Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

All aboard the atheist bus

189111314

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,188 ✭✭✭pH


    Atheist bus adverts could lead to watchdog ruling on God's existence

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/4177717/Atheist-bus-adverts-could-lead-to-watchdog-ruling-on-Gods-existence.html

    "The ASA is now considering whether to investigate his complaint, which could lead to it reaching a deep ontological conclusion about a supreme being.

    If it ruled that the wording in the posters was unsubstantiated, it would be interpreted as effectively saying that in all probability God does exist.

    Ruling that the words were justified could be taken as an agreement that God probably does not exist."


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,616 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    pH wrote: »
    What gibberish was that guy from Churches Advertising Network talking? :pac:

    Talk about straining to find something negative about the whole thing... and then failing to form a coherent sentence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    I didn't realise the UK's ASA was the supreme authority on all matters scientific and philosophical.

    Although any ruling about the existence of God(s) would make a dangerous precedent in ASA guidelines.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,188 ✭✭✭pH


    seamus wrote: »
    I didn't realise the UK's ASA was the supreme authority on all matters scientific and philosophical.
    Who'd have thunk it? If only those Greeks had an ASA all this could have been sorted out long ago!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    pH wrote: »
    Who'd have thunk it? If only those Greeks had an ASA all this could have been sorted out long ago!
    Perhaps the ASA can just admit that they are in fact God, as the telegraph seems to suggest, and put an end to this once and for all?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 330 ✭✭MackDeToaster


    Hilarious, as that probably means that if the ASA do pull it then almost every religious ad can be challenged on the grounds that they also haven't been substantiated. Win all the way :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭Rb


    Hilarious, as that probably means that if the ASA do pull it then almost every religious ad can be challenged on the grounds that they also haven't been substantiated. Win all the way :pac:
    Indeed, this would actually be a much, much bigger win than originally intended should this happen, no more religious advertisements altogether would be a fantastic result.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,888 ✭✭✭AtomicHorror


    This is really funny. An advertising standards board has to rule on the probable existence of non-specific god. Man what a headache. And potentially the fundies have actually, potentially, made this into a bigger score for Dawkins and co. than we ever could have imagined.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    Dades wrote: »
    What gibberish was that guy from Churches Advertising Network talking? :pac:

    Talk about straining to find something negative about the whole thing... and then failing to form a coherent sentence.

    Yeah I didn't get that at all
    The line "probably", "probably there is no God", is a very selfish line, and its actually quite, ah, in a time of credit crunch, in a time of people tightening their belt buckles and making ends meet, it is a time for people to be open and a time for people to be generous

    WTF?

    One assumes he explained what the heck the line "probably there is no God" has to do with the credit crunch and people being generous just after this and it was edited out to make him look stupid .. damn you atheist media barons!! Damn you all to hell!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭Rb


    God spoke to me last night and told me that Stephen Green is actually satan, and that as a society we must reject him and his word by turning the other way.

    Let us circulate this, I would be interested to see Mr. Green prove it didn't happen, since it was my own personal experience and therefore has to be true.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,856 ✭✭✭✭Dave!


    Rb when did you start posting in here? :pac: New guy eh???

    COMMENCE THE INITIATION CEREMONY!!!


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,616 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    Dave! wrote: »
    COMMENCE THE INITIATION CEREMONY!!!
    Hold the goat while I fetch my firstborn... :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 442 ✭✭STBR


    Have you guys seen the pictures?

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1106924/Theres-probably-God--stop-worrying-enjoy-life-Atheist-group-launches-billboard-campaign.html

    I almost want to go over just to get a picture with some of the buses. :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 330 ✭✭MackDeToaster


    :eek: Bus ? You mean there's a bus in that picture ? (wipes the drool from his keyboard)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    pH wrote: »

    If it ruled that the wording in the posters was unsubstantiated, it would be interpreted as effectively saying that in all probability God does exist.

    Ruling that the words were justified could be taken as an agreement that God probably does not exist."[/I]

    I'd throw it out TBH.
    Hilarious, as that probably means that if the ASA do pull it then almost every religious ad can be challenged on the grounds that they also haven't been substantiated. Win all the way :pac:

    Oof, what an own goal! :pac:
    SirDarren wrote: »

    Oid giver yer wan on teh rite a roide!!! :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,117 ✭✭✭Gazza22


    I think this was an excellent idea...love it! Maybe us boardsie atheist's should do something similar on a smaller scale in the future! :pac:


  • Posts: 4,630 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Gazza22 wrote: »
    I think this was an excellent idea...love it! Maybe us boardsie atheist's should do something similar on a smaller scale in the future! :pac:

    Rent some ad-space from Boards and put in the same slogan as they used?:pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,090 ✭✭✭jill_valentine


    Hooray for Graham Linehan, generally.

    Also, that Boardsie ad sounds interesting....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,240 ✭✭✭✭Fanny Cradock


    :eek: Bus ? You mean there's a bus in that picture ? (wipes the drool from his keyboard)

    From the tone of your post it sounds like that's not all you'll be wiping from your keyboard.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,408 ✭✭✭studiorat


    From the tone of your post it sounds like that's not all you'll be wiping from your keyboard.

    One in the eye for Christanity.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 442 ✭✭STBR


    Yes that seems like a good idea for the ad. :D


    Richard Dawkins looks like such a PIMP in that picture! :cool:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,045 ✭✭✭Húrin


    Galvasean wrote: »
    Oid giver yer wan on teh rite a roide!!! :cool:

    I prefer the lady on the left myself though Dawkins has his hand on her arse. lol


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Húrin wrote: »
    I prefer the lady on the left myself though Dawkins has his hand on her arse. lol

    Who are you to contend with the mega-pope? You will make do with his throwaways! :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,188 ✭✭✭pH


    Nice interview with Ariane in the times.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article5488849.ece

    In addition, I’ve had to lie a lot – when the venue asked suspiciously, “What sorts of events have you organised before?”, I said, “Numerous corporate functions” instead of “My birthday party”.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 330 ✭✭MackDeToaster


    Húrin wrote: »
    I prefer the lady on the left myself though Dawkins has his hand on her arse. lol


    Oi! First dibs :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,082 ✭✭✭lostexpectation


    good quote

    i think the probably is her humorous side and we see quotes from kathren hepburn and emily dickison only a women would pick those

    good quote from einstein

    alberteinstein.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 330 ✭✭MackDeToaster




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean



    PC gone mad! :pac:


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,466 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Galvasean wrote: »
    PC gone mad! :pac:
    Uh, looks like a Mac to me.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,188 ✭✭✭pH


    Madeleine Bunting doesn't like these adverts
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jan/12/madeleine-bunting-religion-social-justice/print

    Usual chestnuts (waste of money etc) though she does a particularly good line in "Why can't you think about the poor downtrodden theist coming home in the early hours after working all night who while reading their holy book might be confronted with this awful message."


Advertisement