Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Walt Disney made one just movie, And has been tracing over it ever since

24

Comments

  • #32
    Mr.Lizard
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭Mr.Lizard


    javaboy wrote: »
    Would it be acceptable for a band to release songs that sound the exact same year after year and expect people to pay for them? Huh? Do you think the likes of U2 or Coldplay would get away with that?

    .... or Red Hot Chili Peppers. I'd like to see them try get away with it! Luckily yer average joe is too smart to fall for something like that.


  • #33
    dr.bollocko
    Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 35,948 Mod ✭✭✭✭dr.bollocko


    Ikky Poo2 wrote: »
    Yore Ma

    Somebody please find the painkillers.


  • #34
    Biggins
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    javaboy wrote: »
    Would it be acceptable for a band to release songs that sound the exact same year after year and expect people to pay for them? Huh? Do you think the likes of U2 or Coldplay would get away with that?

    Good question. Topic for another thread?

    Quick reply: God knows this happens too.
    It seems every second song out of No-Life ** cough ** sorry, Westlife, is a copy/rip of original Josh Groban songs as well as other artists.
    So in some cases and not just them, people are actually paying more than once for the same thing again, perhaps only altered slightly in each case.

    Nobody cares too much if you reuse the same wiper motor that worked fine in the last model.
    You would have been better off saying that folk use the basic same engine as it all works along the same principle. Its just the additional functions that use the outcome of the engine that are subsequently different in design and features.


  • #35
    javaboy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,094 ✭✭✭✭javaboy


    I'm wondering now if Ikky was making a subtle nuanced socio-dadactic post apocalyptic social commentary about the lazy reuse of material (be it memes or cartoons) that we were all too thick to get. Is that what you were doing Ikky?


  • #36
    TheIrishGrover
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,778 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    Look closely at this clip. Literally...frame by frame. Pretty incredible scene by scene video comparison. We have been done!!

    We have been paying heaps to bring our kids to watch these movies and they have been using the same templets again and again.

    http://thetruthhandler.blogspot.com/2009/04/disney-made-one-movie-and-has-been.html

    YEAH!!!! And don't get me started: I mean, nothing new has been written since the dawn of writing: all people do is use the same words over and over again but in different order..... Damn you Shakespeare, you're a ripoff artist


  • Advertisement
  • #37
    javaboy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,094 ✭✭✭✭javaboy


    Biggins wrote: »

    You would have been better off saying that folk use the basic same engine as it all works along the same principle. Its just the additional functions that use the outcome of the engine that are subsequently different in design and features.

    No. No I wouldn't. I was talking about using the exact same part. And I deliberately picked one that would not influence a buyer's decision or make them feel cheated in some way. Although engines are reused quite a lot, people tend to feel slightly miffed when they hear that they're brand new engine is the same one they fitted to a model that came out in the 80's. Not so with wiper engines.


  • #38
    Wagon
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,119 ✭✭✭Wagon


    javaboy wrote: »
    I'm wondering now if Ikky was making a subtle nuanced socio-dadactic post apocalyptic social commentary about the lazy reuse of material (be it memes or cartoons) that we were all too thick to get. Is that what you were doing Ikky?
    Oh! i get it now! Ikky doesn't fale!


  • #39
    RandolphEsq
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,296 ✭✭✭RandolphEsq


    javaboy wrote: »
    Why did you do that? Did you see a bigger kid doing it and think it would be cool?

    I thought it was funny

    *hammers fist down on Javaboy's head*


  • #40
    Biggins
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    javaboy wrote: »
    No. No I wouldn't. I was talking about using the exact same part. And I deliberately picked one that would not influence a buyer's decision or make them feel cheated in some way. Although engines are reused quite a lot, people tend to feel slightly miffed when they hear that they're brand new engine is the same one they fitted to a model that came out in the 80's. Not so with wiper engines.

    Fair enough, I understand what your trying to say but I feel you slightly missed my point with my analogy.
    My primary point was that in a lot of cases, copying (not using a particular exact same item) items/sections makes a lot of sense in some cases.
    Where people might start to feel ripped off is debatable and particular to each case.
    A lot of the time, their feeling for being ripped off might be justified - in others perhaps not so much.
    Its all about perspectives and priorities I suppose both to the creator and the end user/purchaser.


  • #41
    javaboy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,094 ✭✭✭✭javaboy


    Biggins wrote: »
    Fair enough, I understand what your trying to say but I feel you slightly missed my point with my analogy.

    No I got your point. I just think you chose a bad example in computer programming.


  • Advertisement
  • #42
    Biggins
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    javaboy wrote: »
    No I got your point. I just think you chose a bad example in computer programming.

    ok lol
    We won't split hairs - just drugs! :pac:


  • #43
    Blue-Eyed
    Closed Accounts Posts: 90 ✭✭Blue-Eyed


    Who cares if they use the scenes again? Disney's still awesome! :pac:


  • #44
    dr.bollocko
    Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 35,948 Mod ✭✭✭✭dr.bollocko


    Blue-Eyed wrote: »
    Who cares if they use the scenes again? Disney's still awesome! :pac:

    They used those same clips again in the Jonas Brothers 3d concert.


  • #45
    live2thewire
    Closed Accounts Posts: 246 ✭✭live2thewire


    your a nutcase


  • #46
    dr.bollocko
    Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 35,948 Mod ✭✭✭✭dr.bollocko


    live2thewire wrote: »
    your a nutcase

    And that is an efficiently quickly posted final straw. I salute you mr. Wire.
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=59785083&postcount=2
    Banned.


  • #47
    useful_contacts
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,821 ✭✭✭useful_contacts


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    Look closely at this clip. Literally...frame by frame. Pretty incredible scene by scene video comparison. We have been done!!

    We have been paying heaps to bring our kids to watch these movies and they have been using the same templets again and again.

    http://thetruthhandler.blogspot.com/2009/04/disney-made-one-movie-and-has-been.html

    Im much too busy and important to view the clip

    but i want you believe you:D


  • #48
    corbo87
    Closed Accounts Posts: 47 ✭corbo87


    Hats off to disney. They are obviously a bunch of very clever people, i mean who got hurt? the children enjoyed the movies. I certainly did, so whats the problem? Who was ripped off? We payed to see a good movie and we got it no matter how it was made. We payed to see the blare witch project and that was made with lies and a handheld camera, yet people still enjoyed it. Everybody takes shortcuts and sometimes its worth it to do so if your still getting the same quality. It took people over 20/30 years to notice that and its very good. Why make a big deal of it? If your going to give out and post threads about being ripped off, i could suggest 10,000 other subjects to protest your angre about.. such as the things that are going on under your nose in your own country!! Never mind disney!!


  • #49
    AlmightyCushion
    Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,351 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    corbo87 wrote: »
    We payed to see the blare witch project and that was made with lies and a handheld camera, yet people still enjoyed it.

    People enjoyed the blair witch project? This is more shocking than run_to_da_hills revelation!!!!


  • #50
    copacetic
    Subscribers Posts: 17,213 ✭✭✭✭copacetic


    AlmightyCushion wrote: »
    People enjoyed the blair witch project? This is more shocking than run_to_da_hills revelation!!!!

    It must have been a conspiracy of one.


  • #51
    copacetic
    Subscribers Posts: 17,213 ✭✭✭✭copacetic


    dr.bollocko wrote: »
    And that is an efficiently quickly posted final straw. I salute you mr. Wire.
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=59785083&postcount=2
    Banned.

    See, even using incorrect grammar cannot protect you from the good Doctor. I see a helpdesk thread around whether the use of 'Your' rather than 'You're' means the abuse wasn't actually directed at the poster.


  • Advertisement
  • #52
    Mimikyu
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,050 ✭✭✭✭Mimikyu


    This post has been deleted.


  • #53
    Terry
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,073 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    Walt Disney was a nazi.

    Holy crap.
    He was also part Klingon.
    Walt Disney was born to Elias Disney an Irish-Canadian, and his mother, Flora Call Disney, who was of German-American descent.[3] Walt Disney's ancestors had emigrated from Gowran, County Kilkenny in Ireland. Arundel Elias Disney, great-grandfather of Walt Disney, was born in Kilkenny, Ireland in 1801 and was a descendant of Hughes and his son Robert d'Isigny (France) who settled in England with William the Conqueror in 1066.[4]. The d'Isigny family settled in the village now known as Norton Disney, south of the city of Lincoln, in the county of Lincolnshire.


  • #54
    dr.bollocko
    Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 35,948 Mod ✭✭✭✭dr.bollocko


    copacetic wrote: »
    See, even using incorrect grammar cannot protect you from the good Doctor. I see a helpdesk thread around whether the use of 'Your' rather than 'You're' means the abuse wasn't actually directed at the poster.

    If only I knew that an hour ago.
    /sniff.


  • #55
    Sanjuro
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Sanjuro


    It's pretty standard procedure in the animation industry, to be honest. Hanna Barbera did it all the time. Reuses save time and money. We do it quite a bit in the animation company I work for.


  • #56
    Princess Consuela Bananahammock
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    javaboy wrote: »
    I'm wondering now if Ikky was making a subtle nuanced socio-dadactic post apocalyptic social commentary about the lazy reuse of material (be it memes or cartoons) that we were all too thick to get. Is that what you were doing Ikky?

    Bingo.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • #57
    Acacia
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,816 ✭✭✭Acacia


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    Look closely at this clip. Literally...frame by frame. Pretty incredible scene by scene video comparison. We have been done!!

    We have been paying heaps to bring our kids to watch these movies and they have been using the same templets again and again.

    http://thetruthhandler.blogspot.com/2009/04/disney-made-one-movie-and-has-been.html

    I remember thinking that Little John from 'Robin Hood' and Balloo from 'Jungle Book' were very alike when I was a kid.

    Oh well. I still love those films and the old animated Disney films knock the socks off CGI cynical crap like 'Monsters vs. Aliens' and the like.:cool:


  • #58
    Run_to_da_hills
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Acacia wrote: »
    I remember thinking that Little John from 'Robin Hood' and Balloo from 'Jungle Book' were very alike when I was a kid.

    Oh well. I still love those films and the old animated Disney films knock the socks off CGI cynical crap like 'Monsters vs. Aliens' and the like.:cool:

    My favourite one is Alice in Wonderland, looking at again I would wonder if the crew were all on tabs when making it. :D


  • #59
    Overheal
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    My favourite one is Alice in Wonderland, looking at again I would wonder if the crew were all on tabs when making it. :D
    Ever stop and consider all the strange things she ate?


  • #60
    Crumble Froo
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,196 ✭✭✭Crumble Froo


    but that was lewis carroll, really... disney just liked the idea and rolled with it.


  • Advertisement
  • #61
    LuckyLloyd
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,963 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    Ikky Poo2 wrote: »
    Yore Ma

    What I'd really like to know is Run_to_da_hill's current thoughts on how well this thread has turned out since it ended up in AH as opposed to CT. Care to comment?


Advertisement
Advertisement