$50,000 reward offered to find the puppy thrower

dr gonzo · 03-09-2010 01:04AM

4chan is helping to track her down...? You mean theyre not a burden on society for once?

BigBenRoeth · 03-09-2010 01:05AM

PeakOutput wrote: »

emmmmmm yes it can

one is painless, the other is one of the most painfull ways to die

how in the fúck is being boiled painless?

On another note,i'd ride yer wan

starbelgrade · 03-09-2010 01:06AM

I heard that she was in Co.Mayo, so I followed the tip & drove to Claremorris to see if I could find her.

She wasn't there. Turns out, I was barking up the wrong tree.

HoJOs · 03-09-2010 01:09AM

Dudess wrote: »

Puppy throwing sounds kinda like a specialist sport - like dwarf tossing.

or danger wánk:p

ascanbe · 03-09-2010 01:09AM

Michael Bay is probably just annoyed that the puppies were killed in such a mundane, predicatable manner.
If you gave him a couple of hundred million dollars budget, he probably feels he could achieve the same in much more visually exciting fashion.
The video would still probably be critically panned, though.

Charlie. · 03-09-2010 01:15AM

SugarHigh wrote: »

How about you post some evidence to back up your assumptions.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1555068/Drowning-of-puppies-not-cruel-court-rules.html

One of the 'experts' in that case said there was no evidence that 10 day old puppies could experience pain...come on!!!!
If you were to die would you rather a lethal injection or to be drowned? I know which one I would choose!
People allowing their dogs to get pregnant and then just drown the pups when they're born is absolutely disgusting!!

Charlie. · 03-09-2010 01:16AM

BigBenRoeth wrote: »

how in the fúck is being boiled painless?

I think he was comparing the puppy being put down by a vet to it being drowned...

My name is URL · 03-09-2010 01:19AM

ascanbe wrote: »

Ridiculous hysterical bull****.

No not really. If some dumb fcuk decides to do such a thing and have someone film it and put it online then what is ridiculous about people wanting to bring her to justice? Look at the Dnepropetrovsk maniacs.. they wouldn't have been found unless their stupidity got the better of them

the bitch deserves the witch hunt

Dudess · 03-09-2010 01:22AM

Charlie. wrote: »

People allowing their dogs to get pregnant and then just drown the pups when they're born is absolutely disgusting!!

Yeah, my brother's dog is a rescue - a farmer discovered her in his barn after she gave birth to nine pups, then he brought her to the rescue shelter. She had just been abandoned - no doubt once her pregnancy was showing. Fuckers. :mad:

Dudess · 03-09-2010 01:24AM

My name is URL wrote: »

No not really. If some dumb fcuk decides to do such a thing and have someone film it and put it online then what is ridiculous about people wanting to bring her to justice? Look at the Dnepropetrovsk maniacs.. they wouldn't have been found unless their stupidity got the better of them

the bitch deserves the witch hunt

Lol at how they're officially referred to as "maniacs".

I still think there is a disproportionate amount of media coverage re the pup-drowning girl though.

andrew · 03-09-2010 01:25AM

My name is URL wrote: »

No not really. If some dumb fcuk decides to do such a thing and have someone film it and put it online then what is ridiculous about people wanting to bring her to justice? Look at the Dnepropetrovsk maniacs.. they wouldn't have been found unless their stupidity got the better of them

the bitch deserves the witch hunt

There's a big difference between brutally murdering several people and throw puppies in a river to drown.

My name is URL · 03-09-2010 01:26AM

andrew wrote: »

There's a big difference between brutally murdering several people and throw puppies in a river to drown.

Yeah, but the outstanding similarity is that they both allowed the deeds to be filmed

ronano · 03-09-2010 01:28AM

SugarHigh wrote: »

Drowning puppies cannot be shown to be more cruel than how a vet would put it down. Why is this so bad compared to say boiling a lobster alive?

I've seen you peddling similar bs on another thread and you ignored any replies and then on this thread. Lets make it clear,throwing anything into a river with the potential bone breaking and then drowning is not equal to injecting an animal to put it down in the most painless way possible to argue otherwise means you must be slobbering on the keyboard due to being lobotomised.

You may view a dog or cat as a creature not needing respect but don't equate two acts to be the same because they have the same end result.

Run_to_da_hills · 03-09-2010 01:28AM

ascanbe wrote: »

Ridiculous hysterical bull****.

I wouldn't put a pass on her, she has all the hallmarks of a serial killer. :eek:

andrew · 03-09-2010 01:28AM

My name is URL wrote: »

Yeah, but the outstanding similarity is that they both allowed the deeds to be filmed

If you allow yourself to be filmed murdering people, then you deserve to get caught and punished. If you allow yourself to be filmed killing puppies, you're a bit morbid/sick, but you don't deserve to have a bounty placed on your head.

My name is URL · 03-09-2010 01:33AM

andrew wrote: »

If you allow yourself to be filmed murdering people, then you deserve to get caught and punished. If you allow yourself to be filmed killing puppies, you're a bit morbid/sick, but you don't deserve to have a bounty placed on your head.

I don't see why not.. and I'm not some woolly headed hippy. I know people who have drowned puppies and kittens after they were born, and though I couldn't do it; I don't really see that as cruelty. The cruelty shows itself in the fact that she done it in such an open and nonchalant way, with absolutely no regard for what it seemed like to others.

It's not a bounty that's on her head, it's a reward for information leading to someone that showed a perceived pleasure in undertaking the task of disposing of animals in a blase fashion

Havesomefun · 03-09-2010 01:34AM

I'm a newbie, spent most of my first few hours reading, enjoying and loving the posts on boards. But fcuk me, how anybody can find humour in the killing of a tiny helpless animal is beyond my understanding.
And for those who come back with "it's only a dog", get a fcuking grip, it lives, it takes a breath..and yes..it feels fcuking pain just as much as we do.

andrew · 03-09-2010 01:37AM

My name is URL wrote: »

I don't see why not.. and I'm not some woolly headed hippy. I know people who have drowned puppies and kittens after they were born, and don't really see that as cruelty. The cruelty shows itself in the fact that she done it in such an open and nonchalant way, with absolutely no regard for what it seemed like to others.

It's not a bounty that's on her head, it's a reward for information.

I don't see a difference between chucking a dog in a river and lovingly placing them into a plastic bag and gently placing them under to be honest. It's not as if the dogs can tell whether they were treated cruelly.

bad2dabone · 03-09-2010 01:39AM

She's a sick and cruel bitch, taking pleasure in killing those puppies.

ascanbe · 03-09-2010 01:40AM

My name is URL wrote: »

No not really. If some dumb fcuk decides to do such a thing and have someone film it and put it online then what is ridiculous about people wanting to bring her to justice? Look at the Dnepropetrovsk maniacs.. they wouldn't have been found unless their stupidity got the better of them

the bitch deserves the witch hunt

The link you provided me with refers to two unimaginably sick ****s who videotaped the torture and murder of 21 people.
This thread refers to that girl who was shown in a video throwing those puppies in a river.
I simply cannot make a connection between the two.
I also found the video of the puppies being killed disturbing and feel nothing but revulsion for the callous, carefree manner in which those animals were destroyed.
Still, let's put it in context.
It was filmed in Latvia, i believe. Quite possibly the girl is from a poor economic background and possibly a farming one. Disposing of unwanted litters of animals in is par for the course in many poor countries, as it was in this one in the past.
The manner in which she did so, as i said, was disgusting an probably points to the girl and whoever videotaped her having some kind of pschological issues.
Do i feel particularly sorry for her? No.
Do i feel that it is hysterical bull**** that, in a world where so many insanely cruel things happen to people on a daily basis, countless people are involved in this kind of witch-hunt, when they could be utilising their ire and energies in a more productive manner? Yes.

drunkmonkey · 03-09-2010 01:41AM

She could be Irish, last spotted in westport.

My name is URL · 03-09-2010 01:41AM

andrew wrote: »

I don't see a difference between chucking a dog in a river and lovingly placing them into a plastic bag and gently placing them under to be honest. It's not as if the dogs can tell whether they were treated cruelly.

There's a big difference.. compassion mostly! Putting a dog down professionally may seem just as cruel as chucking it in a river with a smile on your face but it isn't the same at all.

andrew · 03-09-2010 01:42AM

My name is URL wrote: »

There's a big difference.. compassion mostly! Putting a dog down professionally may seem just as cruel as chucking it in a river with a smile on your face but it isn't the same at all.

From the Dog's perspective, how is it different?

bad2dabone · 03-09-2010 01:46AM

ascanbe wrote: »

Do i feel that it is hysterical bull**** that, in a world where so many insanely cruel things happen to people on a daily basis, countless people are involved in this kind of witch-hunt, when they could be utilising their ire and energies in a more productive manner? Yes.

yes of course you're right here, when you put the act in context it's hardly a big deal. And there's no comparison between chucking the poor puppies into a river and killing 21 people.

But still, that puppy-thrower is a nasty bitch all the same.

Maybe in the afterlife she'll get thrown into a river by loads of puppies.

starbelgrade · 03-09-2010 01:47AM

Havesomefun wrote: »

I'm a newbie, spent most of my first few hours reading, enjoying and loving the posts on boards. But fcuk me, how anybody can find humour in the killing of a tiny helpless animal is beyond my understanding.

I agree. It's ruff.

My name is URL · 03-09-2010 01:47AM

andrew wrote: »

From the Dog's perspective, how is it different?

Why anthropomorphise it? I'm sure dying is terrible for whatever animal it's happening to. That doesn't mean that it's acceptable for the person responsible for it to show such glee while carrying it out and allowing themselves to be filmed while doing so.

Dudess · 03-09-2010 01:48AM

Havesomefun wrote: »

I'm a newbie, spent most of my first few hours reading, enjoying and loving the posts on boards. But fcuk me, how anybody can find humour in the killing of a tiny helpless animal is beyond my understanding.

I don't agree mere wordplay, puns etc indicates finding humour in the act itself. I posted a silly, joking-around comment but as I said, I also don't have the stomach to even view this video or the cat/bin one.

starbelgrade · 03-09-2010 01:52AM

Dudess wrote: »

I don't agree mere wordplay, puns etc indicates finding humour in the act itself. I posted a silly, joking-around comment but as I said, I also don't have the stomach to even view this video or the cat/bin one.

This one is watchable...

andrew · 03-09-2010 01:57AM

My name is URL wrote: »

Why anthropomorphise it? I'm sure dying is terrible for whatever animal it's happening to. That doesn't mean that it's acceptable for the person responsible for it to show such glee while carrying it out and allowing themselves to be filmed while doing so.

As far as I can tell, you were anthropomorphising it. My point was/is that carrying out the act in a callus manner doesn't make a difference to the dogs, so I don't see what the problem is that the person did it in a callous manner. That is if you can even call their behaviour callous; it's not like she was laughing with glee.

bad2dabone · 03-09-2010 02:02AM

andrew wrote: »

That is if you can even call their behaviour callous; it's not like she was laughing with glee.

she says "wheeeeeee" at one point as one puppy is hurled to its death.

If that's not callous then.....

$50,000 reward offered to find the puppy thrower

Comments