Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Why is Tara Mines not Irish owned?

  • 09-04-2011 02:47PM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 837 ✭✭✭


    The Tara mine is owned by o foreign company called Boliden. The Tara mine is the biggest zinc mine in Europe. Why don't we in Ireland have a state owned mining operator that runs it? Then the profits would stay in the country and Ireland is in dire need of revenue?

    There is another zinc mine in Killkenny and that is also owned by a foreign company called Lundin Mining.

    Why can't Ireland have its own mining industry?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,298 ✭✭✭✭later12


    whiteonion wrote: »
    The Tara mine is the biggest zinc mine in Europe. Why don't we in Ireland have a state owned mining operator that runs it? Then the profits would stay in the country and Ireland is in dire need of revenue?
    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/finance/2011/0108/1224287043309.html
    Latest accounts for Tara Mines Holdings Ltd, show that the company made a pretax profit of €5.4 million in the year to the end of December 2009. This compared with a loss of €5.1 million in 2008. Tara paid €1.8 million in corporation tax to bring its total profit for the year to €3.6 million.
    I don't think we need another state body, going through the losses that Tara Mines have gone through, to come out with that sort of profit.

    Doubtless Tara Mines profits will again be up because of ongoing rise in commodities, but it is not something that I would think all that necessary for the state to get involved in. Ireland would be better off investing in zinc and lead equities than actually mining it.

    We would need 12 963 Tara mines, for example, to pay for the bank bailout.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,181 ✭✭✭ronkmonster


    If state assets are being sold in the next few years, should they only be sold to Irish companies?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 837 ✭✭✭whiteonion


    If state assets are being sold in the next few years, should they only be sold to Irish companies?
    If state assets are being sold, it doesn't matter if they are sold to foreign companies or Irish companies. The state will still lose the revenue they had before they sold the assets.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,675 ✭✭✭beeftotheheels


    If state assets are being sold in the next few years, should they only be sold to Irish companies?

    Can you think of any Irish companies that can afford to buy them or would be interested?

    If they have to be sold, they should be auctioned and sold to the highest bidder. We lose the income they generate but also lose the associated payroll costs.

    I don't know if they have to be sold, or what the cost benefit analysis is in the current market.

    But if the EU/ IMF insist on us selling them we would be much better off selling e.g. ESB to an EU utilities company who can pay us cash, and in whom we could take a small equity kicker, than selling to some Irish eejit with no sector experience who is funded by bank debt and likely to end up in Nama if not already there.

    I doubt management could afford the debt to effect a buy-out without a foreign backer, and as we can see from Eircom a one time Irish State Asset owned by the workers and a PE backer = so much debt that they cannot spend on capital improvements.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 45,528 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Can you think of any Irish companies that can afford to buy them or would be interested?
    There are a number of Irish multinationals still making a packet!

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,675 ✭✭✭beeftotheheels


    kbannon wrote: »
    There are a number of Irish multinationals still making a packet!

    So Ryanair are hoping to buy the ESB, CRH are lusting after Coilte, or perhaps Elan really want to own Bord Gáis?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,582 ✭✭✭WalterMitty


    if the state owned mines, they wud be losing money hand over fist. Workers would use union power to extract above market rates of pay and capital would be used less efficiently making the whole project unviable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭baalthor


    I remember during the 70s and 80s there was a lot of discussion about building a smelter for the lead/zinc mine at Tara instead of exporting the ore.

    Building a smelter was on Sinn Fein's policy list up until the late 80s.
    I don't think building a lead/zinc smelter in the middle of suburban-land would be very popular nowadays ...

    It should also be noted that Tara was frequently in financial trouble during this period with many layoffs and I think it may have closed on a few occasions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,813 ✭✭✭chrysagon


    My cousin recently did an interview for a job, down the mine, but the money is no where near what miners were earning a few yrs back, so i suppose it aint recession proof


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,408 ✭✭✭bbam


    whiteonion wrote: »
    The Tara mine is owned by o foreign company called Boliden. The Tara mine is the biggest zinc mine in Europe. Why don't we in Ireland have a state owned mining operator that runs it? Then the profits would stay in the country and Ireland is in dire need of revenue?

    There is another zinc mine in Killkenny and that is also owned by a foreign company called Lundin Mining.

    Why can't Ireland have its own mining industry?

    In general semi-state companies don't work well.
    If you took Tara and transferred all employees onto similar salary scales as existing semi state's like ESB, then it would be closed within 6 months.

    The metals market is notoriously volatile, if world zink prices take a tumble then your semi-state company can't ammend staff or pay and becomes a huge burden on the state.

    Semi-State companies should be reserved for provision of essentials like water and power, public transport, where no matter what the marklet is the public will be supplied..


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,979 ✭✭✭Diarmuid


    if the state owned mines, they wud be losing money hand over fist.
    Our governing classes cannot even run the government without bankrupting themselves. Why would anyone want to give them ownership of other entities they know even less about!?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,007 ✭✭✭Phill Ewinn


    later12 wrote: »
    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/finance/2011/0108/1224287043309.html
    I don't think we need another state body, going through the losses that Tara Mines have gone through, to come out with that sort of profit.

    Doubtless Tara Mines profits will again be up because of ongoing rise in commodities, but it is not something that I would think all that necessary for the state to get involved in. Ireland would be better off investing in zinc and lead equities than actually mining it.

    We would need 12 963 Tara mines, for example, to pay for the bank bailout.


    Because declaring a loss is exactly the same as not making money.

    MAYBE, just maybe Tara/Boliden have good accountants like every other multinational in Ireland.
    http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/ryan-thomas-bankruptcy-latest-example-2422892


Advertisement
Advertisement