Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Bishops have asked that our elected representatives follow a different road

  • 17-06-2010 10:07AM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 852 ✭✭✭moonpurple


    NEWS ITEM ONE RTE 1 TODAY
    Bishops have asked that our elected representatives follow a different road

    http://www.rte.ie/news/2010/0616/civilpartnerships.html

    they want a free vote where each TD takes a position individually on the civil partnership bill

    they do not want legally partnered tom and john to have the same legal status as
    married mary and bill

    do you think the bishops should be giving direction to elected democrats

    is there a connection here to aggressive COIR protest outside dail including a man holding a placard about 'protecting children' from civil partnership


«1345678

Comments

  • Posts: 81,308 CMod ✭✭✭✭ Evie Gifted Stubbornness


    The bishops can sod off


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,744 ✭✭✭funk-you


    Fuck you Bishops and any of the rest of you who feel it's okay to tell anyone how to lead their life. Go take your baby Jesus and....well you have plenty of experience in that.

    -Funk


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,102 ✭✭✭easyeason3


    They are entitled to have an opinion on it however ridiculous it may be.
    But the fact of the matter is the church is completely seperate from the state & one does not dictate to the other, even though they might have gotten away with it years ago.

    The church would be better off cleaning the **** up off it's own doorstep.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,417 ✭✭✭Miguel_Sanchez


    I think the bishops will find that most people in Ireland couldn't give two sh*ts about what they think anymore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,838 ✭✭✭phill106


    How about No?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    Entitled to have an opinion, and entitled to give that opinion.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,630 ✭✭✭folan


    Like any group, they can have their own opinion.

    And like any group, people can listen to them or not.

    I will not.

    they should be more concerned with the abuses the church covered up and the system behind that than Tom and Johns rights.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,789 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    While I have no time for the catholic church on this particular issue, I have always thought that TD's should have a free vote on any issue instead of having to vote along the party line.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,630 ✭✭✭folan


    a free vote would be interesting to see on many topics, always wonder how many party representitives agree with what their party is spouting on about


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,572 ✭✭✭Canard


    Why the **** should the church have more of an influence than anyone else?

    If it doesn't affect them, they should keep out of it. ****ing assholes. :mad:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    Patchy~ wrote: »
    Why the **** should the church have more of an influence than anyone else?If it doesn't affect them, they should keep out of it. ****ing assholes. :mad:

    They don't. So really it's no different to any other interest party or lobby group that make calls on a daily basis for politicians to do x, y or z.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,072 ✭✭✭PeterIanStaker


    The bishops can sod off. They wish it was the "good old days" (from their pov) when they ruled by fear. The likes of Coir can get stuffed as well. Theirs more pressing issues in the country right now than what consenting adults get up to in private.

    But, back to the issue, this sheer arrogance and sense of entitlement they think they have to dictate to people, after the Ryan and Murphy reports have shown them for what they are, is ludicrous. Hypocrisy falls short in describing it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,553 ✭✭✭Banned Account


    The are trying to argue a very shaky point, saying that recognising same sex unions is unconstitutional. Given the fact that the proposed bill doesn't actually change the constitutional position of marriage, I think they haven't really thought the issue through.

    If you ask my opinion, a group of pre-historic, celibate man should have absolutely no say on the issue of marriage.

    They may be entitled to a view on same sex relationships, but if those at issue here are consentual relationships, then again, they have no knowledge on the issue. They should stick to what the know about - things such as guilt and easter eggs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Love thy fellow man.

    Tis in the Bible.

    As long as the church is not being forced to marry them, i don't see why the church should have any say whatsoever in what the law is. Be it a civil partnership or setting speed limits.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,941 ✭✭✭thebigbiffo


    anyone read an article today or yesterday saying bishops in the north want a meeting with senior bankers to discuss the impact they've had on society etc?

    bit like a c'unt convention that meeting. they could all sit around the table discussing who f'ucked the country up the most then go fiddle some kids/accounts


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,960 ✭✭✭DarkJager


    Any TD that will allow himself or his decisions to be influenced by a ****ing cult should get the **** out tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭Blackhorse Slim


    I'm shocked by the attitdes displayed towards the Holy Roman Catholic Church in this thread.

    Ye're all far too lenient on them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,941 ✭✭✭thebigbiffo


    I'm shocked by the attitdes displayed towards the Holy Roman Apostolic Catholic Church in this thread.

    Ye're all far too lenient on them.

    fixed that there


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 489 ✭✭Trashbat


    If Civil Partnership was asacrement i could understand their position, but still wouldn't agree with it.

    I think its issues like this that show the people of Ireland how out of touch with reality the church really are. Anyone objecting to Civil Partnership is doing so purely out of hatred and homophobia, and any other arguement the try to give is a lie.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,941 ✭✭✭thebigbiffo


    Trashbat wrote: »
    If Civil Partnership was asacrement i could understand their position, but still wouldn't agree with it.

    I think its issues like this that show the people of Ireland how out of touch with reality the church really are. Anyone objecting to Civil Partnership is doing so purely out of hatred and homophobia, and any other arguement the try to give is a lie.

    i'm dont hate gay people nor am i homophobic but i worry about how civil partnerships might lead to same sex adoption etc. although i'm still on the fence with same sex adoption - i'm open to debate on it - at the moment to me it still seems a step too far...maybe i'm old fashioned


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 3,918 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    anyone read an article today or yesterday saying bishops in the north want a meeting with senior bankers to discuss the impact they've had on society etc?

    bit like a c'unt convention that meeting. they could all sit around the table discussing who f'ucked the country up the most then go fiddle some kids/accounts

    haha! Maybe they could crown a sort of KING OF THE FIDDLERS at the end of the meeting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,755 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    moonpurple wrote: »
    they want a free vote where each TD takes a position individually on every bill

    ;)

    now that would be more useful to us!


  • Posts: 3,918 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    i'm dont hate gay people nor am i homophobic but i worry about how civil partnerships might lead to same sex adoption etc. although i'm still on the fence with same sex adoption - i'm open to debate on it - at the moment to me it still seems a step too far...maybe i'm old fashioned

    If you'd rather see a kid stay in an orphanage/state care as opposed to being given a loving home, then you are a bit of a douche tbh. How often do your parents throw their sexuality in your face in your house? It's not like same sex couples all have some sort of gay/lesbian propaganda/lovefest in their houses.

    I mean think about it - Nearly every household in Ireland is a household with a mother and father, and (shock horror) they produce gay kids as well as straight kids.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,588 ✭✭✭derfderf


    i'm dont hate gay people nor am i homophobic but i worry about how civil partnerships might lead to same sex adoption etc. although i'm still on the fence with same sex adoption - i'm open to debate on it - at the moment to me it still seems a step too far...maybe i'm old fashioned

    And smoking weed is a gateway to heroin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,161 ✭✭✭flanzer


    I think they're also worried that some of their own will leave the church and marry their boyfriends, if this civil partnership thing comes in


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,553 ✭✭✭Banned Account


    Rojomcdojo wrote: »
    I mean think about it - Nearly every household in Ireland is a household with a mother and father, and (shock horror) hey produce gay kids as well as straight kids.

    I thought that was someting to do with the Kama Sutra though - anything but the missionary and they might turn out on the camp side.*













    *Edit, if this is true, I may be father to David Norris, Graham Norton and Lous Walsh:o*


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 407 ✭✭OxfordComma


    Meh. Let them think what they want. It's pretty funny that they still think people listen to what they have to say though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,941 ✭✭✭thebigbiffo


    Rojomcdojo wrote: »
    If you'd rather see a kid stay in an orphanage/state care as opposed to being given a loving home, then you are a bit of a douche tbh. How often do your parents throw their sexuality in your face in your house? It's not like same sex couples all have some sort of gay/lesbian propaganda/lovefest in their houses.

    I mean think about it - Nearly every household in Ireland is a household with a mother and father, and (shock horror) they produce gay kids as well as straight kids.
    derfderf wrote: »
    And smoking weed is a gateway to heroin.

    lads calm down, i'm trying to be as objective as possible here. i'm not suggesting that same sex parenting is wrong or leads to unhappy/unstable children or even that i'm against it, i'm just saying i dont know where i stand on it yet. my viewpoint on it at the moment is that the traditional mother/father upbringing provides input and influence from both sexes and that maybe this is the more natural way to bring up a kid.

    i did say in my original post it was something that needed more debate and that's my only point. i've gay friends (i hate when people say that - i've also black friends :p) and i've spoken about it with them to and they see the point i'm making. you can't just expect people who've had the 'traditional' upbringing to accept the idea overnight...i know nothing about same sex parenting ffs!!

    i do totally accept same sex couples should have the same rights as married couples though...just so we're clear i dont bash homo's in my free time

    edit: i dont want any f'uckin bishop involved in the debate either - just so we're back on point


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,931 ✭✭✭Prof.Badass


    Des Bishop is a **** :mad:.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,553 ✭✭✭Banned Account


    lads calm down, i'm trying to be as objective as possible here. i'm not suggesting that same sex parenting is wrong or leads to unhappy/unstable children or even that i'm against it, i'm just saying i dont know where i stand on it yet. my viewpoint on it at the moment is that the traditional mother/father upbringing provides input and influence from both sexes and that maybe this is the more natural way to bring up a kid.

    i did say in my original post it was something that needed more debate and that's my only point. i've gay friends (i hate when people say that - i've also black friends :p) and i've spoken about it with them to and they see the point i'm making. you can't just expect people who've had the 'traditional' upbringing to accept the idea overnight...i know nothing about same sex parenting ffs!!

    i do totally accept same sex couples should have the same rights as married couples though...just so we're clear i dont bash homo's in my free time

    edit: i dont want any f'uckin bishop involved in the debate either - just so we're back on point

    I think a strong argument is that same sex couples, and children thereof, will never get the opportunity of being accepted as a normative unless some are willing to braek the mould first.

    I do realise that playgrounds can be the cruellest of places for an kid, so I could only imagine what the child of a same sex couple may go through but the flip side is that a vote for the staus quo here is also a vote against progressing as a nation.


Advertisement
Advertisement