FOXNEWS: 9/11 Report Is A Cover Up From Start To Finish!

K-9 wrote: »

Exactly. I think this is the part he doesn't realise.

You can't use it to sue Bin Laden either.

humanji wrote: »

How would it be exposed as fraud? You seem to know. Why not tell the world right now, just in case the powers that be get involved?

Did you read the NIST report?

humanji wrote: »

I have read a lot of it. Reading it all and memorizing it is pointless. You use it as a reference tool. Then you check the facts yourself. What facts have you checked? What facts can you prove to be wrong? Come on, I asked you before to expose it, since you know how. You could change the world in a blink of an eye. You'd be a celebrated hero for uncovering such an immense conspiracy. Won't you do the right thing?

It has nothing to do with memorizing. It has something to do with honesty.
You know nothing but you open your mouth. You just want to have the last word.

Post from the 18th of July 2010
First let's show the fraud

NCSTAR 1-9 Vol 2 NIST says that WTC 7 is the first known instance where fire induced local damage (i.e., buckling failure of column 79; one of 82 columns in WTC7) led to the collapse of an entire tall building NCSTAR 1-9 vol 2p 618

Fuel oil in tanks did not contribute to collapse of WTC 7 contrary to previous reports p 353 NCSTAR 1-9 Vol 1 and p613 NCSTAR 1-9 Vol 2

Reconstruction of the collapse of WTC 7
The probable WTC7 collapse sequence developed in this Investigation was based on observations from available evidence ( photos, videos and eyewitness accounts) as well as a series of computer simulations that modeled the complete sequence of events leading to the collapse of WTC7. No physical evidence was analyzed! Why? pXXXV ES2 of the summary of the report: the reader should keep in mind that the building and the records kept within were destroyed and the remains of all the WTC buildings were disposed of before congressional action and funding was available for this investigation to begin. As a result, there are some facts that could not be discerned and, thus there are uncertainties in this accounting. Therefore this NIST cannot be trusted. The evidence were disposed by Mr Homeland Security Michael Chertoff( double citizen US and Israel) which is a crime under federal law.

NIST hypothesis is what it calls the leading collapse hypothesis for WTC7 : p323 NCSTAR 1-9 Vol 1 There is no reason to believe this hypothesis it could be wrong they admit it themselves
The leading hypothesis for the failure sequence that characterized the initial local failure events in the tenant floors. Floor beams, girders, slabs, and connections heated more quickly and to higher temperatures than the columns. Elevated temperatures in the floor elements led to the thermal expansion with or without thermal weakening and sagging, which resulted in failure of floor connections and or buckling of floor beams. Sufficient floor component failures (connections and/or beams) resulted in at least one unsupported column over multiple floors at the lower floors. This column buckled and led to the initiation of global collapse.
It means that steel was heated by the fire so it expanded. A steel beam on the 13th floor caused a steel girder attached to column 79 to break loose, without its support, Column 79 failed, and this failure started a chain reaction, in which all the columns of the building failed

Fire-induced thermal expansion of the floor system surrounding Column 79 led to the collapse of Floor 13, which triggered a cascade of floor failures. In this case, the floor beams on the east side of the building expanded enough that they pushed the girder connecting Columns 79 and 44 to the west on the 13th floor."
"The displaced girder and other local fire-induced damage caused Floor 13 to collapse, beginning a cascade of floor failures down to the 5th floor ... This left Column 79 with insufficient lateral support in the east-west direction. The column buckled eastward, becoming the initial local failure for collapse initiation." NCSTAR 1-A, p 19-20
Question: why the girder was pushed? Answer: In WTC 7 no studs were installed on the girders." NCSTAR 1-9, p 346 and NCSTAR 1-9 Vol 2 p 526 Floor beams lost lateral restraint when majority of their shear stud connections failed either by differential thermal expansion between the steel beams and the concrete slab, or by local concrete failure due to fires on the floor slab But that contradicts the Interim Report on WTC 7 page L-6 when NIST stated: most of the beams and girders [in WTC 7] were made composite with the slabs through the use of shear studs. NCSTAR 1-1, p 14

There were 28 of these studs for each of the five beams that supposedly expanded they should have provided plenty of support. However due to differential thermal expansion of the floor beams and floor slab resulted insignificant shear force in the shear studs and caused them to fail. NCSTAR 1-9,vol 2 p473
That's strange because NIST says that steel and concrete have similar coefficient of thermal expansion NCSTAR 1-9 vol 2 p 490, that means that they expand proportionally if heated. So why the shear stud failed? This fraud is easy to understand. As the NIST report is based on computer simulations, the result of the computer simulation depends on the figure they put in their computer. In this case NIST confesses that: no thermal expansion or material degradation was considered for the slab, as the slab was not heated in this analysis. Do you realize what it means? It means that for the simulation they heated the steel beam but did not heat the concrete slab. Therefore you understand why the steel beam expanded, while the concrete floor did not, which provoked the stud to fail and left Column 79 with insufficient lateral support which provoked the entire collapse of the building. This is a clear fraud because they should have heated the floor and the steel beam in their analysis in order to do a correct experiment. But why bother if nobody reads the report?
However that it is nothing because NIST confesses that the building collapsed in free fall.
Indeed NIST described the descent in three phases. In the second phase of the descent NIST describes: freefall descent over approximately eight stories at gravitational acceleration for approximately 2.25 s ?NCSTAR 1-9,vol 2 p607
Do you understand what it means? Just a little reminder of basic Physics
Introduction to free fall
A free-falling object is an object which is falling under the sole influence of gravity. Any object which is being acted upon only be the force of gravity is said to be in a state of free fall. There are two important motion characteristics which are true of free-falling objects:
Free-falling objects do not encounter air resistance.
All free-falling objects (on Earth) accelerate downwards at a rate of 9.8 m/s/s (often approximated as 10 m/s/s for back-of-the-envelope calculations)
It means that the structure below the falling building was removed by something. Like what? An explosion?

NIST says that hypothetical blast events did not contribute to the collapse of WTC 7. NIST concluded that blast events could not have occurred and found no evidence of any blast events NCSTAR 1-9,vol 2 p 609? Why? Because such blast event would have resulted in a sound level 130 to 140 decibels (...). There were no witness reports of such a loud noise, nor was a noise heard on audio tracks of videotapes that recorded the WTC 7 collapse NCSTAR 1-9,vol 2 p 614.

I guess NIST does not know Youtube because this is what everybody can find:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw

Also here


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_A9X_8flGeM

NIST report is a fraud and those who back it up are accomplices and NIST knows it because it says that no part of any report resulting from a NIST investigation into a building failure or from an investigation under the national Construction Safety Team Act may be used in any suit or action for damages arising out of any matter mentioned in such report pXXVIII NCSTAR 1-9,vol1. NIST admits that they cannot defend its own report in a court.

You should read the following book if you want to know more about WTC7
The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False , David Ray Griffin

http://www.amazon.com/Mysterious-Col.../dp/1566567866

The fraud has been exposed a long time ago. However as the media in the US are run by Jews who support Israel and US foreign policy in the Middle East there won't be any truth.