Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Climate Change Bill

«13456

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,980 ✭✭✭meglome


    mgmt wrote: »
    The Greens are staying in government to launch a kamikaze attack on the remnants of the Irish economy. This climate change bill will ruin us. They want to bring us back to the economic output levels of 1990. AGW is a scam of the highest order. Has the Greens asked the Sun what temperature the Earth is supposed to be?



    http://www.oireachtas.ie/documents/committees30thdail/j-climate_change/reports_2008/20101015.pdf

    So let's see...

    The chairman of the committee Dinny McGinley... evil Green... no wait a member of Fine Gael. A big thanks you to Liz McManus... evil green... no wait Labour.

    In fact of the whole committee...
    Dinny McGinley TD (FG)
    Bobby Aylward TD (FF)
    Joe Behan TD (IND)
    Simon Coveney TD (FG)
    Andrew Doyle TD (FG)
    Martin Ferris TD (SF)
    Michael Fitzpatrick TD (FF) (Vice‐Chairman)
    Seán Fleming TD (FF)
    Phil Hogan TD (FG)
    Finian McGrath TD (IND)
    Liz McManus (LAB)
    Trevor Sargent (GP)
    Mary Wallace (FF)
    Paudie Coffey (FG)
    Fiona O’Malley (PD)
    Ned O’Sullivan (FF)
    Joe O’Toole (IND)

    ...there is one Green party member. Will those evil 'Greens' ever stop.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 425 ✭✭barrackali


    mgmt wrote: »
    The Greens are staying in government to launch a kamikaze attack on the remnants of the Irish economy. This climate change bill will ruin us. They want to bring us back to the economic output levels of 1990. AGW is a scam of the highest order. Has the Greens asked the Sun what temperature the Earth is supposed to be?



    http://www.oireachtas.ie/documents/committees30thdail/j-climate_change/reports_2008/20101015.pdf

    Even though I think the Greens have been a disaster in government, I do think you might be slightly over overreacting.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,361 ✭✭✭mgmt


    meglome wrote: »
    So let's see...

    The chairman of the committee Dinny McGinley... evil Green... no wait a member of Fine Gael. A big thanks you to Liz McManus... evil green... no wait Labour.

    In fact of the whole committee...
    Dinny McGinley TD (FG)
    Bobby Aylward TD (FF)
    Joe Behan TD (IND)
    Simon Coveney TD (FG)
    Andrew Doyle TD (FG)
    Martin Ferris TD (SF)
    Michael Fitzpatrick TD (FF) (Vice‐Chairman)
    Seán Fleming TD (FF)
    Phil Hogan TD (FG)
    Finian McGrath TD (IND)
    Liz McManus (LAB)
    Trevor Sargent (GP)
    Mary Wallace (FF)
    Paudie Coffey (FG)
    Fiona O’Malley (PD)
    Ned O’Sullivan (FF)
    Joe O’Toole (IND)

    ...there is one Green party member. Will those evil 'Greens' ever stop.

    The greens are keeping the government up just to pass this.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,361 ✭✭✭mgmt


    barrackali wrote: »
    Even though I think the Greens have been a disaster in government, I do think you might be slightly over overreacting.

    NO.

    How am I overreacting when the government places a bull**** tax on a natural gas?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,892 ✭✭✭spank_inferno


    mgmt wrote: »
    They want to bring us back to the economic output levels of 1990.

    At best this comment is misleading.... I consider it a trolling lie.
    And I think you know very well OP that this is not the case.

    The bills aims are to reduce CO2 output to 1990 levels, not economic output.

    Economic output will still rise if we just do things a little bit greener.
    That goes for all levels of economic production.

    If implemented it is unlikely to dampen economic output at all

    Nice try at the scaremongering though :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,361 ✭✭✭mgmt


    At best this comment is misleading.... I consider it a trolling lie.
    And I think you know very well OP that this is not the case.

    The bills aims are to reduce CO2 output to 1990 levels, not economic output.

    Economic output will still rise if we just do things a little bit greener.
    That goes for all levels of economic production.

    If implemented it is unlikely to dampen economic output at all

    Nice try at the scaremongering though :rolleyes:


    CO2 emissions results from the production of goods. This climate change bill will place carbon restrictions and taxes, thereby reducing the level of economic output.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    Economic output will still rise if we just do things a little bit greener.

    and how do "we" know that? now that we are skint and any money coming in is costing ~7%?


    If implemented it is unlikely to dampen economic output at all

    says who? this guy?
    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRNhAJ6od3JQ_bked22kMKffiro-Lr9WeeO4XcnKDqCX0F89ep-


    Nice try at the scaremongering though :rolleyes:
    Aint that what all the global warming (sorry climate change) arguments center about?

    scaremongering people with a biblical end of the world scenario??

    Ironically with less people around if climate change does kill most humans as promised it will end up being better for the planet :P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,892 ✭✭✭spank_inferno


    EI.... your normally very on the ball.

    I'm not going to trawl for stats etc... but you know they are there.

    Real climate change may not happen in our lifetime, but it will happen.

    If reducing our co2 output now helps alleviate this, then I've no real problem with it.


    And to the OP, cutting co2 consumption may affect economic output if your smelting iron or something but in the vast majority of cases this doesn't have to be the case.
    The company I work for (telecoms multinational) committed to & achieved a cut in co2 consumption of 30% on 2008 levels.
    They achieved that target earlier in the year & in doing so considerably reduced operating costs costs, so despite a drop in revenues due to the recession the company was still very profitable.

    Plus, a bill that will have cross party support is not a Green party plot to our way of life!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,724 ✭✭✭flutered


    farting in the far east does a lot more damage to the enviroment than the irish ecomomy each day, which is not even factoring in their heavy industery, in ireland cows farting do more damage than most of our industery.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,361 ✭✭✭mgmt


    EI.... your normally very on the ball.

    I'm not going to trawl for stats etc... but you know they are there.

    Real climate change may not happen in our lifetime, but it will happen.

    If reducing our co2 output now helps alleviate this, then I've no real problem with it.

    The climate changes naturally.
    And to the OP, cutting co2 consumption may affect economic output if your smelting iron or something but in the vast majority of cases this doesn't have to be the case.
    The company I work for (telecoms multinational) committed to & achieved a cut in co2 consumption of 30% on 2008 levels.
    They achieved that target earlier in the year & in doing so considerably reduced operating costs costs, so despite a drop in revenues due to the recession the company was still very profitable.

    Yeah, will telecoms multinational continue to locate here if the cost of running their sever rooms go through the roof?
    Plus, a bill that will have cross party support is not a Green party plot to our way of life!

    Tell that to the people who are being 'de-energised' because of rising energy bill due to carbon levies and taxes. Or the people who can't afford the car they want because of carbon emission taxes.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,361 ✭✭✭mgmt


    flutered wrote: »
    farting in the far east does a lot more damage to the enviroment than the irish ecomomy each day, which is not even factoring in their heavy industery, in ireland cows farting do more damage than most of our industery.

    John Gormley wants you to be a patriot and stop exhaling CO2.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    EI.... your normally very on the ball.

    I'm not going to trawl for stats etc... but you know they are there.

    Real climate change may not happen in our lifetime, but it will happen.

    If reducing our co2 output now helps alleviate this, then I've no real problem with it.


    And to the OP, cutting co2 consumption may affect economic output if your smelting iron or something but in the vast majority of cases this doesn't have to be the case.
    The company I work for (telecoms multinational) committed to & achieved a cut in co2 consumption of 30% on 2008 levels.
    They achieved that target earlier in the year & in doing so considerably reduced operating costs costs, so despite a drop in revenues due to the recession the company was still very profitable.

    Plus, a bill that will have cross party support is not a Green party plot to our way of life!

    Whether climate change occurs or not (another topic altogether)

    Do I need to keep pointing at the big elephant in the room with "IMF/EU" tattoed on its side :D

    Our country has no money left, we have been setback 2 decades easily, and if you strip away all the assets bought on debt then this country is even poorer.
    Developing countries are exempt from carbon scam, we should be exempt too until we get back on our feet since we are now a developing retarding country

    Anyways the whole carbon targets thing is a joke in a world where the largest polluter USA is ignoring it and concentrating on creating jobs for its citizens (something our politicians dont care about! they rather spend valuable time on dog beeding bills and build refuges in wicklow)
    and of course the second largest polluter China are claiming that they are "developing"


    By pushing ahead with all these targets and taxation now the Greens are setting up the stage for a huge anti- Green backlash, its hard for people to believe in global warming (spend time thinking about) when they unemployed and are freezing at home due to fuels being more expensive


    Fix the economy first, this bill will set back the election we need so much by another month


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,361 ✭✭✭mgmt


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    By pushing ahead with all these targets and taxation now the Greens are setting up the stage for a huge anti- Green backlash, its hard for people to believe in global warming (spend time thinking about) when they unemployed and are freezing at home due to fuels being more expensive


    Fix the economy first, this bill will set back the election we need so much by another month

    Exactly, we cannot afford this stupidity right now. We need the greatest economic growth possible to repay this IMF/EU loan. But with this self-imposed trade tariff, we are effectively shooting ourselves in the foot and the country will remain on its knees.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 281 ✭✭NSNO


    I hate this attitude that life must be put on hold simply because of our current financial difficulties. Yes it's a difficult time and yes many people are struggling deeply but life, and legislation, must go on.

    In 50 years time, these economic difficulties will have been forgotten. However, unless we legislate properly and with consensus on a national plan for dealing with climate change and energy security we will be unprepared for a crisis which will make our current one look like small fry.

    We will get through these difficulties, regardless of whether we have a general election in February or March.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27 RockMan94


    but we have to make a drastic change look at our recent weather


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 281 ✭✭NSNO


    RockMan94 wrote: »
    but we have to make a drastic change look at our recent weather

    Surely legislating for Climate Change means that you legislate for measures that will stop our climate changing in a long-term way that would be detrimental to our environment? Not legislating simply because we've have a very cold winter?

    Climate deals with averages in a range of meteorological elements over a period of around 30 years. We need to legislate to prevent our actions having a significant effect on them.

    You having a knee-jerk reaction to our current bad weather is as bad as mgmt having a knee-jerk reaction to the current financial difficulties.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭Ren2k7


    mgmt wrote: »
    The Greens are staying in government to launch a kamikaze attack on the remnants of the Irish economy. This climate change bill will ruin us. They want to bring us back to the economic output levels of 1990. AGW is a scam of the highest order. Has the Greens asked the Sun what temperature the Earth is supposed to be?



    http://www.oireachtas.ie/documents/committees30thdail/j-climate_change/reports_2008/20101015.pdf

    This rant is more deserving of a place in CT, not here in politics. Climate change has been established as a proven fact time and again on so many occasions so move on.

    By dealing with this important issue now we can avoid the consequences later on.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    NSNO wrote: »
    I hate this attitude that life must be put on hold simply because of our current financial difficulties. Yes it's a difficult time and yes many people are struggling deeply but life, and legislation, must go on.

    In 50 years time, these economic difficulties will have been forgotten. However, unless we legislate properly and with consensus on a national plan for dealing with climate change and energy security we will be unprepared for a crisis which will make our current one look like small fry.

    We will get through these difficulties, regardless of whether we have a general election in February or March.

    You lost your job, your wife lost her job, your kids are hungry, there is no dole and the only money you can get is from the local loan shark at high interest

    do you

    a. take care of your family and try get back on your feet
    b. borrow money at high interest and insulate your home


    Ren2k7 wrote: »
    By dealing with this important issue now we can avoid the consequences later on.

    we can not afford to deal with this issue now, this will ensure the economy is even more uncompetitive while the likes of China continue to build a new coal plant every week making all our efforts pointless

    a state borrowing from IMF should be looking after its people first and foremost, dont come here moaning that the government is not doing anything about unemployment, this bill would ensure even less employment as more business move.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,361 ✭✭✭mgmt


    RockMan94 wrote: »
    but we have to make a drastic change look at our recent weather

    Weather does not equal climate.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,361 ✭✭✭mgmt


    NSNO wrote: »
    I hate this attitude that life must be put on hold simply because of our current financial difficulties. Yes it's a difficult time and yes many people are struggling deeply but life, and legislation, must go on.

    In 50 years time, these economic difficulties will have been forgotten. However, unless we legislate properly and with consensus on a national plan for dealing with climate change and energy security we will be unprepared for a crisis which will make our current one look like small fry.

    We will get through these difficulties, regardless of whether we have a general election in February or March.

