Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The movie "Kick-Ass" promotes pedophilia and child abuse...

2

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,461 ✭✭✭Queen-Mise


    pppfffftt this is like the harry potter thing, that there promoting sex through subliminal messgaes written in hermiones hair?

    WTF - that is baffling, how could they possibly explain that one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 710 ✭✭✭TheReverend




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,178 ✭✭✭✭NothingMan


    It deliberately sells a perniciously sexualised view of children and glorifies violence, especially knife and gun crime, in a way that makes it one of the most deeply cynical, shamelessly irresponsible films ever.

    How can a film critic fail to understand the entire point of a fictitious, tongue in cheek comic book movie. Now if the end credits finished with "Based on a true story" then maybe he'd have a point. But just because he feels uncomfortable about his own sexual urges towards an 11 year old assassin he projects his sick mentality onto the film makers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭ilovelamp2000


    Paul Dacre, Daily Mail Editor, once said the following:
    'The ideal Daily Mail story leaves the reader hating somebody or something.'


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,594 ✭✭✭bonerm


    The movie "Kick-Ass" promotes pedophilia and child abuse...
    Deadly! I'm going to it tonight.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭Fuhrer


    I love how they give it a verdict of Evil.



    They should go further with that though.


    "In terms of Evil this film gets 7 Hitlers out of 10"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,931 ✭✭✭az2wp0sye65487


    Daily Mail headline generator:

    http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/toys/dailymail/ :pac:

    Best one I've gotten so far is: COULD FEMINISM GIVE CLIFF RICHARD CANCER?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭✭Busi_Girl08


    I loved how they managed to throw in a Jonathan Ross mention :rolleyes:

    Seriously, if it was co-written by anyone who was not related to Ross in any way at all, thye wouldn't have been that bothered about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭Bondvillain


    Rosco1982 wrote: »
    Paul Dacre, Daily Mail Editor, once said the following:
    'The ideal Daily Mail story leaves the reader hating somebody or something.'

    Ideally, it should leave them hating Paul Dacre, Daily Mail editor, & the fact that they buy the Daily Mail.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,384 ✭✭✭gbee


    Weird mindset from that writer ... unless it is true, and I don't know and don't have an opinion yet ... I'd be seriously worried about the mental health of that writer.

    And if true, then it's totally irresponsible to publish such a leading article as the writer surely must know it will attract every P in the country now.

    An arrestable offence IMO. If the writer truly thought this, he should have campaigned for the banning of the movie by bringing his concerns to the relevant authorities.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Rosco1982 wrote: »
    Paul Dacre, Daily Mail Editor, once said the following:
    'The ideal Daily Mail story leaves the reader hating somebody or something.'
    He got it right - their own reporters/newspaper!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,114 ✭✭✭corkcomp


    bonerm wrote: »
    Deadly! I'm going to it tonight.

    I think its a class movie.. my friends though it was "a bit too far removed from reality" or something like that .. still worth seeing though and the kid sniper is cool:D cant see how it would promote pedophilia any more than any other move with young kids


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭hooradiation




    Fixed that for you, because this is fantastic.

    Biggins wrote: »
    He got it right - their own reporters/newspaper!

    Hey, wait a second, weren't you arguing that the daily mail was in fact a fine newspaper and we were all just snobs a while back?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Hey, wait a second, weren't you arguing that the daily mail was in fact a fine newspaper and we were all just snobs a while back?
    Nope - NEVER said either, thank you very much! Please once again, don't put words in my mouth.

    I mentioned that some of those there are ok as reporters (having spoken to them and done a bit for the paper myself) but given the nature of tabloid industry, the stuff that management wants is often not what the public would actual like more of, believe it or not.
    There are indeed also idiots that write daft garbage like the Kick-ass article. Their paper career will only go as far as the heights of the tabloids and no further.

    The Mail, Sun, Mirror, Star etc by their nature tends to shorten, skip whole facts, make too quick assumptions and tend to pander to those that have only ten minutes at times to catch a quick read.
    While nothing wrong in that in itself if you want a quick read - and tabloids do actually produce some good stuff occasionally when the editors allow it, some of the articles also tend to be directed towards the brain dead who want their minds made up for them.

    I think the Kick-ass write-up is that type of material.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    Its better to ignore the Daily Mail most of the time. I really think they must be taking the piss the whole time, surely no one can really be that deluded.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,588 ✭✭✭✭dsmythy


    Well unless it somehow encourages lads to wait on 'hot' 11 year old girls to reach the end of consent I think the world might just stay in one piece.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,973 ✭✭✭RayM


    Millions are being spent to persuade you that Kick-Ass is harmless, comic-book entertainment suitable for 15-year-olds.

    Won't somebody please think of the 15-year-olds?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭Pyridine


    Went to see it last night and have to say I really enjoyed it!! I didn't come out a peodo just in case anyone was wondering!

    As for
    Millions are being spent to persuade you that Kick-Ass is harmless, comic-book entertainment suitable for 15-year-olds.

    The English are so backward....have they never heard of a 16's cert!!! :D


  • Posts: 15,814 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Remember that the Daily Mail is a paper who damned the film Antichrist and within the article admitted to having never seen the film but read about it online. An actual journalist would have at least gone to the trouble of viewing the film before forming an opinion but at the Mail all you need is a hint of online/tabloid hysteria to garner a damning news piece.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,369 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    The Daily Mail don't like the fillyum (as some of us say in Kerry), because they hate the BBC - Jonathan Ross - and all the other Rosses by association. When they stick the knife in, they keep on twisting.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 611 ✭✭✭Bigdeadlydave


    In fairness now I dont blame the journalists: if no one bought the damn thing they wouldnt stay in business for very long!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,718 ✭✭✭The Mad Hatter


    The newspaper The Daily Mail promotes idiocy and paranoia.



    Actually, I take it back. The Daily Mail isn't a newspaper.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35 scallywags


    in fairness i saw the trailer and saw the whole film. there is parents who dont want their kids watching that. why 11 anyways.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,598 ✭✭✭✭Aidric


    A quite laughable piece except the guy is serious. The moral guardians @ the Mail have become a parody.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,079 ✭✭✭Simi


    Best one I've gotten so far is: COULD FEMINISM GIVE CLIFF RICHARD CANCER?

    WILL FERAL CHILDREN HURT THE QUEEN?


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 23,907 Mod ✭✭✭✭Kiith


    So thats why i enjoyed it...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,295 ✭✭✭✭Duggy747


    Papers like this are advertising gold. Since it was mentioned I don't think Antichrist would've been seen by as many people had it not been to the whingers.

    Heh heh, the fools never learn. Remember the ruccus over Father Ted? I think most people watched the 1st episodes of South Park because of all the controversy it received when it 1st came out.

    If you're planning on selling something to the public, make sure it "outrages" the tabloids as they'll cover your advertising costs. Nice of them, really!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 357 ✭✭Steodonn


    People still buy that rag for shame


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,178 ✭✭✭✭NothingMan


    Simi wrote: »
    WILL FERAL CHILDREN HURT THE QUEEN?


    Can you really see these adorable little scamps hurting the Queen? I don't think so.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭Optimalprimerib


    I was wondering who would be first to admonish the movie for this. Disappointed it was nt joe duffy. Nothing goes better with your lunch than clueless angry housewives loving the sound of their own loathing.

    Its all getting too predictable. The very reason hit girl was made "sexy" was bait for some cod of a writer or host to give the movie some extra publicity. Same goes for the airport level in call of duty.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement