Advertisement
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Saab 9-5 share same parts as Vectra ?

  • 05-06-2010 12:08PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,306 ✭✭✭


    Hi All

    I'm looking to buy rear swinging arms and links for a 2000 Saab 9-5 estate. The local auto factor says they have nothing listed for the SAAB but thought the Vectra mite be the same.

    Could anyone advise if thy share the above parts ?

    Thanks


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,306 ✭✭✭Mycroft H


    Barr wrote: »
    Hi All

    I'm looking to buy rear swinging arms and links for a 2000 Saab 9-5 estate. The local auto factor says they have nothing listed for the SAAB but thought the Vectra mite be the same.

    Could anyo9ne advise if thy share the above parts ?

    Thanks


    No. As far as i know the 95 has a fancy multi link rear suspension thats slightly different to the one the vectra.

    I am open to correction on this though :pac:

    Go to a proper motor factors if they cant supply you Saab parts.


  • Posts: 23,497 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Barr wrote: »

    The local auto factor says they have nothing listed for the SAAB but thought the Vectra mite be the same.

    The dude in the factors is a muppet tbh, if they were the same then the manufacturer would list them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 Tasmanian Devil


    Have you tried a SAAB Dealer?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,911 ✭✭✭✭ShadowHearth


    i thought only newer 9-3 shared same platform with vectra? 9-5 should be on its own, no?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,433 ✭✭✭✭Mr Benevolent


    i thought only newer 9-3 shared same platform with vectra? 9-5 should be on its own, no?

    Nope, the Vectra has been polluting SAAB's proud heritage *snigger* for the past 15 years.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,877 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    Saab 9-5 uses the 1995 to 2002 Vectra platform afaik. Current 9-3 uses the 02 to 09 Vectra platform.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,766 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    bazz26 wrote: »
    Saab 9-5 uses the 1995 to 2002 Vectra platform afaik.

    Saab 9-5 uses the '89 Vectra platform! :eek:

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Posts: 1,659 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think 900 uses the '89 Vectra, 9-5 uses the "more advanced" :-) '96 platform.

    OP, at least some of the rear bushings (the 4 small ones at the end of the trailing arm) are the same as in Vectra.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,462 ✭✭✭furtzy


    The 9-5 shares some elements of the vectra b platform while the 9-3 shares quite a lot of the vectra c platform. I have used several suspension parts, discs and pads etc on the vectra using saab parts. They were identical just different part numbers


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,766 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    samih wrote: »
    I think 900 uses the '89 Vectra, 9-5 uses the "more advanced" :-) '96 platform.

    I can imagine the 9-5 was improved over the years, but in 2010 it still uses the GM2900 platform first used by the Vectra A in '88. The 9-3 also used this platform until the new model in '03, which used the much improved epsilon platform, but the 9-5 never switched over!

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,462 ✭✭✭furtzy


    unkel wrote: »
    I can imagine the 9-5 was improved over the years, but in 2010 it still uses the GM2900 platform first used by the Vectra A in '88. The 9-3 also used this platform until the new model in '03, which used the much improved epsilon platform, but the 9-5 never switched over!

    Isn't it a mixture of the old Vectra A platform and the vectra B suspension?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,766 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    furtzy wrote: »
    Isn't it a mixture of the old Vectra A platform and the vectra B suspension?

    You could very well be right there - I only know the platform is very old and it wasn't even good when it went on sale 22 years ago :)

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,462 ✭✭✭furtzy


    unkel wrote: »
    You could very well be right there - I only know the platform is very old and it wasn't even good when it went on sale 22 years ago :)

    Yeah shocking that GM let it slide so badly. The 9-3 is referred to as a Vectra in a dinner jacket....guaranteed to piss off a 9-3 owner that :D


Advertisement
Advertisement