Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Double Standards

12357

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,289 ✭✭✭parker kent


    Reward wrote: »
    Parker Kent, your opinion is that I'm moronic, ignorant and talking rubbish, seemingly because you don't understand the origin or meaning of the man bad, woman good mantra that permeates our culture, you are not trying to debate or contribute to the conversation. You are just attacking something that you have not heard about straight off the bat, then in your next post you claim that I'm the one that wont accept other opinions. Ironic on a thread entitled double standards, no?

    How exactly do you know what I have or have not heard of before this thread? How do you know anything that I have studied in my degree or 2 masters? How do you know what I have studied on my own accord? You do not know what I understand, so please stop trying to insinuate that I am lacking knowledge. It is a tiresome tactic of yours when people disagree with you in threads such as this. The same way it is tiresome to claim to know what I think.

    I am not attacking this straight off the bat. It is not as if this is the first thread you have raised these issues. Several people have tried to engage with you on these subjects but you continually rehash the same opinions and the same websites. A first year information literacy student could tell you that some of the links you provide are extremely dubious. The ever decreasing circles that people can enter on the Internet mean that people can easily read websites and articles that only agree with their opinion. This leads to a myopic viewpoint. You offer zero balance in your arguments. It is all one sided and speaking in generalizations. Feminists think this, women think that etc.

    And that is all I will contribute to this topic.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 390 ✭✭Reward


    Look nobody is saying that there are no examples of misandry in the media or society. If you actually read the thread there are several references to such behaviour (including my post which you recently quoted). However, it is nonsensical to suggest that it as severe as you claim.

    Well imagine the conversation about men on Loose Women, change the characters. Make the targets Jews or black people for example and see if it changes your opinion... a very popular tv show that has a strong racist theme running through it, women claping and cheering as black people or Jews are put down and mocked on a daily basis?

    So, if in your perspective its all of a sudden different or more serious because its racist or anti-semitic, chances are that you are blind to misandry or even buy into it because its so accepted and normal in the culture and thats why you find what I'm saying nonsensical.

    And please stop with the personalised attacks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,950 ✭✭✭iptba


    Look nobody is saying that there are no examples of misandry in the media or society. If you actually read the thread there are several references to such behaviour (including my post which you recently quoted). However, it is nonsensical to suggest that it as severe as you claim.
    Some people might say that there is little misogyny in the media now. Others might then say people aren't looking closely enough or need to look at the issue in another way.

    Given the lack of focus on misandry in our education system, and more generally lack of focus and research on "men's studies" and how men are portrayed, it could well be the case that people miss things that other people spot.

    It could of course be the case that a lot of the claimed misandry isn't misandry.

    Just like with how much misogyny there is in the world, it's not an exact science how much misandry there might be and it seems reasonable to me that people can suggest that some goes unnoticed. And especially it seems (if people don't take over too many threads, aren't too aggressive towards individuals, etc) that they should have the freedom to do so.

    Reward was pretty full on last time. Hopefully this time, he won't put so many hours in over a short period.

    And hopefully the focus can remain on points rather than posters.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,925 ✭✭✭Otis Driftwood


    Reward banned for 2 weeks for once again trying to derail threads with his own agenda.From now on there is a zero tolerance for this kind of crap as warnings clearly dont work.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16 Natasha_


    DarkJager wrote: »
    I know this is a topic visited many times here, but todays sacking of Andy Gray for comments he made has got my blood boiling again.

    His comments (which by the way weren't even broadcast on air) have resulted in him losing his job. However, just watching TV this afternoon, I have seen 2 different "womens" chat shows making derogatory comments about men. This was on air, not some recorded conversation leaked afterwards. I just can't understand this and to me it shows what a complete and utter farce this anti-sexism **** is.

    The TV shows were debating about current issues. One of them managed to turn a topic which had nothing to do with genders into a 5 minute male bashing fest, with the cretinous hosts bawking at their own jokes about male stupidity. The other, decided to rip on males about "fashion choices" - something I'm sure none of us really give a **** about because we aren't as vain or clothes obsessed as the opposite sex.

    However, it got me thinking how pointless the sacking of Andy Gray actually is. Why was it done? To appease female viewers of Sky Sports? (which I'd be interested to know what majority they make up of its viewership). Already countless forums are being filled with pissed off sky subscription customers saying they will cancel because of this. Meanwhile, these ****ing self obsessed idiots are making a joke out of our gender for entertainment on afternoon tv shows.

    When do we say enough is enough? When do we start lodging complaints about dopey bints making snide remarks ON AIR, about our gender and then having a great old guffaw about it? It makes me worry that we, as men, are simply satisified to sit back and watch and allow this to happen, while someone like Andy Gray gets fired from his job over comments he didn't even make while the programme was being broadcast. We can't even have a ****ing advert for Hunky Dorys with female models because its sexist, yet we are treated to the sexist **** that is the RSA "He Drives, She Dies" advert year after year and are supposed to ****ing take it all in our stride?

    Are we ever to going to find the balls to call a halt to this sexist nonsense, or does society see us as having to be acceptant of taking this on the chin and going on with life? Are we now supposed to suffer humilation as a gender now because people who aren't even breathing anymore, gave women a hard time before we were even born? I find myself getting more and more infuriated with these double standards we allow to happen. I am sick to my teeth of watching this absolute bull**** carry on, without even a second glance from my gender.

    When does it stop lads? When do we start taking back our pride? I don't want to sound completely anti-female but the more I see this happen the more I can't hating their arrogance and societys blind eyes for allowing to them carry on with it.


    Just want to make sure I stay on topic here, so I'm bringing up the OP as a reminder ;)

    DarkJager, I think you're point is well taken when you ask:
    " Andy Gray gets fired from his job over comments he didn't even make while the programme was being broadcast. We can't even have a ****ing advert for Hunky Dorys with female models because its sexist, yet we are treated to the sexist **** that is the RSA "He Drives, She Dies" advert year after year and are supposed to ****ing take it all in our stride?"

    The double standard IS ridiculous....imagine if they televised something akin to Running Man and used minorities as contestants and encouraged the ruling class to cheer. That wouldn't fly would it? Why is it then, okay for men to be placed in the same postion? It's ludicrous


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,950 ✭✭✭iptba


    Letters in Irish Independent

    http://www.independent.ie/opinion/letters/law-still-making-an-ass-of-men-2514670.html
    Law still making an ass of men

    Friday January 28 2011

    The media is terrified of being seen as "sexist" so they avoid saying things like "I thought Andy Gray's comments were hardly a sacking offence and more of a storm in a teacup".

    But women are free to say anything they wish about men. Equality is all well and good, but it really cannot work when it's lopsided.

    Women say they can do everything men can. I can't claim to wear high heels or shake my lovely long blonde hair coquettishly . . . not properly anyway.

    On a more serious note, and where it matters most, the deference towards women finds its way into our legal family law system to the cost of most men, both financially and emotionally. A man loses everything -- so what? We're only crude men who are automatically guilty.

    The Gray affair is a microcosm of the appalling treatment meted out to men for something so trivial in this era of political correctness and false outrage.
    http://www.independent.ie/opinion/letters/feminazis-ignore-loose-women-2514667.html
    Friday January 28 2011

    Feminazis ignore 'Loose Women'

    The feminazis have made a successful mountain out of the Andy Gray sexism molehill.

    Of course, alleging that someone might be incapable of doing a job solely based on gender is absolutely wrong. So, when will the man-hating presenters on 'Loose Women' get the sack?

    Or is it only wrong when men do it?
    http://www.independent.ie/opinion/letters/even-women-grow-tired-of-pc-brigade-2514672.html
    Even women grow tired of PC brigade

    Friday January 28 2011

    Imagine, if you will, the shock and astonishment I felt when I was talking to a female friend who thought that the Sky Sports presenters being fired for expressing their personal opinions off air was an abhorrent act of political correctness.

    My respect for my friend has gone through the roof as I have finally found a woman who will stand up for what's right rather than what's PC.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,649 ✭✭✭✭CDfm


    I am always a bit wary of this type of topic.

    When have footballers been role models to the rest of us. They really havent.They are footballers ffs.

    IMHO - maybe Andy Gray is not PC but he was or is not employed to be PC and do footballers bitch and slag of match officials. Yup.

    As a double standard think Gerry Ryan - well known cocaine user protected by his peers.

    However, John Leslie springs to mind and an unproven allegation by Ulrika Johnson turned his world upside down.


    This was to prove prescient because in 2002 his world was turned upside down. Ulrika Jonsson, the television presenter, published her autobiography, in which she claimed she had been raped in a hotel room 15 years earlier when she was working as a weathergirl for TV-am.

    She did not name her attacker but said it was a well-known television presenter. Mr Leslie was outed by the show-business journalist turned television presenter Matthew Wright who named him live on air – apparently by mistake.
    Once the allegation became public a number of other women came forward alleging he attacked them and he was suspended from his £200,000 a year job.
    Police began an investigation and eventually Mr Leslie was charged with the two counts of indecent assault on a 23-year-old actress. No action was taken on claims by two other women, a weathergirl and a showbusiness agent.
    In August 2003, the case was dropped. New information was said to have been found and the judge told him he could leave "without a stain on his character".



    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2190441/John-Leslie-From-scandal-hit-celebrity-to-obscure-property-developer.html


    Ulrika wasn't harmed in any way and who knows what her agenda was.

    Then take this extract from Cosmopolitatan , probably one of the best selling womens magazines in the world against Jesse James
    An Open Letter to Jesse James' Fiancée

    January 20, 2011 at 8:40PM By Zoë Ruderman | 18 comments
    kat-von-d-012011-lar.jpeg
    Dear Kat Von D,
    We couldn't find a card that read, "Best wishes on becoming the fourth wife of a total asshole", so you'll have to accept our congratulations via this blog post instead.

    Read the entire blog post

    http://www.cosmopolitan.com/celebrity/news/jesse-james-kat-von-d-engaged



    When you start down the censorship route where do you stop.

    Well , maybe we should start with Grey's Anatomy and ban Dr McDreamy, Cougarville and Desperate Housewives , Cornation Street and Eastenders.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,950 ✭✭✭iptba


    Letter in the Sunday Times
    Everyone in the media is terrified of being seen as "sexist", so they avoid saying things such as "I thought Andy Gray's comments were hardly a sacking offence and more storm in a teacup". Women are free to say anything they wish about men, and opinion and sexism are treated as valid views which are never questioned. Equality is all well and good, but it really cannot work when it's lopsided and hysterical. When we see women on the men's rugby team or on the Cork senior football team, or shovelling concrete for eight hours, then we can say they are indeed equal to men in every way, albeit far cuter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,289 ✭✭✭parker kent


    The above letter contains a few red herrings. Is it really true that nobody would object to a woman saying something objectionable about a man? That reader's contribution is evidence enough that it is not true.

    Also, the line about there only being equality when they are all on the same teams/jobs is just facetious. It is a silly argument and is a pretty obvious way for the contributor to suggest men are better than women. But I'm sure people could suggest syncronised swimming as an example of a sport where men cannot compete. Does that make women better than men? There are other examples of sports where women can perform "better" than men.

    Just because our most popular sports tend to be ones suited to male strengths does not necessarily mean men are "better". Plus there will be plenty of women who are fitter and stronger than many men. What does that make the men they are stronger than?

    I also read this at the weekend. It was an interesting viewpoint of the difference in situations like the Andy Gray incident and a similar one with a woman. I don't agree with everything mentioned, but it is decent argument.
    Why is this kind of casual sexism so prevalent? According to Boycott, there is a sense that women "have got what we wanted" and it is true that the genders are now on a much more equal footing (although, in a country where there are still only four female cabinet members and a 10% pay gap, there is arguably still some way to go). "There is a perception that women have arrived, therefore we don't need to worry about it any more," says Boycott. "If you challenge sexism, you're regarded as an old-fashioned bluestocking."

    It is a perception underlined by the rush of (mostly male) cultural commentators who opined forcefully last week that men, not women, were now the true victims of sexual inequality. Columnist Giles Coren pointed out that women "are allowed to say the most terrible, terrible things" about their male counterparts and get away with it. Coren cited the example of comedian Jo Brand, who when recently asked what her favourite kind of man was, on Have I Got News For You, replied: "A dead one."

    But the difference between Jo Brand and Andy Gray is arguably the power structure around them. For all the progress that has been made over the last three decades, women remain on the back foot: the majority of chief executives, corporate board members, newspaper editors, politicians and, for that matter, comedians are male. And when men are in a position of such dominance their sexism carries deeply unpleasant undertones

    As I said earlier, there are many examples of sexism and unfair treatment towards both men and women. Modern men cannot be held accountable for past wrongs towards women. And modern women should not try and punish men for past wrongs. The same way that modern men should not try and repeat the mistakes of history. Both men and women face various issues that can make life difficult. I'm repeating myself, but I still think it is true. We should eliminate all such treatment and avoid the gender wars which get us nowhere. Two wrongs don't make a right and all that.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 6,391 Mod ✭✭✭✭Macha


    I'll just say that if those comments had been made about a black person, this level of debate would not be taking place.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,289 ✭✭✭parker kent


    Macha wrote: »
    I'll just say that if those comments had been made about a black person, this level of debate would not be taking place.

    Ron Atkinson and his comments about Marcel Desailly caused a similar level of debate.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 6,391 Mod ✭✭✭✭Macha


    Ron Atkinson and his comments about Marcel Desailly caused a similar level of debate.
    What I mean is that there wouldn't be so much debate about whether the comments were acceptable or not. I wouldn't be reading op-eds in newspapers or back-and-forths about whether calling someone a "f***ing lazy think n*gger" was OK or not.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,289 ✭✭✭parker kent


    Macha wrote: »
    What I mean is that there wouldn't be so much debate about whether the comments were acceptable or not. I wouldn't be reading op-eds in newspapers or back-and-forths about whether calling someone a "f***ing lazy think n*gger" was OK or not.

    Oh right, I misunderstood why you thought less debate would happen.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,950 ✭✭✭iptba


    We should eliminate all such treatment and avoid the gender wars which get us nowhere. Two wrongs don't make a right and all that.
    The word "gender war" often seems to come out when men complain or comment. How about all the writing, lecturing, grants etc that go on in educational institutions and other bodies on gender issues - that would seem to qualify much more as a gender war.

    It's a good way to get men to shut up to say their causing some sort of gender war. Men should be entitled to speak if they think there is a double standard; some people may get away with restricting freedom of speech to an extend in academia on gender issues and the like but fortunately it's still a free country.

    There are many ways to look at the world and for example employment. There are rules about equal pay now - people can take a case if they feel their is discrimination. Talking about a pay gap can be like comparing apples and oranges. It may be because there is greater pressure on men not just to get a job but to get a reasonably well-paid job. In return, more men are exposed to danger in the workplace, for example, as well as other trade offs. Warren Farrell explored the issue of the gender pay in "Why Men Earn More": http://www.warrenfarrell.net/Summary/ and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Farrell

    The world is more complicated than some feminists would have us believe. They may want to restrict our freedom of speech and say anyone who disagrees is calling for a gender war. But the same could equally be said about their focus on gender issues.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,029 ✭✭✭um7y1h83ge06nx


    I always find courses in "Women's Studies" sort of amusing.

    http://www.ul.ie/womensstudies/

    http://www.ucd.ie/werrc/
    Women's Studies is not simply the study of women and women's issues. It is the study of women that places women's own experiences at the centre of enquiry and looks at how gender is a fundamental structure in all societies.

    If it is about gender and how it is a fundamental structure (thought that would be a little obvious), why not call it "Men and Women Studies" or better still "Gender Studies". :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,029 ✭✭✭um7y1h83ge06nx


    Eamon Dunphy has waded in:

    http://www.independent.ie/national-news/elections/dunphy-hits-back-at-political-analyst-over-sexist-ageist-attack-on-rte-2520939.html
    BROADCASTER Eamon Dunphy has said he is still shocked by a "sexist and ageist attack" on him during a TV debate.

    The 64-year-old and fellow journalist Fintan O'Toole appeared on RTE's new TV debate show 'The Eleventh Hour' on Monday, alongside political analyst Elaine Byrne.

    She turned on her fellow guests for abandoning plans for a new party, telling them: "This just looks like more middle-aged angry men, who are telling us what the world should look like and then, they talk the talk and don't walk the walk."

    Mr Dunphy said: "She did an Andy Gray on us. What she said was sexist and ageist. In Sky TV, that would be a sackable offence."

    He also hit back during the on-air row, telling Ms Byrne: "If you have anger or passion you should direct it elsewhere."

    Defending herself, Ms Byrne, a TCD lecturer, said her comments "originated from a deep sense of disappointment".

    Eamon Dunphy spoke to the Irish Independent at Aviva Stadium, where he helped launch the 'Walk Of Dreams' fundraiser on March 27 for community football projects with George Hook and Johnny Giles.

    - Ken Sweeney Entertainment Editor


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 437 ✭✭wobzilla1


    They did an article in The Independent a day or two afterwards which had a list of so called "Sexist rants".
    They had Séan Connery's interview where he says it's sometimes ok to hit a woman in the list.
    Since when is it sexist to treat a woman the same as you'd treat a man?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 727 ✭✭✭bureau2009



    Sounds like men need to apologise, well........... for being male and for getting "old".

    I hope Elaine Byrne has a long hard think about her comments.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,925 ✭✭✭Otis Driftwood


    Jaysus we are scraping the bottom of the barrell when Eamon Dunphy wades in.


    The same Eamon Dunphy that referred to Cristiano Ronaldo as being a "poof ball" because he didnt like him as a footballer.

    :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,289 ✭✭✭parker kent


    Bit of a difference in what Elaine Byrne said and the Andy Gray/Richard Keys comments. Her comments were directed towards their non-action,not their age or gender. She was not saying they could not do something because they were men or old.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,950 ✭✭✭iptba


    Her comments were directed towards their non-action,not their age or gender.
    She did mention the gender of course:
    This just looks like more middle-aged angry men

    If somebody criticised a group saying:
    This just looks like more middle-aged angry women
    they could well be criticised for bringing in the people's gender.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,950 ✭✭✭iptba


    Macha wrote: »
    I'll just say that if those comments had been made about a black person, this level of debate would not be taking place.
    And if some of the negative things (or jokes) said about men were said about black people, the debate probably wouldn't happen either.

    That's why one could talk about double standards: are women's comments about men assessed to the same standard as men's comments about women.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Jaysus we are scraping the bottom of the barrell when Eamon Dunphy wades in

    I was gonna post Kevin Myers' thoughts on it all... :pac:

    In fairness to the guy, most of his article was making sense... then he ended it with a juvenile jab at women in general. His articles are like a decent movie ruined by a stupid twist at the end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,950 ✭✭✭iptba


    Galvasean wrote: »
    I was gonna post Kevin Myers' thoughts on it all... :pac:

    In fairness to the guy, most of his article was making sense... then he ended it with a juvenile jab at women in general. His articles are like a decent movie ruined by a stupid twist at the end.
    Here's the one (I presume) in case anyone is interested: http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/kevin-myers/kevin-myers-grisly-pseudofeminist-circus-being-played-out-in-murdochs-news-arena-is-beyond-all-parody-2518766.html


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 6,391 Mod ✭✭✭✭Macha


    iptba wrote: »
    And if some of the negative things (or jokes) said about men were said about black people, the debate probably wouldn't happen either.

    That's why one could talk about double standards: are women's comments about men assessed to the same standard as men's comments about women.
    I'm would agree. But an attempt to dismiss derogatory comments about women as has happend in the public debate, does no favours to the argument that derogatory comments about men should also not be acceptable.*

    *Context and situation is important for comments like these. Gray clearly didn't mean it in jest or ironically.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,289 ✭✭✭parker kent


    iptba wrote: »
    She did mention the gender of course:

    If somebody criticised a group saying:
    they could well be criticised for bringing in the people's gender.

    The context of her comment is very important. Given that I can read, I can obviously see she said middle aged men. But as I said in my post, their age and gender is not the issue. She is referring to non-action. I didn't think that really needed to be clarified.

    Context is crucial in all such debates.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,950 ✭✭✭iptba


    Given that I can read, I can obviously see she said middle aged men.
    Sometimes simply flipping things around can be useful i.e. replacing "men" for "women" and vice versa. This may not be the best example but I've noticed plenty of times where it would allow people to look differently at how the genders are discussed or treated.

    I think she looks like she was bringing in the gender with "more middle aged men" or at least, I could see why if one was on the receiving end one might feel that. The focus may not have been on that, but that doesn't mean it was no part of it or feel like it was no part of it. We already have the President making statements like men were the cause of the crisis we are in*. Men are sometimes talked about in negative ways even if people aren't taught about in courses the way people might focus on how women are talked about or portrayed; or put another way, we are sometimes told that more input from women is what is required (while these were "more middle aged men"). Which could be said to put concerns about the comments in some context. But probably not worth making a song and dance about her comments as if there was sexism in them, there wasn't much. Far worse things are said.

    *http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055884641


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,289 ✭✭✭parker kent


    iptba wrote: »
    Sometimes simply flipping things around can be useful i.e. replacing "men" for "women" and vice versa. This may not be the best example but I've noticed plenty of times where it would allow people to look differently at how the genders are discussed or treated.

    Again, it should be pretty obvious I would say the same were the sentence to say women instead. Which is why I stated that context is key to all such discussions.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,950 ✭✭✭iptba


    Again, it should be pretty obvious I would say the same were the sentence to say women instead. Which is why I stated that context is key to all such discussions.
    Just to point out that I was editing my last post when you posted.


Advertisement