Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Whats your FS background?

2

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,939 ✭✭✭pclancy


    saudek wrote: »
    Hi there,

    I'm new on this forum. I'm a very proud member of the IVAO association since 2005 in which, I estimate having done a total amount of 5000hrs as pilot (3500 hours online) and 2000 hrs as ATC.
    I usually fly PMDG aircrafts, E-jets series (by Wilco), A320 series (which is actually pretty crappy), dreamfleet Baron 58 for IFR traditional navigation, and carenado products for VFR flights.
    FS9 and FS10 equipped.

    I usually fly IVAO tours that make me travelling all over the world in front of my PC enjoying a lot of different procedures, while drinking a good tea :).

    See you all.

    Welcome mate :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 380 ✭✭ryanch09


    i dont know how people could go on a fs flight that lasts more than 30 minutes. i tried flying to new york from shannon and i ended up leaving it on autopilot and going to watch tv i was so bored(eventually sped up the sim rate but it still took a while lol!!!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,939 ✭✭✭pclancy


    Personal preference I guess. You see a lot of long haulers on VATSIM doing massive trans pacific stints LAX to Sydney etc but I personally enjoy VFR and GA flying a lot more. Autopilots are boring :) Events and stuff where you do maybe a 3 hour trip from Auckland to Brisbane for example are good fun because both ends have full ATC and theres loads of traffic.

    I imagine (or hope) that people that do really long haul stuff (like 8 hours) MUST leave their PC for some extended period otherwise they'd actually melt with inactivity. There's only so many times you can check the flightplan and engine gauges before falling asleep :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 668 ✭✭✭ch252


    pclancy wrote: »
    Personal preference I guess. You see a lot of long haulers on VATSIM doing massive trans pacific stints LAX to Sydney etc but I personally enjoy VFR and GA flying a lot more. Autopilots are boring :) Events and stuff where you do maybe a 3 hour trip from Auckland to Brisbane for example are good fun because both ends have full ATC and theres loads of traffic.

    I imagine (or hope) that people that do really long haul stuff (like 8 hours) MUST leave their PC for some extended period otherwise they'd actually melt with inactivity. There's only so many times you can check the flightplan and engine gauges before falling asleep :)

    Have to agree with you there, can't do long haul at all! medium haul and throw on a movie or just short haul/GA is the way to go!


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I have been in to Flight Sim since 2000.
    Started with FLY! then moved on to MS FS 2002 and 2004.

    My first add-on was A340 Professional by PSS/Just Flight.
    Then moved on to PMDG 737NG.

    But my favorite has to be Air Simmers A320.
    I bought/joined in to the Extended Team Program back in April and testing it ever since. :D
    When this Advanced version is finished it's gonna be one of the best add-on to date.

    As you might have guessed I'm a die hard Airbus fan :p.
    I aleady have most A320 training material (FCOM,CBT, etc) anything related to A320 I want it. ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,465 ✭✭✭highlydebased


    ft85915 wrote: »
    I have been in to Flight Sim since 2000.
    Started with FLY! then moved on to MS FS 2002 and 2004.

    My first add-on was A340 Professional by PSS/Just Flight.
    Then moved on to PMDG 737NG.

    But my favorite has to be Air Simmers A320.
    I bought/joined in to the Extended Team Program back in April and testing it ever since. :D
    When this Advanced version is finished it's gonna be one of the best add-on to date.

    As you might have guessed I'm a die hard Airbus fan :p.
    I aleady have most A320 training material (FCOM,CBT, etc) anything related to A320 I want it. ;)



    (only noticed this now)

    What do you think of the Air Simmer 320? On the extended team myself, bit disappointed that its gone a-rye at the moment though! was considering looking for my money back...


  • Registered Users Posts: 226 ✭✭TPMP


    I started playing FS2002 about 5 years ago and only recently switched to fs9 when I got a new PC. Absolutly love it. I usually fly either the captain sim 757, PSS A320 or level d 767. Have never flown online and not sure I want to. I'm sure its great and very realistic, but wouldnt there be much, much less traffic flying around?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,465 ✭✭✭highlydebased


    TPMP wrote: »
    I started playing FS2002 about 5 years ago and only recently switched to fs9 when I got a new PC. Absolutly love it. I usually fly either the captain sim 757, PSS A320 or level d 767. Have never flown online and not sure I want to. I'm sure its great and very realistic, but wouldnt there be much, much less traffic flying around?

    Depends where you fly to really, all the major airports Europe wise see a large attendance at the peak evening time 6pm onwards, and with major events organised its very enjoyable. That combined with using almost real ATC- not a patch on FS default atc.


  • Registered Users Posts: 39 Shaneboyle


    Starting with Fs2002 next then to FS2004 where i still am now.
    I fly on IVAO and membership coord with the Irish division,
    I fly with VA mainly pmdg 737, pss757 and wilco/pa merge A320.
    I also control on IVAO.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,102 ✭✭✭shefellover93


    Had fs98 and did the usual of installing it, crashing a few times, getting frustrated and taking it off for a few months before my curiosity got the better of me again.

    Then I bought 2002 just because it was cheap, and decided that I was going to teach myself how to fly properly.

    I really got into it and got myself FS9 but only ever flew 2 or 3 vatsim flights (Always had technical trouble) I still flew offline quite a bit.

    Over the summer my brothers gaming pc was replaced with a mac, and so now I'm left stranded (Can't find a copy of x-plane anywhere) I really miss Flight Sim, and with Football Manager on the blink as well I'm going mad (Reverting to truck sim to keep myself entertained)

    Used to love flying the 737-800, really easy bird to fly. But also liked the a320 as well (Aer Lingus of course) I got myself a joystick last christmas but now it's just gathering dust :( I got the xplane demo but haven't the foggiest in how to work it properly (Gotten so used to the FS controls)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 127 ✭✭ct89


    Cessna Caravan Amphibian FTW!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,102 ✭✭✭shefellover93


    ct89 wrote: »
    Cessna Caravan Amphibian FTW!

    The plane that was near impossible to crash. Can't find a runway, just aim for the sea! :pac:

    I forgot to mention that I was in a few VA's and have made a few vids as well on youtube, which I sometimes look at to remind me what it looked like ;)


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 22,584 CMod ✭✭✭✭Steve


    Unfortunately, I'm old enough to remember this:

    MSFS1.00_1_0008.png

    I'm pretty sure I've had every version from that to FSX.

    It sortof comes and goes with me, every so often I get back into it and then give up for months on end.

    Current favourite is the PMDG MD11 on FSX, mainly because of doing many many pond hops IRL on Delta.

    I was also involved in IFSD in the early days - if anyone remembers the Howth scenery on approach to EIDW 28, I made it!


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,939 ✭✭✭pclancy


    Yeah I have the same problem. Keep getting bored of it after a while and needing a new challenge. I love the PMDG Jetstream 41 the most at the moment as its great for quick hops between regional airports around the world and has lots of interesting systems to play with. Quite hard to manage its engines and approach speeds too so lots of manual flying. VATSIM keeps some interest going too.

    I'm looking forward to the PMDG 737X when it finally comes out. Might need a new PC to run it at its best though it will be worth it, i love the 737.


  • Registered Users Posts: 127 ✭✭MonkeyDoo


    pclancy wrote: »
    Been into FS since 4.0 on my 386 :) Since then i've had every version and been involved in virtual airlines, VATSIM and a/c repainting for a while. Made myself give it up as I was spending an unhealthy time on it up to about 2 years ago and sold PC to get a laptop. I'm in New Zealand now going for real flying lessons soon but I still fire up FSX a good bit and mess around, theres some good scenery and a good online FS community down here too!

    I've also applied for a job with a company down here that actually builds 737 cockpits using FS2004 as the engine...watch this space if i get the job i'll tell more!

    I had FS3 on a 286 i believe ;-) Chicago Meigs...

    FS4 was cool even had and airplane designer built in was a bit cheesed off when they removed that from later versions.

    I think am addicted to the game used take off from Dub, then do a transatlantic flight....and have the flight plan calculated so that I arrive in JFK about the time my alarm clock goes off...then do a landing first thing before breakfast ;-) Sounds interesting pclancy good luck with the job!


  • Registered Users Posts: 49 SteveSilverhead


    Hello all,

    I've been into FS since Airbus A320 came out for the Amiga in the early 90s. Later on I got into FS3, and almost every version since then.

    I've not been simming all the time, however - it's been more like an on and off interest - a few hours now, maybe a few again in a few weeks time. And I certainly used to do more when I was younger and single and with more time on my hands.

    Recently got a new graphics card for the PC, and am able to get FSX to run on it quite comfortably with some nice graphics, at least in the airports I've visited so far. So, as and when I get time and money I am going to see about adding monitors to try and enhance the experience.

    Will post here if anything remotely useful or interesting comes out of this!


  • Registered Users Posts: 40 redhot


    I stuck with FS2004, and I think it was a wise decision.

    Dell XPS gaming PC
    TrackIR5
    Buttkicker gamer (under seat vibed- great for "wheels up" and getting hit by bullets and shrapnell)
    Saitek Cyborg EVO force stick
    Force feedback Bass headphones
    UK photographic scenery and airport add-ons

    I maxed out with some serious long sessions, most challenging is the flightdeck aircraft carrier landings and take off (see Glacier girl pic), and having fun with inappropriate aircraft on the steam catapult!

    Any of you managed to get FSX cloking good frame rates with max settings?


  • Registered Users Posts: 40 redhot


    A few screenshots from my FS2004 for you


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,205 ✭✭✭Firekitten


    Hi there, new to the virtual flying forum :)

    I started out in fs98, moving through 2000, 2002, 2004, and now fsx. Probably been flying virtually for 8 years on and off....
    Roughly 380 hours comercial, 450 light, 200 fast jet, and currently working on my rotary with 20 hours nearly. (I still suck)
    First got the bug after taking flying lessons for my 16th birthday... thats when the casual interest took off for me.

    Favourite aircraft? Beach King Air or the b738... hard to decide
    Favourite moment flying? Gliding a 738 90nm and landing it on an island strip after a fuel leak... Never thought I'd make it, lost my avionics and flaps without apu, and landed on backup avionics and gravity gear deployment. White knuckles doesn't come close lol.

    Well, Hey, and nice to meet you all :)


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 22,584 CMod ✭✭✭✭Steve


    Firekitten wrote: »
    Well, Hey, and nice to meet you all :)
    Oh no.. there goes the neighbourhood.. :p:D


    /just kidding...please don't ban me Andy..


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,205 ✭✭✭Firekitten


    *sad panda* -->:o:(:o


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭greenpilot


    Time to kickstart this Forum. I have been flying since FS98, then every one after that. I am, however stuck on FS2004, Its the most stable. To boot,I try to fly, or at least get on the controls of as many REAL world aircraft as I can, and then compare the sim versions. I have 3000 hours at least on flight sims. here is what I have on sim..

    PDMG 737
    Aeroworx beech 200
    Captain Sim c-130
    Captain Sim 707
    Maddog DC9
    Concorde PSS
    Flight 1 Spitfire
    Flight 1 Mosquito
    F-16, Flight1
    dreamflight 727
    etc etc etc

    I have flown in real life..
    Hughes 200
    Dc3
    Cessna 172
    Cessna 182
    Grob 115
    Microlite
    Beech 90
    various Gliders
    Harvard
    Yak 52

    I love messing around with the airfiles on 2004, and I still fly a few hours a week, especially weekends..

    G


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,644 ✭✭✭storker


    My slight simming background:

    Ace (C64)
    Ace 2 (C64)
    F-117 (486)
    EF2000
    Fly!
    Falcon 4
    FS 2000
    FSX

    Stork


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,647 ✭✭✭El Inho


    im posting with a hape of nerdy pride that ye may laugh at :D

    basically, started playing with 95 and 98. Played them since i was knee high to a grasshopper (born in 88)

    all i ever did really was take off and crash for the sport. always came back to the sims for a while but never ever made any progress..

    got my hands on fs2004.

    arsed around a bit tonight with it...took some lessons etc.

    got fs2004, sidewinder joystick, and a second monitor for nav and atc etc.

    and here it is...

    for the first time ever, i played the game for more than 5 minutes. took a Boeing 777-300 and flew a route i know quite well from my own experience. Dublin to Schipol.

    Now the landing was a Turlough O Neill special (anyone who flys with ryan air and experienced him knows what im on about)

    but i did it...

    bout an hour and a half, but i handled a full flight...im damn proud :D haha

    but yeah, thats me...first time post..and now im going to bed. iaa rules and all that :P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,959 ✭✭✭gugleguy


    Psion Flight Simulator 16K for the ZX Spectrum > Fighter Bomber for the ZX Spectrum required multiload from cassette tape :(

    then on to the Atari ST e
    F 16 by Digital Integration.

    then on to Windows 95 PC
    Microsoft Flight Simulator 98

    ******FALCON 4.0 by MICROPROSE*******

    the first bug ridden version.
    I threw this out..........one of my lifelong regrets - recently a new F16 combat sim came out, requiring the .exe file in the first version - anything else won't do according to the maker called bfs?

    Microsoft Flight Simulator 2000
    Lots of Crashing and errors in Windows 95. Threw this out as well.
    Microsoft CFS 1. Played ok but I never really took to it. Threw it out.
    Microsoft CFS 2. Would'nt play at all. Kept for my next PC.

    then bought a Win XP Compaq which I downgraded to Win 2000 - sad decision as well on my part.
    Microsoft Flight Simulator 2004
    IL2 1946 - Brilliant Sim - works on my windows 7 Sony Viao after a lot of hacker style installation.
    CFS 2 - Played grand. Then I purchased the Harrier Jump Jet & Falklands war Game Addon The installation program offers installation up to MS FS 2002.

    then bought my current Sony VIAO laptop
    Microsoft FS X Standard Edition. Plays rather well in fact.
    Wings of Prey/Wings of Luftwaffe, Plays ok, i don't play it that often.
    IL2 1946 - this flys along.
    Installed CFS 2 the same way I installed IL2 1946 on this machine. Installed Harrier Jumpjet Falklands addon on top of this - successfully.

    That's my lineage


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,521 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    That screenshot of FS2 on the commodore brings back painful memories. It was dire speed wise, so best flown with a 100 Ft cloudbase (So IFR and no scenery as such) and used as an instrument procedural trainer. Digital joysticks didn't help, so my attitude was that if I broke cloud in the right place to be able to put it on the runway, that was a successful flight.

    Then things like 386's and joy of joys, 486 came along, and FS4, which also then got some very powerful addon packages that meant things like Dublin scenery was possible, and got done, and that started all manner of interesting things.

    I already had a PPL, and at that stage, was trying to get a CPL/IR so Flight Sim was a useful tool. Then Aer Lingus found out about the Dublin Scenery I'd done, and the next thing was a procedural trainer, using FS4 and my scenery, and a specialised dual control joystick type system with a much modified keyboard that allowed flights by two people without using keyboard input to control the basic operations, again built by me. It was used to train some of the new cadets at the time, and then was the centrepiece of the Young Scientist fair the following year.

    That got me looking in a different direction, and I became involved with a package that had split off from FS4, but was very similar, with some common code, and as a result of that, met up with a developer who had produced a graphics package for ATP, along with some better flight modelling.

    That over time became a specialised airline sim which also had a lot of commonality with FS, AS2.

    That then led into a multi machine networked version that was suitable for professional and research use, and I spent a lot of time over a number of years installing a much modified version of this in the UK, based on the A320, with a complete mode control panel, overhead panel, centre console and flight management system, all fully functional, with an instructor station, and this was used with A320 pilots to carry out human factors research on flight deck design, with a view to improving the interface between the aircraft and the crew. That one system used a network of 19 Pc's and had full instrumentation, external view monitors and a lot of other very specialised systems on it, including things like TCAS. and much of the degraded modes of flight depending on the nature of systems failures

    For development work, I had a hybrid simulator that was a mixture of 737, MD83 and Airbus, dual control, and that was seen in a number of events in both Ireland, Austria, Germany and the UK.

    9-11 did huge damage to that market, Microsoft significantly backed off the Flight Sim market, and a number of the other developers moved away from professional work, partly because the changes in rules applied to high end flight simulators made it almost impossible for the low end developers to validate their systems.

    I'd also managed to get the CPL/IR as well, but then Saddam Hussein killed much of the job market, so I stayed with computers, albeit doing a lot less with flight simulation than I used to.

    In terms of real flying, I've done a lot of multi engine IFR flying in Twin Comanche, Aztec, Apache and Seneca, and a whole variety of Cessna, Piper and similar singles, including some multi day long distance cross country flights in the States.

    I also managed to get a lot of time in full flight simulators, and included in that list are Citation, Bombardier and Lear Business jets, then on the commercial side, BAC1-11, Boeing 737-2, 737-3-5, 747 Classic, 747-400, 757, 767, 777, Lockheed Tristar, Douglas DC10, Airbus A320 and Concorde. All in all, there's probably about 200 hours in these sims, and then probably somewhere between 1 and 2 thousand hours in the generic sims that I've been involved with, which were the hybrid development maching I had here, and the A320 in the UK.

    Recent years, I've not done much flying, either real aircraft or simulators, some medical issues got in the way of the real stuff, and a massive flood at our house damaged a lot of my hardware and the flight deck, and I just didn't have the heart at the time to rebuild it all, and with the future post 9-11 being very uncertain, I wasn't sure I could justify the significant expense involved. Most of the sim flying I do now tends to be VFR in a light single or maybe a light twin, over relatively short distances

    I've also started spending more time with radio control model flying, and that is sparking some interests in merging some of the flight sim ideas into the model flying arena, but before I go too far with that, I need to be able to fly the models effectively, and helicopters are a significant challenge, especially the larger ones!

    So, that's my background in simulation, it might not be the longest flight sim career, but I reckon it's not far off it, given the early start on the very basic systems that it started on.

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Registered Users Posts: 26 DavidSullivan


    Currently at about 1500 flying hours on FSX. Mainly flying the PMDG-737 short hopping from EIDW to EGLL.

    Other than that, I'm using the Cessna Grand Caravan with FSpassengers which I find great!


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,021 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    Has anyone used the Lockheed Martin Prepar3d Software?

    I'm about to buy either that or FSX for training purposes, so trying to get some opinions about them first.

    Anyone?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 51 ✭✭GJAerLingus


    I have about 400 hours flight time. I mainly fly offline because I can`t figure out how to use VATSIM. I usually fly commercial, 737/A320 on the short hauls and A330 on the long haul.
    I have recently started flying the PMDG 737, definitely the best addon on the market. I usually fly from EIDW, shorthauls during the week and long hauls if I have time on the weekends/holidays.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,021 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    PMDG 737
    Try their 777, and purchase the Angle Of Attack videos, its an amazing combination that supplies a lot more information than the Boeing FCOM and CBT combined :)


Advertisement