Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Kishoge station: A white elephant never opened

2

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,316 ✭✭✭KC61


    JHMEG wrote: »
    I meant on thread.

    Unkel lives beside the station and doesn't seem to think the service is much use.

    I would agree with that. Unless frequency were built up to provide a realistic alternative to the 25a/25x bus then they can forget about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,316 ✭✭✭KC61


    Victor wrote: »
    Adamstown gets some use, as does Clondalkin Fonthill I imagine. As Kishoge is unlikely to ever have a car park, I can't see it opening until either (a) train frequency is substantially increased (via the extra 22000 sets or displaced 2900 sets) or (b) there is sufficient demand in the immediate vicinity, i.e. on the door step.

    That I think is scandalous. Crazy planning.

    Although not surprising. Look at Clondalkin/Fonthill. The 76/a/b and 210 pass directly outside but there are no bus stops within a 7 minute walk of the station!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    KC61 wrote: »
    I would agree with that. Unless frequency were built up to provide a realistic alternative to the 25a/25x bus then they can forget about it.

    You're missing my point. The frequency doesn't matter when the service doesn't go to where most people want to go. The 25a goes through the heart of the city and on to Pearse Street.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40 HeritageRailway


    JHMEG wrote: »
    You're missing my point. The frequency doesn't matter when the service doesn't go to where most people want to go. The 25a goes through the heart of the city and on to Pearse Street.

    Part of the reason for opening Kishogue and renovating other stations on this line is to feed into the Dart Underground programme. When this is built, it will call at Pearse and it will provide a frequent service in a fraction of the time that either the 25A or 151 currently do. Until there is a scope to open the line fully and the DoT allow for a bus feeder towards the line, Kishogue has no need to open.

    In relation to Ashtown station, the long term plan is for Phoenix Park and a new station located around Ratoath Road to replace it. Currently, this is partly held up due to local residents objecting to a bridge to replace "Reilly's Crossing on Ratoath Road; a long known accident black spot and traffic bottleneck.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,349 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    As a rule of thumb, the need for a car park at a rail station should be inversely proportional to distance from the centre of the city. Where car parks exist in dense urban areas they should be replaced with "kiss and ride" loops and the property then developed.

    However, the failure to integrate fares or to direct bus operators to serve the stations that exist means people will continue to assume "park and ride" as a default.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 267 ✭✭Lifelike


    KC61 wrote: »
    That I think is scandalous. Crazy planning.

    Although not surprising. Look at Clondalkin/Fonthill. The 76/a/b and 210 pass directly outside but there are no bus stops within a 7 minute walk of the station!

    The station doesn't even have a car park :eek:. Now that really is bad planning by IÉ. The whole idea of the station is bad enough already, being so close to Adamstown, but this is off the wall altogether.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,722 ✭✭✭anotherlostie


    Also living along this line, I would never consider the train an option due to its poor frequency. It's a difficult situation for IE - the current demand doesn't lend itself to providing extra services (even when the capacity is there), but on the other hand, if you build, will they come? If I knew there was a train every 15-20 minutes (and not every 2 hours, if that), I would certainly use the station instead of a bus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,316 ✭✭✭KC61


    JHMEG wrote: »
    You're missing my point. The frequency doesn't matter when the service doesn't go to where most people want to go. The 25a goes through the heart of the city and on to Pearse Street.

    I accept that point - but even allowing for the changeover to the 92 at Heuston the train would probably be faster than the 25a/25x.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    KC61 wrote: »
    I accept that point - but even allowing for the changeover to the 92 at Heuston the train would probably be faster than the 25a/25x.
    Which is really a case of bad and worse. Driving to Leixlip and getting the train from there would be a better option for a lot of people.
    Part of the reason for opening Kishogue and renovating other stations on this line is to feed into the Dart Underground programme.
    Hypothetically speaking, of course.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,316 ✭✭✭KC61


    JHMEG wrote: »
    Which is really a case of bad and worse. Driving to Leixlip and getting the train from there would be a better option for a lot of people.

    We are of course speaking hypothetically (assuming Kishoge were open) but I have to say that you're a difficult person to please - an integrated bus/rail service (through tickets available) and you're still not happy!!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    Part of the reason for opening Kishogue and renovating other stations on this line is to feed into the Dart Underground programme. When this is built, it will call at Pearse and it will provide a frequent service in a fraction of the time that either the 25A or 151 currently do. Until there is a scope to open the line fully and the DoT allow for a bus feeder towards the line, Kishogue has no need to open.

    In relation to Ashtown station, the long term plan is for Phoenix Park and a new station located around Ratoath Road to replace it. Currently, this is partly held up due to local residents objecting to a bridge to replace "Reilly's Crossing on Ratoath Road; a long known accident black spot and traffic bottleneck.

    What about Broombridge? Will that close? Its only a fleas spit from Ratoath Road and it would appear to me that it wouldnt really justify the expense or hassle of building a new station. I'm no expert on these matters and perhaps there's a perfectly rational explanation for this but I cant quite see what it is.

    It appears to be transferring the problem down the line. Quite literally


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    Lifelike wrote: »
    Would probably be a good idea, although remember that Wembley Park tube station serves the local community aswell, so it would remain open anyway. But I do agree that something like that could give IÉ an excuse to open this station...

    Then you also have wembley stadium, (although not used daily or weekly by any means) and a lot of office space in the area also.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    KC61 wrote: »
    We are of course speaking hypothetically (assuming Kishoge were open) but I have to say that you're a difficult person to please - an integrated bus/rail service (through tickets available) and you're still not happy!!
    Down my way you'd be called snakey! There is a huge difference between having the option of linking up with a bus service, and having no choice but to use a bus to complete your journey, and well you know it! The latter does not an integrated system make.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,316 ✭✭✭KC61


    JHMEG wrote: »
    Down my way you'd be called snakey! There is a huge difference between having the option of linking up with a bus service, and having no choice but to use a bus to complete your journey, and well you know it! The latter does not an integrated system make.

    You are entitled to your view but I doubt people would make a longer drive from south Lucan to Leixlip to get a longer train journey rather than drive from south Lucan to Kishoge and then train to Heuston even allowing for the 92 bus.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    KC61 wrote: »
    You are entitled to your view but I doubt people would make a longer drive from south Lucan to Leixlip to get a longer train journey rather than drive from south Lucan to Kishoge and then train to Heuston and then having to complete their journey to the city centre by bus

    I fixed that post for you. I would have no doubt that driving to Leixlip from Lucan village would be a quicker and more satisfactory option for the city centre than drive-train-bus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,316 ✭✭✭KC61


    JHMEG wrote: »
    I fixed that post for you. I would have no doubt that driving to Leixlip from Lucan village would be a quicker and more satisfactory option for the city centre than drive-train-bus.

    You are misrepresenting what I said. Please read my posts carefully. I never said Lucan Village. I said South Lucan. There is a big difference.

    Given that the bus from Heuston Station is very consistent to the city centre because of the continuous North Quays bus lane, the option of going via Kishoge and Heuston would actually be the fastest route.

    Assuming that the person is going to say the Grafton Street area, the principal commuter trains from Leixlip Louisa Bridge to Tara Street take 41 and 45 minutes. Allowing for 15 minutes driving/parking and then a 10 minute walk that totals 1 hour 10 minutes approximately.

    Taking Kishoge (were it open and had a car park), 5/10 minutes to get to the station, 17 minutes on the train to Heuston, and then allow 20 minutes between the walk to the bus and then the 92 bus trip direct to the south city. That totals roughly 50 minutes.

    It does boil down to perception a lot of the time, and as I've noted before that does not always equate to the reality.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    KC61 wrote: »
    I never said Lucan Village.
    I did. 10 mins drive to Leixlip Confey and 30 mins into Connolly. No bus required.

    I think your estimates of 20 mins from getting off the train to arriving by bus to your destination are conservative.

    (EDIT: If I was in charge, I would not allow Heuston to be used for any commuter services... it's fine for intercity)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,316 ✭✭✭KC61


    JHMEG wrote: »
    I did. 10 mins drive to Leixlip Confey and 30 mins into Connolly. No bus required.

    I think your estimates of 20 mins from getting off the train to arriving by bus to your destination are conservative.

    (EDIT: If I was in charge, I would not allow Heuston to be used for any commuter services... it's fine for intercity)

    With due respect if you going to start questioning a point that I make, by changing the goalposts, I think that you should make that abundantly clear, because it makes the whole discussion rather pointless.

    From the outset in this thread I said my comments related to South Lucan. You only mentioned Lucan Village in post 46, which was after you started to claim that Leixlip would be faster.

    If we are going to have an intelligent discussion about this it is only fair that you make the basis of your arguments clear at the time, rather than wasting my time.

    As someone who has used the Rail/92 bus through Heuston on quite a number of occasions, I can actually say that 20 minutes is quite realistic from the platform to Grafton Street even in rush hour.

    As I have said before, my comments/observations here are based as someone who uses public transport every day and as someone with a keen interest in how it actually works (or not as the case may be). I am not in the habit of making statements for the sake of it.

    If you are suggesting that it would be quicker to operate around into Connolly and Pearse via the Phoenix Park (even allowing for the lack of capacity there), than Heuston, I honestly think that you're wrong. The bus lane on the North Quays changed that. Furthermore a quick glance at the timetable shows most trains take 35/38 minutes in the morning peak to Connolly from Confey not 30.

    I don't see any point in contributing to a series of posts where someone is just moving the goalposts to suit their own perceptions.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    Fair enouigh, you're talking about south Lucan only. I said Lucan from the outset, and "Lucan" includes, but is not limited to, Lucan Village.

    I have endured the 9x from Heuston on many occasions, and forcing the use of bus does not make for satisfactory transport, and I believe the interconnector plans support my argument, where rail will replace bus. Forcing people to use the bus does not mean transport is "integrated", as you imply.

    I canvassed the opinion of people who actually live in Lucan. With due respect your unwaivering support for CIE and state run public transport in general blinkers you slightly from the reality, in my opinion. I don't live in Lucan and I suspect you don't either, so how about we wait till someone like unkel tells us what he thinks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    KC61 wrote: »
    If you are suggesting that it would be quicker to operate around into Connolly and Pearse via the Phoenix Park (even allowing for the lack of capacity there), than Heuston,
    You've twisted that and turned it into a loaded question, and well you know it. Of course south Lucan into Heuston will be quicker than into Connolly.

    You are fully aware that I meant running via the Park straight into Connolly, and Heuston out of the loop (so to speak) would beat any form of Heuston then bus or Heuston then Luas.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,316 ✭✭✭KC61


    JHMEG wrote: »
    With due respect your unwaivering support for CIE and state run public transport in general blinkers you slightly from the reality, in my opinion.

    I cannot let a comment such as that go unchallenged. I think if you go through my posts here over the years rather than the few months that you've on this particular board you will find I have been quite critical of CIE at times.

    Reference my comments on the Waterford/Rosslare line and other regional routes.

    Reference comments on poor scheduling on corridors by Dublin Bus, lack of intermediate times, the inept management of DART feeder services, poor scheduling of DART - the inexcusable 30 minute gaps in service on Saturdays, an Intercity timetable being run with very little wriggle room in terms of rolling stock while perfectly good stock is rotting away (except one set being restored inexplicably for a railtour).

    With due respect I have no loyalty to CIE whatsoever, except as a daily user, and that's what I base my comments on. CIE is far from perfect, but there are positive changes happening. Bus Eireann came out of the Deloitte Report with a fairly good bill of health. Dublin Bus came out of it not so well. There have been improvements in the rail system with the introduction of clockface services, new stock etc., but there is a hell of a long way to go.

    I happen to believe that if the Deloitte report is implemented in full by Dublin Bus then, together with the implementation of the AVLC we will see a transformation in the bus service in Dublin. Dublin Bus management have committed to implementing the report so I am prepared to wait and hold fire.

    What does frustrate me here is that people often make fairly sweeping statements that I can understand are based on experiences they might have had some years ago, a one off bad day, or similar. As a daily user I get to see quite a variety of both Dublin Bus and Irish Rail operations and it does give me the opportunity to offer some informed comment. Those "perceptions" may well have been correct at the time, but the situation may have changed significantly since the time that the comment was made. I try to comment based on my experiences that are up to date.

    We have the current spectacle of the opposition spokesman criticising Bus Eireann for cutting back services such as the 102 from Dublin to Ardcath that carried no more than 5 people per day for over 6 months, and calling for privatisation! The company is taking steps that are actually making the it a leaner, more efficient operation and giving better value to the shareholder, and all the opposition does start to rant about privatisation and the population being deserted!!! You could not make this up. I would argue that both Dublin Bus and Bus Eireann both tried cutting back unused and uneconomic services in the past only to be stopped by the government of the day because they didn't have the bottle to do so.

    I view the current changes by Bus Eireann as long overdue and a backdrop to a distant time when there were far fewer cars in Ireland. I view the Dublin Bus network review as positive as it is fundamental to getting this city back on track.

    As far as the 92 is concerned - I do actually use it - not every week - but reasonably regularly on and off trains at Heuston to/from Fonthill. Also, from observing the arrival times of 92 buses in the city centre as I pass through it and also seeing them in the mornings on the quays I would have a fair idea which bus was which by looking at the timetable. That's how I can make the statement I did.

    I am not trying to catch you out but frankly I do pride myself in having a very good knowledge of how the whole public transportation system operates in Ireland because I've studied it and I use it. I am a passionate believer in public transport and I feel that we do deserve much better. However, I also know how the political world in which these organisations live operates. I know how long they can battle to get changes through. You have no idea how much contingency planning is done just in case the political wind blows one way or the other. It is frankly staggering.

    To sum up - I try to give a daily informed user's comment. I have no interest in picking arguments with people, but I think that there is an awful lot of perception out there among the public, press and politicians that there is nothing right about public transport, and that is not the case. I do blame the companies themselves for not promoting new initiatives such as the significant benefits to the reliablity of bus timetables from the bus gate, the introduction of new routes, the range of prepaid tickets available etc. On the other hand, some choose to ignore the improvements. As I said elsewhere why should any regular customer be paying a EUR 2.20 cash fare on the bus when a Travel 90 10 Journey Ticket is available that costs effectively EUR 1.80 per trip. Because they choose not to check it out!! Dublin Bus have promoted it.

    I try to give my own comments from my experience/knowledge. If that isn't to your liking/perception, well there's not much I can do about that!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,316 ✭✭✭KC61


    JHMEG wrote: »
    You've twisted that and turned it into a loaded question, and well you know it. Of course south Lucan into Heuston will be quicker than into Connolly.

    You are fully aware that I meant running via the Park straight into Connolly, and Heuston out of the loop (so to speak) would beat any form of Heuston then bus or Heuston then Luas.

    I am not trying to twist anything.

    Since the continuous bus lane opened along the North Quays, the buses take no more than 10 minutes to O'Connell Bridge. I do that trip from Parkgate Street most days of the week and know it to be true.

    Prior to that being implemented I wouldn't have argued one jot about the benefits of bringing the trains around into Connolly via the Phoenix Park.

    However, the time that it would now take for a train to go all the way around and into Connolly, together with the associated time walking to the city centre is, I do genuinely believe, longer than that using Heuston and the 92.

    You are absolutely right of course in stating that the Interconnector will change the situation totally.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,719 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    JHMEG wrote: »
    Driving to Leixlip and getting the train from there would be a better option for a lot of people.

    You're spot on.

    That's exactly what we have been doing. It's quicker overall (and more reliable and more weatherproof) to the IFSC compared with a 25A, even 25X. And the latter is quicker than driving to Fonthill / Adamstown and then getting bus or Luas (which is terribly slow) at Heuston.

    The 300m I live from Kishoge station is as the crow flies and it would take more than 15 mins to walk there. Now the plans are to build the first bit of Clonburris and break through the existing estates, which would reduce the walking time to just a few minutes. But I can't see anyone building anything here anytime soon.

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    Victron stuff for sale, Multiplus-II, Quattro!

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    unkel wrote: »
    You're spot on.

    That's exactly what we have been doing.
    As a matter of interest do you go to Confey or Louisa Bridge? The latter has more parking, but Confey seems to always have a few empty spaces since they started charging for it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,719 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Confey. Haven't done it since last November or so though, due to change in work location.

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    Victron stuff for sale, Multiplus-II, Quattro!

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    unkel wrote: »
    Confey. Haven't done it since last November or so though, due to change in work location.
    Cool. You can see my house from Confey :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,606 ✭✭✭schemingbohemia


    Kishoge is developer funded so it hasn't cost IE money.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,349 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    Kishoge is developer funded so it hasn't cost IE money.
    Unless they didn't pay upfront!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,731 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Kishoge is developer funded so it hasn't cost IE money.
    I'm not so sure. Adamstown was a deal with the developers of Adamstown, but the rest is based on a section 49(?) contribution scheme, where the developer only pays when they start building.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,719 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Just passed Kishoge and there are several cars and vans parked beside the station and several workmen inside. Also there now is a surface carpark on the other side of the outer ring road (spaces for roughly 40 cars). Sure doesn't look like it's not going to be finished. What's going on here?
    JHMEG wrote: »
    Cool. You can see my house from Confey :)

    Damn handy if you're commuting to the city centre :)

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    Victron stuff for sale, Multiplus-II, Quattro!

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



Advertisement