C&H sex discussion thread

eVeNtInE · 30-12-2009 10:52PM

This post has been deleted.

Fad · 30-12-2009 10:54PM

Jay P wrote: »

Isn't it 16 for a guy and 17 for a girl?

It was 15 for guys and 17 for girls, but it was changed recently.

D4RK ONION · 30-12-2009 11:06PM

belge boy wrote: »

ye ive ****ed a couple of time no big deal.

It sounds like you had no emotional bond with your partners and as such, I can imagine it was for you, no big deal. It's supposed to be just as much about the emotional bond as the physical side of it.

Pygmalion · 30-12-2009 11:09PM

belge boy wrote: »

ye ive ****ed a couple of time no big deal.

Well done

Piste · 31-12-2009 12:46AM

D4RK ONION wrote: »

It sounds like you had no emotional bond with your partners and as such, I can imagine it was for you, no big deal. It's supposed to be just as much about the emotional bond as the physical side of it.

I suppose it depends on the emphasis you put on it. I don't think it's "supposed" to be about anything, it's whatever you want it to be. So it can be more about the physical side than the emotional side if you want it to be, or vice versa. There's no "right" or "wrong"* way.

*unless you're not using protection. Which is very, very wrong indeed.

D4RK ONION · 31-12-2009 01:04AM

Piste wrote: »

I suppose it depends on the emphasis you put on it. I don't think it's "supposed" to be about anything, it's whatever you want it to be. So it can be more about the physical side than the emotional side if you want it to be, or vice versa. *snip*.

I definitely should have added "I think" into my post, you are most certainly correct.

Otherwise, I suppose, there would be no point in masturbation. And there is a whole culture out there for having sex for purely the physical.

Insect Overlord · 31-12-2009 01:14AM

Being single at the moment, I can say quite honestly that I miss the emotional closeness of a relationship a lot more than the physical side of things. But, again being as honest as I can be, I think I would put the two on an equal level within any relationship. That said, no two relationships are ever the exact same, so in the end it's all horridly arbitrary

Rozabeez · 12-01-2010 01:17PM

Remember kids, abstinence is the best form of contraception.

Ginja Ninja · 12-01-2010 01:44PM

Rozabeez wrote: »

Remember kids, abstinence is the best form of contraception.

But arguably the least fun.

Rozabeez · 12-01-2010 01:57PM

Teenage pregnancy isn't fun. Neither are STDs, so I've heard.

Jay P · 12-01-2010 02:00PM

Rozabeez wrote: »

Remember kids, abstinence is the best form of contraception.

You saying that made me remember something.

Yes, it is the only method of contraception which is 100% guaranteed, all other methods have something like 98%* success rate. But I think I'm right in saying that most of the 2% failure rate is to do with people using the things incorrectly, like putting on a condom wrong or forgetting to take the pill.
I remember reading something along those lines somewhere.

*Figure probably not correct.

jumpguy · 12-01-2010 02:03PM

Rozabeez wrote: »

Remember kids, abstinence is the best form of contraception.

"Mmm babe, I want you so bad, what form of contraception d'you wanna use?"

"Hmm babe...I heard about this one called abstinence, meant to have a success rate of 100%"

"Oh..."

Pigwidgeon · 12-01-2010 02:04PM

Rozabeez wrote: »

Teenage pregnancy isn't fun. Neither are STDs, so I've heard.

Unplanned pregnancies at any age are never overly fun.
Neither are STD's.
Just because this is a teenage form doesn't mean we're all not going to practise safe sex. There is probably people in their 20's, 30's and 40's who are a lot more irresponsible than the posters in here.

Are you suggesting abstinence for just teenagers or for everyone before marriage? If it's for everyone then I suppose that's fair enough.

phlegms · 12-01-2010 02:05PM

Rozabeez wrote: »

Teenage pregnancy isn't fun. Neither are STDs

Ur doing it wrong tbh.

Rozabeez · 12-01-2010 02:07PM

kateos2 wrote: »

Unplanned pregnancies at any age are never overly fun.
Neither are STD's.
Just because this is a teenage form doesn't mean we're all not going to practise safe sex. There is probably people in their 20's, 30's and 40's who are a lot more irresponsible than the posters in here.

Are you suggesting abstinence for just teenagers or for everyone before marriage? If it's for everyone then I suppose that's fair enough.

Well actually I was joking....

Fad · 12-01-2010 02:07PM

Jay P wrote: »

You saying that made me remember something.

Yes, it is the only method of contraception which is 100% guaranteed, all other methods have something like 98%* success rate. But I think I'm right in saying that most of the 2% failure rate is to do with people using the things incorrectly, like putting on a condom wrong or forgetting to take the pill.
I remember reading something along those lines somewhere.

*Figure probably not correct.

I'm not sure that's how it works, I thinks it's 98% even if things are done 100% correctly. Or I pulled that from the sky, not sure

And this;

Blasphemy can be fun

jumpguy · 12-01-2010 02:08PM

I can't remember from the episode of friends exactly..but isn't the failure rate 3% or something like that?

Either way, have sex 97 times. NO MORE.

Pigwidgeon · 12-01-2010 02:08PM

Rozabeez wrote: »

Well actually I was joking....

My bad..
*needs to pick up on internet sarcasm more*

Rozabeez · 12-01-2010 02:09PM

Actually different forms on contraception have different success rates. It also depends on whether or not they're used correctly/taken properly etc.

www.ThinkContraception.ie has all the rates for different things on there.

Ginja Ninja · 12-01-2010 02:13PM

Fad wrote: »

I'm not sure that's how it works, I thinks it's 98% even if things are done 100% correctly. Or I pulled that from the sky, not sure

And this;

Blasphemy can be fun

Can't you get a 10,000 fine and imprisonment for blasphemy now?Nice knowing you Fad...er....I don't know this person at all I mean

Jay P · 12-01-2010 02:15PM

Fad wrote: »

I'm not sure that's how it works, I thinks it's 98% even if things are done 100% correctly. Or I pulled that from the sky, not sure

That does make sense....but I know that a certain percentage of it is down to people using it wrong.

phlegms · 12-01-2010 02:18PM

Omg sex!

*giggles*

Pygmalion · 12-01-2010 02:24PM

jumpguy wrote: »

I can't remember from the episode of friends exactly..but isn't the failure rate 3% or something like that?

Either way, have sex 97 times. NO MORE.

They'll fail more than twice.

Really it means have sex 32 times and no more, that way it will have failed 0.96 times which is grand.

phlegms · 12-01-2010 02:28PM

Pygmalion wrote: »

They'll fail more than twice.

Really it means have sex 32 times and no more, that way it will have failed 0.96 times which is grand.

I hope these statistics are wrong or else in about 7 1/2 months craguls is going to get a very nasty surprise..

Pygmalion · 12-01-2010 02:29PM

Fad wrote: »

Blasphemy can be fun

Ah now, Jesus can be put down to an experimental error, I'd still say 100%

jumpguy · 12-01-2010 02:31PM

Fecking women and their pregnancy...

Fad · 12-01-2010 02:37PM

Rozabeez wrote: »

Actually different forms on contraception have different success rates. It also depends on whether or not they're used correctly/taken properly etc.

www.ThinkContraception.ie has all the rates for different things on there.

Oh I know, I was just trying to explain how success rates are done

A Neurotic · 12-01-2010 03:29PM

My mumsie (I mean, uh, de mudder) just gave me a bit of a safe sex talk, bless her. The topic of conversation went like this:

>My friend who wants to do Art in college
>>My cousin who did Art in college and is pregnant and unmarried.
>>DON'T HAVE SEX SON.

sock puppet · 13-01-2010 07:17PM

Pygmalion wrote: »

They'll fail more than twice.

Really it means have sex 32 times and no more, that way it will have failed 0.96 times which is grand.

Nah just have sex 32 times with women then once with a guy you know is clean and repeat as necessary. Problem solved:)

Jay P · 13-01-2010 07:36PM

Pygmalion wrote: »

They'll fail more than twice.

Really it means have sex 32 times and no more, that way it will have failed 0.96 times which is grand.

Not really because you still have more than a 50% chance of getting pregnant.

C&H sex discussion thread

Comments