Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

DTT Commercial Multiplexes (was OneVision, Boxer etc...)

1131416181959

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 882 ✭✭✭reslfj


    Boxer in Denmark has been running a 1 mux, 10 channels early start in parts of the country since February 2009.

    At DSO November 1. - in 18 days - Boxer will broadcast 32 channels using 3 DVB-T/MPEG-4 muxes. (a few channels will time-share day-evening)

    But Boxer has only got around 10.000 subscribers by late summer out of a 'hoped for' 100.000 subscribers by year end.

    The Boxertv.dk CEO in an interview with a major newsparer said:
    "One challange is, that people wait. The other is, that we think to many choses a solution which is DR + TV2 only* i.e. the 6 FTA channels from the two state owned broadcasters." / reslfj translation

    A very agessive marketing campaign with 4 true Pay-channels + ARD(de), TV4(se) and TV2-Norway(no) is marketed for just €6.5 a month + €100 per year for the license card. A MPEG-4 STB is included as a gift in this offer.

    Lars :)

    * I will add: In many regions Swedish or German TV is available as spill-over signal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 558 ✭✭✭scath


    Agreed Lars, may be a good reason to consider such option, RTÉ is right I believe to wait for Pay DTT so as to avoid the Danish situation by only retailing Pay DTT boxes. That way gives Pay DTT a chance. I think even if Eircom balked, that UPC would be interested and probably happy to take in Setanta, TV3 and Arquiva leaving them with the multiplexing and RTÉ. So I think then u'd move MMDS customers to DTT and you'd see agressive marketing. They could rebrand as Easy TV alround, either Easy TV cable or Easy TV DTT, wouldn't be really in competition with DTT but complimenting it. They could advertise, 'Where do you live? Go for cable-(Urban areas) or DTT, (no cable available or inside/outside cable areas go for DTT?)'. Its better ROI than what they've done in Denmark with early MPEG2. Now see where its landed them! I guess we're tired of waiting. Personally I hope for MPEG4 and DVB-T2 given 2010 launch and boxes available by launchtime, and future proofing for viewers and more capacity whenever RTÉ upgrade. And also Arquiva have DVB-T2 experience from testing also.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    My issue is why should RTÉ wait for this new company. The first which pulled out and the second that has seen 2 of its investors reduce their shareholding. Let FTA role out with out Pay TV option if that what is required for the role, lets face it this it is in the national interest that DTT is role out regardless of the commercial interest.
    One challange is, that people wait.

    Sky have a word for these people Analogue-holder-ons or something.

    Lets face it most of us here are pretty patient with the Irish role out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,076 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    Some questions relating to DTT were answered in written reply by the Minister in the Dáil on Tuesday
    Broadcasting Services.

    5. Deputy Simon Coveney asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources the position regarding the provision of commercial digital terrestrial television here; the negotiation between the Broadcasting Commission of Ireland and a consortium (details supplied); the timescale for the roll out of a free to air DTT service; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35842/09]

    Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources (Deputy Eamon Ryan): The Broadcasting Act 2009 provides for the development of digital terrestrial television in Ireland and for the closure of the national analogue TV network. Under this Act, RTÉ is required to provide a national ‘free to air’ digital terrestrial television system with capacity to carry RTÉ 1, Network 2, TG4 and TV3. This new service will eventually replace the existing analogue free to air television service. The legislation also requires the newly established Broadcasting Authority of Ireland (BAI) to provide for the development of commercial digital terrestrial television services. A competition for commercial multiplexes was initiated by the Broadcasting Commission of Ireland (BCI) in 2008 and is still ongoing. The contract has been offered to the One Vision consortium.

    The BAI has taken over the role of the BCI in finalising this competition. The BAI, which is an independent regulatory authority, is responsible under the 2009 Act for the licensing and competition issues raised by the Deputy. While I have no direct function in these matters, I am concerned on policy grounds to see an early agreement on the provision of commercial DTT services and an early time path for the implementation of such agreement. My policy objective is the earliest possible switch-off of the analogue system thereby releasing valuable spectrum to enable Ireland to reap the benefits of the digital dividend.

    I am informed by RTÉ that 13 sites have been DTT enabled to accommodate both the single free to air DTT multiplex and also the three commercial DTT multiplexes. This represents the most difficult and costly element of the build plan as it includes the main transmitter sites in Ireland. It also involves costs associated with replacing several of these masts to accommodate the commercial multiplexes. In relation to the timing of the rollout of the ‘free to air’ DTT service, the legislation provides that RTÉ must provide a full national DTT service by the end of 2011 or such later date as the Minister decides. RTÉ have not yet set a date for launching their DTT services but have indicated a preference for launching in parallel with a commercial DTT operator as the availability of commercial DTT is important to assist RTÉ in getting a return on their investment and to ensure adequate viewer choice in the digital era.

    Broadcasting Services.

    7. Deputy Deirdre Clune asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources the position regarding the provision of commercial digital terrestrial television here; the further position regarding the ongoing negotiation between the Broadcasting Commission of Ireland and a consortium (details supplied); the timescale for the roll out of a free to air DTT service; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35550/09]

    48. Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources the position regarding digital terrestrial television; when he expects to finalise the contract for DTT with a company (details supplied); his views on reports that television stations have reduced their stake in the company; the amount spent on DTT by RTÉ to date; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35504/09]

    Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources (Deputy Eamon Ryan): I propose to take Questions Nos. 7 and 48 together.

    As I have already stated in reply to an earlier question today, the Broadcasting Act 2009 provides for the development of digital terrestrial television in Ireland and for the closure of the national analogue TV network. Under this Act, RTÉ is required to provide a national ‘free to air’ digital terrestrial television system with capacity to carry RTÉ 1, Network 2, TG4 and TV3. This new service will eventually replace the existing analogue free to air television service. The legislation also requires the newly established Broadcasting Authority of Ireland (BAI) to provide for the development of commercial digital terrestrial television services. A competition for commercial multiplexes was initiated by the Broadcasting Commission of Ireland (BCI) in 2008 and is still ongoing. The contract has been offered to the One Vision consortium.

