Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Is Irish a dead language?

1101102104106107131

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    If, as you say, the only thing keeping Gaeilge from 'dying' is its compulsory nature until the leaving Cert and the only way in which it can possibly grow is through full immersion schooling, then perhaps the kindest thing would be to let it... die, or at least the attempts at revival.

    Having said that, even if you concede death, you need not necessarily abandon preservation.


    Why? Studying Irish is benefical to peoples education. Very few people are opposed to learning Irish per sé
    (Plenty of people dont like learning Irish in the current system, but thats why I have constantly advocated reform of that system)


    As for full Immersion, This should be supported by the Government and allowed to expand in line with demand. Up til now the government has been very obstructive to Gaelscoileanna.(For some unknown reason)
    Should they be allowed to grow naturally then the language will grow with them.

    Hopefully FG will back up its promises and properly support the growth of this sector.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,019 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    This is the responce I recieved from Michael Creed TD's adviser on the Issue of making Irish optional.

    The Deputy understands that the obligatory status of the subject will only be removed after the entire subject is overhauled and verifiable results are to be seen. Then we will enter into consultation with all stakeholders on its status.


    It seams that the plan to make Irish optional will come after Irish is reformed and results are seen. ie it wont be made optional in the near future.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,925 ✭✭✭aidan24326


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    Apparently they only need 40% (don't ask me how I'm as confused about it as you are) to get an over all majority.

    That's 40% of first preference votes. The difference is made up by transfers from other parties/candidates.

    I have yet to see any evidience of wide spread resentment, People resent the curriculum they have to study, no doubt about that, But that is not the same as resenting having to study the language.

    Again, when asked how people feel about the language, time and again there is a massively positive responce. Where is the resentment? It must be burryed very deep.:rolleyes:


    This isn't about resentment one way or the other, it's about the fact that languages come and go, evolve and die and are replaced by something slse, and that's just the natural order of them, and the question of whether there's any point in trying to artificially prop up a language that has outlived its purpose.

    To what end? Who benefits? Leaving misty-eyed sentimentality aside, the Irish language now has no particular use, if we take language at its basic level of being a means of communication. I think people are seeing this issue far too romantically, if the Irish language is to die away let it go, that will happen eventually anyway, as it does to pretty much every language.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Wolfe Tone


    I didnt want to study English or be forced to read shakespeare etc, would you also support that being optional too for the leaving cert?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 634 ✭✭✭Euroland


    Summer camps are worth 14million to the local economy of Galway alone. If FG makes Irish optional, less people will go on these courses, negativly effecting demostic tourism.

    This figure looks laughable, especially relatively to the damage incurred to our economy by FF over the last few years or relatively to the money spent on the artificial support of Irish language.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.

    I am fully in favor of Reform,FG intends to implement reform so there is no need to agitate for it.


    That's nonsense. Nobody is "forced not to study history." Nobody is "forced not to study geography." They are free to study these subjects if they wish; the same thing will be true of Irish.

    This is simply not true, Of the subjects I wanted to study for my Leaving cert, I only got to study 2, I wanted to do accounting but because of the timetable had to settle for Business studies. I wanted to do Physics but again the timetable forced me to do Ag Science.

    You've never heard of the Language Freedom Movement of the 1960s, then?

    Can we please try to stay in the modern world? What bearing has the 60's on attuides to the language today?

    And when it is proposed that this "massively positive" sentiment be put to the test by allowing people to choose whether they do Irish for the Leaving Cert, the gaelgoir brigade takes to the streets in fear that the language will die out if the state does not continue compulsorily to shove it down people's throats. How ironic.


    There is a list of reasons why people will not choose Irish even if it is something they would like to learn, But feel free to ignore this as it dosent suit your argument.:rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    Euroland wrote: »
    This figure looks laughable, especially relatively to the damage incurred to our economy by FF over the last few years or relatively to the money spent on the artificial support of Irish language.



    What has FF and their economic treason got to do with this? I am not a FF supporter.:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 459 ✭✭Focalbhach


    It seams that the plan to make Irish optional will come after Irish is reformed and results are seen. ie it wont be made optional in the near future.

    More to this effect in the Irish Times letters:
    Madam, – Michael Clancy is wrong (February 11th). Young Fine Gael fully endorses the Fine Gael plan to invigorate the Irish language and the manner in which it is taught. If we do not change the way Irish is taught, the future of Irish is uncertain.

    Fine Gael will change the way Irish is taught in our schools so that Irish people will no longer finish secondary school, having learnt Irish for 13 years, and still being unable to speak the language. Fine Gael will change the curriculum so that Irish children learn the practical elements of the language up to junior certificate level, where they will not be forced to spend time learning poetry to the detriment of learning how to actually speak the language to each other.

    After 10 years of the new and improved curriculum, then, and only then, will Irish become optional for the Leaving Certificate. The biggest indictment of the current syllabus is that many people after just five years learning a foreign language in secondary school come out of school more fluent in that foreign language than they do in Irish. The Fine Gael plan aims to change that. – Yours, etc,

    ERIC KEANE,
    President,
    Young Fine Gael,
    Upper Mount Street,
    Dublin 2.

    Confusion abounds. If I have time later I might go hunting for an actual policy document rather than relying on secondary sources...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,019 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    Leto wrote: »
    Confusion abounds. If I have time later I might go hunting for an actual policy document rather than relying on secondary sources...

    FG Manifesto:

    Fine Gael is strongly committed to the development of the Irish language and the Gaeltacht regions. We recognise the value and cultural importance of our Irish tradition and heritage and we are determined to ensure the language and the Gaeltacht regions survive and prosper.National Strategy: We are supportive of many aspects of the twenty year strategy for the future of the Irish language and will deliver on the achievable goals and targets proposed.Education: Fine Gael supports the continued development of Gaelscoileanna and recognises the significant role the Gaelscoil movement has played in reviving the Irish language within and outside Gaeltacht areas. We will also work with Coláisí Samhraidh to attract greater numbers to the Gaeltacht.We are committed to overhauling the way in which Irish is taught at primary and second levels of education, to ensure teachers are equipped with the right tools to instil a love of the language for all students and the curriculum is designed to inspire students to continue speaking the language after leaving school. We believe that reinventing the way we teach Irish will encourage more students to study the language and engage with it beyond the school system. We believe compulsion has not fostered growth or commitment to the language. We will overhaul the curriculum at second level and we will critically examine the effect of current training methods of teachers to teach. Irish as an optional subject for Leaving Certificate will only apply following consultations on both matters.We will allocate 50% of marks to oral Irish exams.A study on a double curriculum to Leaving Cert will be investigated, one on the current system and a second in communicating Irish. The questions of extra points for third level entry will be investigated.Fine Gael will double the proportion of Irish students sitting the Higher Level Leaving Certificate exam by 2018.Job Creation in Gaeltacht Regions: Our NewERA and Working for Our Future plans will deliver new job creation prospects to Gaeltacht regions. We will invest in energy, broadband and water infrastructure, creating the modern infrastructure needed to attract and support new businesses and jobs. We will also strongly support the potential for jobs in tourism and marine activities.National Proficiency Scale: We will investigate the development of a national proficiency scale for the Irish language. This ten point scale would allow every citizen to have their competence assessed and use modern teaching methods and modern technology to gradually improve their proficiency at a pace that suits themselves.Islands: We are committed to sustaining communities on the islands and will work to improve access to vital services for the islands so that island communities have appropriate access to health care and other social services.Official Languages Act: Fine Gael will review the obligations under the Official Languages Act to ensure expenditure on the language is best targeted towards the development of the language.An GhaeilgeTá Fine Gael go láidir ar son forbairt na Gaeilge agus na gceantracha Gaeltachta.Aithnímid luach agus tábhacht cultúrtha ár dtraidisiúin Ghaelaigh agus ár n-oidhreachta agus táimid diongbháilte go bhfuilimid chun a chinntiú go mairfidh agus go mbeidh borradh ar an teanga agus ar na ceantracha Gaeltachta.Straitéis Náisiúnta: Táimid ag tacú le mórán gnéithe den straitéis fiche bliain do thodhchaí na Gaeilge agus tabharfaimid i gcrích na spriocanna gur féidir agus na haidhmeanna atá curtha chun tosaigh.Oideachas: Tacaíonn Fine Gael le forbairt leanúnach na nGaelscoileanna agus aithníonn sé an ról suntasach atá ag gluaiseacht na nGaelscoileanna in athbheochaint na Gaeilge taobh istigh agus taobh amuigh dena ceantracha Gaeltachta. Chomh maith le sin, oibreoimid lena Coláistí Samhraidh chun níos mó scoláirí a mhealladh go dtí an Ghaeltacht.





