Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Taser watches

  • 08-05-2010 02:17PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,752 ✭✭✭


    Since I only discoverd this forum yesterday and you guys seem to know a lot about watches, what do you think of Taser watches. I have been thinking of acquiring one for a few years. My lifestyle means that usually I just wear some cheap like a G-Shock. I'm a ultra runner so I end up in lots of places like the Sahara and mostly I'm just interested in telling the time and the stopwatch function.

    I also can end up in the middle of now where of the top of a mountain late at night, as these watches claim to be the easiest to read in poor light I'm interested in opinions. I use kit makers that use the same stuff to provide light and I have to say they work great in negative light conditions. So what do you guys make of them?


Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I'm assuming you mean Traser watches? http://www.watchesgb.com/c/traser_watches/

    They started off as licensed copies of US military spec watches, where these tritium vials instead of radioactive paint were first used(The H3 on their dials refers to the tritium radioactive material). This is the original of the species made by Stocker and Yale http://www.50717.com/us/sandy-p650.html Traser made a copy of that particular one as their first release and often sold them as "military issue"(they weren't). That said IMHO they're better quality than the original mil spec(I've owned both) and had a superior quartz movement to the SandY, better waterproofing and the case material seems stronger. BTW mil spec while a good spec in of itself is also engineered to a budget. They're generally not meant to be expensive watches. The original and the newer marathon navigator are around 30 dollars per unit to the military.

    The illumination is very good*. Much better than any other luminous coatings. Nearly all of which have to be charged by a light source first and don't hold their charge for that long. You could leave a traser in the dark for months and it'll stay bright because of the radioactive gas in the vials charging the luminous. BTW the radioactivity contained is very low and very safe. Its not like the radium used in the past, which can be very dangerous, or even the tritium paint which requires careful handling by watchmakers. It does get less bright over a period of years as the radioactivity decays. I have a 10 year old Marathon mil issue that is defo less bright than a later one. Though there are places that will replace the vials.

    If you're looking for longevity and robustness I still think the g shock might be a stronger watch. The military seem to think so as most soldiers etc will buy a g shock in their PX military store. That said this http://www.watchesgb.com/p/traserh3_classic_chrono_pb_watch/ looks nice I have to say. Easier to read too and as its water resistant to 300 feet way you cant really go wrong :)

    Now if you really wanted to treat yourself, really wanted to push the boat out and get an actual mil spec and issued chrono watch with tritium vial illumination that's built like Chuck Norris' brick sh*t house, then you could go for this;
    csar4large.jpg
    The Marathon CSAR chrono. You're talking over 2 grand though and can be hard to source, but it will hold its value second hand compared to most similar watches at that pricepoint. Its a big bugger though, so if you have girlie wrists like me..... :D


    *Indeed these watches are so bright that special forces types were apparently sometimes concerned that looking at the watch in the dark could give your position away.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,265 ✭✭✭MiCr0


    i had a look @ the trasers - very nice :-)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 38 .Moosejam


    Most if not all ball watches use tritium, they come in several shades of awesome check their website.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,752 ✭✭✭Odysseus


    Wibbs wrote: »
    I'm assuming you mean Traser watches? http://www.watchesgb.com/c/traser_watches/

    They started off as licensed copies of US military spec watches, where these tritium vials instead of radioactive paint were first used(The H3 on their dials refers to the tritium radioactive material). This is the original of the species made by Stocker and Yale http://www.50717.com/us/sandy-p650.html Traser made a copy of that particular one as their first release and often sold them as "military issue"(they weren't). That said IMHO they're better quality than the original mil spec(I've owned both) and had a superior quartz movement to the SandY, better waterproofing and the case material seems stronger. BTW mil spec while a good spec in of itself is also engineered to a budget. They're generally not meant to be expensive watches. The original and the newer marathon navigator are around 30 dollars per unit to the military.

    The illumination is very good*. Much better than any other luminous coatings. Nearly all of which have to be charged by a light source first and don't hold their charge for that long. You could leave a traser in the dark for months and it'll stay bright because of the radioactive gas in the vials charging the luminous. BTW the radioactivity contained is very low and very safe. Its not like the radium used in the past, which can be very dangerous, or even the tritium paint which requires careful handling by watchmakers. It does get less bright over a period of years as the radioactivity decays. I have a 10 year old Marathon mil issue that is defo less bright than a later one. Though there are places that will replace the vials.

    If you're looking for longevity and robustness I still think the g shock might be a stronger watch. The military seem to think so as most soldiers etc will buy a g shock in their PX military store. That said this http://www.watchesgb.com/p/traserh3_classic_chrono_pb_watch/ looks nice I have to say. Easier to read too and as its water resistant to 300 feet way you cant really go wrong :)

    Now if you really wanted to treat yourself, really wanted to push the boat out and get an actual mil spec and issued chrono watch with tritium vial illumination that's built like Chuck Norris' brick sh*t house, then you could go for this;
    csar4large.jpg
    The Marathon CSAR chrono. You're talking over 2 grand though and can be hard to source, but it will hold its value second hand compared to most similar watches at that pricepoint. Its a big bugger though, so if you have girlie wrists like me..... :D


    *Indeed these watches are so bright that special forces types were apparently sometimes concerned that looking at the watch in the dark could give your position away.

    Sorry I forgot about my post here and forgive the typo, I don't use this place often. Yeah its one of the H3 ones I'm looking at getting. I have a few keyrings with the radioactive illumination, the torch beside my bed for example. There is no use having a torch handy and not being able to find it in the dark. They are great for attaching to things that you may use in low light conditions and make them easy to find.

    I have a G-Shock for every day use, I just think that these look nice and the illumination is important for me. I hunt and I'm also an ultra runner so I can sometimes be found running through the desert at night when I'm lucky. I was told there is a place in Dublin that stocks them, so maybe I might treat myself for Xmas and get one.

    Cheers thanks for the response.


Advertisement
Advertisement