Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

All Estate Names to be in Irish

13468914

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,104 ✭✭✭moonflower


    Powerhouse wrote: »
    Tis true for you - Irish teachers should do like Geography, Maths and English teachers (apparently) and give their students a choice of playing snakes and ladders or learning Irish in class. That'd revive the language fairly quick I can tell you.

    I actually spent a good few of my leaving cert geography classes playing cards. I still managed a B3. I never spent an Irish class doing anything but trying not to fall asleep and panicking about how screwed I was for the exam. Maybe the snakes and ladders route would be a good one :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,059 ✭✭✭Buceph


    You're all being very nice towards Irish with the way you're blaming things that are easier to fix than the problem as I see it. A lot of you think if it was voluntary then only those interested would pursue it, and classes would be better. Others say that it's the way it's taught is the problem, and a focus on more conversational aspects of the language would be a better method of teaching. While yet others are saying that it's relevance needs to be shown to children, maybe by teaching it to them ensconced in issues appropriate to their age. This comes close to what I see the problem as. Irish isn't relevant, especially to 5 year old.

    Five year olds see through an awful lot of crap. They'll quite happily point out the dark, black man on the street that we wouldn't have seen many of before. Or they'll point out the cripple. When it comes to Irish they know full well that it's not necessary to anything they do. When will a child have any reason beyond an enforced one to learn the language. With French and German you can always point out other countries where they might go. With Irish you can point out what? A TV station that isn't showing the Den, or a small part of Kerry where they speak English anyway. Sure you can point out the cultural reasons and the way it ties into our heritage, but I don't think kids of five are going to comprehend that, some people who are fully grown never grasped culture or heritage. Maths faces a lot of the same problems when it gets to geometry and algebra, lack of relevance. And here we have teenagers who should know better doing the very same thing younger kids are expected to overcome.

    And of course if a child of five hates something, it's very likely that they'll hate it as the grow up, and might not change their minds until it's too late.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,428 ✭✭✭Powerhouse


    kowloon wrote: »

    Not many people would have a problem with the language itself, it's the fact that it's forced on them that matters. A problem with policy as opposed to culture.


    But this is patent nonsense. English, Maths and a Science subject are compulsory in schools and being honest many subjects are de facto compulsory in schools because of lack of rescources which suppresses choice. Yet you don't hear any whinging about that. Compulsion is and always has been a very very weak argument against Irish.

    I'm not sure who said Irish speakers have a monopoly on Irishness. But it's remarkable how insecure the anit-Irish brigade are about their sense of nationality. I am always amused by those who hate the language, the music etc. and the come over all Padraic Pearse when the Re-pub-a-lik of Ireland are playing England or whomever! More Irish than the Irish indeed!

    The 'culture is fluid' argument is really a charter for making it up as you go along and defining whatever you are into yourself as 'Irish culture' to be honest. Fairly meaningless stuff.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,252 ✭✭✭✭stovelid


    Powerhouse wrote: »
    Ah please, come on - "in my day". How can anyone who is so out of touch decide to chip in their tuppence worth? The Irish syllabus changed from that years ago.

    True, I did stress the disclaimer. :)

    Doesn't the language still seem to be in severe difficulty and the classes detested though? At least by any students I know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,939 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    aDeener wrote: »
    i dont know the figures either but you can be damn sure that whatever is being spent on irish is not restricting any of them. the expenditure on irish is immaterial in comparison to government finances. people against irish for the purpose of saving money is rather similiar to people looking to abolish the seanad, it wont save the bloody country, it wont even come remotely close. too many fail to see the bigger picture

    There are some who will argue that a few million here, and a few million there adds up. Like the holes in a collander each little project contributes to the torrent of cash flowing out of the coffers that could be spent on far more important projects. There are lots of other projects that should be axed first before even considering this though.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,428 ✭✭✭Powerhouse


    moonflower wrote: »

    I never spent an Irish class doing anything but trying not to fall asleep and panicking about how screwed I was for the exam.


    Mmmm, some uncharitable types would no doubt suspect your in-class activity - or lack thereof - and the exam panic are not entirely unconnected. Personally I blame the system. If you had the choice to give up Irish you'd probably be presenting on TG4 now. Coulda been a contender.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,487 ✭✭✭aDeener


    ... So how about we go back on topic and stop picking holes in posts for no reason?


    You know what I fuking meant.



    You made a pretty big assumption about why he said he was proud to be Irish. You said it was bullshít.

    What was incorrect in what he said? That at some point that he is unaware of, there may be a non-Irish in his family tree?


    that was exactly what was incorrect. using a family tree to define 100% irishness is wrong as no ones background is 100% from this country.


    and no i didnt know what you "fuking meant" is it the average of the people you know or the average of the country? if it were the latter i was hoping for a link to the state of leaving cert students understanding and interest in irish


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,547 ✭✭✭Agricola


    If the culture isnt fluid, then what is it? An oppressive regime where the powerbrokers tell you what the culture is and how you must adhere to and respect it at all times. Sounds like China to me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,428 ✭✭✭Powerhouse


    stovelid wrote: »

    Doesn't the language still seem to be in severe difficulty and the classes detested though? At least by any students I know.


    Depends what you call severe difficulty I suppose. If you set an unrealistic expectation then it is easy to sustain such an argument.

    But I could find you student who hate a wide range of subjects - citing such a cohort is not terribly scientific. Many students hate anything that involves work. And Irish is not very crammable which is a problem for many.


  • Posts: 18,046 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Powerhouse, the big difference between the other subjects we are forced to learn and Irish is that while we are learning Maths/English, we know it is useful and will be used again either in everyday life or in college.

    It's a fact that compulsion takes away motivation.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,487 ✭✭✭aDeener


    Powerhouse, the big difference between the other subjects we are forced to learn and Irish is that while we are learning Maths/English, we know it is useful and will be used again either in everyday life or in college.

    It's a fact that compulsion takes away motivation.

    id question that, after the spoken language is mastered i fail to see the real necessity in nonsense like sylvia plath poetry, the comparative study etc.
    now that is just my opinion, i really fcuking detested english more than any other subject


  • Posts: 18,046 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    aDeener wrote: »
    that was exactly what was incorrect. using a family tree to define 100% irishness is wrong as no ones background is 100% from this country.


    and no i didnt know what you "fuking meant" is it the average of the people you know or the average of the country? if it were the latter i was hoping for a link to the state of leaving cert students understanding and interest in irish

    Can't believe I'm sitting responding to this on a Saturday night.


    He didn't want to "define" 100% Irishness when he made that statement. It's a turn of phrase. Those words were put in his mouth when the question was asked. FFS, stop picking at nothing.

    And as far as what I said, you know full well I meant the average quality of Irish spoken by people I know. There is no data to backup what I meant.
    You again are trying to create something out of nothing.. Going on about "national averages"?

    Seriously like, do you honestly think I am going to compare how capable my cousin is at Irish to the national average? It's pretty fuking subjective you know.. I don't know his results and even if I did, they're based on a different system and are uncomparable.

    You know this but you're just in an argumentative mood and wrecking a thread for no reason.


  • Posts: 18,046 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    aDeener wrote: »
    id question that, after the spoken language is mastered i fail to see the real necessity in nonsense like sylvia plath poetry, the comparative study etc.
    now that is just my opinion, i really fcuking detested english more than any other subject

    Your first point would be my thoughts on Irish funny enough.. And I detested English too overall, but it's taught well for the large part and there is a genuine appreciation for alot of the subject matter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,939 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    Powerhouse wrote: »
    I'm not sure who said Irish speakers have a monopoly on Irishness. But it's remarkable how insecure the anit-Irish brigade are about their sense of nationality. I am always amused by those who hate the language, the music etc. and the come over all Padraic Pearse when the Re-pub-a-lik of Ireland are playing England or whomever! More Irish than the Irish indeed!

    The 'culture is fluid' argument is really a charter for making it up as you go along and defining whatever you are into yourself as 'Irish culture' to be honest. Fairly meaningless stuff.

    There you go assuming people who don't like Irish don't like trad music. Rubbish!

    People do hate Maths and English, it's a massive problem in the education system, the English literature and poetry should be just as optional as the Irish language. Beyond basic literacy and enough maths to get by in life (we all have to use it at some point) I think everything should be optional.

    Culture is 'made up as you go along' we adapt to the world around us and integrate new things into our culture. The internet for instance has changed the fabric of our society. A stubborn system that doesn't allow for change is a hindrance to progress, with closed minded attitudes we would all still be living under tribal despotism.

    Irish has to be allowed to evolve on its own as a language without interference, I am confident that allowing people who want to learn it learn it by choice would have more benefits than it being allowed to continue down this road of being formalised by the state.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,104 ✭✭✭moonflower


    Powerhouse wrote: »
    Mmmm, some uncharitable types would no doubt suspect your in-class activity - or lack thereof - and the exam panic are not entirely unconnected. Personally I blame the system. If you had the choice to give up Irish you'd probably be presenting on TG4 now. Coulda been a contender.

    I tried listening, but our teacher was a nutter. She'd talk at us in rapid Irish for an hour, knowing full well we were a pass class who hadn't the faintest idea what she was saying, then she'd get angry when she realised we didnt know something.

    I actually quite liked Irish but it was taught so badly that I never got a chance to learn it. I learned all about why Clare was in a treehouse and how to write a letter about an accident I'd seen but nothing that could actually be used in real life.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,763 ✭✭✭✭Crann na Beatha


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,487 ✭✭✭aDeener


    Your first point would be my thoughts on Irish funny enough.. And I detested English too overall, but it's taught well for the large part and there is a genuine appreciation for alot of the subject matter.

    well me too, i hate the poetry in irish. i hate poetry in any language, i just hate poetry full stop.:pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,939 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    aDeener wrote: »
    well me too, i hate the poetry in irish. i hate poetry in any language, i just hate poetry full stop.:pac:

    Particularly when you are told how to interpret it at school level. It defeats the purpose of poetry in the first place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭partyatmygaff


    The language really has no relevance anymore in day-to-day life. Sure it should be taught but it should be optional. Why would someone who wants to be an engineer/solicitor/doctor/pharmacist/accountant/economist/dentist/journalist e.t.c. be forced to analyse prós and poetry in a language they will never need to use.
    It should be taught upto Junior Cert and after that it should be an option.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,000 ✭✭✭dermo88


    I've always had misgivings about the treatment and, dare I say, the mismanaged decline of the Irish language. Making it an "official" language of state, to me, merely meant creating a glorified social employment scheme for a plethora of misfits who had no great love of the language except for keeping them in gainful employment at taxpayers expense. Removing the language meant they were redundant.

    There is preservation, there is maintainance, then there is progress. I suppose the nicest thing to happen is the creation of TNaG which ensures that there is some relevance to the modern world, and growth in usage. I am glad it happened, my only regret is, that I wish it was there when I was in school, although watching An Nuacht, or Radharc helped.

    I will agree that it is the way it is taught. I will shock you. At 11, I spoke and wrote BETTER Irish than I did at 17. This was thanks to a teacher who was very progressive and taught it like a modern European language. Yes - there was poetry and essays to show gramatical and linguistic niceties and unique features at that time, and some of the poetry and prose was required, particularly after learning grammar, we then saw an everyday application of the grammar. Make no bones about it, we do need to learn grammatical structures, syntax, conjugate verbs, and EVERY language requires some degree of rote learning of these, so that they are imprinted on the memory for future usage.

    The argument that a "child of 5 can see through a lot of bull****", is a valid one. Well.....I am sad that I was taught to hate the Irish language at one stage, grew to like it, then to hate it, depending on which teacher was dealing with me at the time. Being a bit precocious I handled sarcasm, nutjobs, power crazed nutters and freaks pretty badly. Am I scarred for life, far from it. Do I have a chip on my shoulder as a result - Yes, two, one on each, so I can be regarded as a pretty balanced individual.

    Was it me, or the system. I am mature enough now to say both. Which came first, the chicken or the egg. It was the switch between Munster dialect, Ulster dialect, then Galway dialect (1st and 3rd dialects are relatively similar, Ulster dialect sounds different). Because of the so called "Irish language fascists", depending on the region they were from, no one dialect predominated. They all wanted their own dialect so hated the others with even more contempt than they had for English, or filthy Soccer, Rugby or Foreign games put together. Indeed.....Myles na Gopaleen (AKA Flann O'Brien) satirised this attitude brilliantly.

    The money spent on the Irish language could be better spent. Putting Estate names in Irish is like the Government policy towards the language since Independence. The Welsh have done a far better job of reviving their language and are willing and proud to use it everyday. Of course, we are Irish and naturally a bit rebellious. I am convinced as a result that the best thing to do to the Irish language is ban it. Immediately - EVERYONE would want to learn and speak it. Plus, we could throw away those Irish language fascists who helped me hate it by using such phrases.

    "Ta se ag caint Gaeilge as an Leabhar"

    (He is speaking "Book Irish", as in he does not have physical experience of it)

    My final line is a savage indictment of the system. We spend perhaps 11 or 12 years in school learning a language that has no use outside a rock on the edge of Europe. We have spent untold BILLIONS of Euro/Pounds/Whatever since Independence teaching a language that we want to resurrect for the sake of resurrection in itself, rather than aiming to look out, we aimed to look in. This left Ireland insular and isolated for a long long time. Propose cutting anything in relation to this bauble, this toy, this ornament, one is called any one of the following:

    "West Brit"
    "Unpatriotic"
    "Anti Irish"
    "Thatcherite"

    I am not saying discard Irish. I am saying reform the methods it is taught. If people wish, they can be reasonably conversant in a language within 2 years. Why is it that we spend 6 times that length of time learning a language that we hardly use after the age of 17, and still are NOT fluent. Why is it that we could spend perhaps a fraction of that time learning a modern European/Eastern language, and end up borderline fluent.

    Work smarter, not harder. The money wasted on it can be spent far more effectively making people WANT to use it, rather than FORCED. The only reason many of us wanted a "D" at Pass level was so we could be eligible for the civil service.

    Was the language sexy enough? I mean, I'd rather admire the curves on Antonia, or Christina, rather than Feachtna, Nollaig or Niamh.....was that it? ....that it reminded me of a land happily covered in mist and damp and cold, rather than the sexy alluring sunshine of Santo Domingo or the Costa Del Sol. ....could I admire the curves on the tits of Apple in Ampang, while seducing her with alluring sexy tones of Malay, Thai or Cantonese?

    This needs to be solved. Our people as taxpayers deserve better. Our parents who bought/buy schoolbooks and tapes deserve better. Those who truly love Ireland and the Irish language and wish to maintain, retain and improve our distinctive cultural identity deserve better.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,418 ✭✭✭curry-muff


    Cen Fáth?


  • Posts: 18,046 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think this can be locked because dermo's post sums up the entire thing :P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,739 ✭✭✭✭starbelgrade


    I think this can be locked because dermo's post sums up the entire thing :P

    And because you agree.

    "I want closure".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,939 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    +1 Very eloquently put Dermo88.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,373 ✭✭✭Executive Steve


    I amn't anti-irish,




    You're hardly an English language enthusiast either, to be fair.

    :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,262 ✭✭✭✭Joey the lips


    smk89 wrote: »
    Why? Given the choice between Irish and German dont you think German should win because its is actually used in the real (buisness) world. I dont believe Irish should be encouraged it is effectively dead.

    Another example of this whole pushing Irish thing is in the UCD library where each announcement is made twice in english and then once in irish, if you dont get it the first 2 times you have very little chance getting it the third

    Being in UCD i take it your educated enough to do the research but I will give you a little start.

    If paddy the Irish man and Hanz the German recently went for a job in the EU. Hanz was at a far superior advantage. Why? Because hanz learned English in School and prob french or Dutch. So Hanz had German English and French which is the 3 languages required for the EU.

    Now Paddy is Irish so learns the Irish language. Paddy speaks english all day but as irish was not an official EU language paddy had to go and learn say french and german.

    Now paddy and Hanz arr sitting in an interview and paddy is actually more qualified than hanz because he has 4 languages but the man behind the desk will treat them the same.

    Rather than sit on the fence and say get rid of irish do you not question 2 things here.

    1. Why was the EU. You know the people who brought you lisbon and nice discriminating agaist paddy
    2. Why do you object to someone having there own national identity. Even in the US with its mix they do not object to national identity. The Irish language forms part of this identity.

    By your logic the world should be one large pot of mixed veg that all speak Chinese maderin. Why? Because its the worlds largest language and whats the point in speaking any other language.After all its far easier to communicate in one language.

    Tell me now we should not encourage irish and give me a rational reason that counters the above.


    ps: The UCD library should introduce a policy of all irish announcements. Bet you will educate yourselves then!


  • Posts: 31,828 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Almost all of the estates built in this part of the world in the precent past have had Irish names.

    The townland I live in has an English name, I have yet to find the original Irish name for it . The Official Irish Placenames Gazetteer has no references in it, so it's likely that any official Irish name will be a direct translation of the current Englisn name.

    OK, it's clear that this thread was started to have a poke at the Irish language.

    As for the language, well I'm still learning it and I have found that my children are starting to "like" the language as a direct result of me showing an interest.

    I believe most of you here "hate" Irish because your parants had zero interest in it and disappeared when it was time for them to help you with your Irish homework.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,000 ✭✭✭dermo88


    The Irish language is part of our national identity. However, it has become a massive waste of resources in terms of the amount of time allocated to it. I'll probably ruin the sense of my first post above in expanding, but I will try. Lets take three modern countries.

    Only one nation I know of has successfully resurrected a "dead" language, and thats modern Hebrew in Israel. There was a rational reason for doing so. There was a diverse population who spoke Yiddish, Polish, Russian, German, English, but needed a unifying tongue to communicate. So modern Hebrew was created, which uses many of the traditional biblical words, but with Polish, Yiddish, Russian words thrown into the modern smorgasbord and given a German/Yiddish syntax. Israel manages to thrive today. Ireland can thrive also.

    Singapore had an equally linguistically diverse populace. The 75% chinese majority spoke Hokkien, Hainanese, Cantonese, Teochew, Hakka and Mandarin dialects. In written form, they are one and the same. In spoken form, they are radically different. However, they discarded the first five and focussed on one - Mandarin. This did cause problems in that an older generation became isolated from their Grandchildren due to not knowing Mandarin. A rich cultural heritage was lost forever as a result. But thats Singapore for you, always chasing modernity and progress. Almost everyone, meanwhile, speaks English, and possibly one other language, Tamil or Malay.

    Malaysia has a sorry linguistic history, in terms of state interference and inward looking policies. In 1974, they decided to teach everything in Malay. As a result, decades later, foreign investment is in decline, the economy depends on oil, and education standards have fallen. You'll notice this as many overseas Malaysians help support that pillar of the Irish economy called Paddy Power. Those remaining in Malaysia, unless they are connected to the corridors of power, now struggle for a shrinking national cake. It was a similar scenario to what could have happened to Ireland with extremists in charge, ethnically cleansing out the Protestants. And....DO remember that it was our first President, Douglas Hyde who was a core figure in the Gaelic revival of the early 20th century.

    100 years ago, to communicate, many people used Latin, because of its wide range of expression. English now fulfils much of the same role. In 100 years time, I cannot predict which language will predominate. English is likely to adopt many more words from Chinese/Indian and African countries in that period, as it has done before. Very few learn Latin today, the last generation to learn it being taught up until the early 1970's

    But back to Irish. We learned "Gaeilge as an leabhar" because at the time I learned it (1980's-1990's), there was no Internet, there was no TnaG, Radio Na Gaeltachta seemed to be a bit....well....primitive and country centric, with little appeal to people of my own age group.

    The Gaelscoileanna thrive for one reason alone, smaller class sizes, ensuring better attention to individual students. Of course parents could send their children there for nationalistic, patriotic reasons. If it gets a better standard of education, then let Gaelscoileanna thrive, as its the best chance for Irish to survive and thrive in the modern age.

    There are possibilities for Irish, certainly in a commercial sphere. Its useful for maintaining confidentiality and trade secrets, particularly if dealing with copyright, and there would not be many people capable of translating it outside Ireland. Consequently, it should be viewed as a possible tool in the knowledge economy, if Ireland finds it has to specialise in biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, etc. In some ways, its ability to communicate concepts, emotions, feelings, can be superior to much vaunted English.

    Reforming Irish -

    Personally, my preference is towards the Munster dialect as its the easiest for an English speaker to pick up, pronounce, write, speak and adjust to. Later, the other dialects can be added on for higher level. Dialects exist in Spanish, French, Italian and German, more so than Irish. Certainly, the best existing literature is from that dialect, mainly originating from the Blasket Islands, in terms of Peig, AntOileaneach, and Muiris O'Suilleabhains writings. However, these, unfortunately, are part of the marketing problem, and the image problem with Irish. I did mention Flann O'Brien/Myles naGcopaleen above, and there are hilarious English translations of his work. It shows the history of the Irish language and those who spoke it as being lives of hardship, suffering, poverty, drudgery, and have about as much romantic appeal in the Ireland of the 21st century as a power cut ot Christmas. It does not mean that I should tread mockingly on that suffering, because its as tasteless as joking about the Ethiopian famine, or Rwanda. It was'nt the Brits fault either, because lets face it, bare barren rocky stony soil can only support so much with an agrarian subsistance barter economy, and the Blaskets were about as isolated then as Africa is now.

    Modern technology can save Irish with the Internet and Television. Those who wish to communicate in it can do so online, and gradually it may recover. But it means winning hearts and minds, making it enjoyable rather than the same drudgery it was for many past generations. Making it better for those who make it the last priority in the Leaving Certificate, who aim for a D3 at Pass level. The tools exist, the ideas exist, and possibilities exist.

    Meanwhile, lets not be fooled and conned by Quango's such as Udaras na Gaeltachta, Minister for the West, Regional Development Boards, expensive baubles riding along doing very little at taxpayer largesse. We can't afford these anymore, and we've got to choose between (for example) cervical vaccines for teenage girls, and the likes of this waste. It was fine during the economic bubble economy, but thats all over now. My crazy line would be turn the lot into a tax haven for gambling, drugs, and hookers, and tourists would flock, BUT they'd have to speak Irish to get the discounts :). At least there would be a chance of a few Euro made on the damp rocks of the west.

    As for me, well.....I can read it well enough. My spoken Irish is relatively poor, Irish words with an English syntax, which is nothing to be proud of, but better than nothing. The moment I speak Irish in an office overseas, local staff start typing faster, suspecting that something serious is afoot, and it often is if I have need to use it with Irish colleagues. Dolanbaker makes a very rational point I believe most of you here "hate" Irish because your parants had zero interest in it and disappeared when it was time for them to help you with your Irish homework. Its a good one, for most of our parents left school, and did not require it for their future career, which caused a vicious circle. If it has no "real life" application, then there are problems.


  • Posts: 18,046 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Being in UCD i take it your educated enough to do the research but I will give you a little start.

    If paddy the Irish man and Hanz the German recently went for a job in the EU. Hanz was at a far superior advantage. Why? Because hanz learned English in School and prob french or Dutch. So Hanz had German English and French which is the 3 languages required for the EU.

    Now Paddy is Irish so learns the Irish language. Paddy speaks english all day but as irish was not an official EU language paddy had to go and learn say french and german.

    Now paddy and Hanz arr sitting in an interview and paddy is actually more qualified than hanz because he has 4 languages but the man behind the desk will treat them the same.

    Rather than sit on the fence and say get rid of irish do you not question 2 things here.

    1. Why was the EU. You know the people who brought you lisbon and nice discriminating agaist paddy
    2. Why do you object to someone having there own national identity. Even in the US with its mix they do not object to national identity. The Irish language forms part of this identity.

    By your logic the world should be one large pot of mixed veg that all speak Chinese maderin. Why? Because its the worlds largest language and whats the point in speaking any other language.After all its far easier to communicate in one language.

    Tell me now we should not encourage irish and give me a rational reason that counters the above.


    ps: The UCD library should introduce a policy of all irish announcements. Bet you will educate yourselves then!


    In paragraph 2, you say that Hanz has a superiour advantage.. Why?
    You say that Paddy knows the three required EU languages and that the interviewer will treat them the same. Contradiction.

    Your first question..
    Why do you think Paddy being discriminated against? If they have the same language capabilities that are required and useful, it will be an even interview.
    It's not discrimination if they don't take account of Paddy's fourth language.. That's like saying a doctor with a qualification in Greek Civilization should get a job over regular doctors. Greek Civilization is as useless as Irish in the real world.

    Your second question..
    I don't see how you think he is objecting to one having their own national identity. He is being realistic about resources and usage..
    Language is a tool to communicate, it doesn't define who you are or add culture. Music, Arts, History, Sport, Traditions etc. are cultural elements we all hold dear in this country. Why do we need to cling onto the least useful, least wanted and possibly the most expensive one? In case people like you say we have are against a "national identity"?

    Is that not rational? Would concentrating on languages used in Business not be the rational thing to do?
    Would the whole world speaking the same language not be the rational step forward? You make it sound like a bad thing.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 31,828 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    dermo88 wrote: »
    Plus, we could throw away those Irish language fascists who helped me hate it by using such phrases.

    "Ta se ag caint Gaeilge as an Leabhar"

    (He is speaking "Book Irish", as in he does not have physical experience of it)

    If anyone ever accused me of that, I would remind them that English has more dialects than you can shake a stick at! e.g. English regions for starters, American, hiberno-English, Australian etc... etc..

    Edit: If "book Irish" becomes the unofficial dialect of the non-Gaeltacht regions, so what!


Advertisement