Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Mary Hanafin on Frontline tonight .. Quote: "There will always be jobs for teachers"

  • 18-01-2011 12:00AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 281 ✭✭


    Please .... please somebody wake her up! :eek: I have no words. Fas scheme teachers, freeze on teaching jobs, immigration our only option .... I am appalled. Utterly.


«13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,939 ✭✭✭goat2


    i too wish she would wake up, i have a child without a full time position, after keeping her in college with the past four yrs, she is a qualified teacher now, what good is it to her, no job, future looking bleak


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 281 ✭✭Rodar08


    I'm the very same, it's awful. I have a mortgage too which seemed like a good idea at the time. The S&S system where permanent teachers cover classes that before subs were called in for is another joke. Paying people who already have jobs extra to sub during their free classes?! I used to get almost 4 days a week subbing, sometimes 5 only a couple of years ago. Now I'm lucky to get 2 days a month. It's a disgrace. The whole thing is unbelievable. I feel for you and your child.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,567 ✭✭✭delta_bravo


    Well in her mind there is. She has a guaranteed post waiting for her if she doesn't win her seat. As does Enda Kenny and a few other teachers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 281 ✭✭Rodar08


    Oh my god are you serious? Who is filling those positions now? Did they take sabaticals or something? If so then suppose there's nothing we can say but if not they should be made go to the back of the line with the rest of us. Outrage all of this. I feel my hands are being cuffed behind my back. I feel betrayed or something. Gagged, blindfolded, hands tied and being shoved on a plane outta the country. They're a crowd of ********


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 119 ✭✭loveroflight


    anyone feel like they are the donkey in animal farm?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 281 ✭✭Rodar08


    Well anything that anyone has done so far has made no difference and brought no change. They carry on making things harder for us and I don't see how I can do anything about it other than voting in the election ... if that's what you mean?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,812 ✭✭✭✭evolving_doors


    Hmm maybe she meant politicians holding teachers positions,,, always seems to be a position there for them!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 909 ✭✭✭gaeilgebeo


    Rodar08 wrote: »
    I'm the very same, it's awful. I have a mortgage too which seemed like a good idea at the time. The S&S system where permanent teachers cover classes that before subs were called in for is another joke. Paying people who already have jobs extra to sub during their free classes?! I used to get almost 4 days a week subbing, sometimes 5 only a couple of years ago. Now I'm lucky to get 2 days a month. It's a disgrace. The whole thing is unbelievable. I feel for you and your child.

    It is not the fault of permanent teachers that you are not getting SnS.
    It is simply another cut by the Dept.
    It makes a lot more financial sense to do it this way.
    It is more expensive to pay a sub by the hour than to pay a lump sum to a permanent teacher(which is no great amount!
    I would prefer see this happen than see anymore cuts to the already overstretched budgets in schools.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 281 ✭✭Rodar08


    gaeilgebeo wrote: »
    It is not the fault of permanent teachers that you are not getting SnS.
    It is simply another cut by the Dept.
    It makes a lot more financial sense to do it this way.
    It is more expensive to pay a sub by the hour than to pay a lump sum to a permanent teacher(which is no great amount!
    I would prefer see this happen than see anymore cuts to the already overstretched budgets in schools.

    I'm not saying it's the teachers fault. I do however think there is something wrong when so many are unemployed and those with salaries and perm. positions feel they need to sign up for extra work that could be given to those unemployed. Also, I would obviously rather a better situation than more cuts to the already overstretched budgets in schools, but, why should it be on the back of me and other unemployed like me rather than those who are already sorted in terms of income, employment and security?? ... and as a matter of interest ... do you know what the 'no great amount' is??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 909 ✭✭✭gaeilgebeo


    Rodar08 wrote: »
    I'm not saying it's the teachers fault. I do however think there is something wrong when so many are unemployed and those with salaries and perm. positions feel they need to sign up for extra work that could be given to those unemployed. Also, I would obviously rather a better situation than more cuts to the already overstretched budgets in schools, but, why should it be on the back of me and other unemployed like me rather than those who are already sorted in terms of income, employment and security?? ... and as a matter of interest ... do you know what the 'no great amount' is??

    So the dept. is better off paying a sub €50.34 per hour than paying staff 2 lump sums which costs a fraction of what a sub would cost?
    I don't want to come across as unsympathetic, but we have to be realistic about things.
    We've faced cut after cut in schools and are really seeing the effects of it this year.
    If we can save money on something as basic as supervision, then so be it.
    The majority of teachers in my school who do SnS are in no way "sorted" or "secure".
    A lot of teachers live contract to contract ,on very few hours, for years.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,380 ✭✭✭sitstill


    I can assure you that after all the deductions, the lump sums we get for S&S are so reduced as to make the scheme not worth opting into. However I think that it's for the better of my school that as many teachers are in it. Covering classes is much easier when there is a list of available teachers already in the building with nothing else to do instead of ringing around subs who may or may not be free.


    That said, Hanafin's statement is outrageous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 127 ✭✭MonkeyDoo


    I had to laugh when she said "there would always be jobs for teachers" given the demographics.

    Is this the great FF plan, everybody in the country teach? The next bubble is probably going to be education!

    There are over 30 TD's that are teachers and lecturers in the Dail.

    Even the next Taoiseach and finance minister will be teachers...

    Lets all be teachers take up Politics as a hobby on our summer hols and get all our former students to vote for us by giving them A's.

    Ohh...and if I lose my TD job I can walk right back into my old teaching job as it's protected under Irish law...

    Let me apply for the HDip right away....safe as houses...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,784 ✭✭✭#15


    MonkeyDoo wrote: »
    I had to laugh when she said "there would always be jobs for teachers" given the demographics.

    Is this the great FF plan, everybody in the country teach?

    Clearly not, going by the amount of unemployed teachers out there.

    How can you fall for such rubbish?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 281 ✭✭Rodar08


    gaeligeBeo I can see your point, yes it would be cheaper but look at my situation for an example of why this is not working for a lot of people. My example is how it is for many throughout the country length and breadth.

    5th year in the same school working as a sub. Once had 4 sometimes 5 days a week. S&S system was put in to force and now I am lucky if I get 2 or 3 days a month. The teachers doing it are not on a few hours a week with temporary contracts for years. They are permanent.

    I was told that in order to be included in the S&S scheme you had to be permanent or on a contract, therefore I am not eligible as I am a mere sub now only able to be employed when a sick cert is handed in by the teacher absent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,758 ✭✭✭eastbono


    My daughter is teaching in the Uk as are a lot of her peers. There are teaching jobs available in the UK and some councils will even pay your re-location costs... this is just one option for unemployed teacher graduates. And its not that far from home as opposed to Oz, NS, US and Canada where a lot of our graduates are going.

    Money isnt as good in Uk as here for teaching but cost of living is less and teachers can also avail of school lunches which are very very cheap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 127 ✭✭MonkeyDoo


    #15 wrote: »
    Clearly not, going by the amount of unemployed teachers out there.

    How can you fall for such rubbish?

    You missed..the sarcasm "#15"

    It's just it's hard for teachers to blame the government when there are so many teachers in government!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 281 ✭✭Rodar08


    Correction Monkeydoo ... I think you mean 'so many DUMBASS teachers in government' :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,567 ✭✭✭delta_bravo


    MonkeyDoo wrote: »

    There are over 30 TD's that are teachers and lecturers in the Dail.

    Is it that high?

    Theres Enda Kenny, Mary Hanafin, Noel Dempsey, Batt O'Keeffe and Michael Martin I think. Who are the others?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 127 ✭✭MonkeyDoo


    Is it that high?

    Theres Enda Kenny, Mary Hanafin, Noel Dempsey, Batt O'Keeffe and Michael Martin I think. Who are the others?

    I'm afraid it goes that high delta_bravo, if you include college lecturers too

    here is spreadsheet of TD's professions before their cushy number in the dail...it's not my work I just found it online

    https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0ArtXDGF50fODdFpKMXk1VHE0VFVlcmhYUFlfQmpsX2c&hl=en&authkey=CNq4xtwH#gid=0


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 127 ✭✭MonkeyDoo


    Rodar08 wrote: »
    Correction Monkeydoo ... I think you mean 'so many DUMBASS teachers in government' :D

    Ha ha!

    Those who can do...
    Those who can't teach....

    Those who can't teach...get into politics (of course keeping their full time teaching post until they get turfed out by the electorate)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,567 ✭✭✭delta_bravo


    MonkeyDoo wrote: »
    I'm afraid it goes that high delta_bravo, if you include college lecturers too

    here is spreadsheet of TD's professions before their cushy number in the dail...it's not my work I just found it online

    https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0ArtXDGF50fODdFpKMXk1VHE0VFVlcmhYUFlfQmpsX2c&hl=en&authkey=CNq4xtwH#gid=0

    I doubt all those listed as teachers would have served long enough time to get the right to take a permanent sabbatical. I doubt Brian Hayes or Mary Harney taught much, probably very briefly. It would be interested to research how many are availing of the scheme. It seems to be a common belief that FF is the publican party but there seems to be far more teachers. Even stranger considering their current education policies.

    The SF occupations were rather funny:

    Ferris: "Hardware Importer"
    O Caolan: "Bank Official" :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,142 ✭✭✭M three


    Rodar08 wrote: »
    I'm the very same, it's awful. I have a mortgage too which seemed like a good idea at the time. The S&S system where permanent teachers cover classes that before subs were called in for is another joke. Paying people who already have jobs extra to sub during their free classes?! I used to get almost 4 days a week subbing, sometimes 5 only a couple of years ago. Now I'm lucky to get 2 days a month. It's a disgrace. The whole thing is unbelievable. I feel for you and your child.

    Well believe it and quit moaning. Maybe both you and mary hanafin need to cop on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 281 ✭✭Rodar08


    Eehh .. M Three are you seriously telling me to cop on??


    :D:D:D:D:D you're the craic!! lol


    Care to elaborate? What would you like me to cop on to? The fact that the government has made it impossible for teachers to get a job?? Mmm!! Maybe it's YOU M Three that needs to COP ON


    If you've nothing worthwhile to ad then don't bother adding anything at all. Ciao :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,784 ✭✭✭#15


    MonkeyDoo wrote: »
    It's just it's hard for teachers to blame the government when there are so many teachers in government!

    That doesn't make sense.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 134 ✭✭EoghanRua


    Rodar08 wrote: »
    Please .... please somebody wake her up! :eek: I have no words. Fas scheme teachers, freeze on teaching jobs, immigration our only option .... I am appalled. Utterly.


    What's the deal? Mary Hanafin is right, there will always be jobs for teachers (unless they stop education altogether which seems unlikely).

    What she did not say (assuming your quote is accurate) is that anyone qualifying as a teacher will never have to emigrate (not 'immigrate' by the way) or that irrespective of the economic situation goverment will keep employing extra teachers, or that every teacher is going to enjoy some utopian scenario in their careers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,937 ✭✭✭implausible


    Rodar08 wrote: »
    5th year in the same school working as a sub. Once had 4 sometimes 5 days a week. S&S system was put in to force and now I am lucky if I get 2 or 3 days a month. The teachers doing it are not on a few hours a week with temporary contracts for years. They are permanent.

    5 years subbing in the one school and they've never given you some of your own hours?:eek: In fairness, relying on that kind of work in one school was never going to be a runner, regardless of the s/s scheme. S/S seems a minor thing to get annoyed about, as there are far more serious cuts and employment problems out there.

    In fairness, Mary Hanafin is technically right and it plays to the public's perception - there will always be children to teach; ergo there will always be teachers required. She has conveniently left out the existing backlog of unemployed teachers:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,939 ✭✭✭goat2


    maybe she meant there would always be jobs for those who are teachers who are now in government, did they give up their positions as teachers, if not there are subs keeping their positions open until they lose their seats and return to the classrooms


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 127 ✭✭MonkeyDoo


    Well said goat2, the question Hanifin dodged was about the jobs crisis not teachers.

    She then said there would always be jobs for teachers...she almost encouraged everyone at home to 'go get a job in teaching' But who is going to pay teachers salaries if the number of private sector tax payers are shinking due to unemployment and emmigration.

    The statement 'there will always be jobs for teachers' is not going to fix the countrys jobs crisis. It just demonstates the lack of talent in today's politics.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 4,635 Mod ✭✭✭✭dory


    MonkeyDoo wrote: »
    I'm afraid it goes that high delta_bravo, if you include college lecturers too

    here is spreadsheet of TD's professions before their cushy number in the dail...it's not my work I just found it online

    https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0ArtXDGF50fODdFpKMXk1VHE0VFVlcmhYUFlfQmpsX2c&hl=en&authkey=CNq4xtwH#gid=0

    Mary Coughlan: Charity work (briefly) and amateur evolutionary physicist???

    Is that a joke?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 134 ✭✭EoghanRua


    dory wrote: »
    Mary Coughlan: Charity work (briefly) and amateur evolutionary physicist???

    Is that a joke?


    I don't think the source is credible. Produced by malcontents for malcontents I would say.


Advertisement