    This country is experiencing the disease of mass emigration again. In 50 years time these people will return home to die, not to focking see if the country has dealt effectively with climate change.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    mgmt wrote: »
    We need the greatest economic growth possible to repay this IMF/EU loan.
    And economic growth can only be achieved by burning as great a mass of (imported) fossil fuels as possible?
    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    You lost your job, your wife lost her job, your kids are hungry, there is no dole and the only money you can get is from the local loan shark at high interest

    do you

    a. take care of your family and try get back on your feet
    b. borrow money at high interest and insulate your home
    c. Close doors after you’ve left rooms, turn off lights when rooms are not in use, turn off appliances, etc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    djpbarry wrote: »
    c. Close doors after you’ve left rooms, turn off lights when rooms are not in use, turn off appliances, etc.

    that will not feed your children

    what we are doing now is borrowing money at high interest from the local loan shark (IMF) since the wife (piblic sector) doesnt want to loose some weight or cares much for the children (welfare)
    whats worse we turn around and are handing hundreds of millions of this borrowed money to wind industry, who are not state run

    its madness


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    that will not feed your children
    Trying to keep the energy bills to a minimum won't help feed the children?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    djpbarry wrote: »
    Trying to keep the energy bills to a minimum won't help feed the children?

    but thats not what the government is doing :rolleyes:



    we are borrowing money at ~7% from the loan shark (IMF) only to give a few hundred million of this a year to the wind industry/lobby
    at a time when we are closing hospitals and cutting welfare (and not dealing with public paybill)
    thats craziness
    on top of that as added insult everyone (business or private) pays more for electricity in order to subsidise wind which is not capable of competing on price and reliability, this impacts consumers who face higher prices and business who can not compete due to high energy costs

    the "green" policies are already costing the economy money at a time when there is none and jobs at a time when we need them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,336 ✭✭✭Mr.Micro


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    the "green" policies are already costing the economy money at a time when there is none and jobs at a time when we need them

    Its like putting the brakes on the economy after it has become a wreck?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 251 ✭✭EastTexas


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    Whether climate change occurs or not (another topic altogether)

    Do I need to keep pointing at the big elephant in the room with "IMF/EU" tattoed on its side :D

    Our country has no money left, we have been setback 2 decades easily, and if you strip away all the assets bought on debt then this country is even poorer.
    Developing countries are exempt from carbon scam, we should be exempt too until we get back on our feet since we are now a developing retarding country

    Anyways the whole carbon targets thing is a joke in a world where the largest polluter USA is ignoring it and concentrating on creating jobs for its citizens (something our politicians dont care about! they rather spend valuable time on dog beeding bills and build refuges in wicklow)
    and of course the second largest polluter China are claiming that they are "developing"


    By pushing ahead with all these targets and taxation now the Greens are setting up the stage for a huge anti- Green backlash, its hard for people to believe in global warming (spend time thinking about) when they unemployed and are freezing at home due to fuels being more expensive


    Fix the economy first, this bill will set back the election we need so much by another month


    Very well said.
    Turning emissions into a commodity is totally insane and the European carbon market demonstrates it.
    The credits are in fact highly leveraged debt, premised on a future change nobody can assure - the only people who benefit are Goldman Sachs, Corporate greed and the climate alumni and the bureaucrats implementing this lunacy.


    It’s nothing more but a tax scam masquerading as environmental policies where big corporations are given a free ride and the regular citizen/ small business are held to impossible standards, penalized, charged and exploited with political correctness.

    What could be more ironic than people freezing in their homes because of alleged global warming?
    If Obama only touches on Cap and Trade again, he will not get a second term.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,333 ✭✭✭RichieC


    Just leave this here.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDTUuckNHgc


    cant figure out how to embedd.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 251 ✭✭EastTexas


    RichieC wrote: »
    Just leave this here.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDTUuckNHgc


    cant figure out how to embedd.

    The climate has changed since the inception of the planet and will continue to do just that.
    Taxing climate is like taxing water because it’s wet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    but thats not what the government is doing
    I didn’t say this was what the government are doing. Alls I’m saying is maximising energy efficiency, within budgetary constraints, doesn’t strike me as a bad idea, whether we’re talking about a household or a country.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    EastTexas wrote: »
    The climate has changed since the inception of the planet and will continue to do just that.
    We shouldn’t try and understand why the climate is changing?


Advertisement