Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Girl nine begged Please don't shoot me. [Dailymail reports on a US crime]

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,052 ✭✭✭winston82


    Muff_Daddy wrote: »
    A young defenseless girl is murdered in cold blood, and all anyone in this thread can do is take cheap shots at a media source......

    Words fail me.

    I agree that's terrible.

    The Internet, serious business.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 760 ✭✭✭seafood dunleavy


    scumbags


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 299 ✭✭Metallergy


    crazy bitch :( just another mad redneck with a grudge, taking their law in their hands.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,287 ✭✭✭davyjose


    Nodin wrote: »
    ...as a number of people will not entertain a story from that particular rag, yes, it most certainly is.

    I just think it's a little worrying that some people are so immune to the content of the story, they're more concerned about who published it.

    We've established via other sources that the story is true.

    I find it heartbreaking to read a lot of the tragic and cruel stories that pop up on this forum, it really gets me down sometimes. But it could be worse, I could find myself more concerned about the journalistic standards of the Daily fcuking Mail.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,902 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    It is to be noted that whilst the Daily Mail article is not inaccurate, it does seem to omit a fairly interesting detail which the CBS article notes.
    The Arizona Daily Star reports that there have been some discrepancies in the statements Gonzalez has made to investigators - reportedly telling them the woman who invaded her home was a brunette, when Forde is blonde. She also claimed that some items of jewelry found in the possession of the suspects had belonged to her, but one bracelet she said was stolen from her home was apparently purchased by a suspect on eBay.

    NTM


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,575 ✭✭✭✭FlutterinBantam


    davyjose wrote: »
    I just think it's a little worrying that some people are so immune to the content of the story, they're more concerned about who published it.

    We've established via other sources that the story is true.

    I find it heartbreaking to read a lot of the tragic and cruel stories that pop up on this forum, it really gets me down sometimes. But it could be worse, I could find myself more concerned about the journalistic standards of the Daily fcuking Mail.


    Don't worry Davy, some contributors are ,regretfully, like the leopard, no matter what the issue, can't change their spots.

    Lots of leopards in these here parts, I'm afraid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,661 ✭✭✭General Zod


    Someone's been watching The Shield too much.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,661 ✭✭✭General Zod


    Don't worry Davy, some contributors are ,regretfully, like the leopard, no matter what the issue, can't change their spots.

    Lots of leopards in these here parts, I'm afraid.
    http://www.livescience.com/animals/060808_leopard_spots.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,512 ✭✭✭BigDuffman


    Irregardless of source, the facts are the same no matter what rag it is printed on. 9 year old begging for her life then gunned down in cold blood, by murdering white thrash scumbags.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Don't worry Davy, some contributors are ,regretfully, like the leopard, no matter what the issue, can't change their spots.

    Lots of leopards in these here parts, I'm afraid.

    O look, Flutters posted another barely coded insult as an aside to another member....never seen that happen before...no sir....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    Nodin wrote: »
    O look, Flutters posted another barely coded insult as an aside to another member....never seen that happen before...no sir....

    I think you have seen it happen before, fairly adept at it yourself ;):pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,331 ✭✭✭RichieC


    It is to be noted that whilst the Daily Mail article is not inaccurate, it does seem to omit a fairly interesting detail which the CBS article notes.



    NTM

    Jesus how would a women after being shot and seeing her husband and child murdered make a mistake like that..

    also, she's a brunette in the picture on the daily mail.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,038 ✭✭✭jackiebaron


    BigDuffman wrote: »
    Irregardless of source, the facts are the same no matter what rag it is printed on. 9 year old begging for her life then gunned down in cold blood, by murdering white thrash scumbags.


    Sorry BDM, but the word is "regardless" ...either that or use "irrespective".

    And yeah, I agree.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,331 ✭✭✭RichieC


    Sorry BDM, but the word is "regardless" ...either that or use "irrespective".

    And yeah, I agree.

    It's informal, but correct.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 67 ✭✭barnaclebill


    The Mail is a vermon infested publication.. end


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,575 ✭✭✭✭FlutterinBantam


    :eek:

    We got another one here..........................


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,902 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    RichieC wrote: »
    Jesus how would a women after being shot and seeing her husband and child murdered make a mistake like that

    Fortunately, you're not the prosecution. You'd have just discredited any testimony by your own witness. If she could be wrong about that, what else could she be wrong about?
    Irregardless of source

    <sigh>
    It's informal, but correct.

    It shows in the dictionary, but is considered dialectical, not correct. For example, the American Merriam-Webster's entry says "Use 'regardless' instead.

    Or from the UK, Oxforddictionaries.com, "The word dates back to the 19th century, but is regarded as incorrect in standard English"

    NTM


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,331 ✭✭✭RichieC


    Fortunately, you're not the prosecution. You'd have just discredited any testimony by your own witness. If she could be wrong about that, what else could she be wrong about?



    <sigh>



    It shows in the dictionary, but is considered dialectical, not correct. For example, the American Merriam-Webster's entry says "Use 'regardless' instead.

    Or from the UK, Oxforddictionaries.com, "The word dates back to the 19th century, but is regarded as incorrect in standard English"

    NTM

    like I said, informal.

    your not one of these are you?
    http://www.justiceforshawnaforde.com/


  • Posts: 81,308 CMod ✭✭✭✭ Joziah Purring Goggles


    RichieC wrote: »
    like I said, informal.

    your not one of these are you?
    http://www.justiceforshawnaforde.com/

    If it were a word it would mean "regarding"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Don't worry Davy, some contributors are ,regretfully, like the leopard, no matter what the issue, can't change their spots.
    Indeed - e.g. you.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement