Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Where were you when John Lennon was shot dead?

1235

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,397 ✭✭✭✭Degsy


    bonerm wrote: »
    That might work with your U2 bashing but the Beatles were worth every bit of praise thrown at them.

    So you say...i happen to think they were appalling..thier music makes my feel physically sick...and whats more annoying is that Paul McCartney and the Hag Yoko Ono seem helbent on shoving them down our throats every so often as if they're expecting some sort of resurgence in interest in the band...the motives for all this are,of course purely financial..Macca is a well known tightwad and old One Leg had a few bob off him and that crazy old bitch Ono has been wallowing in Lennon's money and fame for years.
    Somebody should re-unite the lot of them with a couple of bullets.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,190 ✭✭✭✭Latchy


    John Lennon was not just a founder member of any band . The Beatles became a social phenomenon so when that turd bag shot Lennon he robbed a wife of a husband ,children of a father and also robbed the world of a man ,only 40 years old who with his partner McCartney wrote classic pop songs that have stood the test of time .

    The cretin who shot him apparently didn't have a beatle or Lennon record to his name so by that logic in killing Lennon he knew he would make it big time ....why ? For no other reason than klling the most famous person on the planet to achieve in an instant the fame , what it took the deceased to achieve with talent , over 20 odd years ...that's how big Lennon was and still is
    Degsy wrote: »
    Fcuck John Lennon and fcuck the rest of the bastards too.
    HA HA HA ..

    AH Cowen, Lenihen and co have had enough hate thrown at them ...hmm ... maybe not


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,423 ✭✭✭cml387


    Degsy wrote: »
    So you say...i happen to think they were appalling..thier music makes my feel physically sick...and whats more annoying is that Paul McCartney and the Hag Yoko Ono seem helbent on shoving them down our throats every so often as if they're expecting some sort of resurgence in interest in the band...the motives for all this are,of course purely financial..Macca is a well known tightwad and old One Leg had a few bob off him and that crazy old bitch Ono has been wallowing in Lennon's money and fame for years.
    Somebody should re-unite the lot of them with a couple of bullets.

    If music be the food of love,play on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59 ✭✭ForceOfNature


    Degsy wrote: »
    So you say...i happen to think they were appalling..thier music makes my feel physically sick...and whats more annoying is that Paul McCartney and the Hag Yoko Ono seem helbent on shoving them down our throats every so often as if they're expecting some sort of resurgence in interest in the band...the motives for all this are,of course purely financial..Macca is a well known tightwad and old One Leg had a few bob off him and that crazy old bitch Ono has been wallowing in Lennon's money and fame for years.
    Somebody should re-unite the lot of them with a couple of bullets.


    There music makes you physically sick? hahahahahahahaha
    think its time you went back to listening to your jedward albums


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭bodice ripper


    I wasn't born for another 10 months.

    however, had I been a teenager when the beatles were going, i would have been well into paul - what a voice.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭bodice ripper


    also, if you don't like the beatles - the problem is you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,154 ✭✭✭Rented Mule


    I was 12 years old sitting in our local watching Monday Night Football with my father, uncle and teacher when they announced that he had been murdered.

    It was surreal when I think about it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    I was born... 2 years later!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,640 ✭✭✭phelixoflaherty


    Having a lazer dump in the back lawn


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,007 ✭✭✭knird evol


    I think he started out with some good ideas but then was corrupted by power. Not to the extent that Stalin was later though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,564 ✭✭✭Daroxtar


    it was my 5th birthday


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,397 ✭✭✭✭Degsy


    There music makes you physically sick? hahahahahahahaha
    think its time you went back to listening to your jedward albums

    In my experience men who like the Beatles tend also to like Abba,Elton John and george Micheal.

    Women who like them are usually single,in thier late 50's and pay for sex with younger men.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,587 ✭✭✭Pace2008


    Degsy wrote: »
    In my experience men who like the Beatles tend also to like Abba,Elton John and george Micheal.
    I assume you're being tongue-in-cheek?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,397 ✭✭✭✭Degsy


    I i would have been well into paul - what a voice.

    I can see what women wouuld see in him alright,the crooked,stroke-victim face,the twitching head,the baggy eyes and the dyed hair.

    If he wasnt rich he wouldnt be able to score in a brothel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,302 ✭✭✭Snickers Man


    Given that it took place at about 4 o'clock in the morning (Irish time), I was in bed.

    Given that I was a student at the time I didn't get up until about 4'o clock the following afternoon. :P

    Saw it on a headline in the Evening Herald. Or it might have been the Evening Press.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 447 ✭✭AntiMatter


    Degsy wrote: »
    I can see what women wouuld see in him alright,the crooked,stroke-victim face,the twitching head,the baggy eyes and the dyed hair.

    If he wasnt rich he wouldnt be able to score in a brothel.

    He was meant to do some beatle-ing, all the same.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Degsy your modus operandi is so transparent as to be quite boring. Why not try a counter-intituive move by declaring your love of All things Beatles?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,397 ✭✭✭✭Degsy


    Pace2008 wrote: »
    I assume you're being tongue-in-cheek?


    Eh,no actually..the fact is that real men dont listen to teh beatles..they were the first boyboand marketed and manufactured to appeal to teenage gilrs.
    Sure they "developed" and grew moustaches and all that shiite but the fact remains they were a 1960's Take That that got older and fatter and more pretentious as time went on.

    Thier music has no value whatsoever today and no social or emotional context..listening to it is like listening to the soundtrack to the Wizard of Oz or some shiite by Andrew Loyd Weber..suitable for "Friends of Dorothy" only.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,949 ✭✭✭✭IvyTheTerrible


    Degsy wrote: »
    Eh,no actually..the fact is that real men dont listen to teh beatles..they were the first boyboand marketed and manufactured to appeal to teenage gilrs.
    Sure they "developed" and grew moustaches and all that shiite but the fact remains they were a 1960's Take That that got older and fatter and more pretentious as time went on.

    Thier music has no value whatsoever today and no social or emotional context..listening to it is like listening to the soundtrack to the Wizard of Oz or some shiite by Andrew Loyd Weber..suitable for "Friends of Dorothy" only.

    What's a Friend of Dorothy?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    A gayer.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,397 ✭✭✭✭Degsy


    What's a Friend of Dorothy?

    A male Beatles fan.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 35,948 Mod ✭✭✭✭dr.bollocko


    Degsy don't post in this thread again. Please PM for details.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,758 ✭✭✭Laois_Man


    How can anyone say The Beatles were manufactured?
    Just coz they grew mustaches and got older (seemingly unlike non-manufactured bands) - Such drivel.

    A manufactured band is something forced together by a manager, producer or something like the X-Factor where the members wouldn’t even have known each other beforehand and where none of them have to exhibit any ability to compose two consecutive notes of music, oe even play an instrument and will try get a foothold in the marketplace by singing old covers before they’ll even attempt to release something original (written by someone else).

    The Beatles was formed before they even met Brian Epstein and had even already met Ringo Starr - formed by the members themselves who were from the same area who had the same interest when Lennon invited McCartney and later Harrison to join his band The Quarrymen who later became Johnny and The Moondogs and then The Silver Beetles. A real band who played real instruments and who wrote real music.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 232 ✭✭Teddy_Picker


    My arrival was 10 years away. :p

    I would have loved to have been around to see John and The Beatles in their heyday, and hear all that fantastic music when it was fresh and new and exciting. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,190 ✭✭✭✭Latchy


    Lennon himself said the whole Beatle expierence was based on a myth and image as much as music ,but an image that was also copied by other bands ie ,the Monkees ,the Byrds ( not to take away from the great music also made by those two bands ) and later on by the boy band explosion ie , he's the cute one , he's the serious one , he's the quite one etc, which is all part of the fame game essential to make it to the top .

    The difference with the beatles was that behind that image was a band that had Lennon /McCartney,two young guys who had confidence and belief in their own abilities to write their own songs,to be competent musician's in the studio and the first band to experiment with studio wizardry .You only have to listen to their first 6 albums, please please me , with the beatles ,hard days night , revolver ,help and rubber soul to see how their craft developed , improvising when they needed to along the way

    Lennon was a very self absorbed individual ,of that there's no doubt and even at the height of Beatlemania was pulling silly ,gormless faces at the cameras , took the piss out of everybody and anybody and could be quite cruel at times .But it was a facade to hide the deep insecuritys he had himself and it's later reflected in his solo career mainly writing about himself and Ono. Had he lived It would have being interesting to see how his style might have changed ,what direction and topics he might have seen fit to write about but as long as Ono was around her influences in the background would have played a big part in it .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,369 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    Degsy wrote: »
    Eh,no actually..the fact is that real men dont listen to teh beatles..they were the first boyboand marketed and manufactured to appeal to teenage gilrs.
    Sure they "developed" and grew moustaches and all that shiite but the fact remains they were a 1960's Take That that got older and fatter and more pretentious as time went on.

    Thier music has no value whatsoever today and no social or emotional context..listening to it is like listening to the soundtrack to the Wizard of Oz or some shiite by Andrew Loyd Weber..suitable for "Friends of Dorothy" only.

    So, how did your parole hearing go, Chapman?:confused:





    :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,072 ✭✭✭marcsignal


    inside mark chapman's head :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 644 ✭✭✭filthymcnasty


    Degsy wrote: »

    Thier music has no value whatsoever today and no social or emotional context..listening to it is like listening to the soundtrack to the Wizard of Oz or some shiite by Andrew Loyd Weber..suitable for "Friends of Dorothy" only.

    Some of their stuff like she loves you, i want to hold her hand etc is all bit sappy allright. But the likes of Helter Skelter and the white album are pure class.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,564 ✭✭✭Daroxtar


    Latchy wrote: »
    Lennon himself said the whole Beatle expierence was based on a myth and image as much as music ,but an image that was also copied by other bands ie ,the Monkees ,the Byrds ( not to take away from the great music also made by those two bands ) and later on by the boy band explosion ie , he's the cute one , he's the serious one , he's the quite one etc, which is all part of the fame game essential to make it to the top .

    Yer wrong about the monkees, they were 100% manufactured and daydream believer was written by Neil Diamond. They didn't make any great music, they just played someone elses.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59 ✭✭ForceOfNature


    Degsy wrote: »
    Eh,no actually..the fact is that real men dont listen to teh beatles..they were the first boyboand marketed and manufactured to appeal to teenage gilrs.
    Sure they "developed" and grew moustaches and all that shiite but the fact remains they were a 1960's Take That that got older and fatter and more pretentious as time went on.

    Thier music has no value whatsoever today and no social or emotional context..listening to it is like listening to the soundtrack to the Wizard of Oz or some shiite by Andrew Loyd Weber..suitable for "Friends of Dorothy" only.

    haha i would love to hear who your favourite band is!
    all you have mentioned so far is george michael and elton john.... are they your heroes? actually you also mentioned the wizard of oz....


Advertisement
Advertisement