    The BAI has taken over the role of the BCI in finalising this competition. The BAI, which is an independent regulatory authority, is responsible under the 2009 Act for the licensing and competition issues raised by the Deputy. While I have no direct function in these matters, I am concerned on policy grounds to see an early agreement on the provision of commercial DTT services and an early time path for the implementation of such agreement. My policy objective is the earliest possible switch-off of the analogue system thereby releasing valuable spectrum to enable Ireland to reap the benefits of the digital dividend.

    I am informed by RTÉ that 13 sites have been Digital Terrestrial Television (DTT) enabled to accommodate both the single free to air DTT multiplex and also the three commercial DTT multiplexes. This represents the most difficult and costly element of the build plan as it includes the main transmitter sites in Ireland. It also involves costs associated with replacing several of these masts to accommodate the commercial multiplexes. RTÉ has informed me that the accumulated capital expenditure on DTT as at 30th September 2009 is €31.5m approximately.

    In relation to the timing of the rollout of the ‘free to air’ DTT service, the legislation provides that RTÉ must provide a full national DTT service by the end of 2011 or such later date as I decide. RTÉ has not yet set a date for launching their DTT services but have indicated a preference for launching in parallel with a commercial DTT operator as the availability of commercial DTT is important to assist RTÉ in getting a return on their investment and to ensure adequate viewer choice in the digital era.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    The Cush wrote: »
    Some questions relating to DTT were answered in written reply by the Minister in the Dáil on Tuesday

    He repeat what he said why didn't he take all 3 PQs together?
    In relation to the timing of the rollout of the ‘free to air’ DTT service, the legislation provides that RTÉ must provide a full national DTT service by the end of 2011 or such later date as I decide. RTÉ has not yet set a date for launching their DTT services but have indicated a preference for launching in parallel with a commercial DTT operator as the availability of commercial DTT is important to assist RTÉ in getting a return on their investment and to ensure adequate viewer choice in the digital era.

    If RTÉ want a return ASAP give them the control of the commercial muxs.

    Anyone got a copy of RTÉ NL Annual Report?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,076 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    Elmo wrote: »
    He repeat what he said why didn't he take all 3 PQs together?

    The first question was one of five nominated for priority to be answered orally in the Dáil by the Minister on Tuesday but due to the resignation and election of the Ceann Comhairle no time was available so all question were published with written answers, because of this the opposition were unable to ask any supplementary questions or debate with the Minister.
    Elmo wrote: »
    Anyone got a copy of RTÉ NL Annual Report?

    2008 RTÉ Annual Report here, RTÉ NL is a wholly-owned RTÉ subsidiary company.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 558 ✭✭✭scath


    Am not surprised with the reply from the Minister and RTÉ's views on it. The reality is it might be really nice from the enthusiasts point of view to see RTÉ go ahead with freeview digital terrestrial television. The reality is a return on investment that maximises investment in state infrastructure has to followed by RTÉ as would be expected of any state companies getting funding from the taxpayer. We've seen enough already of where agencies didn't seem to be using resources properly. Lets not be seen to encourage RTÉ to do the same. In fairness they are not on this occassion.

    I can understand enthusiasts impatience. I'd love to see that which I've been following, get going, and people I've told about DTT actually see it happening as I told them.

    But, the fact remains the network that RTÉ is rolling out is capable of carrying up to 6 multiplexes or more depending on whether DVB-T or DVB-T2 is used.

    For RTÉ to go ahead in my view would not attract enough viewers to switch over to DTT until they had to. It would also make things harder for a Pay DTT operator to gain traction when there would be so many FTA DTT TVs out there anyways.

    However if RTÉ wait and try and get Top UP TV involved in the UK to get UK TV manufacturers to have a common CI system, then it makes it much more attractive to promote a whole DTT ecosystem ie 4 muxes, ie One Vision Digiview Channels.

    The Irish broadcasters can call free-to-air channels Digiview channels to allow them to be identifiable as Irish and free to air across all TV platforms.

    It makes sense for RTÉ to be seen to encourage the Pay DTT platform, as that platform will potentially provide it with the most return.

    The alternative option I see open RTÉ and the consortium is for RTÉ NL and Arquiva to set up a new network infrastructure company which Arquiva could invest into to pay for the extra multiplex equipment on the transmitters. In that way Arquiva would only have to pay mast rental and not DTT multiplex equipment rental as it would own the additional multiplex equipment. It could then rent out to others such as Eircom/UPC.

    In my view RTÉ seem to be doing the right thing even though understandably enthusiasts are so tired of waiting for it to launch. But get it right they must.

    I have no doubt that if Eircom even decided to pull out, that UPC would quickly step in with Arquiva and Setanta & TV3 and have no difficulty in quickly fast tracking from where Onevision left off and agreeing channel line-up because they already know the market, know the broadcasters and have relationships with them. So I don't see there being any difficulty in a 2010 launch.

    I think the BAI and RTÉ need to be open to Arquiva investing in the RTÉ DTT infrastructure, that is if Arquiva are interested or invited to do so. If that is not the issue delaying things then I guess we need to see clarity by end of 2009 at the latest so that come January either UPC step in or if they're not interested then direct RTÉ open up the 3 muxes to Sky, UPC, Setanta and free-to-air UK broadasters to rent capacity from them, have their CI cards across a common CI interface so that people can have Pay DTT instead of Sky Satellite if the viewer wishes, UPC's chellomedia and City Channels and put DCTV, Cork City TV etc. DCTV and Cork City TV can time-share anyhow under a ICTV (Irish Communicty TV brand) on the RTÉ Mux.

    So I think a 2010 launch should be possible. I think that if UPC weren't interested that Sky, Setanta, UPC etc, would be very quickly able to get cards working etc. The only delay really would be the pre-order of set top boxes or agreement with the TV manufacturers around IDTVs that work again with both Top Up TV and the Irish DTT system. 6 months deadline from January for a 3rd operator should be in place, after which the multiplex is opened up to subscription and other broadcasters. That's a worst case scenario.

    You could be sure that like in the UK ie Sky Picnic, that Sky, UPC, Setanta would be more than happy with that as a way to extend their reach beyond their own platform and get subs. It would also gaurantee RTÉ a return on its DTT multiplex in the worst case scenario, though it might be the least attractive option.

    By contast RTÉ Freeview going out there is no go from a business point of view because its harder to get people to go for pay TV afterwards as Top UP TV found out in the UK, its just better from a marketing point of view to co-advertise with a pay DTT operator, its cheaper and means RTÉ get a return from it sooner plus RTÉ would want some money coming in first before launch with which it could use to put against its spend on the infrastructure to date.

    One thing for sure, Pay DTT is not dead, its just a matter of whether its promoted under the consortia model as in 2008 or whether the BAI has to revert to the 3 seperate multiplexes model that it was open to. I guess that will become clearer in 2010, the economy has changed, and thus the thinking of the consortia may also. It may or not be feasible for Eircom/UPC though I think it will be. If not there's always the worst case option which may lead to a fragmented Pay DTT platform due to fragmentation but it could be the most viable model. Nothing to stop a person from subscribing to all packages in the fragmented setup. The EPG can be a common one, with the relevant package name ie Sky coming up on the EPG when it the card is loaded.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    scath wrote: »
    For RTÉ to go ahead in my view would not attract enough viewers to switch over to DTT until they had to.

    UNTIL THEY HAVE TO. WE ALL WILL HAVE TO. END OF. I have being saying this for years, if RTÉ are to continue to wait for the commercial operator RTÉ NL will continue to be forced to upgrade for the 2012 ASO. This won't be good for RTÉ and why should RTÉ let a commercial operator benefit from their upgrades? After all it is a public network.

    People who aren't interested in pay TV aren't interested RTÉ will have to pay for their STBs for switch over this means at least 200,000 Free or Subsides basic STBs.

    One Vision is only interested in one thing and that is ARPU.

    Multiroom, oh that is extra, triple play with eircom brilliant sure it brings up or ARPU, sports, movies sure keep our ARPU up it looks good for are shareholders.

    And you can be guaranteed that Digital will only be rolled out as OneVision, forget about your DigiFreeView option even being marketed. I wouldn't be surprised if RTÉ, TV3 and TG4 are encrypted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    The Cush wrote: »
    2008 RTÉ Annual Report here, RTÉ NL is a wholly-owned RTÉ subsidiary company.

    :( doesn't breakdown RTÉ NL accounts or RTÉ CEL unfortunately.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 558 ✭✭✭scath


    Elmo wrote: »
    UNTIL THEY HAVE TO. WE ALL WILL HAVE TO. END OF. .

    Of course, but I think end of June 2010 is reasonable, with a plan D. Plan A, pulled out, Plan B is negotiating. That means by end of 2010 we have launch of Pay TV.

    I wouldn't say its necessarily true that many people won't be interested in Pay TV via aerial. Many of the technology illiterate either can't be bothered with what arent' familiar with, ie satellite. If they aren't familiar with it with regards to aerial, except via overspill it was never an option. Don't underestimate the the power of impulse purchase. One thing it could affect is pubs down the country, because if subscription TV becomes pretty much most households then inevitably some lads will get together at each others houses with drink to watch a match instead of going to the pub, and then go out later.

    Elmo wrote: »
    I have being saying this for years, if RTÉ are to continue to wait for the commercial operator RTÉ NL will continue to be forced to upgrade for the 2012 ASO. This won't be good for RTÉ and why should RTÉ let a commercial operator benefit from their upgrades? After all it is a public network.

    You're assuming no-one will be interested in Pay DTT and they'll be waiting til 2012. But I would be confident that Sky would be more than happy to rent capacity and come out with a subscription card for DTT, likewise UPC, Setanta, ESPN. They'd have pay license costs to the BAI, make some Irish programming probably-why not, Sound & Vision Fund, news etc, and pay RTÉ NL carraige costs also. so commercial operators wouldn't be benefitting from RTÉ's upgrades without paying rental for usage for the public network.

    The reason I think, RTÉ waited is exactly because there was no material benefit for them to upgrade until now, then they had no commercial partner, and no ASO on the horizon. The model of selling the network was the wrong model, it should have been a flexible model that allowed RTÉ take on a co-investor rather than sell the infrastructure for a minority stake. The legislation was all wrong. The politicians were at fault totally back in 1999 when the economy was in full flow. Then after DTT didn't work out, we went for a trial when in fact the trial should have strarted after the DTT process failed in 2002/3, so that a fair wind would have been there for DTT in 2006 for launch from the economic point of view. This basically was the a government Dept, in 1999, 2 depts, this time Comms, waiting just like in 1999 to get clarity from the UK market. In this time Freeview UK picked up the ball after ITV Digital, they didn't wait around long unlike us, did they? About 18 months was it?
    Elmo wrote: »
    People who aren't interested in pay TV aren't interested RTÉ will have to pay for their STBs for switch over this means at least 200,000 Free or Subsides basic STBs.

    Its hard to determine how many people aren't interested in pay TV down the country. Some of those for sure wouldn't be bothered, but there are some who might get it, but don't really know anything about satellite or cable and don't want to be getting dishes up on their house, too much hassle. They know aerial, and it'll be simple for them, so they may well become Pay TV subscribers, some of them.

    The point is to avoid free to air stb on the market by going for official pay TV only stb's either subsidised by Dept of Social in the case of the aged or social welfare recipients. Its all about making the business sustainable which is in RTÉ's ultimate best interest, ie If a small number of consumers go for FTA set top boxes or just digital TVs, then so be it but unsuccessful Pay DTT won't give RTÉ a good return which is why RTÉ are waiting. I guess RTÉ etc can't stop FTA DTT boxes being retailed by retailers etc, but promoting them wouldn't be in RTÉ's interest.

    The sales line in my mind would be, why get FTA now and then have to pay for a subscription box later. Own the pay TV compliant stb now and subscribe any time u want to if not now, then later.

    Elmo wrote: »
    One Vision is only interested in one thing and that is ARPU.Multiroom, oh that is extra, triple play with eircom brilliant sure it brings up or ARPU, sports, movies sure keep our ARPU up it looks good for are shareholders

    That's also good for RTÉ then rental costs it gets from Onevision, if Onevision doesn't go well, then RTÉ's revenue to pay back for loans for DTT infrastructure build is difficult isn't it putting them under more strain, possible a help out from the taxpayer or privatised? That's why it would be less riskier to have Arquiva invest in a joint company with RTÉ so as to give defray RTÉ NL from taking out a big loan for the DTT infrastructure.

    Seeking, good APRU, I wouldn't blaim them for this. I'm not against enterprise here. Its getting the mix right. Because our population is small, big FTA depends on UK broadcasters paying the premium to make a decent sized Freeview, on its own its not sensible economically for RTÉ to launch ahead of pay DTT because its their network infrastructure and they want the best return on it for the benefit of the finances of RTÉ to spend later on HD channels. That has to be taken into account to. You can't just think of the viewer, we don't have the luxury the UK has of market size, population, amount of home content available.

    They are not a charity. Of course we'd like a strong Freeview mix, but the reality is we haven't enough Irish programming and content channels for that.

    What may emerge is an alternative to UPC that'll kick the hell out of UPC. That is where UK broadcasters see more benefit paying to be FTA on DTT because every TV unlike cable will have it. They might have more to gain from that than the royalties from UPC. That'll mean you'd see UPC's package resemble Sky's closer with similar charges and content between platforms instead of the current discrepency between satellite and cable in Ireland where its charged on cable and free on FTA satelite.

    There's nothing to stop Onevision providing quite a few free-to-air channels if broadcasters from the UK want that and pay Onevision the premium that they'd otherwise get on subscriptions. There's no problem in Onevision and RTÉ agreeing to extend the Digiview brand to cover these so that Digiview covers all Irish Free-to-air channels.

    Remember that APRU means jobs, possibly jobs in Ireland, more investment potentially from TV3, Setanta In Irish programming. Of course these are not guaranteed. But its good news for RTÉ and that does mean more Irish programming if pay DTT successful.

    It ultimately does come down to money much like we like to forget about that in the interests of the viewer. But reality dictates that a mix is the best we can get, and the market dictates the need here for a better balance than in the UK DTT market. To my mind Top-up TV should have been launched at the same time as Freeview and together with the Top-UP TV box. Its ridiculous of the UK broadcaster in terms of license fee, to give Freeview precedence, a mix is much better because that gives everyone a fair crack of the whip. I'm certainly not in favour of all subscription as with cable. But all FTA isn't good for the economy either.
    Elmo wrote: »
    And you can be guaranteed that Digital will only be rolled out as OneVision, forget about your DigiFreeView option even being marketed. I wouldn't be surprised if RTÉ, TV3 and TG4 are encrypted.

    I think they'll want to differentiate it for platform reasons. In the UK they are seperate. But you could be right about that. Again I couldn't disagree with it, because it saves RTÉ money if there is one brand. One can see the logic in it.

    Onevision Free
    Onevision Packagename

    I doubt they'll encrypt RTÉ unless it was for the benefit of the TV license. That wouldn't go down well with the public, I doubt that that will happen, because of the uproar they'd be with people comparing it with the Uk situation. Can you imagine the complaints that would be going to politicans, and Eamon Ryan would get it in the neck and would have to direct RTÉ under pressure from colleagues to unencrypt.

    Anyhow, RTÉ will be in charge of their own Mux because it was gifted to them and they don't need a license from the BAI as far as I understood legislation so they won't have to encrypt.

    Since RTÉ is not part of the Onevision consortium it then wouldn't want to encyrpt. RTÉ launching a Freeview brand in advance simply isn't economically sensible for it.

    I think the main thing now is the deadlines, that consortium 3 gets offered in January then must conclude by end of June. July you go to broadcasters direct ie Sky, UPC since the other model would have failed. It wouldn't be feasible to restart the whole process again. Basically it just means if Easy TV weren't interested then go to the seperate multiplex model (change the model) since players who turned down the previous plan surely wouldn't be interested to bid again. No point any more waiting around with ASO now playing a factor. DTT->ASO needs at least a year to bed down. That's my view anyhow.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    scath wrote: »
    Of course, but I think end of June 2010 is reasonable, with a plan D. Plan A, pulled out, Plan B is negotiating. That means by end of 2010 we have launch of Pay TV.

    I wouldn't say its necessarily true that many people won't be interested in Pay TV via aerial. Many of the technology illiterate either can't be bothered with what arent' familiar with, ie satellite. If they aren't familiar with it with regards to aerial, except via overspill it was never an option. Don't underestimate the the power of impulse purchase. One thing it could affect is pubs down the country, because if subscription TV becomes pretty much most households then inevitably some lads will get together at each others houses with drink to watch a match instead of going to the pub, and then go out later.

    Those that are interested in Pay TV have already have Pay TV. I grew up in Dublin in a house with 2 channels. At the time 20% of people did not subscribe to cable service in Dublin an area where cable was wide spread, do you think that those 20% are interested by the time I did get "Pay TV" I was utterly disappointed. Those people who One Vision or Easy TV are going to try to target first are in areas where cable isn't wide spread i.e. we don't have Pay TV because we can't get it, One Vision/Easy TV will obsess with Dublin, Cork, Galway and Limerick areas were up take is high, where penetration is already saturated. One Vision/Easy TV have no interest in Biddy and Miley in the back end of no where who have little reception for TV3.

    Your comment is based on Young affluent people possible already with Sky Digital or who like going to the pub for a match.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    You're assuming no-one will be interested in Pay DTT and they'll be waiting til 2012. But I would be confident that Sky would be more than happy to rent capacity and come out with a subscription card for DTT, likewise UPC, Setanta, ESPN. They'd have pay license costs to the BAI, make some Irish programming probably-why not, Sound & Vision Fund, news etc, and pay RTÉ NL carraige costs also. so commercial operators wouldn't be benefitting from RTÉ's upgrades without paying rental for usage for the public network.

    They will be waiting on till 2012, I am going to be pesimistic and state that it isn't people but One Vision/BAI/RTÉ/DCERN that will be the problem.

    Sky will not rent capacity on RTÉ NL, RTÉ NL will collect subs from cust for Sky and just like UPC, they will get 10% of these subs which I suppose is payment.

    BAI have no interest in regulating TV3, City, Setanta what makes you think they have any interest in regulating Sky.

    Any satellite service can already get Sound and Vision Fund as long as the unencrypt those TV shows. Setanta, C4, BBC have already received funding.

    The BAI could licence FTA channels which would pay to be on RTÉ NL just as TV3 and TG4 do at the moment and RTÉ NL could provide a commercial pay service for sports and movies. Giving subs to Discovery, Viacom etc doesn't help the Irish industry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    I think the main thing now is the deadlines, that consortium 3 gets offered in January then must conclude by end of June. July you go to broadcasters direct ie Sky, UPC since the other model would have failed. It wouldn't be feasible to restart the whole process again. Basically it just means if Easy TV weren't interested then go to the seperate multiplex model (change the model) since players who turned down the previous plan surely wouldn't be interested to bid again. No point any more waiting around with ASO now playing a factor. DTT->ASO needs at least a year to bed down. That's my view anyhow.

    There are no deadlines for these negotiations that is the problem. 31/12/2012 will not see switch over as you point out a year would be required across the country some areas will only get a month.

    I don't think it is going to happen.

    Sorry I could reply in detail but it is late.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 558 ✭✭✭scath


    You makes some good points Elmo. I guess pay DTT is challenging, but one end that you aren't factoring in is laptop DTT ie usb DTT. Subscriptions on that still have an advantage over mobile broadband contention rates. Okay that is shrinking, TV license etc, TV on your mobile. Its challenging.

    I guess dates need to be set by the BAI now otherwise danger of us not making ASO. Sky in the UK were looking for Sky Picnic to replace their Freeview slot. So why not in Ireland, obviously, retailers would sell the card subscriptions as Sky do in shopping centres, you suggested the other situation with RTÉ NL collection on their behalf.

    I think we're gonna see something happen anyways. I think if consortia pull out then the BAI need to open it out to interested parties or RTÉ to get on with it. One thing for sure, we need a definite 2011 launch commitment by RTÉ and to make money they need to offer Pay DTT for sports, movies etc.. I agree, problem is no deadlines. But the Minister has the power to set it and has ASO pencilled in for end of 2011 meaning RTE would have to go ahead themselves from January 2011. I clarity is needed from July 2010 on and RTE need to put the stb order in themselves at that stage if consortia don't go ahead. Then they can see do they want to allow consortia sell directly, collect subs, or have their own brand. They should be able to discover that in negotiations and put in the stb order anyhow. So beginning 2011 launch should be possible.

    But deadlines do need to be set in the background for scenarios. Hopefully One Vision sign off and we're ready for take-off in 2010. They might aswell go for Christmas launch rather than September when people are coming back from holidays but start pre-launch in September.

    We'll see what'll happen. And you didnt do bad on the detail either for the hour u replied. Return on investment is more important for RTÉ really which makes pay DTT a requirement even if that return is small its something, better than nothing. Sky won't mind trying to grab a few customers on DTT also, they're open to multiplatform & have stated so before and in recent times. They're on UPC. No reason they won't be on DTT either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    In all likelihood One Vision will want to launch in September 2010, 2011 or 2012 for Christmas build up, after Christmas they are dealing with sales in most retail outlets, unlikely to launch a new product in the middle of sales, and a spring/summer launch does really work either. And as we are saying the problem lies with deadlines while One Vision won't suggest a September launch that is what they want.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Lets get a grip on REALITY here.
    There will be no launch.
    There is no business model.
    The dregs of the market that haven't got FTA Satelite at this stage or sky aren't going to sign up.
    The few that do, wouldn't pay for the rent of one transmitter never mind them all.
    The Fat lady was allowed a decades worth of Encores.
    Thinking or musing that she never sung is pie in the sky.

    RTE will probably switch to DTT properly on it's own at the required time.

    No Bank or Venture capitalist would burn their money in such an obvious way as a waste of a venture like a pay DTT platform in the Republic would be now at THIS STAGE IN THE GAME AFTER ALL THE WASTED YEARS..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    Unfortunately have to agree with Black Briar. The statistics used in the OneVision, Boxer and Easy TV of people with FTA either via Sky non-payment or plainly FTA services has increased somewhat since then (4 years nearly since the quoted 06 figures not 07 or 08), in particular Sky non-payment. That's not to mention Freeview spillover.
    No Bank or Venture capitalist would burn their money in such an obvious way as a waste of a venture like a pay DTT platform in the Republic would be now at THIS STAGE IN THE GAME AFTER ALL THE WASTED YEARS..

    I don't know much about banks or Venture Capitalist but they do seem to know how to burn money. So I think that statement is the only part of your post I am going to disagree with.

    No Launch of Pay DTT, launch of DTT just as a face saving measure by RTÉ, who will be scapegoated.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,230 ✭✭✭Solair


    You'd really have to wonder what the scope for DTT is likely to be, other than as a direct replacement for free-to-air analogue.

    It could be argued that Ireland already has DTT, albeit encrypted, private and operating at 2.5Ghz i.e. UPC MMDS. (and SCTV Digital in Cork too!)

    I think it would kind of make sense to do some deal with UPC, SCTV and any other interested parties where by the free-to-air public service stuff was carried on open DTT, while some combination of encrypted DTT on UHF and MMDS frequencies could provide cable-like service to existing MMDS customers.

    Customers could be offered decoders that could handle SCTV or UPC's channels, along with the DTT off air. All it would require is 2 small antennae, a combiner/filter+downconverter unit - the free aspect coming from the DTT signals and the pay aspect coming from the MMDS provider.

    It would give the pay operators more scope for more channels.

    The only thing though is why would they be bothered?

    UPC can quite easily cut over to MPEG4, or better on MMDS and provide quite a decent service.

    Sky, Cable, MMDS and free to air satellite are most definitely already achieving near 100% penetration of anyone who wants it. DTT is really looking at the dregs of the market, i.e. people who are quite happy in 4 channel land.

    We also have to remember that unlike the UK, cable and sat penetration in Ireland is huge. To compete, DTT will have to be at least as good as digital MMDS, and all the indications so far are that it won't have anything like the range of channels.

    I strongly suspect what we will ultimately end up with is FTA RTE, TV3, TG4 and maybe 3e and a few other free-to-air channels on DTT e.g. community channels and oireachtas tv, with a very limited audience i.e. old people, student flats etc. Basically, a direct replacement for PAL and nothing more.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,076 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    Solair wrote: »
    It could be argued that Ireland already has DTT, albeit encrypted, private and operating at 2.5Ghz i.e. UPC MMDS. (and SCTV Digital in Cork too!)

    I think it would kind of make sense to do some deal with UPC, SCTV and any other interested parties where by the free-to-air public service stuff was carried on open DTT, while some combination of encrypted DTT on UHF and MMDS frequencies could provide cable-like service to existing MMDS customers.

    Customers could be offered decoders that could handle SCTV or UPC's channels, along with the DTT off air. All it would require is 2 small antennae, a combiner/filter+downconverter unit - the free aspect coming from the DTT signals and the pay aspect coming from the MMDS provider.

    It would give the pay operators more scope for more channels.

    The only thing though is why would they be bothered?

    UPC may become involved by default if OneVision fail to sign the contract. UPC is part of the Easy TV bid with RTE, the third placed bidder in the DTT tender process.

    I live in Co Limerick and within a 15 mile radius there are 3 MMDS transmitters but due to the topography I cannot receive a signal. This will be familiar to people who live in parts of the country where the terrain is not flat and without line-of-sight to the MMDS transmitter. For this reason the mixed DTT/MMDS option is a non runner.

    I receive my analogue and DTT signal from Mullaghanish and DTT from Woodcock Hill and my only option for pay tv in the future will be DTT if I choose not to go with Sky.
    Solair wrote: »
    Sky, Cable, MMDS and free to air satellite are most definitely already achieving near 100% penetration of anyone who wants it. DTT is really looking at the dregs of the market, i.e. people who are quite happy in 4 channel land.

    25% of Irish households do not subscribe to pay tv right now, if the pay DTT provider offered a cheaper lighter pay-as-you-go option (no contract) - I think this was included in one of the bids - it might be an attractive option for people who won't or can't afford a Sky or UPC sub.
    Solair wrote: »
    UPC can quite easily cut over to MPEG4, or better on MMDS and provide quite a decent service.

    Easily - if all the current receivers are MPEG-4 capable, otherwise over 80,000 receivers would require replacement.
    MMDS may be forced to go the MPEG-4 route in the medium term, after April next year ComReg begins its review of the MMDS spectrum before licence renewal in 2012 and 2014. ComReg has previously indicated it would reduce the amount of spectrum available to MMDS in this band, last year the EU required national authorities to review this band to ensure efficient and effective spectrum use.
    At the moment approx. 81,000 MMDS subscribers use about 144 MHz of spectrum - hardly efficient and effective spectrum use.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The Cush wrote: »
    25% of Irish households do not subscribe to pay tv right now, if the pay DTT provider offered a cheaper lighter pay-as-you-go option (no contract) - I think this was included in one of the bids - it might be an attractive option for people who won't or can't afford a Sky or UPC sub.
    I have one of these households beside me who said they are not paying "rent" for their TV.
    Rent is their word for subscription
    They were being advised to get freesat upon the welsh analogue close down and because it didn't involve "rent" and they were happy to pay the €249 for this.
    I've retuned their tv to receive presely digital terrestrial perfectly so now they're spending nothing-though they might get another tv later.

    OK so they are the lucky ones living in wicklow or wexford but you can be guaranteed that wide swathes of Leinster,all of Ulster and much of North Connaught will have *that option* as soon as the NI tx'es light up in a little over 2 and a half years now.
    Meantime the freesat penetration is ever growing.

    Again-pay dtt is not an profitable proposition in Ireland anymore in my view.
    Meteor may aswell put a mast underwater in the middle of the irish sea which would probably be only marginally less economically viable.

    You can blame the infighting and indecision for the situation.

    Thats not to say that by some miracle some group might set it up only to go bust after 12 or 18 months though.
    They'd be stupid.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,230 ✭✭✭Solair


    From Comreg's www.comstat.ie site :

    Digital Cable and MMDS TV subscriptions: 320 265
    Satellite TV subscriptions: 586 431
    Analogue Cable and MMDS TV subscriptions: 184 415

    Total number of households with some form of PayTV : 1,091,111
    Total number of households with some form of Pay Digital TV: 906,696

    Total number of households : 1,462,296 (as at 2006 census)

    This indicates that as at Q2 2009, 62% of Irish households are watching subscription-based digital tv. It ignores the numbers of people on Freesat, or those households which may be from parts of Eastern Europe and may be watching foreign-language digital TV.

    74.6% of the population have some form of PayTV, the bulk of this extra number is legacy analogue cable subscribers, MMDS switch-over is nearing completion and I have no doubt that UPC will force-migrate to Digital on cable soon. They're already pushing it very hard, and Cork's already migrated fully.


    So, of the remaining 25.4% of households which do not have UPC, SCTV or Sky Digital, it would be interesting to find out what % really don't have access to anything other than Free-to-air terrestrial.

    I would suspect that it's less than 10%.

    A large % are undoubtedly watching TV from analogue broadcasts from Northern Ireland or Wales, another large % are watching analogue deflector systems and an ever-increasing number are using FTA satellite.

    Then as I mentioned, there is a significant group of households which are not English-language based i.e. speak Polish, Czech, Chinese, French, German etc. Lots of these watch digital TV from Sky's counterparts in their home countries.

    Ireland's statistics for digital TV in international comparisons have regularly been totally inaccurate too. I don't know where they were getting them from!

    E.g. some of the stats seem to ignore Sky digital as it's seen as 'foreign' even though it operates commercially here.

    I would suspect the real figure for households without digital (or analogue cable) is probably more like 10%.

    Someone really needs to carryout a proper survey of households, it would be an interesting question in the next census.

    Relying solely on the Sky and UPC figures seems a bit misleading to put it mildly.

    The indications however, would seem to me that DTT would need to compete directly with MMDS and FTA satellite. It really doesn't have much of a hope against Cable or Sky, although I suspect the FTA aspect of it might have some uptake for 2nd and 3rd TVs, particularly when Analogue Cable in some cities goes blank and decoders are required.

    TVs with integrated receivers are going to be the driver of this.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 456 ✭✭mrdtv


    Solair wrote: »
    From Comreg's www.comstat.ie site :

    Digital Cable and MMDS TV subscriptions: 320 265
    Satellite TV subscriptions: 586 431
    Analogue Cable and MMDS TV subscriptions: 184 415

    Total number of households with some form of PayTV : 1,091,111
    Total number of households with some form of Pay Digital TV: 906,696

    Total number of households : 1,462,296 (as at 2006 census)

    This indicates that as at Q2 2009, 62% of Irish households are watching subscription-based digital tv. It ignores the numbers of people on Freesat, or those households which may be from parts of Eastern Europe and may be watching foreign-language digital TV.

    74.6% of the population have some form of PayTV, the bulk of this extra number is legacy analogue cable subscribers, MMDS switch-over is nearing completion and I have no doubt that UPC will force-migrate to Digital on cable soon. They're already pushing it very hard, and Cork's already migrated fully.


    So, of the remaining 25.4% of households which do not have UPC, SCTV or Sky Digital, it would be interesting to find out what % really don't have access to anything other than Free-to-air terrestrial.

    I would suspect that it's less than 10%.

    A large % are undoubtedly watching TV from analogue broadcasts from Northern Ireland or Wales, another large % are watching analogue deflector systems and an ever-increasing number are using FTA satellite.

    Then as I mentioned, there is a significant group of households which are not English-language based i.e. speak Polish, Czech, Chinese, French, German etc. Lots of these watch digital TV from Sky's counterparts in their home countries.

    Ireland's statistics for digital TV in international comparisons have regularly been totally inaccurate too. I don't know where they were getting them from!

    E.g. some of the stats seem to ignore Sky digital as it's seen as 'foreign' even though it operates commercially here.

    I would suspect the real figure for households without digital (or analogue cable) is probably more like 10%.

    Someone really needs to carryout a proper survey of households, it would be an interesting question in the next census.

    Relying solely on the Sky and UPC figures seems a bit misleading to put it mildly.

    I am glad the economics of this proposition are now being given careful scrutiny: you can also be certain putative bidders have carried out due diligence on this proposition. The reason for their continuing silence is obvious: its commercially probably not viable.

    The main problems have been the lengthy delays since DTT was launched in NI in 1998, the curious approach by the Government and regulatory entities to a prescriptive business model which failed elsewhere in the EU, the eroding economic circumstances of Ireland and RTE which has been affected by the structural downtown in television advertising.

    There are a large number of issues:

    a) Sky control nearly all premium sports and movie rights for the UK and Ireland. Other platforms are redistributors with much lower profit margins.

    b) Demand for access to UK FTA main channels is satisfied by a combination of cable, Freesat, MMDS, and Sky.

    c) Analogue terrestrial overspill is being replaced by digital terrestrial overspill. In the South East Preseli and Arfon DTT are widely available: Llanddona remains to be investigated and the situation with Blaen-Plwyf will be determined next spring. These services can all be received via cheapo set-top boxes or via digital tuners widely available in current TV sets

    d) The economics of DTT rollout in Ireland have always looked dubious for a 4-6 mux operation and are completely unviable without a pay-DTT operator. This is a vicious circle which, to date, has not been broken. It is attributable to poor thinking, poor judgement and poor decision making on the part of many parties.

    e) The delays have meant that numerous opportunities to exploit current technologies have been missed: MPEG2 in 2001, MPEG4 in 2007/2008 and now the largest neighbour plans to switch to an advanced DTT system which is 120% more efficient than its first generation DTT system. This, coupled with the widespread availability of free-to-air HD will exacerbate problems.

    f) The current trials have not evolved into an operational service which is commercially promoted or marketed and, outside Internet reflectors, is not widely known about.

    g) The inability of RTE to deliver its services FTA/FTV via satellite hobbles it from going down the Freesat/Skyfrom Freesat route which would have been an attractive alternative in many other EU countries such as the UK, France, Italy and Germany where this is quite normal.

    h)The overall DTT market size for a bespoke Irish system is probably now less than 100,000 homes. Viewed from an international STB vendor perspective this is now quite small and predicated on a technology which is now viewed by innovating vendors as having peaked. The introduction of DVB-T2 is going to materially impact Ireland and will factor into any due diligence investigation by any putative operators and their investment backers.

    For these reasons the current impasse is likely to continue until a decision to taken to ditch the current regulatory preferred business model.

    The obvious solution is:

    a) Roll out one FTA multiplex only

    b) Establish a joint venture with Freeview and/or Arqiva

    c) Review technology choices with a view to engaging consumer and vendor support with a degree of futureproofing.

    This is unlikely to happen soon, therefore it will be business as usual in Ireland: trials may continue and nothing will happen.

    Irish DTT is a very special Groundhog Day for connoisseurs.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,376 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    RTE should do the following.

    1. Identify and supply a low cost STB that works with the system. The Picnic box would have been ideal, if the software was upgraded and the unit sold for €25.

    2. Promote DTT, with a launch for Three Rock coverage, and ASO very soon after. Continue this through each transmitter area.

    3. Launch a RTE HD service, with more than a RTE 1 HD schedule, only available on DTT.

    Give viewers a reason to go DTT.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,230 ✭✭✭Solair


    The only commercially viable alternative I can think of would be to get UPC involved, which would probably be illegal or, at the very least would introduce serious competition law issues, but it would create a viable DTT roll out proposal.

    The MMDS 2.5Ghz spectrum allocation for MMDS is quite seriously out of line with normal European allocations, i.e. it's being used for broadband. There is also serious scope to re-use this spectrum in Ireland with technologies like WiMax to allow for decent coverage.

    If the state were to offer UPC a direct swap, i.e. get off MMDS and move your pay operation over to DTT, over say a 5 year period.

    The BCI could retain control of perhaps 2 MUXes which could be used to carry FTA content while UPC would carry the pay aspects of its services on the remaining MUXes.

    The downsides, other than the competition law would be that the DTT platform would need to be capable of carrying at least as many channels as digital MMDS.

    The upside would be that UPC would ditch the almost line-of-sight MMDS system they're lumbered with and could continue to provide rural 'cable-like' service.

    SCTV, the only other provider of MMDS services could be relieved of its must-carry obligations for RTE, TV3 etc, if it could implement something that would allow the DTT signals to be integrated into their EPG e.g. a box with two tuners or some clever tricks at the downconverter. With a bit of state R&D help, it might work! It would mean SCTV could offer more pay content, and not have to worry about carrying free-to-air stuff.

    The only way I can see DTT being commercially viable is with something creative. Otherwise, it's going to be a single MUX as a simple direct replacement for PAL broadcasts.

    I also think that in border areas, it's vitally important that someone develops a system that can allow for simultaneous reception of both UK and Irish DTT platforms through a single STB, otherwise RTE will lose lots of viewers who will just watch Freeview and won't bother with RTE if it's not in the EPG.

    It's a bit messy, but I'm sure it could be achieved, even if the box required two tuners, the technology's cheap these days.

    If there's a big enough market, RTE could quite easily commission Sagem, Humax or whoever to custom build a run of branded boxes and sell them in border counties in NI too.

    A bespoke weird Irish-only system is going to be an utter disaster from a commercial point of view.

    Also, RTE's failure to be on Freesat is just an absolute disaster from a audience reach point of view.

    I suspect as this recession takes hold, lots of Sky and UPC MMDS subs will get dropped in favour of FTA satellite. So, RTE will just be losing viewers to keep Sky happy!

    Analogue cable customers in Dublin and elsewhere will also be quite tempted by it.

    The channel line up on FreeSat is pretty decent, it certainly beats analogue cable's pathetic 16 channel fuzzy lineup hands-down.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    Why are we all still suggesting business models the business model has already been decided upon, by people far wiser than any of us plebes here on boards :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,230 ✭✭✭Solair


    Elmo wrote: »
    Why are we all still suggesting business models the business model has already been decided upon, by people far wiser than any of us plebes here on boards :)

    So wise in fact, that they may end up being unable to launch DTT at all - EVER! the way things are going.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    Solair wrote: »
    So wise in fact, that they may end up being unable to launch DTT at all - EVER! the way things are going.

    I was being sarcastic. It just doesn't come across in text. :o:o


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,376 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    It is not a new business model, it is a business model. There is no business at the moment.

    RTE should get it launched, anyone will buy into it if it is there and working. Do not forget all the people with second tellies in bedrooms, etc. DTT is simpler for set top aerials.
    The pay side is for others in the market. RTE will save on the power saving of ASO.

    I dropped NTL as soon as I knew about Freesat. It is brilliant, and free. If DTT worked on my newish TV I would be delighted. A merged EPG would be much better, but then you can't expect everything.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    Can I not be sarcastic?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,376 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Elmo wrote: »
    Can I not be sarcastic?
    It is beyond sarcasm, it is beyond farce. See the title of this thread - One vision awarded 11th May. Boxer said they would launch Jan 2009. No word even of a launch date now. No word of even the existence of DTT. TVs being advertised as 'HD Ready!' and we know what that means - 'not ready for Irish DTT'.

    This is not a time for sarcasm - it is a time for despair.

    Every part of the process is filled with gobsh!tes who deliver nothing but long term promises that never happen.

    Clearly what we need is a few politicians with their civil servant advisers to go with a full delegation of business worthies to go to some far off place like Las Vegas, or Tokio, to discuss it, and then write a report on how we need a few more trials and tests.

    You know it makes sense.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement