Top Boys and Girls names for 2007

Moonbaby wrote: »

Speaking as someone who is going to name her first superheros childer Lena and Blaze.

If you have a personal dislike for a name, keep it to yourself.

I dont see a smiley but i know you're taking the piss right? Right?

Well it's a well-known fact that young 'uns today pop out a little cabbage-head sprog. And also that Rihanna has had a song with that word repeating in the chorus. Coincidence? Over to you.

chin_grin wrote: »

I was following on from Mikes 'proper names' point.

Aww I thought someone wanted to talk to me

Moonbaby wrote:

Speaking as someone who is going to name her first superheros childer Lena and Blaze.

If you have a personal dislike for a name, keep it to yourself.

We all have names that we don't like, there was even a thread on it not so long ago. Don't see why it should bother you that I don't like that particular name.

(And for the record, I think Lena is actually quite a nice name.)

mike65 wrote: »

square_igloo OUCH!

Mike.

Sorry, had to be done! :P

Moonbaby wrote:

(Blaze is a legend name for a ginger kid and male gigilo)

Ah well, if the kid's ginger it doesn't matter what you call him. He's doomed anyway :pac:

javaboy wrote:

I knew a Lena once. She used to eat a lot of mayonnaise. Bear that in mind.

Um......ok then (Is this an obvious joke that I'm just not getting?)
I HATE mayonnaise......eugh!!

Names are over-rated. People should be assigned a number at birth. It should be the date followed by the order you were born on that day. e.g. 20080829-001 for the first child born today 20080829-002 for the second etc. This number can then double up as their phone number later in life and their email address.

For the time being an optional f or m may be added to the end of the number to indicate the sex of the individual. Obviously once my plan for a unisex world is implemented in full this will no longer be needed.

This system also has the added advantage of no two people ever having the same name, unless they're from different countries* as different countries will use their access code with children:

353-20080829-538f: Now if that isn't a sexy name you're all ghey!

*This post was not made up as I went along

Drift wrote: »

Names are over-rated. People should be assigned a number at birth. It should be the date followed by the order you were born on that day. e.g. 20080829-001 for the first child born today 20080829-002 for the second etc. This number can then double up as their phone number later in life and their email address.

For the time being an optional f or m may be added to the end of the number to indicate the sex of the individual. Obviously once my plan for a unisex world is implemented in full this will no longer be needed.

This system also has the added advantage of no two people ever having the same name, unless they're from different countries* as different countries will use their access code with children:

353-20080829-538f: Now if that isn't a sexy name you're all ghey!

*This post was not made up as I went along

I think this makes perfect sense. Along with tattooing barcodes on us (lest we forget) and making us go to camps (former schools) where we all have to concentrate really hard (learn).


- Bren (this might catch on.....I'll give it a couple of posts.....)

square_igloo wrote: »

Oi! Get your own damn name, stop stealing and abbreviating mine :mad:

Eh, okay. It stops there.......feck.

(Other half's sis has the same name too.......it gets quite confusing! )

Epic Tissue wrote: »

:rolleyes:

Thank you. Your valuable contribution has been noted.

OK I probably shouldn't have phrased it like I did, it's just that certain "American" names just sound....weird over here, where they wouldn't sound so strange in America.

Like when you hear Jayden, you automatically think "Ugh. Britney's kid" It's not that it's a bad name, it just has bad connotations.