Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Adverts for Pro-abortion.

2»

Comments

  • #32
    Kiera
    Closed Accounts Posts: 13,130 ✭✭✭✭Kiera


    dr.bollocko wrote: »
    Thank you Kiera, hereafter to be referred to as feety Mc. Gee. Only this time instead of your Irish teacher it's life you're trying to bang.
    You can call me Gee for short.


  • #33
    c0rk3r
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,257 ✭✭✭c0rk3r


    First the gore image in the cycling forum to try prove a point and now this pro-abortion stance in After hours. By any chance were you one of those "activists" that stood outside the GPO on oconnell street with pictures of aborted fetuses ? Out of interest, whatever happened to those guys + who were they?

    By activist i of course mean nutters


  • #34
    Nodin
    Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    dr.bollocko wrote: »
    OK. Just for the laugh I'll try and be fair and balanced and actually contribute something useful to a thread for once.
    This is gonna be fun.
    Can somebody please PM an outraged mother and a rape victim who had an abortion and get them in on this too?
    Who wants to be the fetus?

    I'll be the back street abortionist. I'll need a coat hanger, fairy liquid, and an assistant called Mungo.


  • #35
    Kiera
    Closed Accounts Posts: 13,130 ✭✭✭✭Kiera


    Nodin wrote: »
    I'll be the back street abortionist. I'll need a coat hanger, fairy liquid, and an assistant called Mungo.
    And a bottle of Gin.


  • #36
    Nodin
    Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Kiera wrote: »
    And a bottle of Gin.

    No, I'm a budget operator. It's byob I'm afraid.

    (We do offer discounted alcopops in the lounge though....)


  • Advertisement
  • #37
    Kiera
    Closed Accounts Posts: 13,130 ✭✭✭✭Kiera


    Nodin wrote: »
    No, I'm a budget operator. It's byob I'm afraid.

    (We do offer discounted alcopops in the lounge though....)
    Meh what do i care, i'm the fetus.

    This is like the AH nativity play. I'm the baby Jesus :)

    /Jakkass is gonna kill me for making fun of Holy God.


  • #38
    Nodin
    Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Kiera wrote: »
    Meh what do i care, i'm the fetus.

    This is like the AH nativity play. I'm the baby Jesus :)

    /Jakkass is gonna kill me for making fun of Holy God.

    I remember a manger, but no mention of 3 wise men skulling Jesus when he hopped out of a bucket.


  • #39
    CrazyRabbit
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,659 ✭✭✭CrazyRabbit


    Pro abortion when....

    Mothers life is at risk.
    The fetus is severely disabled to the point that the quality of life will be low.
    The pregnancy was the result of a rape.
    The pregnancy was the result of incest with an immediate family member (sibling/parent/son/daugther)
    The mother is young (less than 12/13)..mainly due to health risks.

    Pro life when....

    The pregancy was the result of consensual sex where no contraception was used or it was faulty.
    The pregnancy is just an inconvenience for the parent(s).
    At least one of the parents wishes the pregnancy to go full term.
    The mother is young but over 14.

    ===================
    Of course there are many many grey areas, but my general view is that the pregnancy should be allowed to continue unless it presents a danger to the mother, or will likely result in severe disabilities/genetic flaws.

    Aborting a fetus due to an unplanned pregnacy where no birth control was used is one of the most infuritating aspects of abortion. Use birth control or accept the responsibilities of a potential baby. Abortion in this case is a cop out and is destroying a potential life because the parents couldn't be arsed to pop a pill or use a condom.


  • #40
    kona
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,522 ✭✭✭kona


    Ah **** off with all this serious talk. These two jip bags are a disgrace to humans never mind music. I thought Rappers were went to have a tough hard ass image. These two are fecking pansies. I hate hip hop, but had some respect for it. I think these two are a sign the genre has died, and not with dignity.

    Thats why they are arguments for pro abortion.

    Somebody like say Cantona would be a advert for anti abortion.


  • #41
    kona
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,522 ✭✭✭kona


    c0rk3r wrote: »
    First the gore image in the cycling forum to try prove a point and now this pro-abortion stance in After hours. By any chance were you one of those "activists" that stood outside the GPO on oconnell street with pictures of aborted fetuses ? Out of interest, whatever happened to those guys + who were they?

    By activist i of course mean nutters

    eh, If i was pro abortion why would I protest against it?:confused:

    I couldnt give a **** either way. It can be a good option sometimes. If you can offer the kid a decent life(like can afford to feed him or hes going to be a junkie out of the womb) then whats the point?


  • Advertisement
  • #42
    epgc3fyqirnbsx
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,228 ✭✭✭epgc3fyqirnbsx


    Well in respect to that other thread discussing new legislation allowing lethal force to be used in defence of personal property,

    Does that justify a woman using lethal force against a foetus to protect its assault on her womb??


  • #43
    Kiera
    Closed Accounts Posts: 13,130 ✭✭✭✭Kiera


    Kase Yummy Banknote wrote: »
    Well in respect to that other thread discussing new legislation allowing lethal force to be used in defence of personal property,

    Does that justify a woman using lethal force against a foetus to protect its assault on her womb??
    Stop ruining our play!


  • #44
    Ticktactoe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 765 ✭✭✭Ticktactoe


    Kase Yummy Banknote wrote: »
    Well in respect to that other thread discussing new legislation allowing lethal force to be used in defence of personal property,

    Does that justify a woman using lethal force against a foetus to protect its assault on her womb??

    Seriously, if ya start with the serious talk in this forum your gonna get highly offended!


  • #45
    epgc3fyqirnbsx
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,228 ✭✭✭epgc3fyqirnbsx


    Ticktactoe wrote: »
    Seriously, if ya start with the serious talk in this forum your gonna get highly offended!

    Believe it or not, I was actually trying to be funny :o

    Might be funnier in the legal discussion forum...


  • #46
    Kiera
    Closed Accounts Posts: 13,130 ✭✭✭✭Kiera


    Kase Yummy Banknote wrote: »
    Believe it or not, I was actually trying to be funny :o

    Might be funnier in the legal discussion forum...
    Wooah..... you need to work on your "funny", dude!


  • #47
    mahamageehad
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,673 ✭✭✭mahamageehad


    wish someone had said that to mrs. grimes 18 years ago....

    the musical world and Irish race would be a lot happier


  • #48
    Mike 1972
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,017 ✭✭✭Mike 1972


    CrazyRabbit wrote: »
    Pro abortion when....
    The pregnancy was the result of a rape..

    This sounds perfectly reasonable until you actually think about it

    On the pholisophical level: if it is murder to abort an embryo/foetus who was not concieved as a result of rape how is it not murder to abort an embryo/foetus who was concieved as a result of rape ? On the other hand if it is not murder to abort an embryo/foetus then why should the right to choose be limited to rape victims ?

    On the practical level: Given that most rape cases take a lot more than nine months from the event to the conclusion of legal preceedings how would you deal with someone looking for an abortion claiming to have been raped and how would you establish that the (alleged) rapist was the actual father of the embryo/foetus if the woman was (consentually) sexually active around the same time ?


  • #49
    fizzynicenice
    Closed Accounts Posts: 466 ✭✭fizzynicenice


    I be pro-choice ONLY in a situation where it benifits me. ie; if I knocked up some bird.

    Otherwise fugeddahbout it


  • #50
    CrazyRabbit
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,659 ✭✭✭CrazyRabbit


    Mike 1972 wrote: »
    This sounds perfectly reasonable until you actually think about it

    On the pholisophical level: if it is murder to abort an embryo/foetus who was not concieved as a result of rape how is it not murder to abort an embryo/foetus who was concieved as a result of rape ? On the other hand if it is not murder to abort an embryo/foetus then why should the right to choose be limited to rape victims ?

    On the practical level: Given that most rape cases take a lot more than nine months from the event to the conclusion of legal preceedings how would you deal with someone looking for an abortion claiming to have been raped and how would you establish that the (alleged) rapist was the actual father of the embryo/foetus if the woman was (consentually) sexually active around the same time ?

    As I said...lots of grey areas.


  • #51
    Nodin
    Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Kiera wrote: »
    Stop ruining our play!

    I have it.

    'Abortion - The Panto'.


  • Advertisement
  • #52
    Kiera
    Closed Accounts Posts: 13,130 ✭✭✭✭Kiera


    Nodin wrote: »
    I have it.

    'Abortion - The Panto'.
    Oh no its not!

    :P


  • #53
    Latchy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 21,190 ✭✭✭✭Latchy


    ' Oh yes it is ' :p



    somebody had to say it


  • #54
    Kiera
    Closed Accounts Posts: 13,130 ✭✭✭✭Kiera


    Latchy wrote: »
    ' Oh yes it is ' :p



    somebody had to say it
    He's behind you!


  • #55
    j2u
    Closed Accounts Posts: 314 ✭✭j2u


    orourkeda wrote: »
    Whoever shot him has no pride in their work

    chances are whoever shot him was paid by him to do it so he could talk about it in almost every song how he got shot and is the hardest man ever in the history of everything everrrrr. I like a bit of hip hop but people in wars and in the army get shot all the time and i am sick to death of hearing how fifty cent got shot. The guy was paid to do it or is disabled. one or the two .
    How retarded do you have to be to shoot someone 9 times and they survive.
    Shoot him in the head????? Its like the viper. Why cant someone not shoot him in the head??? could the shooter not see his head>? How?????
    Is it rocket science?
    Oh and i think this is getting off topic.


  • #56
    brummytom
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,572 ✭✭✭✭brummytom


    Kiera wrote: »
    He's behind you!
    Shhhhh he wouldn't have seen me!


  • #57
    Latchy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 21,190 ✭✭✭✭Latchy


    Kiera wrote: »
    He's behind you!
    Oh no , not him again ...


Advertisement
Advertisement