Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Everyone seems to want a 1 litre car !

  • 29-03-2011 11:25AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭


    Have been talking to a few people who are considering changing their cars. Most are not into cars as such, but the buzz word seems to be a 1 litre. Even those who have families are talking about them. Its either that or the cheaper tax new cars, which are too expensive for many. Anyone else notice this. :rolleyes:


«1345678

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,219 ✭✭✭✭biko


    Not really but it makes sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    Not me, from what i've seen the cut-off point for most people is still 2.0.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,069 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    I noticed when I moved to Ireland, that small cars with small engines, keep their price - which pretty much indicates that there is a market for them.

    F.E. in year 2000 brand new Vectra 2.0 was way more expensive then brand new Corsa 1.0.
    Now, when both cars are over 10 years old, probably Corsa would be worth more than Vectra.

    That was really strarnge for me, as in my home country, usually the bigger, better performance, and more comfortable car, the bigger the price.
    Usually the price of 10year old Vectra would be twice as much as 10 year old corsa.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Max Power1


    Also diesel rather than petrol is another trend recently.

    Hate to see the repair bills in a few years for DMF/DPF/Turbo etc failures on diesels being used for short trips only and doing 5k miles a year!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,240 ✭✭✭Lurching


    I dont, im sticking with my 3L turbo thanks.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,069 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    Anan1 wrote: »
    Not me, from what i've seen the cut-off point for most people is still 2.0.

    Because above 2.0 motor tax starts to raise tremendously.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,584 ✭✭✭ronan45


    is there a huge saving between say a 1 litre Petrol car and a 1.4 liter petrol car doing the same journey per week?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Max Power1


    Anan1 wrote: »
    Not me, from what i've seen the cut-off point for most people is still 2.0.
    Id disagree with you there Anan and say that its either 1.4 or 1.6 now amongst the general car buying public.

    I mean look at the worrying trends towards 1.4 and even worse 1.2 saloons!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    Max Power1 wrote: »
    Id disagree with you there Anan and say that its either 1.4 or 1.6 now amongst the general car buying public.

    I mean look at the worrying trends towards 1.4 and even worse 1.2 saloons!
    TBH, it's a very hard one to prove either way.:)
    CiniO wrote: »
    I noticed when I moved to Ireland, that small cars with small engines, keep their price - which pretty much indicates that there is a market for them.

    F.E. in year 2000 brand new Vectra 2.0 was way more expensive then brand new Corsa 1.0.
    Now, when both cars are over 10 years old, probably Corsa would be worth more than Vectra.

    That was really strarnge for me, as in my home country, usually the bigger, better performance, and more comfortable car, the bigger the price.
    Usually the price of 10year old Vectra would be twice as much as 10 year old corsa.
    I think the main reason for this is insurance - older cars tend to be sought after by younger drivers, who are limited by insurance to smaller engines.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,144 ✭✭✭Staplor


    Not really, have seen an increase in people going below 2 litres, 1.8, 1.6 yes, but not all looking for as low as 1 litre cars.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 407 ✭✭daddydick


    Absolutely no way I could drive a 1L car...i'd have no problem paying extra road tax and extra fuel for the sake of my sanity!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,987 ✭✭✭ottostreet


    I started driving a 1.3 as a runaround...it's just about tolerable. I definitely wouldn't WANT one. Smallest engine size to feel comfortable on the road for me is about 1.8-2.0.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭Cionád


    Interesting to see engine size being equated to power.

    I've got a 2L, it is slower than than a 1L Yaris, waaaaay slower.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 813 ✭✭✭Satanta


    Cionád wrote: »
    Interesting to see engine size being equated to power.

    I've got a 2L, it is slower than than a 1L Yaris, waaaaay slower.

    a 2ltr what?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭Cionád


    Satanta wrote: »
    a 2ltr what?

    Almera diesel


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 374 ✭✭STForSale


    jjhone076 wrote: »
    I want to buy a new car and I like the look of the 1 series.
    I had the same idea until I drove one!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 430 ✭✭cullen5998


    1 litre is so small, the cars with these engines were never designed to be going on motorways at 120kmph or rural back roads. They feel too flimsy


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,472 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    cullen5998 wrote: »
    1 litre is so small, the cars with these engines were never designed to be going on motorways at 120kmph or rural back roads. They feel too flimsy
    Nonsense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,264 ✭✭✭✭Eoin


    ottostreet wrote: »
    I started driving a 1.3 as a runaround...it's just about tolerable. I definitely wouldn't WANT one. Smallest engine size to feel comfortable on the road for me is about 1.8-2.0.

    What type of driving? I'd have absolutely no problems with a nippy 1.4 hatchback or something similar if my commuting was mostly urban.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,739 ✭✭✭BigEejit


    my wife had a 1L jap import micra several years ago and when going into Cork city centre it was brilliant, fitted into all those narrow or short parking spaces that a family car wouldn't have a hope fitting into. And because it was a jap import it was not bog spec, air-conditioning, all electrics

    Would I drive long distance (>150km's) in it? not a hope, it was small, noisier than my car and just didnt have the power to overtake easily or make it up any sort of gradient without dropping gears.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    My W124 was a 2.5 diesel and I reckon it was slower than a Yaris.

    Back to the OP, haven't noticed the trend myself, I don't know anyone who is changing their car really. Although a buddy has a 1995 Golf GTi 16v that's seen better days so he bought a 1997 golf gti 16v on Sunday night.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭shawnee


    Just noticing sold cars on donedeal and the 1 litres are selling while the others are very slow :o:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,316 ✭✭✭bonzodog2


    I remember when the Yaris was introduced, its 1L engine supposedly had more power than the old 1.6 OHV Carina.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 917 ✭✭✭Joe 90


    It's 1300ccs as standard but I'm sure you could have it with 1 litre.
    xtr2a.jpg

    440kgs, so would make sense:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,448 ✭✭✭fletch


    Cionád wrote: »
    Interesting to see engine size being equated to power.

    I've got a 2L, it is slower than than a 1L Yaris, waaaaay slower.
    Yes and I've bought a 1.4 and what is way quicker than most normally aspirated 2ltrs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,653 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Cionád wrote: »
    Almera diesel

    That's the slowest 2 litre...




    ... in the wurld :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,506 ✭✭✭Seweryn


    unkel wrote: »
    That's the slowest 2 litre...

    ... in the wurld :D
    I would say that a W123 200D Automatic is slower :D.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,822 ✭✭✭✭EPM


    Seweryn wrote: »
    I would say that a W123 200D Automatic is slower :D.

    Not as slow as the 2.3d Serena though:D;):p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,942 ✭✭✭Danbo!


    cullen5998 wrote: »
    1 litre is so small, the cars with these engines were never designed to be going on motorways at 120kmph or rural back roads. They feel too flimsy

    I dunno, my missus has a 1ltr yaris thats 12 years old but low mileage and in good nick. Its not the most comfortable car in terms of interior, but it handles itself fine above 120 on a motorway and grand on back roads.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 737 ✭✭✭murphthesmurf


    I've just bought a 1 litre, though not through choice. Bought it because of the shocking road tax prices here. Thanks to the Green party I expect.
    My last car in the UK was a vectra 2.6 v6 sri, how I miss it :(
    Previous to that a seat toledo 2.5 v5 :(
    Ba573rd road tax :mad:
    Gone from 170bhp to 50bhp :o


Advertisement