Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Nigerian woman loses her deportation challenge

135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,178 ✭✭✭Mena


    This post has been deleted.

    Unfortunately that is the truth of the matter. As much as I like the idea of open borders, it's just not practical and would no doubt end very badly.
    Ally Dick wrote: »
    Argument settled so. Get rid of her back to her own country and we won't have to put up with this additional expense. What about the legal fees ? I'm assumed we the taxpayers are paying for these as well. Bloody ridiculous

    She is liable for costs, however as I posted in another thread, you can't get blood from a stone so yes, we the taxpayers will be forking out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,426 ✭✭✭testicle


    I hope they are on a plane already.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12 caz88


    Ally Dick wrote: »
    Does this woman pay her taxes or live on handouts ?


    well as far as i know (correct me if i am wrong) asylum seekers are not allowed to work and so have no choice to live off handouts while in the country. from what i know about this woman, she is seeking the right to work and live in sligo, and subsequently contribute taxes like any other working irish citizen. the laws the state has in place that prevents her from working here are very convienent in that they promote a nice level of resentment from the irish public, and people like you, who seem to think the country has a finite number of resources that will be depleted as more people enter the country. every time that woman buys an apple. a can of coke, a pair of shoes for her daughter, she is contributing taxes to our economy. you probably receive far more allowances and benefits from the irish government than she ever has.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,898 ✭✭✭✭seanybiker


    tis about time. Delighted for her.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 38,989 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12 caz88


    Ally Dick wrote: »
    Argument settled so. Get rid of her back to her own country and we won't have to put up with this additional expense. What about the legal fees ? I'm assumed we the taxpayers are paying for these as well. Bloody ridiculous

    ah the joy of taxes, if you want to nitpick at everything your taxes pay for you will find your wages fund alot of things you don't want to pay for.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,300 ✭✭✭CiaranC


    This post has been deleted.

    Its €19.10 a week plus a free merc ;)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,397 ✭✭✭✭Degsy


    I've said this before.

    If you want to work..apply for a work permit

    If you want to scrounge benefits..apply for asylum.

    I am sick of my tax money being wasted on these freeloaders and even sicker of the Irish ignoramuses who feel they should be allowed to stay here and scrounge.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 318 ✭✭rkeane


    caz88 wrote: »
    well as far as i know (correct me if i am wrong) asylum seekers are not allowed to work and so have no choice to live off handouts while in the country. from what i know about this woman, she is seeking the right to work and live in sligo, and subsequently contribute taxes like any other working irish citizen. the laws the state has in place that prevents her from working here are very convienent in that they promote a nice level of resentment from the irish public, and people like you, who seem to think the country has a finite number of resources that will be depleted as more people enter the country. every time that woman buys an apple. a can of coke, a pair of shoes for her daughter, she is contributing taxes to our economy. you probably receive far more allowances and benefits from the irish government than she ever has.


    She might be seeking the "right to work and live in sligo".....but she certainly won't be getting it.

    Donegalfella, from what i've been told (by a senior immigration lawyer)...it's extremely unlikely that the European Court will prevent their rightful deportations...the minister will be happy with that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,608 ✭✭✭Victor_M


    Mena wrote: »
    As an asylum seeker, she is legally barred from entering into any type of work.

    As an Asylum seeker she is supposed to present herself for asylum to the authorities in the first country she lands in outside of the country she is fleeing. Last time i checked there are no direct flights from Lagos to Dublin.

    She and many more nigerian economic migrants that arrive here 39 weeks pregnant with their hands out are depriving genuine asylum seekers of aid.

    Unless a Nigerian has a working Visa and employment prearranged in this country there is no justifiable reason for 1 of them to be in this country.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 38,989 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,919 ✭✭✭✭Gummy Panda


    I see the pussy slice post is gone.

    Can someone explain to me why they perform that in nigeria? and is this a nationwide thing there or some backwater tribe tradition?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 38,989 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,397 ✭✭✭✭Degsy


    caz88 wrote: »
    she is seeking the right to work and live in sligo

    Doing what exactly?
    If she wanted to work she should've applied for a work permit,not asylum.

    She's seeking the right to stay here and claim benefits.

    Good riddence to her and her ilk,they're helping to bleed the country white.
    http://hiberniagirl.blogspot.com/2008/05/asylum-seekers-will-cost-300m-in-legal.html


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Degsy wrote: »

    If you want to scrounge benefits..apply for asylum.

    .

    And what "benefits" would these be? How much, exactly, do they amount to?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,752 ✭✭✭markesmith


    Ally Dick wrote: »
    Argument settled so. Get rid of her back to her own country and we won't have to put up with this additional expense. What about the legal fees ? I'm assumed we the taxpayers are paying for these as well. Bloody ridiculous

    Good man Dick Littlejohn. Get back to your tabloid paper and your white van.

    That said, if there was a 22-page document involved, it's obvious that there were some doubts about female genital mutilation.

    And to be honest, this FGH is being used as an excuse a lot these days. And as far as I know, it's not that widespread in Nigeria - which is where a lot of these refugee cases originate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,506 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey



    Can someone explain to me why they perform that in nigeria? and is this a nationwide thing there or some backwater tribe tradition?

    yea just seems to have vanished, I replied recommending we send out Charlie Bird to make sure the girls are safe....thought it was a good idea, make a film about it...

    don't think they do what you say so graphically, i think they just poke sticks at it to make sure there still virgins....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,178 ✭✭✭Mena


    Victor_M wrote: »
    As an Asylum seeker she is supposed to present herself for asylum to the authorities in the first country she lands in outside of the country she is fleeing. Last time i checked there are no direct flights from Lagos to Dublin.

