Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Manchester United Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread

1639640642644645827

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,092 ✭✭✭Le King


    Vanbis wrote: »
    Rodwell i would like but not sure on Gourcuff. Diego from Juventus would be nice, if they wont qualify for the Champions League they may have to sell a few players.

    They are 3 points behind Palermo with 6 games left....

    And Gourcuff is a better player than Diego IMO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    The Muppet wrote: »
    The Clubs Financial statement I read made no comment on the availability of future transfer funds to the manager.
    Well then you didn't read the statement I'm talking about. This has been argued over at length before. Evidence, with links to the finance statement, was posted as well. You failed to provide counter arguments or evidence.
    The Muppet wrote: »
    Thats pure conjecture and if you don't mind me saying a rather naive comment on your part . Some people have principles and wouldn't tell bare face lies for their employer, I know I wouldn't, would you?

    Honestly what do you think the Glazers could do to Fergie if he were to say they were giving him no transfer funds provided he was was telling the truth. Rafa told lies like that and got away with it because the owners knew the trouble sacking him would cause them and Fergie is in a much stronger position that him. Seriously think about it and you will see the stupidity of your argument on this point.
    Your argument is based on the conjecture that they wouldn't, or don't have good reason to, lie. However, it is simply an unknowable. I'm not saying that they are lying I'm saying we can't know, either way, with any degree of certainty. Why rely on it when the club have actually published a detailed financial statement?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭Vanbis


    Osu wrote: »
    And Gourcuff is a better player than Diego IMO.

    I can't comment on Gourcuff, only saw him a couple of times so far, not much else to say ;).

    On the current squad, i think this summer will see big changes with alot of current squad and fringe players sold or gone on loan with the view to sell.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,006 ✭✭✭✭The Muppet


    Pro. F wrote: »
    Well then you didn't read the statement I'm talking about. This has been argued over at length before. Evidence, with links to the finance statement, was posted as well. You failed to provide counter arguments or evidence.


    Your argument is based on the conjecture that they wouldn't, or don't have good reason to, lie. However, it is simply an unknowable. I'm not saying that they are lying I'm saying we can't know, either way, with any degree of certainty. Why rely on it when the club have actually published a detailed financial statement?

    Theres a little bit of backtracking in that, Give me a straight yes or no answer to this. Do you believe that the manager is telling lies when he says he has transfer fund available?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,814 ✭✭✭Gone Drinking


    Headshot wrote: »


    Obertan was pretty good last night now, gave the ball away some times but overall he was very good imo. Im not sure is it my imagination but he looked like he bulked up a bit too

    haha, i misread what you said and after watching the clip, thought to myself "wtf, he didn't puke up at all"


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,802 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    haha, i misread what you said and after watching the clip, thought to myself "wtf, he didn't puke up at all"

    stop drinking :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    ...
    Goal Keepers

    Van Der Sar
    Foster (home grown)
    Kuszczak

    Defenders

    Neville (home grown)
    Brown (home grown)
    O'Shea (home grown)
    Ferdinand (home grown)
    Vidic
    Evans (home grown)
    Evra
    De Laet (may qualify as home grown, not sure on the timing)

    Midfield

    Valencia
    Nani
    Park
    Carrick (home grown)
    Scholes (home grown)
    Fletcher (home grown)
    Gibson (home grown)
    Giggs (home grown)
    Anderson
    Hargreaves
    Tosic

    Forwards

    Rooney (home grown)
    Owen (home grown)
    Diouf
    Berbatov
    Chicharito

    The following players can be additions to the squad, but don't need to be registered - only listing the standout more likely ones

    Fabio
    Rafael
    Smalling

    Cleverly
    Matt James
    Obertan

    Macheda
    Welbeck

    Other players would be the likes of Petrucci, Eikrem, King, Evans, Gill etc - the younger reserve team players.

    Looking at that list I have compiled, it ALREADY needs to be trimmed (and I could easily have forgotten somebody), without adding anyone to it. I count 27 players that would need to be registed from the current squad in order to play next season (with 13 of them classing as home grown).

    ...
    I hadn't really looked to hard at the squad previously with regards to this issue, so I find it interesting how the age of the squad looks in terms of actual squad places and numbers.

    Great stuff Mitch. Really interesting reading.

    So three squad members to be loaned/sold before we bring in one new addition. Easily doable I suppose.

    With Giggs, Scholes, Neville, Owen all to be retired in the next few years that would bring our home grown players down close to the minimum. And that's without players like Foster or Gibson being moved on. So presumably, we can expect promotions from the youth or homegrown transfers in, to be important over the next few years. So, moves for the likes of Rodwell and Milner are more likely than overseas players? Maybe that's reading too much into it all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,224 ✭✭✭✭SantryRed


    How's Robbie Brady getting on over there lads?

    Can't find anything on the web.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    The Muppet wrote: »
    Theres a little bit of backtracking in that,
    No, no backtracking. As I said, they are compromised as a source of evidence (ie because of their position), so there is definitely room for debate on whether we should trust them or not. However, we simply can't know if they're telling the truth or lying. While anybody could argue for or against their reliability, it is fundamentally uncertain.
    The Muppet wrote: »
    Give me a straight yes or no answer to this. Do you believe that the manager is telling lies when he says he has transfer fund available?

    I don't know if he's lying or not. I couldn't know and, equally, you couldn't know if he is or not. So, like I said last night, and have said all along (since even before the books were published), it is pointless using something as unknowable as this as evidence. Lets rely on the actual concrete evidence that the club has provided us with.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,321 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Pro. F wrote: »
    Great stuff Mitch. Really interesting reading.

    So three squad members to be loaned/sold before we bring in one new addition. Easily doable I suppose.

    With Giggs, Scholes, Neville, Owen all to be retired in the next few years that would bring our home grown players down close to the minimum. And that's without players like Foster or Gibson being moved on. So presumably, we can expect promotions from the youth or homegrown transfers in, to be important over the next few years. So, moves for the likes of Rodwell and Milner are more likely than overseas players? Maybe that's reading too much into it all.

    As older players like Neville retire in the next couple of seasons - summer 2011 could see Scholes, Giggs and Neville retire, we will certainly have to look at the home grown issue. Of course there are players already in the first team squad that could bulk the number if needed, such as Kiko and Welbeck (if they are still at United). Rafael and Fabio may be able to bulk that number in time too - not sure when exactly, or even if they will be able to, depends when they were registered. I know they arrived at 18, but don't know if they were registered - not sure how their transfer is viewed.

    It does, as you say, make players like Milner and Rodwell (whom I would like United to sign, along with Gourcuff) a lot more appealing - and more expensive too.

    I do worry about the impact of the rules though. The bigger clubs should be ok, but I would worry about smaller teams, like Wigan for example, how rely on picking up bargain players like Valencia from abroad. Foreign players are cheaper than their english equivalents, so will they be able to afford enough players to qualify for the home grown rule without weakening their squad (ie. buying very average lower league players to bulk the number or adding not good enough youth team players to the list.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,321 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    SantryRed wrote: »
    How's Robbie Brady getting on over there lads?

    Can't find anything on the web.

    Ok - was looking very good at the start of the season, captained the Milk Cup squad to victory, finishing among the top scorers i think (may have been the top scorer) and was looking very good both on the wing and through the centre.

    Unfortunately, he has suffered some bad injuries this season which have kept him out for long stretches, so it has not been a great season for him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,092 ✭✭✭Le King


    Vanbis wrote: »
    I can't comment on Gourcuff, only saw him a couple of times so far, not much else to say ;).

    On the current squad, i think this summer will see big changes with alot of current squad and fringe players sold or gone on loan with the view to sell.

    This is who I think will be definitely sold:

    Cathcart
    Tosic
    Gray
    Chester
    Hewson
    Possebon
    Heaton


    Players who are at risk of not being here next season:

    Neville
    Foster
    Welbeck
    Carrick
    Anderson (who is going to buy an injured player tho)
    Owen


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,190 ✭✭✭✭IvySlayer


    Rodwell won't come cheap, 20 million at least. If we offer Everton Carrick aswell, maybe....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,006 ✭✭✭✭The Muppet


    Pro. F wrote: »
    No, no backtracking. As I said, they are compromised as a source of evidence (ie because of their position), so there is definitely room for debate on whether we should trust them or not. However, we simply can't know if they're telling the truth or lying. While anybody could argue for or against their reliability, it is fundamentally uncertain.

    You appeared to be pretty sure in your earlier comments that United the manager was lying about having money available for transfers, I still feel you are rowing back from that now.
    Pro F wrote:
    Ferguson and Gill's claims are in contradiction of the club's own financial statements. Ferguson and Gill are employees of the Glazers and so, obviously, are going to be compromised as sources of evidence.


    Pro. F wrote: »
    I don't know if he's lying or not. I couldn't know and, equally, you couldn't know if he is or not. So, like I said last night, and have said all along (since even before the books were published), it is pointless using something as unknowable as this as evidence. Lets rely on the actual concrete evidence that the club has provided us with.

    I asked for your opinion, noting more. Your attempt to side step that question is noted but I'll ask it again none the less.

    In you opinion is the manager lying when he says he has money available for transfers, a simple yes or no answer will suffice .

    To make it easier for you I don't know if he's telling lies or not for sure but it is my opinion that he's not for the reason's I stated in an earlier post.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,092 ✭✭✭Le King


    IvySlayer wrote: »
    Rodwell won't come cheap, 20 million at least. If we offer Everton Carrick aswell, maybe....

    If we offer them Carrick it will cost us 30 Million then. 10 Mill scrappage charge


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,802 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    I like the idea of pre-contracts agreements, the likes of Madrid have been doing it for years, utd should do it more often


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,814 ✭✭✭✭keane2097


    The Muppet wrote: »
    I asked for your opinion, noting more. Your attempt to side step that question is noted but I'll ask it again none the less.

    lol


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,696 ✭✭✭✭SlickRic


    The Muppet wrote: »
    In you opinion is the manager lying when he says he has money available for transfers, a simple yes or no answer will suffice .

    To make it easier for you I don't know if he's telling lies or not for sure but it is my opinion that he's not for the reason's I stated in an earlier post.

    why does he have to say yes or no? when you clearly don't know either, and have put yourself on the fence, yet you want him on one side of the fence or the other?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,092 ✭✭✭Le King


    Headshot wrote: »
    I like the idea of pre-contracts agreements, the likes of Madrid have been doing it for years, utd should do it more often

    Yeah but they take the whole tapping-up thing to another level and most of their transfers involve super-tapping up. I know most clubs do it, but Madrid take it to another level.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,283 ✭✭✭Smegball


    Rodwell, Milner and Gourcuff would be excellent but unattainable unfortunately!

    Rodwell and Defour is much more likely imo.

    Can see us moving for Modric and or Milner and being priced out.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,838 ✭✭✭✭3hn2givr7mx1sc


    If we play 4-4-2 next season(I don't think we will, though) who would you prefer to see alongside a creative cm, Fletcher or a fully-fit Hargreaves?

    I think I'd prefer Hargreaves, tbh. He does the same job as Fletcher but better, imo. His tackling is better, he is/was faster, closer control of the ball and he's good at free-kicks. The one thing Fletcher has over him is leadership though, imo.

    Fletcher has been great last season and this season, but I'd prfer a fully-fit Hargreaves in there, if he's at the same level he was the last time he played, which he might not be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,802 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    Osu wrote: »
    Yeah but they take the whole tapping-up thing to another level and most of their transfers involve super-tapping up. I know most clubs do it, but Madrid take it to another level.

    I know where your coming from but pre contracts arent tapping up, our latest striker was signed on a pre contract, madrid use marca, president elections and ex players as their tapping up methods


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 32,865 ✭✭✭✭MagicMarker


    baz2009 wrote: »
    If we play 4-4-2 next season(I don't think we will, though) who would you prefer to see alongside a creative cm, Fletcher or a fully-fit Hargreaves?

    I think I'd prefer Hargreaves, tbh. He does the same job as Fletcher but better, imo. His tackling is better, he is/was faster, closer control of the ball and he's good at free-kicks. The one thing Fletcher has over him is leadership though, imo.

    Fletcher has been great last season and this season, but I'd prfer a fully-fit Hargreaves in there, if he's at the same level he was the last time he played, which he might not be.
    We might finally get to see Hargreaves on Sunday methinks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,608 ✭✭✭Spud83


    baz2009 wrote: »
    If we play 4-4-2 next season(I don't think we will, though) who would you prefer to see alongside a creative cm, Fletcher or a fully-fit Hargreaves?

    I think I'd prefer Hargreaves, tbh. He does the same job as Fletcher but better, imo. His tackling is better, he is/was faster, closer control of the ball and he's good at free-kicks. The one thing Fletcher has over him is leadership though, imo.

    Fletcher has been great last season and this season, but I'd prfer a fully-fit Hargreaves in there, if he's at the same level he was the last time he played, which he might not be.

    I think both would play a massive amount of games, based on my assumption that Hargreaves won't be able for two games a week. It will come down to form who plays in the big games if we go 4-4-2, but I imagine it will still be 4-5-1 in the big games next year.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,608 ✭✭✭Spud83


    We might finally get to see Hargreaves on Sunday methinks.

    I doubt that, just don't think it would happen without any mention of it in the press conference.

    Besides Blackburn away ain't the game to bring him back into.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,339 ✭✭✭me-skywalker


    Hargreaves still only has 2 seasons left in him with them dodgey knees. The game has moved on so much even since he has been at United and missing.

    United should be looking at Banega for long term or Joao Moutinho.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,814 ✭✭✭✭keane2097


    Spud83 wrote: »
    I think both would play a massive amount of games, based on my assumption that Hargreaves won't be able for two games a week. It will come down to form who plays in the big games if we go 4-4-2, but I imagine it will still be 4-5-1 in the big games next year.

    Hargreaves, Fletcher and ACM would be pretty awesome...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,435 ✭✭✭✭redout


    Thursday April 8, 2010, became one of the most treasured days in the history of Mexican football.

    Forget about Rafael Marquez, Andres Guardado, Hugo Sanchez, Luis Garcia and even the great 'Pirata' ('The Pirate') Luis de la Fuente . The transaction that took Javier 'Chicharito' Hernandez to Manchester United was the most expensive of all time, and the best part was the manner in which this transaction was accomplished.

    First of all, an acknowledgement must be made to Chivas and to president Jorge Vergara for going against the traditional policies of Mexican clubs when they decided that a 21-year-old player is destined for success.

    Secondly, and this is an irrefutable fact but nevertheless unusual in Mexican football: they have sold his rights in a decided, determined way, with no strings attached, no loans, no promoters, no favours, no help, without the infamous 'Let's see whether he works out for you and then we make the payments'. This type of negotiation is very simple to achieve in other latitudes, but it is terribly unusual to see in Mexico.

    'Chicharito' has left at the right time. It is the right time to display his skills, to continue with his learning process, to listen to the wise advice of Sir Alex Ferguson , to immerse himself at Old Trafford, to hear the sound of glory coming from this venerable stadium.

    Jorge Vergara seized the opportunity to sign a cooperation agreement with the famous and powerful English side. Chivas will no longer sell their players to an alternative market such as the Netherlands. They will sit at a position of honour at the negotiating table, alongside the biggest and most powerful teams in international football.

    In the same announcement, Vergara indicated that the complete starting line-up of Manchester United will be on hand to inaugurate the new Chivas stadium, the Great Temple, towards the end of July.

    A dream come true, a great business deal, the lucky strike that the red-and-white faithful had been waiting for for so long.

    The events that took place on Thursday are more important than many may expect, and their importance extends to the rest of Mexican football, beyond Chivas or the player himself.

    What comes after this will depend on his talent, his dedication, his professionalism and his enthusiasm, and Hernandez has plenty of all that.

    But for a football community that dreams eternally of a brighter tomorrow, the sale of 'Chicharito' to Manchester United brings a new opportunity to expand its own hopes.

    :confused:

    Did we sign some sort of co-operation deal ?

    First I heard of it.

    ESPNSoccernet


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,092 ✭✭✭Le King


    Headshot wrote: »
    I know where your coming from but pre contracts arent tapping up, our latest striker was signed on a pre contract, madrid use marca, president elections and ex players as their tapping up methods

    True, I know they aren't tapping up. But they are a bit if you think about it... ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,814 ✭✭✭✭keane2097


    redout wrote: »
    :confused:

    Did we sign some sort of co-operation deal ?

    First I heard of it.

    ESPNSoccernet

    Wouldn't be a bad thing...


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement