guarantee Jagger and Richards output would have been limited to basic blues progressions ripping off their Delta Blues betters ad nauseam. This was noted at the time. There's a beatles album called Rubber Soul. They got the title after one of them overheard a black American musician of note comment on Jagger saying of him "he's got a plastic soul man, plastic soul".

    This debate was even had by Lennon(who I agree 100% was a bit of a twat) in 1970, just after the Beatles split up;

    I was always very respectful about Mick and the Stones. But (Mick) said a lot of sort of tarty things about the Beatles, which I am hurt by, because, you know, I can knock the Beatles, but don't let Mick Jagger knock them. Because I would like to just list what we did and what the Stones did 2 months after, on every ****in' album and every ****in' thing we did. And Mick does exactly the same - he imitates us. And I would like one of you ****in' underground people to point it out. You know, Satanic Majesties is Pepper. We Love You, man, it's the most ****in' bull****, that's All You Need Is Love. I resent the implication that the Stones are like the revolutionaries and that the Beatles weren't. If the Stones were or are, the Beatles really were, too. They are not in the same class, music-wise or power-wise, never were. I never said anything, I always admired them because I like their funky music and I like their style.

    Funny that even back then the Beatles felt the need to fight the "just because we're populist we're not hip enough" tag.

    IMHO the Stones as a band, inventive they are not, or in a very limited sense. They pick a groove and stick with it and they've had maybe three such grooves in their musical career. Hell they've been ripping themselves off ad nauseam for the last 20 odd years. Actually they remind me a lot of U2 on that score. They're very similar in that respect. To be fair, both are distinctive bands. You can't mistake them for anyone else and they do have some good grooves in the mix. But overall and when we're talking about quality and consistency in output and influence the Beatles are scarily ahead.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,326 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    karma_ wrote: »
    If you don't like the Beatles, then you should be shot.

    Seriously...

    Shot!
    Signed Mark Chapman. :D

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,080 ✭✭✭✭Big Nasty


    Wibbs wrote: »
    IMHO the Stones as a band, inventive they are not, or in a very limited sense. They pick a groove and stick with it and they've had maybe three such grooves in their musical career. Hell they've been ripping themselves off ad nauseam for the last 20 odd years. Actually they remind me a lot of U2 on that score. They're very similar in that respect. To be fair, both are distinctive bands. You can't mistake them for anyone else and they do have some good grooves in the mix. But overall and when we're talking about quality and consistency in output and influence the Beatles are scarily ahead.

    You know way more than me on this subject, but to me it's simply a matter of taste. I find much of the Beatles music very boyish and sometimes cringeworthy. I find most of the Stones stuff damn cool - but hey, that's just me! ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,191 ✭✭✭✭Latchy


    Millions of Youtube listeners prefer Justin Bieber over your dinosaur music. Speaks for itself


    I think your Jedward poster just fell of the wall there ......





    Some songs written by Lennon/McCartney recorded by other artists

    * The Rolling Stones — "I Wanna Be Your Man" (1963). Released first by the Stones as a single; appeared on the Beatles' With The Beatles album shortly after
    * Billy J. Kramer with the Dakotas — "I'll Keep You Satisfied" (1963), "From a Window" (1964), "Bad To Me" (1964)
    * Tommy Quickly — "Tip of My Tongue" (1963)
    * The Fourmost — "Hello Little Girl" (1963), "I'm In Love" (1963)
    * Cilla Black — "Love of the Loved" (1963), "It's For You" (1964), "Step Inside Love" (1968)
    * The Strangers with Mike Shannon — "One And One Is Two" (1964)
    * Peter & Gordon — "A World Without Love" (1964), "Nobody I Know" (1964), "I Don't Want To See You Again" (1964), "Woman" (1966)
    * The Applejacks — "Like Dreamers Do" (1964)
    * P.J. Proby — "That Means a Lot" (1965)
    * John Foster & Sons Ltd Black Dyke Mills Band — "Thingummybob" (1968)
    * Mary Hopkin — "Goodbye" (1969)
    * Badfinger — "Come And Get It" (1970)

    Got To Get You Into My Life (Cliff Bennett and the Rebels) (08/05/66) this is of interest because it was produced by Paul McCartney, and was released the same day as the REVOLVER LP in the U.K.

    . Theme From The Family Way (The George Martin Orchestra) (12/23/66) Produced by George Martin

    . Catcall (The Chris Barber Band) (10/20/67) (Paul is present at this session and can be heard among the chorus in the songs' wild ending.)


    Thingumybob (John Fosters and Sons LTD. Black Dyke Mills Band) (09/06/68) Produced by Paul McCartney

    Badge (Cream) (02/05/69) (This song was written by George Harrison and Eric Clapton)

    Sour Milk Sea (Jackie Lomax) (03/21/69) Produced and written by George Harrison. The song also features George, Paul, and Ringo backing up Lomax as a band.


    Best of luck in the euro Jedward ....


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,148 ✭✭✭✭KnifeWRENCH


    ejmaztec wrote: »
    Their music was crap before they started using vast quantities of illegal substances. Paul McCartney and Ringo were crap no matter what they took, or didn't take, and still are crap.
    Lolwut?

    Paul McCartney (regardless of what you think of him as a person) is a fantastic songwriter and still gives great live performances. Saw him last year at the RDS and he was brilliant. Still in fine voice and so much energy for a man only a few years off 70.
    Biggins wrote: »
    Them and Elvis, never really liked either.
    I think the Beatles were fantastic, but I also think Elvis was the most overrated singer in history. I don't hate his music, but there's very little of it that I actually enjoy ("Suspicious Minds" is a good song but the rest is very meh.) Also the fact that he never wrote his own songs and was basically a puppet being controlled by svengalis in the background annoys me. He had a decent voice and was pretty good looking but nothing more.
    squod wrote: »


    Anyone who likes this kind of rubbish needs their head examined removed.

    :mad:
    That is quite possibly my favourite Beatles song of all time. How dare you, sir.

    /adds squod to list of boards enemies.


Advertisement