Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Wikileaks merge (Assange loses extradition appeal)

1246740

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,536 ✭✭✭Mark200


    Biggins wrote: »
    I see while the Sunday Times site, German news and American websites mention some royal up to no good, the Sky news site has bowed to government pressure, the D notice and not mentioned the royal inappropriateness.

    Correction: I see they must have thought it ok to cave in and mention it - well seeing as its all over the net now anyway! LOL

    You seem to be completely over-analysing the reporting of this leak.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Mark200 wrote: »
    You seem to be completely over-analysing the reporting of this leak.
    No, I get notified of changes, updates and things have been happening through out the day.
    Thats all.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,797 ✭✭✭karma_


    Mark200 wrote: »
    I don't see anything unreasonable with that statement. A Government can be transparent without having to release details of private conversations between its highest diplomats.

    This latest 'leak' will achieve nothing except making it harder for countries around the world to communicate with each other with any level of trust.

    It's not my problem if you see nothing wrong about preaching openness and transparency then actually doing the contrary.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 296 ✭✭Inverse to the power of one!


    Which had what effect, in the end? A couple of officers had their careers ended, a couple of guards were imprisoned, about what was likely to happen anyway. One of those little-acknowledged pieces of truth is that the legal system doesn't care about the publicity, unless the publicity is so great that finding an unprejudiced juror is impossible and the trial doesn't happen at all. The only difference is that a lot more people got pissed off at the US, possibly extending or increasing the war.

    NTM
    Speculation on your part none the less, just as easy to speculate that it would have been hushed over.....but in the end just speculation on both our parts.

    The key difference is that transparency was assured, and world saw with it's own eyes what was being allowed to happen by a lax chain of command.

    And in fairness to argue against accountability outside an enclosed military system on the basis that it might hurt a war effort?

    Do you really want information on wars manipulated? Seriously? Given the last century of propaganda and manipulation of the public opinion, I beg to differ and well.....am kinda of enamored with the information age.

    Seriously, china could just as easily claim that leaked video showing human rights abuses in NK is conducive to war and just pisses more people off at NK?
    Would you accept that as a viable policy position? From the Chinese perspective maybe, but for the rest of the world, not really.

    Besides, you've just received a rare glimpse in to the Diplomatic world, had this come out by normal channels, you'd have to wait 15 years and collate 1000 autobiography's each one more painful to read then the last ;)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    On top of the leaked news now that Saudi Arabia wanted Iran bombed over their nuclear capabilities, comes this...
    Iranian Nuclear Scientist Killed In Tehran

    Iranian state media has reported that a nuclear scientist was killed and another injured after coming under attack in Tehran.

    The university lecturer was killed in a car bomb blast and three people were wounded in another explosion, Iran's al Alam Arabic language television reported.

    "Majid Shahriyari was martyred and his wife was injured... Fereydoun Abbasi and his wife were both wounded," a radio report said.

    Fars news agency said the scientists were targeted in two different locations by men on motorcycles who approached their vehicles and attached bombs to their cars.

    According to the official IRNA news agency, Shahriari was a member of the nuclear engineering department of Shahid Beheshti University in northern Tehran.

    The hardline news website Mashreghnews said Abbasi held a PhD in nuclear physics and did nuclear research at the defence ministry.

    Iran has said its atomic programme is purely peaceful, but suspicions that it is seeking nuclear weapons have led to the imposition of several rounds of international sanctions by the United Nations, the European Union and the US.

    Iranian officials have long claimed Western governments have funded covert actions aimed at destabilising the nation.

    According to the Wikileaks dump of diplomatic correspondence, Arab rulers secretly lobbied the US to launch air strikes to destroy Iran's nuclear programme.
    http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Iranian-State-Media-Iranian-Nuclear-Scientist-Killed-And-Another-Injured-After-Attack-In-Tehran/Article/201011415838804?lpos=World_News_Carousel_Region_2&lid=ARTICLE_15838804_Iranian_State_Media%3A_Iranian_Nuclear_Scientist_Killed_And_Another_Injured_After_Attack_In_Tehran

    So who was REALLY behind the attack?

    Saudi Arabia?
    Israel?
    America?

    Chances are - we will never know!


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,895 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I wonder if Wikileaks hasn't taken an extra risk in this one?

    As long as they were releasing just US military information, really the only people that were going to lose out were the US, and some of its military allies. This diplomatic leak, however, affects not just the US, but a substantial number of other countries seem not best pleased by the leak either, some of whom have their own methods of dealing with problems. Even those who aren't affected are probably wondering if they're next.

    This could result in an increasingly hostile climate for the organisation.

    NTM


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,536 ✭✭✭Mark200


    karma_ wrote: »
    It's not my problem if you see nothing wrong about preaching openness and transparency then actually doing the contrary.

    So your idea of an open and transparent Government is one where senior diplomats can't have a conversation without the whole world knowing?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,536 ✭✭✭Mark200


    Biggins wrote: »
    No, I get notified of changes, updates and things have been happening through out the day.
    Thats all.

    Well when I said over-analysing, I meant that you seemed to be looking for a story where there doesn't seem to be one. For example Sky News and you thinking they left out the Royal incident. When you thought they had left it out, you assume they were bowing to pressure from the DA notice. When you see that, in fact, they actually had reported on it you assumed that they were bowing to pressure from other media outlets by mentioning it. Maybe, just maybe, they were just reporting it because it was news?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,712 ✭✭✭YFlyer


    On rte online now

    US State Department briefing on the classified US documents released by WikiLeaks, live from Washington.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Mark200 wrote: »
    So your idea of an open and transparent Government is one where senior diplomats can't have a conversation without the whole world knowing?

    I don't think the odd conversation and wry observation are really the issue....eg...
    The US State Department gave its diplomats instructions to spy on other countries' representatives at the United Nations, according to a directive signed by Hillary Clinton. Diplomats were told to collect information about e-mail accounts, passwords and encryption keys, credit cards, biometric information and a whole lot more.
    The subject line of the document sounds harmless. "Reporting and collection needs: The United Nations." But the secret dispatch dated July 31, 2009, is among the more explosive of the raft of embassy cables that have now been reported. In a total of 29 pages, the United States State Department calls on its diplomats to spy on the United Nations and its leaders.
    http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,731747,00.html


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Mark200 wrote: »
    ...Maybe, just maybe, they were just reporting it because it was news?
    They did in fact (because I was aware of the timeline) in fact leave that one part of the leaks out when others including The New York Times, The Guardian, Spain's El Pais, France's Le Monde, Germany's Spiegel and European news agencies including Reuters and the Press Association, did in fact leave that one detail in too.
    All the others reported the same facts exactly - Sky just decided to leave that one issue out - maybe because of the D notice - maybe because the didn't wish to offend the royals - maybe both!
    Only later when it was very noticeable that the rest was including it, and it was glaringly obvious that they had left it out, was the royal bit also included by Sky.

    Of the details so far that have come out, it should be noted that these details are only coming from some of the first 200 communications of the many that are available to Wikileaks.
    As the rest will emerge and be waded through, you can be sure there will be a lot more crap to come.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,797 ✭✭✭karma_


    Mark200 wrote: »
    So your idea of an open and transparent Government is one where senior diplomats can't have a conversation without the whole world knowing?

    Way to miss the point, well done Mark.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,758 ✭✭✭✭TeddyTedson


    Can someone tell me what exactly this wikileaks thing is?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,633 ✭✭✭SamHarris


    karma_ wrote: »
    Way to miss the point, well done Mark.

    Way to clarify your point, well done Karma.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,797 ✭✭✭karma_


    SamHarris wrote: »
    Way to clarify your point, well done Karma.

    Welcome to AH Sam.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,633 ✭✭✭SamHarris


    karma_ wrote: »
    Welcome to AH Sam.

    Point taken, touché.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,633 ✭✭✭SamHarris


    Also, I like the Polish reaction "The Polish Prime Minister, Donald Tusk, said "Rumor goes that Americans messaged among themselves with regret that we negiotiate too firmly, but if it is really in this correspondence, it's rather as compliment than flashpoint"

    Wikipedia has a good overview of the entire thing, well laid out.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_diplomatic_cables_leak

    And The Economist did a good piece on it to, which is indicative of how alot of the more high brow media is dealing with this, altough a little more flippant than I myself would put it.

    http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2010/11/wikileaks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,775 ✭✭✭Spacedog


    glen becks take on it is "beautiful and horrifying"



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Can someone tell me what exactly this wikileaks thing is?

    Wikileaks is a fraud, a propaganda channel, a scam, ie something that was invented by the US Authorities just like Alqueda and Bin Laden.

    The Complete Idiots Guide to Wikileaks. :)


    Wikileaks, following much media fanfare (reason for suspicion right there) has just released a huge number of "cables" documents supposedly leaked to WikiLeaks and no other websites'.

    The media is denouncing this as a threat to the United States while US politicians wring their hands and wonder when they will be free of the curse of the First Amendment and all that troublesome nonsense about Freedom of Speech.

    Many observers think this is a propaganda set up and that neither Julian Assange or WikiLaeks should be taken at face value. After all, Julian Assange keeps insisting there was no 9-11 conspiracy and the 9-11 truth movement a "distraction." Apparently Julian Assange has patented conspiracy and nobody else may expose one except himself!

    Of course, there is really not that much that is new in this latest dump. Like prior WikiLeaks dumps, most of it is old news mixed with some rather dubious claims. In his last such dump, Julian Assange included a claim that Osama bin Laden is still alive and controlling Al Qaeda. Of course, it is well documented outside the United States that Osama bin Laden has been dead for many years and that Al Qaeda itself is a fake front group created to hoax Americans into endless wars of conquest, much as the fictional Emmanuel Goldstein was used in George Orwell's "1984."

    In yet another infamous propaganda attempt, WikiLeaks tried to claim that weapons of mass destruction had been found in Iraq, justifying the invasion. No such weapons were ever found.

    As for the present batch of documents, again it is a rehash of stories already known to the blog-o-sphere. Even those people who did not know US diplomats spy on their United Nations counterparts did not find it surprising or in any way a new idea.

    So what is the real purpose of Assange's little charade? Propaganda.

    Propaganda is like rat poison. 95% of it is tasty, healthy food. But the purpose is to get you to swallow the poison. The same is true of the WikiLeaks document dump. The bait are all these old stories which we already knew about, used to convince us that the entire pile is "tasty, healthy food," except that it isn't. Buried in the pile of delicious, albeit past the expiration date morsels are the bits of poison which the US Government knows you will no longer accept at face value from the controlled media, but hope you will eat if handed to you by a con artist posing as hostile to the government.

    So, given that 95% of the current WikiLeaks is really old news, as a public service I will point out the bits of poison that Julian hopes you will eat.

    1. Iran is bad so you should all want to kill them.

    2. Saudi Arabia is bad because they are funding Al Qaeda so you should all want to kill them.

    3. North Korea is bad because they gave really long range missiles to Iran for Iran to put their nuclear warheads in, so you should all want to kill them.

    4. China is messing with your computers, so you should all want to kill them.

    That about sums it up. Oh yes, there is nothing negative about Israel in all these diplomatic messages, an impossibility given the lethal Israeli attack on the Aid Flotilla last May. That suggests who Assange really works for.

    Funny thing about rat poison. After a while the rats learn to eat the food and leave the poison behind.

    http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/comidwiki.php


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Wikileaks is a fraud, a propaganda channel, a scam, ie something that was invented by the US Authorities just like Alqueda and Bin Laden.

    The Complete Idiots Guide to Wikileaks. :)


    Wikileaks, following much media fanfare (reason for suspicion right there) has just released a huge number of "cables" documents supposedly leaked to WikiLeaks and no other websites'.

    The media is denouncing this as a threat to the United States while US politicians wring their hands and wonder when they will be free of the curse of the First Amendment and all that troublesome nonsense about Freedom of Speech.

    Many observers think this is a propaganda set up and that neither Julian Assange or WikiLaeks should be taken at face value. After all, Julian Assange keeps insisting there was no 9-11 conspiracy and the 9-11 truth movement a "distraction." Apparently Julian Assange has patented conspiracy and nobody else may expose one except himself!

    Of course, there is really not that much that is new in this latest dump. Like prior WikiLeaks dumps, most of it is old news mixed with some rather dubious claims. In his last such dump, Julian Assange included a claim that Osama bin Laden is still alive and controlling Al Qaeda. Of course, it is well documented outside the United States that Osama bin Laden has been dead for many years and that Al Qaeda itself is a fake front group created to hoax Americans into endless wars of conquest, much as the fictional Emmanuel Goldstein was used in George Orwell's "1984."

    In yet another infamous propaganda attempt, WikiLeaks tried to claim that weapons of mass destruction had been found in Iraq, justifying the invasion. No such weapons were ever found.

    As for the present batch of documents, again it is a rehash of stories already known to the blog-o-sphere. Even those people who did not know US diplomats spy on their United Nations counterparts did not find it surprising or in any way a new idea.

    So what is the real purpose of Assange's little charade? Propaganda.

    Propaganda is like rat poison. 95% of it is tasty, healthy food. But the purpose is to get you to swallow the poison. The same is true of the WikiLeaks document dump. The bait are all these old stories which we already knew about, used to convince us that the entire pile is "tasty, healthy food," except that it isn't. Buried in the pile of delicious, albeit past the expiration date morsels are the bits of poison which the US Government knows you will no longer accept at face value from the controlled media, but hope you will eat if handed to you by a con artist posing as hostile to the government.

    So, given that 95% of the current WikiLeaks is really old news, as a public service I will point out the bits of poison that Julian hopes you will eat.

    1. Iran is bad so you should all want to kill them.

    2. Saudi Arabia is bad because they are funding Al Qaeda so you should all want to kill them.

    3. North Korea is bad because they gave really long range missiles to Iran for Iran to put their nuclear warheads in, so you should all want to kill them.

    4. China is messing with your computers, so you should all want to kill them.

    That about sums it up. Oh yes, there is nothing negative about Israel in all these diplomatic messages, an impossibility given the lethal Israeli attack on the Aid Flotilla last May. That suggests who Assange really works for.

    Funny thing about rat poison. After a while the rats learn to eat the food and leave the poison behind.

    The above post was brought to you by a man that regularily uses the Daily Mail as a news source.


  • Posts: 2,032 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    At least were doing our part. The main Wikileaks page is mirrored on Amazon servers here in Ireland.

    The cables files are mirrored on Amazons EC2 cloud based system in the US, that is not going to be taken down too easily. Its also mirrored in France failing that.

    This is just over hype by Sky again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,468 ✭✭✭FGR


    Biggins wrote: »
    It does don't it!
    Cyber wars at their strangest! :pac:

    Why don't the hackers go all Die Hard 4 on us and 'hack' and launch 50 nuclear missles at the people who downloaded the backup files? (and traffic lights, television stations and other ridiculous things while they're at it.) :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,633 ✭✭✭SamHarris


    http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2010/11/overseeing_state_secrecy

    The other side of the other link I posted, if anyone is interested. Also good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,184 ✭✭✭nyarlothothep


    Wikileaks is a fraud, a propaganda channel, a scam, ie something that was invented by the US Authorities just like Alqueda and Bin Laden.

    The Complete Idiots Guide to Wikileaks. :)


    Wikileaks, following much media fanfare (reason for suspicion right there) has just released a huge number of "cables" documents supposedly leaked to WikiLeaks and no other websites'.

    The media is denouncing this as a threat to the United States while US politicians wring their hands and wonder when they will be free of the curse of the First Amendment and all that troublesome nonsense about Freedom of Speech.

    Many observers think this is a propaganda set up and that neither Julian Assange or WikiLaeks should be taken at face value. After all, Julian Assange keeps insisting there was no 9-11 conspiracy and the 9-11 truth movement a "distraction." Apparently Julian Assange has patented conspiracy and nobody else may expose one except himself!

    Of course, there is really not that much that is new in this latest dump. Like prior WikiLeaks dumps, most of it is old news mixed with some rather dubious claims. In his last such dump, Julian Assange included a claim that Osama bin Laden is still alive and controlling Al Qaeda. Of course, it is well documented outside the United States that Osama bin Laden has been dead for many years and that Al Qaeda itself is a fake front group created to hoax Americans into endless wars of conquest, much as the fictional Emmanuel Goldstein was used in George Orwell's "1984."

    In yet another infamous propaganda attempt, WikiLeaks tried to claim that weapons of mass destruction had been found in Iraq, justifying the invasion. No such weapons were ever found.

    As for the present batch of documents, again it is a rehash of stories already known to the blog-o-sphere. Even those people who did not know US diplomats spy on their United Nations counterparts did not find it surprising or in any way a new idea.

    So what is the real purpose of Assange's little charade? Propaganda.

    Propaganda is like rat poison. 95% of it is tasty, healthy food. But the purpose is to get you to swallow the poison. The same is true of the WikiLeaks document dump. The bait are all these old stories which we already knew about, used to convince us that the entire pile is "tasty, healthy food," except that it isn't. Buried in the pile of delicious, albeit past the expiration date morsels are the bits of poison which the US Government knows you will no longer accept at face value from the controlled media, but hope you will eat if handed to you by a con artist posing as hostile to the government.

    So, given that 95% of the current WikiLeaks is really old news, as a public service I will point out the bits of poison that Julian hopes you will eat.

    1. Iran is bad so you should all want to kill them.

    2. Saudi Arabia is bad because they are funding Al Qaeda so you should all want to kill them.

    3. North Korea is bad because they gave really long range missiles to Iran for Iran to put their nuclear warheads in, so you should all want to kill them.

    4. China is messing with your computers, so you should all want to kill them.

    That about sums it up. Oh yes, there is nothing negative about Israel in all these diplomatic messages, an impossibility given the lethal Israeli attack on the Aid Flotilla last May. That suggests who Assange really works for.

    Funny thing about rat poison. After a while the rats learn to eat the food and leave the poison behind.

    http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/comidwiki.php

    1. Iran is pretty bad as governed by its regime
    2. Saudi Arabia is also bad, considering the lack of human rights, theocratic nature etc
    3. NK is diabolical, just read up on it, the majority of the population live in utter poverty, its a big brother autocratic state that brutally asserts its domestic power, a real throwback to the primitivism of authoritarianism.
    4. China fcks with a lot of computers, business people were warned not to accept usbs as gifts from Chinese companies the level of hackery was so bad. Apart from the fact that its really close to NK and its utterly despicable politburo it has a dubious reputation for infilitration.

    I'm reading the entries, tbh I can't see anything anywhere were it says kill all these people because they're bad. Also are there sources on Assange's remarks concerning Al Queda and 911?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,517 ✭✭✭RobitTV


    sorry edit..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    1. Iran is pretty bad as governed by its regime
    2. Saudi Arabia is also bad, considering the lack of human rights, theocratic nature etc
    3. NK is diabolical, just read up on it, the majority of the population live in utter poverty, its a big brother autocratic state that brutally asserts its domestic power, a real throwback to the primitivism of authoritarianism.
    4. China fcks with a lot of computers, business people were warned not to accept usbs as gifts from Chinese companies the level of hackery was so bad. Apart from the fact that its really close to NK and its utterly despicable politburo it has a dubious reputation for infilitration.

    I'm reading the entries, tbh I can't see anything anywhere were it says kill all these people because they're bad. Also are there sources on Assange's remarks concerning Al Queda and 911?
    Proof Arab states fear Iran, says Israel

    MIDDLE EAST RESPONSE: ISRAEL SAYS the documents made public by WikiLeaks prove what Jerusalem has been saying for years: Arab states recognise Iran is the biggest regional threat but were afraid to say so in public http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2010/1130/1224284434167.html

    Lets now bomb Iran because its bad and feared by other Arab states.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    .......... After all, Julian Assange keeps insisting there was no 9-11 conspiracy and the 9-11 truth movement a "distraction." ..........

    Good Jaysus, what a looper...he should be in Dundrum in a straitjacket....


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,386 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    He does make one interesting point though; considering the major back and forth diplomatic stuff between the US and Israel it is a little surprising by it's absence in these leaks.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,758 ✭✭✭Stercus Accidit


    Wibbs wrote: »
    He does make one interesting point though; considering the major back and forth diplomatic stuff between the US and Israel it is a little surprising by it's absence in these leaks.

    Maybe that is the insurance they have kept.


Advertisement
Advertisement