Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Possible cell phone in movie from 1928

2

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    Sure Leonardo Da Vinci designed and used futuristic inventions so in this case Charlie Chaplin had a futuristic mind for his films, so what? :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭Kernel


    The-Rigger wrote: »
    It could be a radio, it could be someone with their hand to their ear.

    At that time there were no 'portable' radio5 as 5uch.
    wiki wrote:
    Bell Laboratories demonstrated the first transistor on December 23, 1947.[1] The scientific team at Bell Laboratories responsible for the solid-state amplifier included William Shockley, Walter Houser Brattain, and John Bardeen.[2] After obtaining patent protection, the company held a news conference on June 30, 1948, at which a prototype transistor radio was demonstrated.[3] There are many claimants to the title of the first company to produce practical transistor radios, often incorrectly attributed to Sony (originally Tokyo Tsushin Kogyo). Texas Instruments had demonstrated all-transistor AM (amplitude modulation) radios as early as 1952, but their performance was well below that of equivalent vacuum tube models. A workable all-transistor radio was demonstrated in August 1953 at the Düsseldorf Radio Fair by the German firm Intermetall. It was built with four of Intermetall's hand-made transistors, based upon the 1948 invention of Herbert Mataré and Heinrich Welker. However, as with the early Texas Instruments units (and others) only prototypes were ever built; it was never put into commercial production. RCA had demonstrated a prototype transistor radio as early as 1952 and it is likely that they and the other radio makers were planning transistor radios of their own, but Texas Instruments and Regency were the first to offer a production model.

    From Wiki.

    The phone was invented long before this anyhow.

    The first mobile telephone call made from a car occurred in St. Louis, Missouri, USA on June 17, 1946, it's hardly inconceivable that people may have considered the possibility that these phones might become portable.[/QUOTE]

    Nahhh...
    Expensive and far from "mobile", the service cost $15 per month, plus 30 to 40 cents per local call, and the equipment weighed 80 pounds. Just as they would use a CB microphone, users depressed a button on the handset to talk and released it to listen.

    Wonder what el5e it could be?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,152 ✭✭✭✭Liam Byrne


    Kernel wrote: »
    At that time there were no 'portable' radio5 as 5uch.

    Radio 5 ????? There wasn't even a Radio 1!!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,243 ✭✭✭✭Jesus Wept


    The first mobile weighed 80 pounds, it doesn't mean that someone was unable to imagine a regular sized telephone and picture it as mobile and of a smaller size.

    Will people watch Star Trek in years to come and think that they must be time travelers?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,967 ✭✭✭✭mikemac


    Cell phone?

    Are you American OP?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Cell phone?

    Are you American OP?
    FYI: Americans use boards. And so do Irish Americans. And immigrant workers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,967 ✭✭✭✭mikemac


    I didn't ask aggressively

    I just asked a question :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,357 ✭✭✭punchdrunk


    She's clearly rockin out to a bit of Wagner,off her chops on some legal amphetamine!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,791 ✭✭✭up for anything


    Looks like Nanny McPhee chatting to her next family on an original Star Trek communicator!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭bowsie010


    Her hearing aid fell out.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,779 ✭✭✭Spunge


    Then who was phone ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,943 ✭✭✭abouttobebanned


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    Why? lol. Its only an accent.

    I dunno...it's ice cream for my ears. (remember - hetro)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,822 ✭✭✭iPlop




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,490 ✭✭✭Fluorescence


    It doesn't even look like there's anything in her hand to me. She was probably scratching her head or (being in Hollywood) was perhaps an actress trying to remember her lines. I don't see a phone anyway.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,007 ✭✭✭knird evol


    I think the camera man was on acid and not of this happened at all


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 7,943 Mod ✭✭✭✭Yakult


    Those were the special effects back in the day.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,559 ✭✭✭✭AnonoBoy


    She's walking past the camera, covering her face saying, "Don't film me ya bastard, I'm supposed to be at work!"


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 28,726 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    http://idle.slashdot.org/story/10/10/28/1545230/1928-Time-Traveler-Caught-On-Film
    Irish filmmaker George Clarke, who claims to have found a person using a cellphone in the "unused footage" section of the DVD The Circus, a Charlie Chaplin movie filmed in 1928. To me the bigger mystery is how someone who appears to be the offspring of Ram-Man and The Penguin got into a movie in the first place, especially if they were talking to a little metal box on set. Watch the video and decide for yourself.

    Just to burst his bubble but it looks like its a old Siemens hearing aid
    http://hearing.siemens.com/en/10-about-us/01-our-history/milestones.jsp?page=3&year=1924

    I expect atleast one back to the future reference within the first 10 posts,


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Done already, sorry.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,425 ✭✭✭FearDark


    Biggins wrote: »
    Done already, sorry.

    Its always been done before. Its AH. Copy and paste central. Its why I post elsewhere.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,718 ✭✭✭Taco Corp


    Cabaal wrote: »

    I expect atleast one back to the future reference within the first 10 posts,

    They didn't go to 1928 in Back to the Future


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 136 ✭✭PG4000


    It's almost as if this thread is from the past


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    FearDark wrote: »
    Its always been done before. Its AH. Copy and paste central. Its why I post elsewhere.

    How about now?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 613 ✭✭✭Misanthrope


    Well if they had Rolexs in the time of Ben Hur it's conceivable we'd have mobile phones by 1928.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,548 ✭✭✭BrokenArrows


    Cabaal wrote: »
    http://idle.slashdot.org/story/10/10/28/1545230/1928-Time-Traveler-Caught-On-Film



    Just to burst his bubble but it looks like its a old Siemens hearing aid
    http://hearing.siemens.com/en/10-about-us/01-our-history/milestones.jsp?page=3&year=1924

    I expect atleast one back to the future reference within the first 10 posts,


    Possibly but he was walking and talking by himself :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭biko


    New thread travels back in time, meets old thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,027 ✭✭✭The_B_Man
    Something about sandwiches


    Strangely enough, theres a square shadow on his/her cheek in the video that doesnt correspond to his/her palm. :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,801 ✭✭✭Big Pussy Bonpensiero


    Sorry if this has been posted before but I haven't yet seen a forum on it so...


    Basically its a short film about this guy who thinks he's found a time traveller in an old movie. He sees what appears to be an old woman talking on a mobile phone in 1928. The film was made by Charlie Chaplain and the DVD is available in shops.
    It was posted a few weeks ago and already has almost 3 million hits.

    Personally I think its a load of bollocks for several reasons, the main one being who is she (or he) talking to? Doubt the coverage would have been great back then. Also there is no clear image of the alledged phone.

    Anyways, what are the thoughts of the good people of AH?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,454 ✭✭✭mink_man


    link fail.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,339 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    In before Biggins and everyone else. (damn, beaten to it)


    How could you have missed the other 2 threads on it? They had about 3 million views each.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement