Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

NTL V SKY

  • 14-10-2009 05:24PM
    #1
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 3,645 Mod ✭✭✭✭


    Some advice please.

    My parents have the basic NTL analog TV package. It costs them something like €74 every 3 months. I was looking at the NTL site to see about getting the digital package with the record/pause live tv included. As far as I can make out it would cost the €25 per month for ther package and €5 for the box, a total of €30.
    I have SKY and for €28 per month I have a lot more channels as well as the + box for no extra cost.
    Sky is cheaper and provides far more channels.
    It looks like SKY is far better value or am I missing something????


«13

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,763 ✭✭✭Jax Teller


    sky is great , had ntl for awhile 2 years ago and didnt like it at all


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 3,645 Mod ✭✭✭✭Beeker


    Some advice please.

    My parents have the basic NTL analog TV package. It costs them something like €74 every 3 months. I was looking at the NTL site to see about getting the digital package with the record/pause live tv included. As far as I can make out it would cost the €25 per month for ther package and €5 for the box, a total of €30.
    I have SKY and for €28 per month I have a lot more channels as well as the + box for no extra cost.
    Sky is cheaper and provides far more channels.
    It looks like SKY is far better value or am I missing something????


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,140 ✭✭✭JDxtra


    Sounds like you dont have all the packs on Sky. All the non-premium packs add up to around €32 per month, making it just a tad more expensive than NTL. Basic multi room is a lot cheaper and simpler with NTL. If this is required, keep it into consideration when choosing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,140 ✭✭✭JDxtra


    Sky often have new customer offers, so check these. Also confirm what the install costs will be for both so there are no surprises. You can make real savings if you combine phone and broadband with NTL, which is something Sky cant offer.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 3,645 Mod ✭✭✭✭Beeker


    JDxtra wrote: »
    Sounds like you dont have all the packs on Sky. All the non-premium packs add up to around €32 per month, making it just a tad more expensive than NTL. Basic multi room is a lot cheaper and simpler with NTL. If this is required, keep it into consideration when choosing.
    True I dont have all the packs with sky because I dont want them. What I have is plenty and it looks like what I have is far more that you can get with ntl for roughly the same money. As far as I can work out its the Bargin Deal for €30 or the TV Deal for €77 per month but nothing in between????
    Bargin has few channels and TV has loads. With Sky you can get loads of channels for just €28 and you do not have to pay an extra €5 per month for the box.
    What an I missing here?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,630 ✭✭✭Koloman


    Beeker wrote: »
    Some advice please.

    My parents have the basic NTL analog TV package. It costs them something like €74 every 3 months. I was looking at the NTL site to see about getting the digital package with the record/pause live tv included. As far as I can make out it would cost the €25 per month for ther package and €5 for the box, a total of €30.
    I have SKY and for €28 per month I have a lot more channels as well as the + box for no extra cost.
    Sky is cheaper and provides far more channels.
    It looks like SKY is far better value or am I missing something????

    No, it's around 20 Euro for a standard box from NTL but if you want the record/pause box as you put it then it's a extra 5 Euro on top of that. So that would make it 25 Euro a month not 30.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 3,645 Mod ✭✭✭✭Beeker


    Koloman wrote: »
    No, it's around 20 Euro for a standard box from NTL but if you want the record/pause box as you put it then it's a extra 5 Euro on top of that. So that would make it 25 Euro a month not 30.
    I might be wrong but its €20 for new cusomers but €25 for existing pust the 5 for the box.:(


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,054 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Beeker wrote: »
    I might be wrong but its €20 for new cusomers but €25 for existing pust the 5 for the box.:(

    No, €20 is the entry level product.
    Beeker wrote: »
    Bargin has few channels and TV has loads. With Sky you can get loads of channels for just €28 and you do not have to pay an extra €5 per month for the box.
    What an I missing here?

    What you are missing is UPC's pick and mix section which can give you a frightening array of options:

    http://www.upc.ie/deals/made_to_measure/

    UPC's entry level Digital TV pack costs €20 per month and gives you about 40 channels plus the 17 channel analogue service for multiroom for free.

    The DVR is an extra €5 per month, so total cheapest option is €25 not €30.

    Take into account that a Sky+ box will cost you €24.50 and install €40, with UPC both are free.

    UPC particularly comes into itself if you also get phone and BB from them, works out a lot cheaper then the alternative.

    Also please don't open the same thread in multiple forums, I've merged them here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,000 ✭✭✭whosedaddy?


    and how does the picture quality compare?
    some claim sky has superior picture quality...

    UPC might be cheaper, but if sky has "significant" better picture quality for SD channels (which are the majority of channels), it still might be better value.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 3,645 Mod ✭✭✭✭Beeker


    bk wrote: »
    Also please don't open the same thread in multiple forums, I've merged them here.
    Thanks for info! Sorry for starting on two different forums but was unsure which to go far as it relates to both!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 554 ✭✭✭spongeman


    and how does the picture quality compare?
    some claim sky has superior picture quality...

    UPC might be cheaper, but if sky has "significant" better picture quality for SD channels (which are the majority of channels), it still might be better value.

    Value is not the the most important part here I feel. The difference is that Sky has a hugely better picture quality. And thats always important for me.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,054 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    spongeman wrote: »
    Value is not the the most important part here I feel. The difference is that Sky has a hugely better picture quality. And thats always important for me.

    I would disagree, Sky has only slightly better picture quality, but not a massive difference, most people probably wouldn't notice the difference.

    Also Sky can vary greatly, some channels can have a high bitrate and excellent pq, others can have a very low bitrate and awful PQ.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭maggy_thatcher


    My experience with the two:

    1. Picture quailty - Sky wins hands down. The "low bitrate" channels are generally ones like TruMovies etc, and I've found this actually affects sound more than picture.
    2. Channel selection - Sky has many more channels, but UPC have a few channels more conveniently available (e.g. BBC3/4, BBC News), whereas Sky only has them hidden away under 'Other Channels'
    3. User Experience - When UPC had the Purple interface, I found it fairly easy to use (if a little clumsy at times); then they switched to the 'Blue' interface (I'm sure there's a better term for it!), and I found it buggy as hell, and really awkward...random crashes, pausing while entering channel numbers would make it pick some other channel that it thinks you mean; etc. In fact that was what prompted us to get rid of the UPC box and replace it with Sky. The only thing I miss on Sky's user interface is the ability to get program information on a program you aren't actually watching without going to the TV guide. Sky Anytime is also pretty good, especially if you have the movie channels. Have they added the ability to watch one/record one or watch pre-recorded+record two to UPC yet?
    4. Cost - Sky costs between €21.50 and €31.50 a month excluding premium channels depending on what packs you want. UPC these days only seems to have one €27.50 package available (at least for new customers). We have the €23.50/mth option, which has pretty much any channel I'd want.
    5. Warranty - this is the only +1 on UPC for me - with UPC they own the hardware, with Sky you own the hardware. If something goes wrong with the box, with UPC they'll replace it, with Sky you have to buy a new box.
    There's no clear winner really, it's really down to what you prefer. We used to have Sky TV and UPC BB, but we've since moved to an area that UPC only has very basic coverage, so we're down to Sky TV and no BB until I figure out who to go with.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭Freddie59


    bk wrote: »
    I would disagree, Sky has only slightly better picture quality, but not a massive difference, most people probably wouldn't notice the difference.

    Also Sky can vary greatly, some channels can have a high bitrate and excellent pq, others can have a very low bitrate and awful PQ.

    +1 to that. The joys of flat-screen LCDs.:) Even though I have one myself I was in my niece's house last night and she has a 100Hz Sony CRT. The picture quality is absoloutely stunning, either on NTL analogue or digital. Many people forget the viewing/distance ratio when purchasing LCD TV sets, either for NTL or Sky.

    http://www.dtvcity.com/lcdtv/lcdscreensize.html


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,054 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Channel selection - Sky has many more channels, but UPC have a few channels more conveniently available (e.g. BBC3/4, BBC News), whereas Sky only has them hidden away under 'Other Channels'

    UTV also and one thing to note, you can record these "Other Channels" on the UPC DVR, but not on Sky+
    Cost - Sky costs between €21.50 and €31.50 a month excluding premium channels depending on what packs you want. UPC these days only seems to have one €27.50 package available (at least for new customers). We have the €23.50/mth option, which has pretty much any channel I'd want.

    You can still get the €20 package from UPC. €27.50 is for HD and DVR.

    I agree that UPC's DVR is a little too expensive, and distorts UPC's value versus Sky, they should allow people to pay a once off fee for it.

    While UPC's entry level product offers less channels, some might argue it is better value then Sky's. If you only get two Sky Subs, for instance Entertainment and Docs, then you don't get any music channels, kids channels, etc., that maybe fine for some people, but not great for a family with wide tastes. UPC has the advantage that it gives you the top rated one or two channels from each category.

    Also UPC can be great value when you take into account free analogue multiroom.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,035 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    My house has three TV points, they were all the old Cablelink TV/FM connector boxes but I hadn't been connected for several years. I decided to go with UPC because with Sky I'd need a digital box at each location whereas with UPC I only need one digital box at the main TV and I have free analogue (20 channels) TV at the two other points.

    UPC don't yet offer broadband (or HD) in my area but when they eventually do I'll be able to dump my Vodafone BB and consolidate on to one service provider, this was another reason to go UPC.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 342 ✭✭thomasjad


    Sorry if this is a bit off topic but I didn't want to start a new thread. Anyway I have a few questions about multiroom viewing, it's €8.50 per month extra, is that per room? Is there a limit to how many rooms? Most importantly if I have a Digital + HD box in my same room could I get another Digital + HD box in another room or would it have to be the basic box?


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,054 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    thomasjad wrote: »
    Sorry if this is a bit off topic but I didn't want to start a new thread. Anyway I have a few questions about multiroom viewing, it's €8.50 per month extra, is that per room? Is there a limit to how many rooms? Most importantly if I have a Digital + HD box in my same room could I get another Digital + HD box in another room or would it have to be the basic box?

    - yes €8.50 per extra box
    - I think they recommend 4, but you might be able to go higher.
    - yes you can get a Digital + HD box for extra rooms, but you will have to pay for the box, I think it is €90.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭maggy_thatcher


    I imagine that it would be difficult to go much higher. Firstly once you go past 4 you'd need more than an Octo-LNB on your dish (can you even get more than that?), unless of course you use the old non-plus boxes. Secondly with Multi-Room Sky have this very irritating requirement that all boxes are hooked up to the same land-line. If you had more than 4 boxes + a regular phone, your REN on the line might go too high.

    What we've done in-house is we just have one box, and then use a wireless video-sender to send it over to a different TV. It does mean we can only watch one channel at a time, but we can live with that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭Max Power1


    why does this issue come up again and again?

    Sky is waaaaaaaay better. Unless you want internet and tv from same company.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭Freddie59


    Max Power1 wrote: »
    why does this issue come up again and again?

    Sky is waaaaaaaay better. Unless you want internet and tv from same company.

    And phone.......and no call-out fees.......and you're not responsible for the equipment.......etc.:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,630 ✭✭✭Koloman


    Max Power1 wrote: »
    Sky is waaaaaaaay better.

    No, Sky are just way better at hyping up their own business. On a value for money basis then UPC is better.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭Freddie59


    Koloman wrote: »
    No, Sky are just way better at hyping up their own business.
    :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭Max Power1


    Freddie59 wrote: »
    And phone.......and no call-out fees.......and you're not responsible for the equipment.......etc.:)

    and many channels not available on NTL - ITV1-4, Channel 5, Living TV2 etc. COmpetent customer service, and a much better EPG system
    Koloman wrote: »
    No, Sky are just way better at hyping up their own business. On a value for money basis then UPC is better.

    riiiiight.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,210 ✭✭✭hightower1


    Max Power1 wrote: »
    and many channels not available on NTL - ITV1-4, Channel 5, Living TV2 etc. COmpetent customer service, and a much better EPG system.


    ITV1-5 = the bill....endlessly... oh and dancing with stars lol
    Channel 5 = The dregs of daytime tv but with the added bonus of being carried through the night!
    Living +2 = Great! If I menstrated and had breasts ...... +1 hour.


    But it doesnt end there... Live roulet TV 24/7!!! cant live without that!
    Infomercial tv.... excellent! Classicial music tv... if I dont have some Bethoven before I head out on the booze Iit aint a REAL night out!

    Anything on NTL is channels you ACTUALLY watch as opposed to 400 channels of utter cack clogging up that excellent epg.

    I would trade all of those channels for a proper one like channel 4.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭maggy_thatcher


    hightower1 wrote: »
    I would trade all of those channels for a proper one like channel 4.

    You mean channel 135/136 on the Sky EPG? And on top of that, when Channel-4 blocks transmission to Ireland for whatever reason, just go back onto the Other Channels list and grab the UK version to go with it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 205 ✭✭hitbit


    Sky may appear to have far more channels than UPC but many are god, porn, hd, shopping and quite a variety of obscure ones. Remove these and the gap narrows considerably.
    Sky installation and multiroom are far more expensive.
    Sky insist on you having an active phone line connected to each box at all times. This creates a major problem if you need 4 or more boxes in your home as domestic phone lines carry a max of 4 REN so nothing left for phone, broadband etc.
    Sky customer services people are unhelpfull, rude and arrogant. Just try and speak to anyone in their Milton Keynes centre. They will never return your calls and when you call them again quoting the name you were given they will deny all knowledge of that person. I actually have signed by persons whom they deny exist. So the question is are they lying or are the names ficticious inventions.
    Sky picture quality is no better than UPC though I am on a Fibre Optic Cable.
    I switched to UPC, TV, Broadband and Phone a year ago.
    There installers were, pleasant, polite, professional and did a good job.
    They are much cheaper than others including Sky.
    Their customer services people are excellent ( I acknowledge it sometimes takes a while to get through to them but when you do they are not rude or impolite like Sky's people).
    Sky have a great range of channels but so do UPC.
    Sky picture quality is excellent but no better than UPC's.
    Don't know about Sky's but UPC Broadband and Phone are great and cheap.
    But when it comes to the people you have to speak to on helplines UPC staff simply blow Sky out of the water.

    Hitbit


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,053 ✭✭✭✭BostonB


    Funny because was told by sky you had to pay extra if you didn't have a phone line. I've also read of lots of people disconecting their sky box from the phone line with no problems. Perhaps that's no longer possible and the sky person was telling me porkies.

    And as a UPC customer for many years my experience of them is certainly not as dream like as yours.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭maggy_thatcher


    BostonB wrote: »
    Funny because was told by sky you had to pay extra if you didn't have a phone line. I've also read of lots of people disconecting their sky box from the phone line with no problems. Perhaps that's no longer possible and the sky person was telling me porkies.

    And as a UPC customer for many years my experience of them is certainly not as dream like as yours.

    You only need a phone line if you have Sky Multiroom. If you have a single box you won't need it.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,053 ✭✭✭✭BostonB


    You only need a phone line if you have Sky Multiroom. If you have a single box you won't need it.

    Ah. How often do they check the boxes are connected to the phone line?


Advertisement
Advertisement