Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Snickers Advert Pulled

«134

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,971 ✭✭✭Holsten


    Haha, good ad, made me chuckle.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,346 ✭✭✭KTRIC


    Fuck Yeah, Mr T is the shit !!! :D

    I can now turn off my tv because I have seen quite possibly the coolest add ever :cool:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,006 ✭✭✭PurpleBerry


    What the hell is offensive about that???


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 35,948 Mod ✭✭✭✭dr.bollocko


    Quick! Delete this thread!
    If faceman sees this people will get shot at and have to dive into bushes in slow motion.
    Nobody got killed in the eighties, but his aim might be better since then.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 194 ✭✭Munya


    That's silly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,429 ✭✭✭✭star-pants


    ha ha - I like it :D
    doesn't beat the 'smack' on the head of the other one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Neesa wrote: »
    What the hell is offensive about that???
    good question - ima gonna go ask the GBL forum people


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 135 ✭✭dreamr


    its offensive to anyone who does speed walking... or wears yellow shorts.. :pac:


    and i just read the first link, apparently is offensive to gay people. because anyone who speed walks is now gay.

    you've all been warned.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 18,100 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    Overheal wrote: »
    good question - ima gonna go ask the GBL forum people
    I imagine we're all equally puzzled. I mean seriously - how did they find it offensive? It's Mr. T! How can they have it in for an ad featuring Mr. T?!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,368 ✭✭✭thelordofcheese


    Apparently speedwalkers == teh gay.

    Says alot more about the mentality of the people who complained than anything else.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 35,948 Mod ✭✭✭✭dr.bollocko


    Apparently speedwalkers == teh gay.

    Says alot more about the mentality of the people who complained than anything else.

    Speed walking turned me half gay for a good three weeks in the eighties.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Using codes of masculinity to sell products to guys is nothing new, but it's usually about beer, "hard lemonade" or deodorant. It's also usually funny, and pokes fun at male insecurities while celebrating them. A new Snickers commercial, however, seems to just be about beating the crap out of sissies. It opens on a guy in bright yellow shorts sashaying down a sidewalk. He's speedwalking. Suddenly a truck comes roaring over the houses and smashes onto the street beside the man. Mr. T is in the back of the truck behind a Gatling gun. He yells at the man to stop speedwalking: "You a disgrace to the man race!" he shouts. Then he fires candybars at the man, and the man dances around on the sidewalk in fear and takes off running. The tagline: "Snickers. Get some nuts." (You can watch it here.) Yum! Now when I want to satisfy my hunger and think about shooting down a mincing, nutless homo in suburbia, I'll know what candy bar to buy! Thanks, Snickers!
    Bob Garfield at the magazine Ad Age wrote an open letter last week to the CEO of Omnicon, the ad corporation responsible for the spot, accusing him of using "dehumanizing stereotypes" and "jokey violence" in of all things a candy commercial.
    This letter is to you, but it is equally to your colleagues throughout the industry. Are you so bereft, of ideas and simple humanity, that you must be reduced to stereotyping and bullying? That you must identify an "other" to ridicule, or worse? That you must build a brand on the backs of people who have harmed no one save for challenging a high-school locker-room standard of masculinity?
    He points out that Omnicom says it practices corporate responsibility by "ensuring that we use our position to promote socially responsible policies and practices and that we make positive contributions to society across all of our operations." Then why, in a candy ad that you assume is at least partially targeted to children, would you go this route? Garfield points out that it's not just about anti-gay attitudes, or more broadly about gender roles and what's "okay" for one sex or another. It's really about attacking people who are different or seen as weak:
    You don't have to be gay to be the target of macho aggression. If you are slight, or weak, or meek or odd. If you don't like football or groove on Liza. If you read books. If you drive a Neon. If for any reason you don't fulfill the masculinity expectations of the bully, you are therefor[sic] a ****** and: ridiculed, berated, laughed at, marginalized, stuffed into a locker, beaten up, murdered. Ass-wiggling speedwalker = ******. It's code. Likewise sweater-draped poodle walkers who squeal "oooooooh!" This kind of ad, which normalizes and even incites contempt or worse for the supposed ******s, is therefore homophobic whether the runner is gay or not. [I think the censored word rhymes with bob saget - Overheal]
    Some Ad Age readers have commented that Garfield is being too politically correct and that it's all in good fun. After all, it's not a crime to offend someone. At the very least, one of them argued, kids today don't have the same anti-gay culture of past generations.
    Is this true? I'd love to hear from Consumerist readers who are, say, in their early twenties or younger: has bullying based on codes of masculinity abated in recent years? Is that sort of behavior really a thing of the past? Because if it is, good for humanity—but I wonder if a Snickers ad that shows a pop-culture icon firing a large gun at a big ole' sissy is teaching kids it's time to bring it back.
    But enough about that cheery world of high-school—the real question, writes CV Harquail on his blog Authentic Organizations, is why a global corporation that claims social responsibility would produce a spot that undermines its promises to do good.
    What I don’t understand about the responses to Garfield’s letter is that so few people are focused on holding Wren accountable for aligning his organization’s actions with its words. Why is this?
    Striving for authenticity, for alignment between who you say you are, what you believe about yourself, and how you behave as an organization, is the responsibility of the organization’s leadership.
    And responsibility for being authentic is not confined to leadership: Keeping behavior aligned with the organization’s statements of purpose, vision and value is the responsibility of every employee. The people at Omnicom know this– it’s right here in Omnicom’s Code of Conduct statement:

    Our reputation depends, to a very large measure, on you taking personal responsibility for maintaining and adhering to the policies and guidelines set forth here. Your continued cooperation in this regard is appreciated.
    "An Open Letter to Omnicom President-CEO John Wren" [AdvertisingAge via Towleroad]
    "Homophobia and (In)Authenticity at Omnicom: What can a leader do?" [Authentic Organizations]


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,677 ✭✭✭ronnie3585


    What a joke, that ad is brilliant. More PC sh1t!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,113 ✭✭✭johndaman66


    Definately one of the best ads i've seen in a long time. But what actually makes it funny for me is the fact certain members of society found it that offensive that it was pulled!!! Thats whats really funny:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    this just reminds me of when Taco Bell pulled the chihuahua ads because they were afraid of offending mexicans. In all reality the mexican population responded the other way on that, saying they loved and missed the dog.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 631 ✭✭✭andrewie


    Great ad :D

    Can't believe its been pulled!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,589 ✭✭✭✭dsmythy


    What a waste of a great ad.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,308 ✭✭✭Rowley Birkin QC


    Great ad.


    Feckin pc shower.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,740 ✭✭✭Naos


    It's great when he comes crashing through the house.

    <--- Hates PC


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,041 ✭✭✭Havermeyer


    Fúcking Mary Whitehouses the lot of em. The end of the world is nigh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 296 ✭✭BeansMeansHynes


    Aw that is a brillant add :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 559 ✭✭✭ZygOte


    thats brilliant, but yeah i fail to see how gay men would be offended by this :rolleyes:
    I wonder if the CSO has stats on the number of gay men who enjoy speedwalking?

    and whats that MR T says at the end "Get some nuts!" , and they claim its offensive to gay men?, MR T is telling you to do it! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,566 ✭✭✭GrumPy


    +1


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭truecrippler


    lmfao, I love it!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,102 ✭✭✭✭Kintarō Hattori


    Hilarious stuff. Kudos to whoever decided to get Mr. T involved in promoting Snickers. Ahhh the world is gone PC mad and to be honest it's kinda scary.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 759 ✭✭✭gixerfixer


    Is it just me our is the world gone Pc mad.:mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35 Jordon


    Am I the only one who can see it is using the gay thing as an ad gimmick?
    I like Mr T but shooting at a homo is a step to far by the ad makers.

    :(:(:(:(:(:(


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 18,100 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    Jordon wrote: »
    Am I the only one who can see it is using the gay thing as an ad gimmick?
    I like Mr T but shooting at a homo is a step to far by the ad makers.

    :(:(:(:(:(:(
    Well asides from the fact there's no indication the walker is gay, Mr. T should be allowed shoot at whatever foo' he wants!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 559 ✭✭✭ZygOte


    Jordon wrote: »
    Am I the only one who can see it is using the gay thing as an ad gimmick?
    I like Mr T but shooting at a homo is a step to far by the ad makers.

    :(:(:(:(:(:(

    so your the one who objected


Advertisement
Advertisement