    She and many more nigerian economic migrants that arrive here 39 weeks pregnant with their hands out are depriving genuine asylum seekers of aid.

    Unless a Nigerian has a working Visa and employment prearranged in this country there is no justifiable reason for 1 of them to be in this country.

    Jeez, I'm sorry if it now appears I am picking on you, but this silly argument comes up every time asylum and refugees are mentioned.

    You are wrong. If you want to argue about asylum and refugees please, please at least do the slightest little bit of homework first.

    I suggest you read up about the "Dublin Regulation". Here is a short extract outlining the relevant points.

    Suffice it to say, there are direct flights from Lagos to Dublin, as described under the Dublin Regulation.

    Edit: donegalfella got there first.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    yea just seems to have vanished, I replied recommending we send out Charlie Bird to make sure the girls are safe....thought it was a good idea, make a film about it...

    don't think they do what you say so graphically, i think they just poke sticks at it to make sure there still virgins....

    Surely it would be better to send a journalist of some sort?

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,397 ✭✭✭✭Degsy


    Nodin wrote: »
    And what "benefits" would these be? How much, exactly, do they amount to?

    Lets see now..on succesfully being granted asylum she stood to get:
    Free housing
    Social welfare
    Childrens' allowance
    Medical card
    Various allowances eg footwear and clothing allowances
    and most importantly THE COMPLETE BACKING of a small but vocal left-wing with access to the media.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,506 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Ikky Poo2 wrote: »
    Surely it would be better to send a journalist of some sort?

    I forgot Bird is an explorer these days.....maybe we should send Lorraine Keane instead, no fear of her getting eaten...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,008 ✭✭✭not yet


    Degsy wrote: »
    Lets see now..on succesfully being granted asylum she stood to get:
    Free housing
    Social welfare
    Childrens' allowance
    Medical card
    Various allowances eg footwear and clothing allowances
    and most importantly THE COMPLETE BACKING of a small but vocal left-wing with access to the media.

    Shame on you for bringing that to light.....

    Sure didn't the irish go etc etc..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,608 ✭✭✭Victor_M


    This post has been deleted.

    I stand corrected on the matter of the country they land in first.

    Obviously between the loophole regarding not leaving an airport en route to the country which hands out the most free stuff and the good Friday agreement loophole regarding the birth of a child on the Island of Ireland we unfortunately have left ourselves wide open to shameful abuse from many nations, Nigeria being the most prominent due to it global reputation for dishonesty.

    It sickens me that genuine Asylum seekers are suffering because our government panders to the demands of the fraudsters who have be well versed in what to say, where to go and what to demand.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    testicle wrote: »
    I hope they are on a plane already.
    I love hypocritical zionists...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    freedom of speech is allowed here i hope?
    Nope. This isn't a state-backed website, it's a private one so you CAN'T say what you like.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Degsy wrote: »
    Lets see now..on succesfully being granted asylum she stood to get:
    Free housing
    Social welfare
    Childrens' allowance
    Medical card
    Various allowances eg footwear and clothing allowances
    .

    And what makes you think that she intended to go on benefits as oppossed to starting a life here, with a job etc....
    Degsy wrote: »
    and most importantly THE COMPLETE BACKING of a small but vocal left-wing with access to the media.

    Why would she get that on succesful completion of her application, when in fact what support she has is in relation to her failure thus far to be granted same?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,078 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Like some have pointed out, she still has a chance, as the European courts will decide?

    She has been thru an exhaustive legal process and has been found to not warrant a stay here. Didn't the state award costs AGAINST her?

    Maybe now, these filth greedy lawyers will think twice about delaying and delaying and delaying these court decisions. Who pays the lawyers now? The woman never could, and we, the taxpayer, have been footing the bill for far too long with these bogus deportation
    cases.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,008 ✭✭✭not yet


    At what stage will bleeding heart, left wing, melting pot,lets feed the world liberals understand this is a small country,with a population pre-1999 of approx 4.2 million........how the fcuk can we now be expected to sustain 5+million many of who send home vast amounts of cash. Any small country cannot sustain billions of euro sent out of it's economy over a period of time.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,397 ✭✭✭✭Degsy


    Nodin wrote: »
    And what makes you think that she intended to go on benefits as oppossed to starting a life here, with a job etc....



    Why would she get that on succesful completion of her application, when in fact what support she has is in relation to her failure thus far to be granted same?

    A)Because she dint apply for a work permit,she applied for asylum,in the knowledge that she couldnt work and
    b)http://www.letthemstay.org/

    Anyway,she's going and thats the main thing!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 78 ✭✭confused-dazed


    Mena wrote: »
    Hah, I'm non-EU and would almost be sure I've paid twice the taxes you have in the eight years I've been here.
    you may have paid your taxes but there are thousands who have arrived here over the years been allowed to work and for their first three or so years whilst working have been exempt from paying tax.i know this because i've worked with people who've never paid taxes in their first few years and have seen their wage slips.
    This post has been deleted.
    F.G.M. as it's called has been used in nearly all asy cases involving women and their daughters. if this country was to grant asy to everyone then the economy would've went belly up years ago. anyone that gets asylum here doesn't live on fresh air ,most things are paid for by the tax payers upto and including accomodation
    Nodin wrote: »
    Thats actually not true.

    Whats a "common fact" btw?
    i know people who advertised their cars for sale in certain mags/papers, f.n's. mainly nigerians have come out looked at the car said yes they'll take the car ask if the seller would accept s/w/ cheques and turn up the following day in full payment with the s/w. cheque .now whether the s/w. gave them the cheque to buy a car i dont know, for all i know they could've given the s/w. officer some cock and bull story about needing the money. but it does and has gone on.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement