Women are ruined by 21/22 yrs old?

Susannahmia · 17-04-2008 03:10PM

mmm sandwiches...........

helimachoptor · 17-04-2008 03:18PM

Some good points here so i'll add in my 2c

First love pretty much moved in with another guy the same day she dumped me. TBH I was more than delighted as everytime I tried to dump her she always made me take her back so when she did this she was all upset yet I had the smile of a cheshire cat!

That made me determined not to stay in a dead relationship ever again.

Next GF she sent me a stupid txt I dumped her end of story, pretty heartless but thats the way it is. She ran off to another country for a year.

A few others ups and downs.

But they have made me the good catch I am today, I'm not a jealous lunatic like I used to be. I'm probably too relaxed if you ask my current GF.

Without all those experiences I wouldnt be who I am today. My Gf wouldnt be who she is without her own experiences. Some people just handle it others dont.

chopperbyrne · 17-04-2008 03:19PM

Brown bread, REAL BUTTER, ham, sliced cheddar cheese, lettuce and cucumber is nice.

Bit of salad cream if I can get it.

boardinwork · 17-04-2008 03:20PM

The_B_Man wrote: »

Guys,
What do ya reckon?

I'll elaborate.

There are a lot of females out there, nice females, who have had long term boyfriends who have dumped them (or vice versa).

This tends to leave them scared to get into anything serious, or to commit, for fear of getting very badly hurt again.

So, us blokes go out, meet a girl or two, as you do, only to discover she has been badly hurt. She still seems nice enough though. If you pursue it further, on either a couple of dates, or a casual thing(F**k buddy), you realise that they are, in fact, mental, based solely on the mental anguish received when said previous long term relationship ended. This may be permanent, but usually only lasts a couple of years. Also, the level of mental-ness is based on how recent the break-up was.

I always wondered why ya see 30 yr old blokes goin for 18/19/20 yr old girls, but now I know!!

Has anyone else any opinions of this? It seems to be all the decent women who actually are ruined, coz all the headwreckers couldnt get a fella to ruin them in the first place!

lol and I'm not jsut sayin this to get a reaction!! In my opinion, younger girls are much easier to get on with than 21/22 yr old, post-relationship girls as they havent been treated like crap by men. Whereas 21/22 yr olds have been through it all, have experienced the pr*cks and have lost all faith in mankind, so are less open, and can basically be pure bitches, or completely mental!!

you go for younger than 21? What age are you?

tallaght01 · 17-04-2008 03:20PM

watna wrote: »

You have a gee! :eek::eek:

When did that happen?

A very good point, watna.

I need to start thinking of some new figures of speech.

Gotta stop borrowing them from me granny

tallaght01 · 17-04-2008 03:20PM

Does anyone else here like crisp sambos?

watna · 17-04-2008 03:21PM

tallaght01 wrote: »

A very good point, watna.

I need to start thinking of some new figures of speech.

Gotta stop borrowing them from me granny

I understand. My granny is a dirtbag too.

Once, she asked me was I shagging around!

constitutionus · 17-04-2008 03:21PM

Mirror wrote: »

Well to be perfectly honest I disagree with such age gaps, more so from the guys perspective than the girls. Girls want older, more mature guys. However, for a guy of 29 to get involved with a 19 year old, it's pretty pathetic and all it says to me is he can't impress anyone his own age so needs to prey on young, vulnerable girls.

now now, in fairness you dont know what dudess looks like. i was 27 when i hooked up with a 17yr old and she had tits bigger than my head (dont worry i waited til she hit 18, which drove her nuts as she hit on me):D

in regards to the OP i put alot of the nuttyness down to the mixed signals girls get over what theyre supposed to be. as well as the breakups. ive found most 20 somethings a messed up in regards to the whole career thing and spend far too much time poncing about insted of just being themselves. teenagers are still in college and the thirty somethings have their act together so there doesnt seem to be so much insanity abounding around them

chopperbyrne · 17-04-2008 03:21PM

tallaght01 wrote: »

Does anyone else here like crisp sambos?

Hell yeah!

White bread, King crisps and real butter of course!

stovelid · 17-04-2008 03:22PM

tallaght01 wrote: »

Does anyone else here like crisp sambos?

Burger bites or king on buttered white bread.

edit: right you are chopper...

Ginny · 17-04-2008 03:24PM

tallaght01 wrote: »

Does anyone else here like crisp sambos?

No, crisp sandwiches are evil.

The_B_Man · 17-04-2008 03:30PM

GinnyJo wrote: »

No, crisp sandwiches are evil.

evil....like a woman scorned??? And the circle is complete!!

Adam · 17-04-2008 03:31PM

constitutionus wrote: »

now now, in fairness you dont know what dudess looks like. i was 27 when i hooked up with a 17yr old and she had tits bigger than my head (dont worry i waited til she hit 18, which drove her nuts as she hit on me):D

in regards to the OP i put alot of the nuttyness down to the mixed signals girls get over what theyre supposed to be. as well as the breakups. ive found most 20 somethings a messed up in regards to the whole career thing and spend far too much time poncing about insted of just being themselves. teenagers are still in college and the thirty somethings have their act together so there doesnt seem to be so much insanity abounding around them

You judge a girls age on the size of her tits? Well I think my case is closed there, intellect like that (or lack there of) wouldn't impress a woman of 27, would it? :rolleyes:

cson · 17-04-2008 03:33PM

Two pints of Guinness and two brown sauce sambo's. Lash it on good and thick.

On topic, Irish women are peculier. Especially around the 18-21 age. They confuse me.

constitutionus · 17-04-2008 03:33PM

Mirror wrote: »

You judge a girls age on the size of her tits? Well I think my case is closed there, intellect like that (or lack there of) wouldn't impress a woman of 27, would it? :rolleyes:

hey, YOU asked why a 29yr old guy would go for a 19yr old, i didnt say you'd like the answer!

fact is most guys go out with girls circa 5yrs their junior. the girl i was with hit on me, she was built like a porn star and i'dve been nuts to say no. and TBH it was one of the best relationships ive been in. certainly beats the mid 20s nutters

RedXIV · 17-04-2008 03:35PM

Mirror wrote: »

You judge a girls age on the size of her tits? Well I think my case is closed there, intellect like that (or lack there of) wouldn't impress a woman of 27, would it? :rolleyes:

depends on the 27yr old doesn't it? and i think he means that he found her physically attractive, so what he wanted was there. just because he wants something pretty to look at then doesn't mean he couldn't match the sophistication of an older woman

helimachoptor · 17-04-2008 03:36PM

constitutionus wrote: »

now now, in fairness you dont know what dudess looks like. i was 27 when i hooked up with a 17yr old and she had tits bigger than my head (dont worry i waited til she hit 18, which drove her nuts as she hit on me):D

in regards to the OP i put alot of the nuttyness down to the mixed signals girls get over what theyre supposed to be. as well as the breakups. ive found most 20 somethings a messed up in regards to the whole career thing and spend far too much time poncing about insted of just being themselves. teenagers are still in college and the thirty somethings have their act together so there doesnt seem to be so much insanity abounding around them

17 is the legal age my friend, think of how much time you wasted

:D

cson · 17-04-2008 03:36PM

Mirror wrote: »

You judge a girls age on the size of her tits? Well I think my case is closed there, intellect like that (or lack there of) wouldn't impress a woman of 27, would it? :rolleyes:

To be fair, some 17 yr olds are very mature while some 27yr olds aren't. thats not a dig at connundrum or anything but age isn't necessarily indicative of maturity, i.e. Age doesn't equal Maturity.

Adam · 17-04-2008 03:37PM

constitutionus wrote: »

hey, YOU asked why a 29yr old guy would go for a 19yr old, i didnt say you'd like the answer!

fact is most guys go out with girls circa 5yrs their junior. the girl i was with hit on me, she was built like a porn star and i'dve been nuts to say no. and TBH it was one of the best relationships ive been in. certainly beats the mid 20s nutters

Well, um, no, I didn't ask that, but thanks anyway...

LouOB · 17-04-2008 03:41PM

The_B_Man wrote: »

Guys,
What do ya reckon?

I'll elaborate.

There are a lot of females out there, nice females, who have had long term boyfriends who have dumped them (or vice versa).

This tends to leave them scared to get into anything serious, or to commit, for fear of getting very badly hurt again.

So, us blokes go out, meet a girl or two, as you do, only to discover she has been badly hurt. She still seems nice enough though. If you pursue it further, on either a couple of dates, or a casual thing(F**k buddy), you realise that they are, in fact, mental, based solely on the mental anguish received when said previous long term relationship ended. This may be permanent, but usually only lasts a couple of years. Also, the level of mental-ness is based on how recent the break-up was.

I always wondered why ya see 30 yr old blokes goin for 18/19/20 yr old girls, but now I know!!

Has anyone else any opinions of this? It seems to be all the decent women who actually are ruined, coz all the headwreckers couldnt get a fella to ruin them in the first place!

lol and I'm not jsut sayin this to get a reaction!! In my opinion, younger girls are much easier to get on with than 21/22 yr old, post-relationship girls as they havent been treated like crap by men. Whereas 21/22 yr olds have been through it all, have experienced the pr*cks and have lost all faith in mankind, so are less open, and can basically be pure bitches, or completely mental!!

and your point is....................?!!
to highlight this fact and what.... exploit it?

Lawless_Samurai · 17-04-2008 03:41PM

Ya know I was gonna throw my two cents in here but now after getting to the end of all the posts all I want is a Sandwich!!! And I just had lunch... Whats wrong with me???

tallaght01 wrote: »

Does anyone else here like crisp sambos?

No they are rotten!

chopperbyrne wrote: »

Hell yeah!

White bread, King crisps and real butter of course!

I'm pretty sure thats a condition you should get checked

GinnyJo wrote: »

No, crisp sandwiches are evil.

Thank you

cson wrote: »

Two pints of Guinness and two brown sauce sambo's. Lash it on good and thick.

On topic, Irish women are peculier. Especially around the 18-21 age. They confuse me.

Thats just about the worst concoction I've ever heard! Plus be honest cson (because AH is all about honesty!) ALL women confuse you!!!

:)

Alright thats me done, now to make my sandwich

,8,1 · 17-04-2008 03:42PM

lol and I'm not jsut sayin this to get a reaction!! In my opinion, younger girls are much easier to get on with than 21/22 yr old, post-relationship girls as they havent been treated like crap by men. Whereas 21/22 yr olds have been through it all, have experienced the pr*cks and have lost all faith in mankind, so are less open, and can basically be pure bitches, or completely mental!!

You're blaming men haha not the case. Many (if not most) girls nowdays don't even bother with relationships and just dive straight into promiscuous bedhopping - so your premise is weak.

The modern woman is born pre-pissed. That's where you're getting it wrong, it's not a learned behaviour!

Yes, by 21/22 women are ruined. Not physically, but psychologically (from their own inflated sexual egos).

Dudess · 17-04-2008 03:42PM

To be fair, I've only ever been interested in older guys anyway (weirdly enough I've been talking about the very same thing today on a thread over in PI). But when I was under 18 and in school I didn't bother seeking out older guys as I felt it was inappropriate. I can't understand why an older guy would go out with a schoolgirl but after that, it's a bit more fair game.

constitutionus · 17-04-2008 03:43PM

helimachoptor wrote: »

17 is the legal age my friend, think of how much time you wasted :D

this was ages ago, there was a bit of hue and cry about changing that back then so i decided to err on the side of caution.

besides it was only a two months wait

weird being at her 18th with the whole family though, kept expecting the da to beat the **** out of me for being a perv but the ma and grandma loved me !

personality wise she SEEMED a bit of an airhead but she was an enourmous amount of fun to be with and some of the stories she told me about her modeling days would turn your hair white. she was quite smart under all that blonde.

EDIT. shoult point out we met in work ! just incase you guys think im trawling schools

Radharc na Sleibhte · 17-04-2008 03:44PM

The_B_Man wrote: »

In my opinion, younger girls are much easier to get on with than 21/22 yr old, post-relationship girls as they havent been treated like crap by men.

Younger than 21/22????
22 is young ffs.
What kind of relationship have most 22 year olds had????

Radharc na Sleibhte · 17-04-2008 03:46PM

tallaght01 wrote: »

Does anyone else here like crisp sambos?

chopperbyrne wrote: »

Hell yeah!

White bread, King crisps and real butter of course!

Can I be on ye're team?

Dudess · 17-04-2008 03:49PM

MikeySligo wrote: »

Younger than 21/22????
22 is young ffs.
What kind of relationship have most 22 year olds had????

It's easy to say that from the perspective of being older (I'm nearly 30, I can see where you're coming from) but you've got to remember back to when you were 21/22. It is possible to have been in a long-term relationship by that age - e.g. one that started at 17/18.

Radharc na Sleibhte · 17-04-2008 03:54PM

Dudess wrote: »

It's easy to say that from the perspective of being older (I'm nearly 30, I can see where you're coming from) but you've got to remember back to when you were 21/22. It is possible to have been in a long-term relationship by that age - e.g. one that started at 17/18.

Absolutely, long term.
But relationship?????
This coming from the guy that married his 18 year old sweetheart 7 years later. D'oh Ill stop typing now.

Ginny · 17-04-2008 03:54PM

Yup at 22 I was in a relationship for 5 years already.

watna · 17-04-2008 03:56PM

GinnyJo wrote: »

Yup at 22 I was in a relationship for 5 years already.

At 22, I'd been with someone for three years and just broken up with them. It's actually quite common really.

Women are ruined by 21/22 yrs old?

Comments