    Now, It seams to me that this suggests that FG intend to make Irish optional after a Consultation,

    However Deputy Creed assures me that the Subject will be reformed first, while it is still compulsory, and then there will be discussion on making it optional with the various stakeholders after verifaible results are seen.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.


    Dont misrepresent what I have said.

    People will base their choices on the reality of the Points system. Irish has a terrible curriculum that is literature heavy.

    I wouldent choose it for the LC in its current form.
    Quite a lot. The FG proposals can be interpreted as an extension of the Language Freedom Movement, which forced the government (among other things) to revoke the rule which said that if you failed Irish, you failed your entire Leaving Cert. Making Irish optional is just the next step in language freedom.

    The LFM ceased to exist long ago. Get with the times. FG are backtracking fast from their position anyway.

    From making Irish optional across second level in 2005 to a consultation after which Irish may be made optional for the LC in a generation or two.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,019 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.

    What struggle? More importantly, Who's struggle?

    And where do you get the "generation or two"?

    Fine Gael manifesto:



    They could have consultations the week after they form a government. Irish could be an optional subject for incoming LC students by the autumn.


    I get it from Michael Creed TD.
    Fine Gael Candidate for Cork North West has made an assurance that Irish will not be removed as compulsory language for the leaving certificate for a generation or two.

    Michael Creed TD, Website


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,019 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.


    Ok, So how about a Cosmopolitan, modern, liberal, Bilingual Ireland? Would that be a problem for you?

    What DeV or the Church has to do with Ireland in 2011 is beyond me,
    I think its quite sad that you have to use such strawman exagerations to try to support your arguments.:rolleyes:


    Curiously, the FG manifesto says nothing whatsoever about "a generation or two." Is Mr Creed authorized to make definitive pronouncements about the party's intentions?


    Well he is a member of the Parlimentary Party, I doubt he would go around making announcments on his website if they were against his pary's line.


    This is what his advisor E-Mailed to me:
    The Deputy understands that the obligatory status of the subject will only be removed after the entire subject is overhauled and verifiable results are to be seen. Then we will enter into consultation with all stakeholders on its status.

    I think that he should be in a position to understand FG policy, dont you?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,019 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 634 ✭✭✭Euroland


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.

    +100%, agree


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.


    Sorry, but 'Fascistic' hardly applys to Ireland in the 30's By comparrision to most countries in Europe, Ireland was not facistic at all.
    But feel free to keep up the name calling regardless of facts, they do your arguments justice.:rolleyes:


    Classic wording. Maybe the Deputy misunderstands.

    "We have turned a corner." Sound familiar? :)

    I think Depuity Creed has a fairly accurate picture of the Situation, More so than you and your 'Freedom Movement' anyway.:)

    RTE.ie
    Fine Gael leader Enda Kenny said that his party is to conduct an 'audit' of the curriculum and the structure of the curriculum and that the proposed policy will not be implemented until after the completion of such an audit.

    The party also propose to examine the points structure for Irish in the leaving and plan to look at introducing a new subject ' Gaeilge agus Cumarsáid', according to Mr Kenny.


    The second Bit is even more interesting if you ask me, As it relates closly to the reforms proposed by CnaG.
    That is, Irish should be split into two subjects.

    CnaG
    Go bhforbrófaí dhá shiollabas don Ghaeilge ag an dara leibhéal le dhá pháipéar scrúdaithe ar leith don Ardteist agus don Teastas Sóisearach, Teanga na Gaeilge a mhúinfí do gach mac léinn agus Litríocht na Gaeilge le déanamh ag gach mac léinn ardleibhéil.


    For 'Teanga na Gaeilge' see 'Gaeilge agus Cumarsáid'


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,359 ✭✭✭cyclopath2001


    What DeV or the Church has to do with Ireland in 2011 is beyond me
    Strange thing to say for someone who wants to restore the past.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,019 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    Strange thing to say for someone who wants to restore the past.


    Thats not true Cyclopath, Try to keep up:rolleyes:


    If the best argument you can come up with against promoting the Irish language is that we are trying to 'restore the past', then you are really scraping the end of the barrel.

    Your attitude to the Irish language however is firmly in the past.:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.

    More name calling, keep it up, You are doing your argument wounders, LOL.:rolleyes:

    Nice crystal ball you have there. Surely you should be buzy predicting the Lotto results or something?

    Who exactly will celebrate? The population who time and again support the language? I dont think so.



    I deduce that it wont be for a generation or two because that is what a member of th FG parlimentary Party has written on His Personal Website. You can claim that he is lying, but you would look a fool.



    You opinion is in the vast minority, accept that and move on with your life.


    Ar aon nós, Slán libh. Táim ag dul abhaile.:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,019 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,359 ✭✭✭cyclopath2001


    Thats not true Cyclopath, Try to keep up:rolleyes:
    It is indeed true, you and your mates in CnaG want to restore or reinstate a language that was, in the past the common language here. The words 'restore' and 'reinstate', are your own translation and mean, 'to go back'.
    If the best argument you can come up with against promoting the Irish language is that we are trying to 'restore the past'
    I see nothing nothing wrong with promoting the Irish language as long as you use your own money and don't force others to speak it against their will.

    I find it very strange that you ignore the gaeltachtanna (being totally unaware of an important report on the decline of Irish there), you dismiss the Church (part of our heritage), you say de Valera (a huge fan of Irish) is not relevant in 2011 and yet you passionately want to restore a version of Irish as Ireland's common language, to be spoken by everyone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 459 ✭✭Focalbhach


    ...you passionately want to restore a version of Irish as Ireland's common language, to be spoken by everyone.

    Disregarding the inanities in the rest of your post, Deise has categorically stated on numerous occasions that the position you ascribe to him here is untrue. Yet you claim it on his behalf again and again. Serious question: why are you pretending to 'discuss' anything in this thread when you only seem to be interested in having a two-way conversation with yourself?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,463 ✭✭✭marienbad


    Leto wrote: »
    Disregarding the inanities in the rest of your post, Deise has categorically stated on numerous occasions that the position you ascribe to him here is untrue. Yet you claim it on his behalf again and again. Serious question: why are you pretending to 'discuss' anything in this thread when you only seem to be interested in having a two-way conversation with yourself?

    The same applies to everyone else on this thread ! The only thing we can agree on is that language policy in this country has failed . Yet compulsion , which is inextricably bound up with that failure is ring-fenced and is not even open for genuine debate by those in the language lobby.

    kettle pot and black springs to mind


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 459 ✭✭Focalbhach


    marienbad wrote: »
    The same applies to everyone else on this thread !

    No, it doesn't. There are plenty of differing perspectives on this thread, and plenty of differing interpretations of the same facts/'facts'. I don't expect everyone to see eye to eye (what would be the point if they did?), and disagreements are welcome. I would differ with a lot of posters here on a lot of points, but for the most part I don't doubt their sincerity.

    I do doubt cyclopath's sincerity. Fabricating another contributor's position deliberately and repeatedly, in the face of constant correction, is not disagreement. It's dishonest, childish, ignorant and rude.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,463 ✭✭✭marienbad


    Leto wrote: »
    No, it doesn't. There are plenty of differing perspectives on this thread, and plenty of differing interpretations of the same facts/'facts'. I don't expect everyone to see eye to eye (what would be the point if they did?), and disagreements are welcome. I would differ with a lot of posters here on a lot of points, but for the most part I don't doubt their sincerity.

    I do doubt cyclopath's sincerity. Fabricating another contributor's position deliberately and repeatedly, in the face of constant correction, is not disagreement. It's dishonest, childish, ignorant and rude.

    Well it depends on how you read it then, with just a few exception across the (at least) three threads currently going on this issue I have found little or no tolerance for anyone with a different view and certainly no willingness to even try and understand that view. Just a constant hiding behind statistics and surveys .


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    marienbad wrote: »
    The same applies to everyone else on this thread ! The only thing we can agree on is that language policy in this country has failed . Yet compulsion , which is inextricably bound up with that failure is ring-fenced and is not even open for genuine debate by those in the language lobby.

    kettle pot and black springs to mind

    I have no problem with open and genuine debate. So far no one has put forward a convincing argument that shows that Compulsion is inextricably bound up with the failure.

    I believe that the poor curriculum is the root cause of the failure, and that reforming the curriculum is the solution to the problem.

    Now, why am I wrong in this? Show me why it is compulsion that is at fault.
    (without just saying that things that are compulsory inevitably cause resentment)


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement