Walt Disney made one just movie, And has been tracing over it ever since

Run_to_da_hills · 11-04-2009 01:59AM #1

Look closely at this clip. Literally...frame by frame. Pretty incredible scene by scene video comparison. We have been done!!

We have been paying heaps to bring our kids to watch these movies and they have been using the same templets again and again.

http://thetruthhandler.blogspot.com/2009/04/disney-made-one-movie-and-has-been.html

Saibh · 11-04-2009 02:01AM

Do you think it's some sort of conspiracy theory

copacetic · 11-04-2009 02:02AM

I heard that run to da hills has been posting the same thread over and over and over and over again just changing the names and links.

Run_to_da_hills · 11-04-2009 02:02AM

Saibh wrote: »

Do you think it's some sort of conspiracy theory

Maybe it should have been posted there, Mods???

Peared · 11-04-2009 02:03AM

I dunno. I can see like maybe 3 movies in that clip?

Certainly not "all".

Saibh · 11-04-2009 02:06AM

Children are not going to pick up on whether a clip was used before in another film.

Overheal · 11-04-2009 02:07AM

that's fcuked up.

liah · 11-04-2009 02:14AM

Well sure if you had to hand-draw each and every one of your movies I'm sure you'd do a little copy paste too.

AlmightyCushion · 11-04-2009 02:20AM

So a few films he made share about thirty seconds of similar looking clips and they're mostly filler that don't matter a jot to the plot or the film at all. Whoop-de-fooking-doo.

gaz wac · 11-04-2009 02:21AM

its sooooo not the same !! one is a dwarft and the other is fox !!! watcha talk about willis?

anniehoo · 11-04-2009 02:27AM

Somebody has way too much time on their hands *aka the person who spent hours/weeks editing disney cartoons*!!

Who cares??!!:rolleyes:

CHD · 11-04-2009 02:28AM

Genius imo.

xOxSinéadxOx · 11-04-2009 03:14AM

don't think anybody cares tbh

Piste · 11-04-2009 03:21AM

I think it's really cool, I never noticed anything like that before!

lostexpectation · 11-04-2009 03:25AM

AlmightyCushion wrote: »

So a few films he made share about thirty seconds of similar looking clips and they're mostly filler that don't matter a jot to the plot or the film at all. Whoop-de-fooking-doo.

yeah but it look like the same plot aswell, song big, goofy friends bit, slapstick henchmen, etc etc.

RATM · 11-04-2009 03:48AM

Was has a better quality of conspiracy theoritics to it is Walt's 1957 film 'Our friend the atom'.
It's been regarded as a US Cold War propa flick to enhance the future generation's reliance on nuclear power and fossil fuels.
Came with the quote 'Coal and oil can now be used for better things'

de5p0i1er · 11-04-2009 04:39AM

I saw some of those movies in the cinema when I was a kid, I should sue them.

ZzubZzub · 11-04-2009 05:46AM

[obligatory] I for one welcome our new Walt Disney Overlords [/obligatory]

star-pants · 11-04-2009 08:56AM

Some are the same, but it's not all from the one film though, so title fail!

Plus - why mess with something that works? Those films are better than half the crap released today. +1 for oldskool disney

Ro: maaan! · 11-04-2009 10:10AM

Pretty amazing. Reminds me of those two Nickleback songs that were almost identical. I'd be pretty embarrased if it was me who was responsible. But that's all really. As yer man said, it's all just dancing around and filler. Storylines could be completely different, and more modern too. Pretty much every film/tv show/song/joke is a rehash of older stuff at this stage anyway. Why not save a few bob on this type of thing for the animators. These people have no such obligation to always do things the hard way and go the extra mile when an easier option exists. They also have no responsibility to your kids or your wallet. This we were tricked into seeing the same movie twice **** don't fly. You probably never noticed it until you saw this vid.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock · 11-04-2009 10:11AM

Yore Ma

Biggins · 11-04-2009 11:41AM

To be honest, it would make sense in terms of time, economic and graphic, that he do or his subordinates do this.

For example: a lot of programmers do similar to this with their applications.
As long as the underlying core architectural coding structure is well defined and secure, expanding on the basic components is just a tweaking of the current job as to suit and tailored to further customer/order specific requirements/wishes.

So applying the same basic principle to film animation; if the fluidity of the character moments is found to be possibly the best (at that time given the tools/tech they had) that they can get given the required scene, it should come as no surprise that they are just tweaked, added to or taken away from, to suit the desired out come for the big screen.

It is a cheat of sorts but there is good reasons for it I feel.

javaboy · 11-04-2009 11:53AM

Ikky Poo2 wrote: »

Yore Ma

Why did you do that? Did you see a bigger kid doing it and think it would be cool?

mike65 · 11-04-2009 11:54AM

Interesting but ultimatly not world changing.

Wagon · 11-04-2009 12:01PM

Ikky Poo2 wrote: »

Yore Ma

Ihre Mutter.

It's widely believed that German is the funniest language in the world. If it's not funny in German, it's not funny in English.

So you fale!

BaconZombie · 11-04-2009 12:03PM

I've seen a video years ago that show that the "jungle book" was just a almost direct copy of an older non disney film.
Can find the video now but it used also all the same clips from the "jungle book" IIRC

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Look closely at this clip. Literally...frame by frame. Pretty incredible scene by scene video comparison. We have been done!!

We have been paying heaps to bring our kids to watch these movies and they have been using the same templets again and again.

http://thetruthhandler.blogspot.com/2009/04/disney-made-one-movie-and-has-been.html

Mr.Lizard · 11-04-2009 12:14PM

Great clip. No problem with Disney doing this as their essentially just 'ripping off' themselves. Plus a lot of those copycats are 40ish years inbetween each other eg Snow White to Robin Hood so it's hardly as tho they're cutting corners in some attempt at mass production. If anything it just comes off looking as an attempt to reference an earlier movie.

ejmaztec · 11-04-2009 12:21PM

It's similar to Friends with the same script and canned laughter used for every single episode.

Mr.Lizard · 11-04-2009 12:27PM

ejmaztec wrote: »

It's similar to Friends with the same script and canned laughter used for every single episode.

"Could that reference BE any more whatever".

Ah how I don't miss that piece of shít show.

javaboy · 11-04-2009 12:30PM

Biggins wrote: »

For example: a lot of programmers do similar to this with their applications.
As long as the underlying core architectural coding structure is well defined and secure, expanding on the basic components is just a tweaking of the current job as to suit and tailored to further customer/order specific requirements/wishes.

So applying the same basic principle to film animation

That's not really a good comparison though. Code reuse in programming is like part reuse in cars. Nobody cares too much if you reuse the same wiper motor that worked fine in the last model. That's purely a functional thing. Art is different and that's what these films are.
Would it be acceptable for a band to release songs that sound the exact same year after year and expect people to pay for them? Huh? Do you think the likes of U2 or Coldplay would get away with that?

ejmaztec · 11-04-2009 12:32PM

Mr.Lizard wrote: »

"Could that reference BE any more whatever".

Ah how I don't miss that piece of shít show.

I can't possibly miss it since some retard bought my daughter the entire box-set.:(

Walt Disney made one just movie, And has been tracing over it ever since

Comments