Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

What is the most goverment can take off social welfare?

2456711

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,818 ✭✭✭Minstrel27


    CorkMan wrote: »
    I assume €10-€15 euro max. Lots of people are struggling, they can't cut off too much.

    I guess that those who still do can get rid of the Sky tv. Hardly a necessity now is it. Nights drinking could also be stopped.

    I am aware that this isn't true for all social welfare recipients but I know of quite a few who pay for Sky and go on the piss with their dole.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,843 ✭✭✭Nulty


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    Not wanting to sidetrack this thread into a serious discussion, but how does it follow that the most vulnerable in society are scum?

    I think he's refering to the scum as some of the "most vulnerable".

    All scum are vulnerable but not all vulnerable are scum.

    I do not endorse the comment, I'm just trying to give my idea of what he was trying to communicate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,180 ✭✭✭bryaner


    Susie_Q wrote: »
    Then I assume you're living at home with Mummy and Daddy who pay for your electricity, gas, food, household cleaning products etc? Get real.

    No thats all free via the electricity, heat ,food and gas fairy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,456 ✭✭✭✭ibarelycare


    There should be no lower limit on who pays the income levy and those on the dole should have to pay it too. It would save millions. It's 2% at the moment (will possibly go up in the budget).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭syklops


    Susie_Q wrote: »
    Then I assume you're living at home with Mummy and Daddy who pay for your electricity, gas, food, household cleaning products etc? Get real.

    How much are you spending on household cleaning products that you have put it in the same category as ESB and Gas? :eek:


    With careful budgeting you can live on very little. Its amazing how little you can live on if you put your mind to it. There are bargains to be had everywhere, if you look for it.

    Beans on toast is a tasty and nutritious snack which costs very little to make. A hell of a lot less than a 7 Euro Panini.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,426 ✭✭✭testicle


    The-Rigger wrote: »
    I really don't see what help it is to people's psyche to make them progressively poorer month after month after month after month after month after month after month.

    Governments (any of them) aren't here to help people's psyche!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,180 ✭✭✭bryaner


    syklops wrote: »
    How much are you spending on household cleaning products that you have put it in the same category as ESB and Gas? :eek:


    With careful budgeting you can live on very little. Its amazing how little you can live on if you put your mind to it. There are bargains to be had everywhere, if you look for it.

    Beans on toast is a tasty and nutritious snack which costs very little to make. A hell of a lot less than a 7 Euro Panini.

    I think Susie was just pointing out that they are not free, most kiddos on the dole think everything is free.

    I didn't even know a panini was €7 but I know a can of beans is 25c


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 366 ✭✭johnnyjb


    Rojomcdojo wrote: »
    Unless you're paying a mortgage also the dole is extremely easy to survive on. I saved 100 euro a week when I was on it and I was spending almost 40 quid a week on smokes...

    Ya well you obviously live with mammy and have no car ,bike etc.. She buys and cooks dinner and you just sit in a pile of **** all day smoking counterfit fags.

    Grow up , just cause your neglecting yourself doesnt mean whole families should.

    I suppose this whole thing is being blown out of proportion "Vote Fianna Fail" :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,962 ✭✭✭✭dark crystal




    would cut the single parents allowance by 50%, if you want to have kids, then its your choice to feed them and cloth them.

    How is punishing the children for the 'sins' of the parents going to help? It may make you feel better to see many more children delivered into poverty because of a predisposed view you have of lone parents, but I honestly hope the government sees that not all lone parents are availing of this allowance to live the life of luxury you seem to think they are.

    For each recipient, there are countless different stories of how they got to that point. Of course there will be chancers, as in every walk of life, but I suspect the majority of single parent families are simply trying to get by on very little, same as a lot of other families.

    However, I would definitely advocate cutting the child benefit for higher earners. in my view, anyone who can afford to live without it, should.

    I would also abolish the Seanad, overhaul the T.D's expenses system and take a long, hard look at the immigration policy employed in this country. When unemployment is running at 12%, supporting a growing number of asylum seekers entering the country, as well as it's own citizens surely can't continue in the current climate without something starting to buckle.

    Cutting overseas aid is also another viable option for the same reasons.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,942 ✭✭✭topper75


    Ireland's budget deficit has shot up in direct proportion to the sense of entitlement. Something has to be thrown out of the basket to stop the balloon falling. The dole is looking rather heavy at almost €200 a week versus the £65 across the pond. Interesting times.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 ✭✭zeds alive


    topper75 wrote: »
    The dole is looking rather heavy at almost €200 a week versus the £65 across the pond. Interesting times.
    Shame that the cost of living this side of the pond is far higher


  • Posts: 3,918 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    zeds alive wrote: »
    Shame that the cost of living this side of the pond is far higher

    Really? Got figures to back that up?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,941 ✭✭✭thebigbiffo


    However, I would definitely advocate cutting the child benefit for higher earners. in my view, anyone who can afford to live without it, should.

    so the people who pay the most tax to keep the social welfare pot nice and high dont get any return whatsoever from the state.

    i hate this idea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,860 ✭✭✭✭inforfun


    zeds alive wrote: »
    Shame that the cost of living this side of the pond is far higher

    3x as expensive?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,755 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    back to 2000 levels since thats where a lot of prices are anyway


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 ✭✭zeds alive


    Rojomcdojo wrote: »
    Really? Got figures to back that up?

    Have you got figures to prove me wrong?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,942 ✭✭✭topper75


    zeds alive wrote: »
    Shame that the cost of living this side of the pond is far higher

    Some things can be a little higher I'll grant you zeds. Far higher? Probably not. Some things e.g fuel can even be lower here.

    If you ask me, generous welfare payments might have their own, not insignificant, role in generating higher prices in our economy.

    Rent relief would be a good instance of this. It is an artificial floor for the entire house rental market. When our housing market is oversupplied as it is, such an artificial price floor is a very ugly, not to mention ludicrous, distortion.

    Either way the discrepancy between €200 and £65 is one to be reckoned with. And reckon with it they will.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,334 ✭✭✭earlyevening


    FYI, here are the figures which indicate the dramatic rise in unemployment benefit in the last few years.

    Budget 2000: €96.50
    Budget 2001: €106.66 (+10.5%)
    Budget 2002: €118.80 (+11.3%)
    Budget 2003: €124.80 (+5%)
    Budget 2004: €134.80 (+8%)
    Budget 2005: €148.80 (+10.3%)
    Budget 2006: €165.80 (+11.4%)
    Budget 2007: €185.80 (+12%)
    Budget 2008: €197.80 (+6.4%)
    Budget 2009: €204.80 (+3.5%) .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,180 ✭✭✭bryaner


    Its far cheaper across the pond, a mate of mine lives in Essex and and is dumbfounded at the cost of living when he comes back to Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,948 ✭✭✭The Waltzing Consumer


    FYI, here are the figures which indicate the dramatic rise in unemployment benefit in the last few years.

    Budget 2000: €96.50
    Budget 2001: €106.66 (+10.5%)
    Budget 2002: €118.80 (+11.3%)
    Budget 2003: €124.80 (+5%)
    Budget 2004: €134.80 (+8%)
    Budget 2005: €148.80 (+10.3%)
    Budget 2006: €165.80 (+11.4%)
    Budget 2007: €185.80 (+12%)
    Budget 2008: €197.80 (+6.4%)
    Budget 2009: €204.80 (+3.5%) .

    That is pretty interesting, at the moment, 2010, its what 185 Euro I think. I would guess it will be cut by ten, fifteen euro this year.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,456 ✭✭✭✭ibarelycare


    FYI, here are the figures which indicate the dramatic rise in unemployment benefit in the last few years.

    Budget 2000: €96.50
    Budget 2001: €106.66 (+10.5%)
    Budget 2002: €118.80 (+11.3%)
    Budget 2003: €124.80 (+5%)
    Budget 2004: €134.80 (+8%)
    Budget 2005: €148.80 (+10.3%)
    Budget 2006: €165.80 (+11.4%)
    Budget 2007: €185.80 (+12%)
    Budget 2008: €197.80 (+6.4%)
    Budget 2009: €204.80 (+3.5%) .

    Jesus. I never realised it more than doubled in 10 years :eek: If people could live on €96.50 a week in 2000, then people should be able to live off significantly less than €196 a week in 2011. 10% would be a good cut IMO, but no way would the government have the balls.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,113 ✭✭✭optogirl


    Pdfile wrote: »
    their as actual jobs out their just not worth anyones time doing them as they might have to be productive...

    i dunno and dont care, the whole country can sink ima stay afloat.


    Your username, desperate sentence construction and logic make me want you


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,942 ✭✭✭topper75


    bryaner wrote: »
    Its far cheaper across the pond, a mate of mine lives in Essex and and is dumbfounded at the cost of living when he comes back to Ireland.

    Two words for your mate: Council Tax.
    Jesus. I never realised it more than doubled in 10 years :eek: If people could live on €96.50 a week in 2000, then people should be able to live off significantly less than €196 a week in 2011. 10% would be a good cut IMO, but no way would the government have the balls.

    Balls to shaft the welfare vote isn't as big as the balls required to shaft the ECB hand that feeds us. They have to slash it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,180 ✭✭✭bryaner


    Jesus. I never realised it more than doubled in 10 years :eek: If people could live on €96.50 a week in 2000, then people should be able to live off significantly less than €196 a week in 2011. 10% would be a good cut IMO, but no way would the government have the balls.

    I'd say it will be around that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,180 ✭✭✭bryaner


    topper75 wrote: »
    Two words for your mate: Council Tax.



    Balls to shaft the welfare vote isn't as big as the balls required to shaft the ECB hand that feeds us. They have to slash it.

    Yes council tax and all you get with it!

    How Council Tax is spent

    Further information: Local government in England, Local government in Wales, and Local government in Scotland
    Although it is the only tax which is set by local government, the Council Tax contributes only a small proportion (25%, on average) of local government revenue. The majority comes from central government grants and from business rates which are collected centrally and redistributed to local authorities.
    Local government provide services such as police, fire, recycling, refuse collection and removal, schools, leisure centres, park and ride schemes, parks and open spaces, street cleaning, subsidising of public transport, tourism, museums, social housing grants, housing and council tax benefits, environmental health and food safety in pubs, restaurants and shops, planning services, support for voluntary groups, meals on wheels, facilities for young people, adapting homes for disabled people, play centres for children, cctv installation, sports facilities, issuing taxi licences, flood defences, and many others.
    A significant proportion of local government services are stipulated by central government in the form of statutory provision. Local councils are obliged by law to provide these services. The remainder of services are discretionary and are determined by the local council.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,942 ✭✭✭topper75


    FYI, here are the figures which indicate the dramatic rise in unemployment benefit in the last few years.

    Budget 2000: €96.50
    Budget 2001: €106.66 (+10.5%)
    Budget 2002: €118.80 (+11.3%)
    Budget 2003: €124.80 (+5%)
    Budget 2004: €134.80 (+8%)
    Budget 2005: €148.80 (+10.3%)
    Budget 2006: €165.80 (+11.4%)
    Budget 2007: €185.80 (+12%)
    Budget 2008: €197.80 (+6.4%)
    Budget 2009: €204.80 (+3.5%) .

    Funny thing is - the daftest increase in that list IMO is actually the smallest one. Deflationary environment prompting higher welfare payments?!! You couldn't make it up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,942 ✭✭✭topper75


    bryaner wrote: »
    Yes council tax and all you get with it!

    I'm not arguing that you get nothing from it.

    I'm arguing the reality that it is an additional expense for people living in Britain. They have no choice in it. We pay none. (yet!:eek:)

    Your mate from Essex came over to visit. He didn't weigh up everything when making his assertion.

    I worked in Britain there lately and came home to earn an equivalent salary in euros. I can actually save more here when the spending is done(not by much mind you!).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,180 ✭✭✭bryaner


    topper75 wrote: »
    I'm not arguing that you get nothing from it.

    I'm arguing the reality that it is an additional expense for people living in Britain. They have no choice in it. We pay none. (yet!:eek:)

    Your mate from Essex came over to visit. He didn't weigh up everything when making his assertion.

    I worked in Britain there lately and came home to earn an equivalent salary in euros. I can actually save more here when the spending is done(not by much mind you!).

    He's Irish working in England the last 8 years

    Just off the top of my head road tax, cars, groceries, beer, restaurants, clothing all a good deal cheaper over there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,500 ✭✭✭✭ctrl-alt-delete


    topper75 wrote: »
    I'm not arguing that you get nothing from it.

    I'm arguing the reality that it is an additional expense for people living in Britain. They have no choice in it. We pay none. (yet!:eek:)

    Your mate from Essex came over to visit. He didn't weigh up everything when making his assertion.

    I worked in Britain there lately and came home to earn an equivalent salary in euros. I can actually save more here when the spending is done(not by much mind you!).

    Doesn't Council Tax include refuse collection though? Which is a significant cost factor over here - I understand most on social welfare might qualify for a waiver though.

    The UK have water charges too - which not all places have here.

    I lived there for a good period too, and food and drink are a good deal cheaper along with clothing.

    It would take a good deal of effort to do the required research to work it all out though, something i'm not going to do :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,097 ✭✭✭Herb Powell


    would cut the single parents allowance by 50%, if you want to have kids, then its your choice to feed them and cloth them.
    that's called neglect, and it's not cool


Advertisement
Advertisement