Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Weakness of the 'Left' in America

  • 27-07-2010 01:25PM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,847 ✭✭✭


    Hey everyone, first post on this forum as I didn't know it existed until now :).

    Just wondering does everyone think the 'left' is extremely weak in the US at the minute and has been for the last 30 years or so. If you compare the radicalism of the sixties and seventies (Black Panthers, anti-war movement, student sit ins at Columbia, civil rights movement, hippies etc etc) to what is considered left wing today ( a centre right Democrat party by European standards) I have to wonder what happened??

    Was it simply a case that the left wingers wn all their struggles and faded from obscurity? Or was it a case that there was a conservative backlash in the eighties against the left that has continued to the present day??

    I'd be interested in everyones views :D.


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,386 ✭✭✭Killer Wench


    I think that you will have to provide a clearer definition of what you mean by "left".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,847 ✭✭✭HavingCrack


    I think that you will have to provide a clearer definition of what you mean by "left".

    Hmmmm I probably mean radical socialism rather than the 'liberalism' in the modern American sense that is considered left wing by many people in the US today. Sorry if my post is a bit wishy washy but I'm finding it difficult to express what I mean.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Radical Socialism went the way of the Cold War.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,884 ✭✭✭spank_inferno


    Yeah, I'm not sure America really has a "left" anymore.

    In the same way we dont have any "left" mainstream parties in Ireland.

    Like Ireland America has two largely centre / centre right parties who 90% of the time are two sides of the same coin.

    There is a large block of American voters that would see themselves as being "lefty" but I think they are unsure of what it entails.

    One way or another, the only real "-ism" in american politics is populism.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 108 ✭✭PopeUrbanII


    Hey everyone, first post on this forum as I didn't know it existed until now :).

    Just wondering does everyone think the 'left' is extremely weak in the US at the minute and has been for the last 30 years or so. If you compare the radicalism of the sixties and seventies (Black Panthers, anti-war movement, student sit ins at Columbia, civil rights movement, hippies etc etc) to what is considered left wing today ( a centre right Democrat party by European standards) I have to wonder what happened??

    Was it simply a case that the left wingers wn all their struggles and faded from obscurity? Or was it a case that there was a conservative backlash in the eighties against the left that has continued to the present day??

    I'd be interested in everyones views :D.

    The United States was founded on Enlightenment thought, most notably that of John Locke. It was not founded on the teachings of Karl Marx. Communism is anathema to authentic American thought, culture and politics. Not only must the American Left be weakened, but ultimately destroyed, if America is to remain a great nation.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 210 ✭✭Hazlittle


    America had a revolution to reduce the size of the government. So no. Leftism isnt popular.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,847 ✭✭✭HavingCrack


    The United States was founded on Enlightenment thought, most notably that of John Locke. It was not founded on the teachings of Karl Marx. Communism is anathema to authentic American thought, culture and politics. Not only must the American Left be weakened, but ultimately destroyed, if America is to remain a great nation.

    Left wing doesn't necessarily mean exclusively Marxism however. Socialism, Libertarianism, Classical Liberalism and Anarchism have all been seen (rightly or wrongly) as left wing movements during history. Interestingly surely your post would show you don't agree with democracy as you said the left must be eradicated, a sentiment certain messrs Hitler, Franco and Mussolini would agree with. If I've misread your post I apologise but thats how its come across.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,847 ✭✭✭HavingCrack


    Hazlittle wrote: »
    America had a revolution to reduce the size of the government. So no. Leftism isnt popular.

    Leftist politics weren't popular anywhere at the time of the American Revolution. Marx and Bakunin weren't even born at the time so it's not really a good historical precedent in my opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 888 ✭✭✭Mjollnir


    Hazlittle wrote: »
    America had a revolution to reduce the size of the government. So no. Leftism isnt popular.

    Really? When?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,047 ✭✭✭Dob74


    Hey everyone, first post on this forum as I didn't know it existed until now :).

    Just wondering does everyone think the 'left' is extremely weak in the US at the minute and has been for the last 30 years or so. If you compare the radicalism of the sixties and seventies (Black Panthers, anti-war movement, student sit ins at Columbia, civil rights movement, hippies etc etc) to what is considered left wing today ( a centre right Democrat party by European standards) I have to wonder what happened??

    Was it simply a case that the left wingers wn all their struggles and faded from obscurity? Or was it a case that there was a conservative backlash in the eighties against the left that has continued to the present day??

    I'd be interested in everyones views :D.

    The Black Panthers all got government jobs thanks to affirmative action(unsures a high percentage of minorities get gov jobs)
    Anti-war protestor, well the war ended and they moved to the suburbs and started to vote republician.
    Columbia students graduated and all got top jobs. And are all making more money than most of us could probably dream of.
    Hippies dead of drug overdoes our cleaned themselves up and got jobs.

    The Left in america got everything they wanted in the 70's, Roe v Wade and more importantly the intergration of high school's. Hence a Black president today.
    When fee paying schools have there fair share of africian and foreign nationals going to them in Ireland we will have caught up with america socially.
    As for things like unions they are a dirty word in this country. Similiar to the south.
    Economicly we are close to the US, socially we are 50 years behind.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,386 ✭✭✭Killer Wench


    Dob74 wrote: »
    The Black Panthers all got government jobs thanks to affirmative action(unsures a high percentage of minorities get gov jobs)
    Anti-war protestor, well the war ended and they moved to the suburbs and started to vote republician.
    Columbia students graduated and all got top jobs. And are all making more money than most of us could probably dream of.
    Hippies dead of drug overdoes our cleaned themselves up and got jobs.

    The Left in america got everything they wanted in the 70's, Roe v Wade and more importantly the intergration of high school's. Hence a Black president today.
    When fee paying schools have there fair share of africian and foreign nationals going to them in Ireland we will have caught up with america socially.
    As for things like unions they are a dirty word in this country. Similiar to the south.
    Economicly we are close to the US, socially we are 50 years behind.

    That is not the definition of Affirmative Action. I believe you are confusing Affirmative Action with the Quota system; the Quota system is explicitly not permitted in terms of recruitment and hiring.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭Highly Salami


    Dob74 wrote: »
    As for things like unions they are a dirty word in this country. Similiar to the south.

    which country?, Ireland or US?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 469 ✭✭loveissucide


    Hazlittle wrote: »
    America had a revolution to reduce the size of the government. So no. Leftism isnt popular.

    As opposed to simply change the power from colonial overlords to large agricultural interests who proceeded to pass laws protecting themselves, with the fact the original US Constitution protected the right to own slaves being a prime example? The US founded in 1776 may have been more liberal than most nations at the time, but the American Revolution is a terrible example to indicate why leftism has never been a dominant political force in the US, considering that Workers Rights and Civil Rights organisations have been a constant presence.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 469 ✭✭loveissucide


    To answer the OP's question, there has always been a left in the US. It's weakness is the fact that US society is so different to European, and the US public in many areas does have a different view to the government's obligations than Europeans would, meaning politicians base their policies on the demands of a constituency which has a much more libertarian worldview than most Europeans.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,251 ✭✭✭Sandvich


    It's hilarious how angry the right are about the left and how forceful and fascist they are when in reality the problem with the modern left is that they have no ****ing balls.

    The right have guns and insanity? **** that. You have SCIENCE.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33 stretchtex


    A healthy majority of Americans aren't down with big brother and the folks up at central planning.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 523 ✭✭✭coonecb1


    I don't think it's weakness by the Democrats.

    I think the fact that the Republican's are so unified and speak almost the exact same message, with such unerring consistency, that it actually feeds into people's sub-conscious.

    The Democrats on the other hand actually tend to think for themselves on most issues, which weakens their message.

    The other big problem is that Republicans have their own cable network!! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,175 ✭✭✭Amerika


    coonecb1 wrote: »
    I think the fact that the Republican's are so unified and speak almost the exact same message, with such unerring consistency, that it actually feeds into people's sub-conscious.

    The Democrats on the other hand actually tend to think for themselves on most issues, which weakens their message.
    This is a joke, right? You're just trying to yank our chains, aren't you? You had me going there for a minute. Good one!
    The other big problem is that Republicans have their own cable network!! :D
    Unfortunately, the Democrats will just have to settle for their current control of NBC, CBS, ABC, PBS, MSNBC, and since getting rid of Lou... CNN. But not to fear, after November I'm sure the lame duck congress will target FNC with another try at the Fairness Doctrine. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/350637/august-17-2010/fox-news-and-republican-party-make-it-official
    Fox News and the Republican Party finally make it official -- their all-white wedding will be beautiful. (02:17)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,175 ✭✭✭Amerika


    What was that term? Oh yeah, Hyperbolic rubbish.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Hit a nerve have I?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,175 ✭✭✭Amerika


    Overheal wrote: »
    Hit a nerve have I?

    Actually, since the situation is similar and fits, just looking to see if I get any "thanks" from the cliquey gang. ;)

    My bet is hypocrisy rules the day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Amerika wrote: »
    Actually, since the situation is similar and fits, just looking to see if I get any "thanks" from the cliquey gang. ;)

    My bet is hypocrisy rules the day.
    Well you see your Saudi remark wasn't based on any facts, and had no references. Kind of like the Terror Babies guy.

    The above however, at least Colbert bases it on something, even though he's clearly doing a tongue in cheek.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 523 ✭✭✭coonecb1


    Amerika wrote: »
    This is a joke, right? You're just trying to yank our chains, aren't you? You had me going there for a minute. Good one!


    Unfortunately, the Democrats will just have to settle for their current control of NBC, CBS, ABC, PBS, MSNBC, and since getting rid of Lou... CNN. But not to fear, after November I'm sure the lame duck congress will target FNC with another try at the Fairness Doctrine. :D

    It wasn't a joke. Republicans are fear-mongering, using scare tactics to taint the Democrats. The current message is that Obama is leading a "Big Government Takeover" of people's lives. Too bad they weren't saying that when the Patriot Act was being signed.

    Do you mean the regulation stipulating media have to give equal importance to both sides of the political spectrum? What's so wrong with that? :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Do you mean the regulation stipulating media have to give equal importance to both sides of the political spectrum? What's so wrong with that?
    Personally I find it as tasteful as a Biased news channel that vehemently denies it has a bias.

    I'd rather the GOP or the RNC or the Tea Party just launched a TV channel rather than all this fair-and-balanced-but-we're-not BS.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 523 ✭✭✭coonecb1


    Amerika wrote: »
    Unfortunately, the Democrats will just have to settle for their current control of NBC, CBS, ABC, PBS, MSNBC, and since getting rid of Lou... CNN. But not to fear, after November I'm sure the lame duck congress will target FNC with another try at the Fairness Doctrine. :D

    Just curious, but if the Democrats really had all those news channels, does that mean they owned the news all the time up until 1996 when Fox was launched?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 523 ✭✭✭coonecb1


    Overheal wrote: »
    I'd rather the GOP or the RNC or the Tea Party just launched a TV channel rather than all this fair-and-balanced-but-we're-not BS.

    That's a pretty good idea, and one that would definitely serve the viewers well. However, GOP would never do that because then they wouldn't be able to mislead Americans as easily


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,175 ✭✭✭Amerika


    coonecb1 wrote: »
    Just curious, but if the Democrats really had all those news channels, does that mean they owned the news all the time up until 1996 when Fox was launched?

    Not owned, but they both had the same ideological viewpoints.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,460 ✭✭✭demonspawn


    I guess that's what happens when you beat the opposition into submission. There's a great film called Battle in Seattle. If you really wanna know what happened to the Great American Protester, have a look. Kinda like what happened in Dublin during that Reclaim the Streets demo a few years back. If you wanna go waaay back, there's always Kent State University.

    Not many people are gonna show up to demonstrate against tyranny if they know they're gonna get their skulls cracked by some overzealous law enforcement officers, and the ones that do are not there to protest peacefully. Black Bloc comes to mind.

    The time of peaceful protests is long gone. It's only a matter of time before small groups of people start taking direct action against their oppressors.

    Edit: Oh yeah, and there is no left or right anymore. It's just government or cattle.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    demonspawn wrote: »
    I guess that's what happens when you beat the opposition into submission. There's a great film called Battle in Seattle. If you really wanna know what happened to the Great American Protester, have a look. Kinda like what happened in Dublin during that Reclaim the Streets demo a few years back. If you wanna go waaay back, there's always Kent State University.

    Not many people are gonna show up to demonstrate against tyranny if they know they're gonna get their skulls cracked by some overzealous law enforcement officers, and the ones that do are not there to protest peacefully. Black Bloc comes to mind.

    The time of peaceful protests is long gone. It's only a matter of time before small groups of people start taking direct action against their oppressors.

    Edit: Oh yeah, and there is no left or right anymore. It's just government or cattle.
    Uhhhhhhhhhhm.............. your argument is invalid ;)

    Not that I think the Obama administration is tyrannical, but a few of these protesters would have.


Advertisement
Advertisement