Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The Damned United

  • 27-03-2009 12:09AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,337 ✭✭✭✭


    Anyone going to see this? It looks quality from the scenes i've seen and Michael Sheen seems to have Clough down to a tee!


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,407 ✭✭✭Quint


    Who plays Johnny Giles? Will be worth watching just to see that.
    But don't expect anything factual


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,252 ✭✭✭✭stovelid


    I heard Tom Humphries hated it which is more than enough validation for me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,531 ✭✭✭Im_No_Superman


    Bought the book today. So I'll give that a read first before I go see it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,337 ✭✭✭✭monkey9


    I can't remember the name of the person who plays Giles. Reading a bit about it other day and the director was saying that because Giles sued the author of the book, they minimized his role in the film because they couldn't take the chance of him hating this one too.
    Heard a review of it on Today FM this morning and the reviewer was saying that they make Giles out to be a bit conniving. Also, the bloke who plays him is taller than Giles (but that just seems to be getting into specifics).
    I haven't read the book, but by all accounts it's a novel based on factual events of Clough's 44 days as Leeds Utd's manager. The book is meant to be a bit heavy whereas the film is more lighthearted.
    It's getting great reviews and i can't wait to see it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭daithijjj


    Quint wrote: »
    Who plays Johnny Giles? Will be worth watching just to see that.
    But don't expect anything factual

    Chap called Peter Mcdonald plays giles.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,307 ✭✭✭cruiserweight


    monkey9 wrote: »
    I can't remember the name of the person who plays Giles. Reading a bit about it other day and the director was saying that because Giles sued the author of the book, they minimized his role in the film because they couldn't take the chance of him hating this one too.
    Heard a review of it on Today FM this morning and the reviewer was saying that they make Giles out to be a bit conniving. Also, the bloke who plays him is taller than Giles (but that just seems to be getting into specifics).
    I haven't read the book, but by all accounts it's a novel based on factual events of Clough's 44 days as Leeds Utd's manager. The book is meant to be a bit heavy whereas the film is more lighthearted.
    It's getting great reviews and i can't wait to see it.

    AFAIK Giles law suit was to make sure that the book was recognised as fiction based on fact rather than fact


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭Iang87


    dunno if i'll go see this. According to the documentary last night on UTV no1 really close to clough sees it as a true portrayal of him or any1 else in it. Johnny Giles described it as fiction based on fact which doesn't sound very good.

    I do like Martin Sheen though and from the clips i seen of the film looks like he done a super job


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,643 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    Quint wrote: »
    I can't remember the name of the person who plays Giles. Reading a bit about it other day and the director was saying that because Giles sued the author of the book, they minimized his role in the film because they couldn't take the chance of him hating this one too.
    .

    As long as there's plenty of moral courage and honesty of effort I'm sure John will be happy.

    I did see the Clough documentary on UTV last night and really enjoyed it. Sounds like the book is a load of tosh as it portrays many elements which are totally out of character with Clough himself. Seems like it's basically the world of Brian Clough according to this author.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,983 ✭✭✭leninbenjamin


    supposed to be very loose with the facts alright, and there are certainly complete fabrications in it, the court case proved that. don't know if i want to see it tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,337 ✭✭✭✭monkey9


    It's in no way a biography, but je$us it looks entertaining!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,213 ✭✭✭✭therecklessone


    daithijjj wrote: »
    Chap called Peter Mcdonald plays giles.

    Also played the role of Git opposite Brendan Gleeson in I Went Down and Tomo in Paths to Freedom.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,492 ✭✭✭MementoMori


    Having read the book I wouldnt really recommend it. Overall it's not very well written and parts are tricky to follow and it gets very repetitive. It tries to get into the head of Clough and doesn't really succeed. Only after I finished did I realise that it was written by the David Peace. I read Tokyo Year Zero, which was a crime novel, by him as well and thought that wasn't great either. I'm hoping that it ends up as a case of the film being better that the book. The trailer looks decent and Shannon is always worth a watch.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,132 ✭✭✭x in the city


    Gotta see this myself...

    Clough was a legend of a manager


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,433 ✭✭✭wandatowell


    defo worth a watch


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭daithijjj


    Also played the role of Git opposite Brendan Gleeson in I Went Down and Tomo in Paths to Freedom.

    Havent seen either of those but someone said to me that he was in a few episodes of 'spooks' tv series.......never watched that either but im gonna try and get to see this, the only sour note for me is the family arent behind it so i suppose we will have to just take it as fiction, doesnt seem right to me but should be entertaining. Sheen was pretty good as david frost in frost/nixon and tony blair.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,147 ✭✭✭✭Xavi6


    Really wanna see this, though my head is already filled with hopes that it's gonna be another Mike Bassett and I know it isn't!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    supposed to be very loose with the facts alright, and there are certainly complete fabrications in it, the court case proved that. don't know if i want to see it tbh.
    They're calling it Faction. I suppose, to a degree, most films are. Tom Humphries has fairly slated the inaccuracies in his Irish Times column (http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/theticket/2009/0320/1224243084534.html), but more so because he's a Leeds fan and it doesn't show his club in the greatest of lights.

    I'm really looking forward to seeing it (might go tonight), Sheen is an amazing actor.
    Apparently they've decided not to go down the showing the actors playing football route so we're saved from the cringe-worthy-match-winning-last minute-overhead-kick-goal which is normally the case in Football movies. Instead they just show actual clips.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,153 ✭✭✭everdead.ie


    BaZmO* wrote: »
    Apparently they've decided not to go down the showing the actors playing football route so we're saved from the cringe-worthy-match-winning-last minute-overhead-kick-goal which is normally the case in Football movies. Instead they just show actual clips.
    Ah yes the classic picture of foot hits ball and ball hits net nothing in between:rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,407 ✭✭✭Quint


    Iang87 wrote: »
    dunno if i'll go see this. According to the documentary last night on UTV no1 really close to clough sees it as a true portrayal of him or any1 else in it. Johnny Giles described it as fiction based on fact which doesn't sound very good.

    I do like Martin Sheen though and from the clips i seen of the film looks like he done a super job

    That documentary was class. It also made Giles look bad though. He wanted Clough out and wouldn't put in any effort for him. Also when Giles tried to say Leeds weren't dirty and they showed a few of his tackles, and even other leeds players said they were dirty.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,337 ✭✭✭✭monkey9


    Quint wrote: »
    That documentary was class. It also made Giles look bad though. He wanted Clough out and wouldn't put in any effort for him.

    No honesty of effort from Giles???


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,407 ✭✭✭Quint


    monkey9 wrote: »
    No honesty of effort from Giles???

    Giles says he did a lot of things in his playing career he's not proud of. Apparently he broke some young players leg and ended his career to teach him a lesson. Dunphy mentioned it in one of his rants.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭SectionF


    I'm a Leeds supporter, fan follower, but I really would like to be able to turn on a radio or open a newspaper without having to learn all about Cloughie and Revie all over again.

    Hats off to the PR people: they have the media, and not just the sports hacks, eating out of their hands.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,492 ✭✭✭MementoMori


    monkey9 wrote: »
    No honesty of effort from Giles???

    You can understand why he took the courtcase in fairness given the stuff in the book given there are parts of the book which seem to be simply the imagining of conversations between Clough and Giles (or The Irishman as Clough constantly refers to him in his head)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    Bought the book today. So I'll give that a read first before I go see it.
    monkey9 wrote: »
    I can't remember the name of the person who plays Giles. Reading a bit about it other day and the director was saying that because Giles sued the author of the book, they minimized his role in the film because they couldn't take the chance of him hating this one too.
    Apparently as part of the court settlement they had to re-draft the book, so I'd imagine the first print edition is the one to get, even if a lot of it is made up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,146 ✭✭✭✭DvB


    To be fair i have a first print copy of the book & i'm pretty sure it stated it was a 'Fictional Account' of the period in question. This may have changed in subsequent editions to be clearer though based on the court case(s)

    As for the author David Peace, personally speaking i enjoy his work and have read all of his books, though i must admit his writing style is one few people seem to manage to get to grips with and can find hard to follow, the damned utd was by far the easiest to follow however & IMO was an enjoyable read. I'm looking forward to seeing the film which i genuinely hope is true to the book & not 'real life events' which are likely to be far less entertaining.
    "I will honour Christmas in my heart, and try to keep it all the year" Charles Dickens


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    DvB wrote: »
    To be fair i have a first print copy of the book & i'm pretty sure it stated it was a 'Fictional Account' of the period in question. This may have changed in subsequent editions to be clearer though based on the court case(s)
    Plus isn't a lot of the book suppose to be coming from Clough's thoughts? That alone would show that it's fiction, or as they've labelled it "Faction"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,146 ✭✭✭✭DvB


    BaZmO* wrote: »
    Plus isn't a lot of the book suppose to be coming from Clough's thoughts? That alone would show that it's fiction, or as they've labelled it "Faction"

    There's certainly parts of the book that are clearly a work of fiction, Cloughs personal thoughts are IMO to be filed under that heading.

    Everyone i know who's read the book and discussed it with me has referred to it as a fictional novel & certainly not as a biographical record of the man or the period.
    "I will honour Christmas in my heart, and try to keep it all the year" Charles Dickens


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,317 ✭✭✭bullpost


    I'd like to see it purely to enjoy the period recreation.
    Watched the documentary the other night and it clearly showed just why Clough was so great.
    Leading a modest sized club like Notts. Forest to 2 European cup triumphs (remember thats only one less than man utd) was a work of genius.

    He was also a brilliant character with a quick wit - He reminded me a lot of Mourinho but more entertaining.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,828 ✭✭✭KerranJast


    Quint wrote: »
    That documentary was class. It also made Giles look bad though. He wanted Clough out and wouldn't put in any effort for him. Also when Giles tried to say Leeds weren't dirty and they showed a few of his tackles, and even other leeds players said they were dirty.
    Clough lost the dressing room the minute he walked in and abused the team. These weren't a rag tag bunch of journeymen like he took over at Derby and Notts Forest. They were league champions with some very experience and talented players in the squad. As a Leeds fan I'll freely admit the team were a tough tackling side. That's what made them a very effective defensive side. Going forward too though they were brilliant. They had the likes of Allan Clarke, Eddie Gray, Johnny Giles, Peter Lorimer & Mick Jones banging in some cracking goals.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,219 ✭✭✭invincibleirish


    I'll definitely watch it at some point alright, i didn't particularly enjoy the book mainly because Clough is depicted as a schizo ogre. Fair enough Pearce has stressed that it is a fictional interpretation and the movie has received great reviews but old big head certainly doesn't come out of it smelling of roses.


Advertisement
Advertisement