Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Tibettan scumbags

13

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,082 ✭✭✭lostexpectation


    im quite clearly taking the piss out of typical after hours thinking for those haven't read this thread closely enough.

    although i don't think the Tibetans are some sort saintly people, they deserve autonomy, but I didn't know everyone was such a fan of nationalists, they're being used a economic stick to hit china with, and could be set up by a fall by western countries.

    they really looked like full on mass riots the really messed the place up.

    I wonder if china is going to start splitting up like russia, I never heard of Uigher until I heard a couple were in guantameno


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,764 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    But in Ireland we are entitled to A) decide who comes into the country and B) on what terms they can stay. In Tibet the PR China government decides who can move to Tibet (and actively encourage Chinese people to go over) and on what terms they can stay (usually better conditions than the local Tibetans)

    Yes. The situation seems more analagous to Ireland's past (the plantations) than Ireland's present.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,764 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    but I didn't know everyone was such a fan of nationalists

    I dunno. I don't think the sympathies of Irish people lie with the empires & big powers (China) in these sorts of situations.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,566 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    Victor wrote: »
    Of course the Chinese version of the story is that Tibet was a rogue province that split form the Chinese Empire. And later causing all sort of problems like making treaties with the British, which later led to war between China and India. Not that I agree.

    There is an Anti-British-Imperial Museum in Giantse, Tibet, where apparently the British invaded through India and Nepal, and the Tibetans made their last stand, eventually committing suicide rather than being captured. I have to say that is one of the strangest things I've ever seen, in a lifetime of seeing some pretty strange things.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,556 ✭✭✭✭AckwelFoley


    Tha Gopher wrote: »
    State censorship isnt all bad.

    If we had it here, yes, the news might be one sided, but someone might shut down the Sindo for being a waste of trees.

    Ha!! :D


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,566 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    Thirdfox wrote: »
    I thought that the history of Tibet was that a few thousand years ago it was a tributary protectorate state to the Chinese Empire, a few hundred years ago it got incorporated into the Qing(?) dynasty's empire, a hundred years ago the British split it up and 50 years ago the Chinese reclaimed it (having said that the declaration of independence in 1913 was made by a Russian envoy and hence illegal under international law).

    I think the way the Tibetans tell it is that Tibet was always autonomous, but continuously invaded by China and India (I think it was the invading Indians who brought buddhism to Tibet). Any claim China had over it was, I suppose, more like the rule of the British over Ireland prior to the plantations - other countries might have recognised it as a dominion, and there might have been a few garrisons at easily accessable points, but no real governance or control over the place, and in particular, the Tibetans were free to rule themselves, continue their culture, raise armies and taxes etc. I think they even made a brief alliance with the Mongolians to protect their borders against China.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 152 ✭✭rivers


    Thanks for those links, but i think they're a little biased too thirdfox

    'In the shocking degree of cruelty which local Tibetans said they had not seen in their whole lives, "brutal" was an understatement of the true picture, but the word was only reserved for the mob, and not for the policemen.

    Throughout the incident, Lhasa police officers exercised great restraint. They remained patient, professional and were instructed not to use force. In humanitarian spirit, they even rescued the malicious monks who attempted sensation through hurting themselves. But such restraint was met with even more malice.'
    (from china daily).

    The sad fact is that because journalists are not allowed into tibet now, we can't get a completely clear view of whats going on. Obviously the CCP are trying to clear this situation as quickly as they can so it wont stain the precious olympics.
    Also the statement u made about Young chinese of university age can mostly speak english and therefore could and would read foreign news websites is way off...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,105 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    The links are biased towards Chinese views (except for the NY times one I would think). But the value of this is so that people can read past the bias in media on both sides and build a clearer picture of what each sides' grievances are. I did compare China Daily to Fox News :p "We report, you decide..." Xinhua news agency might give a more balanced Chinese view.

    As for how many uni students read the NY Times I wouldn't know - those who are interested definitely have the English ability to do so. I find many Chinese people have a better grasp of the grammar and structures of English than the English or Irish (since they are specifically taught advanced grammar whereas we are not). I am basing that assertion on my personal experience in Peking University where I studied law for a year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,800 ✭✭✭Senna


    Kipperhell wrote: »
    Using that logic Christian Brothers and Catholic Priests did nothing wrong because of their faith and order. I am also pretty sure they aren't true Buddhist Monks either and are following the Dali Lama which was not a fair peaceful system that many believe. More like a monarchy.

    In saying that you can understand the dislike the Tibet people have for Chinese settlers and human nature will react as it does. Mob behaviour is thuggery and scum bag like.

    A few Catholic Priests were involved in the republican movement of the late 60's and 70's. A local priest here in Donegal was involved in quite a bit of gun running. In tibet, they maybe religious, but desperate times require.....
    its a struggle for freedom, not a terrorist war.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37 carsonsunhao




  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31 Burko


    snyper wrote: »
    I would suggest because the Chineese gov have being slaughering the tibetan people for thast 4 decades or more.

    Ha! The population of the region has doubled in the past 4 decades. I'd love to know your sources.

    People here seem to be for autonomy for the people in the region. That’s fine, I think that if they want it they should get it....but then what?

    A religious dictator shrouded in an aura of Zen and mysticism.... is still a dictator.
    Are people in Ireland for the separation of church and state or not?

    Know what serfdom is?
    Can you locate the place on a map? (no googling please :D )

    If you honestly answered 'no' to either the above two questions I kindly ask you to refrain from pretending to know what the issues are.

    And how will they afford this autonomy exactly?....where will they get the money for all the roads, medicine and clean water currently provided for them by the PRC?
    Oh wait...I forgot about the mountain of cash the DL has been sitting on with thanks to the CIA....he'll share it of course, right?
    Would it be likely that we will see an American base there?
    Tibetan culture is slowly vanishing.....it will either take 100 years under the PRC or 15 years with thanks to someone else.

    Miss Fluff, I agree that the average Chinese person is not as exposed to international news as you or I may be....but I think that the more you examine the propaganda of the west vs the propaganda in China....they become strikingly similar.
    Miss Fluff wrote: »
    Why on earth should they question it? Yes, many of the people you or I know in China have been educated and can speak English so can seek out international websites (the ones that haven't been blocked) so to make a sweeping statement like they know what is going on is still making me ROFL quite frankly.

    Haha....but there it is, I agree with you but you're making that statement from the standpoint that you actually DO know whats going on.
    But then.....its the propaganda you've grown up with , why on earth should you question it?
    International websites??:)
    Thats a joke right?...no sorry..I take it back...there's no bull**** on the net.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭biko


    ghandai could be peaceful why can't these guys be...
    I don't know why the Chinese are so violent either. Probably because of their bloody history.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,727 ✭✭✭✭Sherifu


    im quite clearly taking the piss out of typical after hours thinking for those haven't read this thread closely enough.
    Phew, it was touch & go for a while there.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,691 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    Miss Fluff wrote: »
    Because your average Joe Zhang in China is not exposed to international news like we are, or has the inclination to seek it out because the Chinese channels covering "international" news should suffice to most. Why on earth should they question it? Yes, many of the people you or I know in China have been educated and can speak English so can seek out international websites (the ones that haven't been blocked) so to make a sweeping statement like they know what is going on is still making me ROFL quite frankly.

    I used to have a similar view as im sure many westerners do. However i spent some time in China recently and it sure was an eye opener.

    Have you ever been to China?

    The average Chinese person has plenty of exposure to international news, Im not sure how you came to that conclusion. Granted that the is some censorship of some websites, (I remember reading a figure of 10% of news websites but i dont have figs to back it up), international news is readily available. CNN is shown on the TV (although certain reports on China have in the past been blocked out) The internet is everywhere, particularly wifi spots in urban areas.

    From the comfort of my hotel room and office i was able to browse many internation news sites without issue.

    My colleagues and people i spoke to there were well versed on both Chinese and international affairs.

    They spoke openly on political affairs.

    Having spent a number of years in East Africa, I saw more censorship there than I did in China.

    PLease elaborate on why you hold that view?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31 Burko


    faceman wrote: »
    The average Chinese person has plenty of exposure to international news, Im not sure how you came to that conclusion.
    Likewise.....well.... actually I'm not curious at all...I know how.:)

    The same way many Chinese people come to equally inaccurate conclusions. They fall for the propaganda just like the people here have.
    The main difference is that its not hidden in China...it is in fact openly labeled "Propaganda", and most Chinese people are aware that they are being lied to about something even if don't know the specifics of each issue.

    Whereas in Ireland....propaganda is more subliminal than that...many of its citizens aren't even aware it exists.:(

    I'd like to point out that this issue is openly discussed on English language forums in Beijing, but users were in fact requested to refrain from doing so at all on this very site last month.

    http://boards.ie/vbulletin/announcement.php?a=525

    Wow...look at all that free speech go!!
    Oh...and trust me....Tibet gets much better coverage in China than it gets on any Irish media source....even if it is biased in the other direction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 211 ✭✭MasterSun


    Burko wrote: »
    Likewise.....well.... actually I'm not curious at all...I know how.:)

    The same way many Chinese people come to equally inaccurate conclusions. They fall for the propaganda just like the people here have.
    The main difference is that its not hidden in China...it is in fact openly labeled "Propaganda", and most Chinese people are aware that they are being lied to about something even if don't know the specifics of each issue.

    Whereas in Ireland....propaganda is more subliminal than that...many of its citizens aren't even aware it exists.:(

    I'd like to point out that this issue is openly discussed on English language forums in Beijing, but users were in fact requested to refrain from doing so at all on this very site last month.

    http://boards.ie/vbulletin/announcement.php?a=525

    Wow...look at all that free speech go!!
    Oh...and trust me....Tibet gets much better coverage in China than it gets on any Irish media source....even if it is biased in the other direction.

    i concur.

    according to Chomsky and Herman on western propaganda model, there are 5 filters through which news and political coverage are distorted:

    1. the business interests of owner of the media companies
    2. a sensitivity to the views and concerns of advertisers and sponsors
    3. the sourcing of news and info. from agents of power, eg. govts and business backed think tanks
    4. pressure applied to journalists including threats of legal actions
    5. an unquestioning belief in the benefits of market competition and consumer capitalism


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,673 ✭✭✭Miss Fluff


    faceman wrote: »
    I used to have a similar view as im sure many westerners do. However i spent some time in China recently and it sure was an eye opener.

    Have you ever been to China?

    The average Chinese person has plenty of exposure to international news, Im not sure how you came to that conclusion. Granted that the is some censorship of some websites, (I remember reading a figure of 10% of news websites but i dont have figs to back it up), international news is readily available. CNN is shown on the TV (although certain reports on China have in the past been blocked out) The internet is everywhere, particularly wifi spots in urban areas.

    From the comfort of my hotel room and office i was able to browse many internation news sites without issue.

    My colleagues and people i spoke to there were well versed on both Chinese and international affairs.

    They spoke openly on political affairs.

    Having spent a number of years in East Africa, I saw more censorship there than I did in China.

    PLease elaborate on why you hold that view?

    Have I been to China? Yes, I ran a company of 230 people in Beijing for a year Faceman so I'd know the country pretty well. BBC News website was blocked, any reports on CNN and BBC World relating to China were blocked out. Granted some people know what's going but I'd say they are in the minority. Some people still think the Cultural Revolution was for the common good ffs. So while some educated, travelled Chinese are aware of what's going on, there are plenty who have no idea.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,295 ✭✭✭Acid_Violet


    but scumbags are scumbags, they are attacking people in a sectarian manor, randomly destroying people shops etc, there disrupting people's work and family life...I don't care whether they are oppressed or poor, there's no excuse.

    I fúcking love the irony that you're giving out about 'scumbags' who are acting drastically to alleviate their problems of oppression and poverty but that you're not saying a word against the oppressors. You're either extremely naive and have no idea of what the Chinese government has been doing to

    a) christians
    b) practitioners of falun gong
    c) tibetans
    d) trade union workers
    e) any kind of protestors against the government's regime

    or have a pretty fúcked sense of right and wrong imho.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31 Burko


    Miss Fluff wrote: »
    Have I been to China? Yes, I ran a company of 230 people in Beijing for a year Faceman so I'd know the country pretty well. BBC News website was blocked, any reports on CNN and BBC World relating to China were blocked out. Granted some people know what's going but I'd say they are in the minority. Some people still think the Cultural Revolution was for the common good ffs. So while some educated, travelled Chinese are aware of what's going on, there are plenty who have no idea.

    haha...you were in Beijing for a whole year and you've already become an expert on the country....and you had time to do that while managing 230 people, no less.

    Nevermind the fact that Beijing is nothing like the rest of the country, I've been in China for more than five years and I'm still a learner....I know some people who have been here for 15 years or more that still would'nt be quite bold enough to make that statement.
    You must be quite special.

    And perhaps you'd care to have a look at what China was like before the cultural revolution before you start pretending that the world of Chinese politics is black and white.

    Change doesn't come over night.Rome wasn't built in a day.
    But what the hell, you're right....as long as we're pretending to know what we're on about lets take the moral high-ground and imply that we know more about the place than they do because we are so free and enlightened.

    I fúcking love the irony that you're giving out about 'scumbags' who are acting drastically to alleviate their problems of oppression and poverty but that you're not saying a word against the oppressors. You're either extremely naive and have no idea of what the Chinese government has been doing to

    a) christians
    b) practitioners of falun gong
    c) tibetans
    d) trade union workers
    e) any kind of protestors against the government's regime

    or have a pretty fúcked sense of right and wrong imho.

    Well thanks for all that info....would you care to fill us in on what we have no idea about?
    You just listed off several groups....but we're still waiting for the revelation of how there is some kind of secret genocide going on.
    We have no idea what they're doing to them? :confused:

    do you?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,295 ✭✭✭Acid_Violet


    Burko wrote: »
    Well thanks for all that info....would you care to fill us in on what we have no idea about?
    You just listed off several groups....but we're still waiting for the revelation of how there is some kind of secret genocide going on.
    We have no idea what they're doing to them? :confused:

    do you?

    I do indeed, I've researched things for myself so I would be in a position to make such a statement. You should do the same. Hint; the internet is useful.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,691 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    Miss Fluff wrote: »
    Have I been to China? Yes, I ran a company of 230 people in Beijing for a year Faceman so I'd know the country pretty well. BBC News website was blocked, any reports on CNN and BBC World relating to China were blocked out. Granted some people know what's going but I'd say they are in the minority. Some people still think the Cultural Revolution was for the common good ffs. So while some educated, travelled Chinese are aware of what's going on, there are plenty who have no idea.

    Given China according to the UN has an area of 9,629,091 km² and had a population of 1,321,851,888 in summer 07, i dont think working for a year in Beijing qualifies for knowing the country very well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,295 ✭✭✭Acid_Violet


    According to my cousin who's just back from China the Chineese people themselves are banned from going into Beijing during the Olympics.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,591 ✭✭✭RATM


    Burko wrote: »
    haha...you were in Beijing for a whole year and you've already become an expert on the country....and you had time to do that while managing 230 people, no less.

    Nevermind the fact that Beijing is nothing like the rest of the country, I've been in China for more than five years and I'm still a learner....I know some people who have been here for 15 years or more that still would'nt be quite bold enough to make that statement.
    You must be quite special.

    And perhaps you'd care to have a look at what China was like before the cultural revolution before you start pretending that the world of Chinese politics is black and white.

    Change doesn't come over night.Rome wasn't built in a day.
    But what the hell, you're right....as long as we're pretending to know what we're on about lets take the moral high-ground and imply that we know more about the place than they do because we are so free and enlightened.




    Well thanks for all that info....would you care to fill us in on what we have no idea about?
    You just listed off several groups....but we're still waiting for the revelation of how there is some kind of secret genocide going on.
    We have no idea what they're doing to them? :confused:

    do you?

    Errrr change does come overnight, its called a revolution. You must have a short memory and forgotten what happened in Bucharest in 1989.

    And perhaps you should educate yourself on China before joining this discussion, try Googling 'Human Rights China'; look at Amnesty's website, go to the UNs section on Human Rights and read the reports, go to Human Rights Watch.Its all there, if you don't know about these issues that are now common knowledge then get your head out of the sand. Ffs at least inform yourself before making statements like that.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,691 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    According to my cousin who's just back from China the Chineese people themselves are banned from going into Beijing during the Olympics.

    Thats not true.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,105 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    RATM wrote: »
    Errrr change does come overnight, its called a revolution. You must have a short memory and forgotten what happened in Bucharest in 1989.

    And perhaps you should educate yourself on China before joining this discussion, try Googling 'Human Rights China'; look at Amnesty's website, go to the UNs section on Human Rights and read the reports, go to Human Rights Watch.Its all there, if you don't know about these issues that are now common knowledge then get your head out of the sand. Ffs at least inform yourself before making statements like that.

    Oh so with our shambolic health service the cure is to have a revolution and implement overnight change?

    Either you are politically naive or you want to see chaos (I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and go with the first). Modern countries cannot afford to have revolutions unless they want to plunge back 50 years in terms of their economy and positioning on the global stage.

    I notice you haven't done what the other poster has suggested and taken a look at China before and during the Cultural Revolution (a revolution that lasted a good few years actually) and where it's at now. Of course they have problems (some serious ones too) but so do our wonderful European and American neighbours (and dare I say it, ourselves). This doesn't take away our right to criticise, but certainly it makes it less likely they'll listen.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,296 ✭✭✭RandolphEsq


    If I found out my relative was druid king of Ireland and I sought to reclaim that title, could I?
    What 'criteria' must be met in order for a person/group of people to lay claim to a land?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,591 ✭✭✭RATM


    Thirdfox wrote: »
    Oh so with our shambolic health service the cure is to have a revolution and implement overnight change?

    Either you are politically naive or you want to see chaos (I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and go with the first). Modern countries cannot afford to have revolutions unless they want to plunge back 50 years in terms of their

    Oh my god,what kind of thwarted logic is that? Like learn how to reason in a rational manner if you are going to discuss the topic. You just can't compare the Irish Health system and the Romanian Revolution of 1989, that is daft and its the reasoning of a child.

    Revolutions are for countries where the people want change, reforms are for health systems that need change, theres a wealth of difference between the two and if you didn't know that its a bit rich to be calling me politically naive.

    The fact of the matter is a previous poster said change can't come overnight and I said yes, yes, yes it can giving the Romanian revolution as an example. And Im right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,105 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    Thank you for not addressing my points (or the previous user's points) again.

    So you want the Chinese to have a revolution - good for you. Do you know the cost in human life and the cost for you in economic terms (nevermind the poor Chinese)? Do you think it's feasible for a major world power to undergo an overnight revolution?

    I still stand by the statement that you are politically naive. Or maybe bloodthirsty (that is what would happen with a revolution - civil war on such a scale making Iraq looking like a picnic in the park). Let the Chinese kill each other - we can then teach them democracy our way, the right way. Get off your high horse and look at reality.

    So, no. You are wrong. Going further than a simple statement - you are wrong insofar as the Chinese will not undergo another revolution, it's simple economic and stability suicide. And most Chinese people are happy with the progress made so far.

    (I can't help but smile at the irony of starting a sentence with the word "Like" and then delivering a lecture about logic and acting like a child.)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,591 ✭✭✭RATM


    Thirdfox wrote: »
    Do you think it's feasible for a major world power to undergo an overnight revolution?

    I still stand by the statement that you are politically naive. Or maybe bloodthirsty (that is what would happen with a revolution - civil war on such a scale making Iraq looking like a picnic in the park). Let the Chinese kill each other - we can then teach them democracy our way, the right way. Get off your high horse and look at reality.

    So, no. You are wrong. Going further than a simple statement - you are wrong insofar as the Chinese will not undergo another revolution, it's simple economic and stability suicide. And most Chinese people are happy with the progress made so far.

    (I can't help but smile at the irony of starting a sentence with the word "Like" and then delivering a lecture about logic and acting like a child.)

    WTF???? Why are you trying to put words in my mouth? When did I ever say what China needs is a revolution? I didn't, simple as. I said you were wrong to equate the Irish health system with the Romanian revolution.
    Now you are wrong yet again because your flawed reasoning has led you down a path of inference. You inferred by me saying that change can come overnight in the form of the Romanian revolution then the same can happen to China. Wrong again, I don't want revolution for China so stop trying to put words in my mouth.

    And yet again you have shown your political naivety. You said

    So you want the Chinese to have a revolution - good for you. Do you know the cost in human life and the cost for you in economic terms (never mind the poor Chinese)?

    You can't honestly tell me you know something about politics and not know that a revolution can be peaceful? Like the Orange Revolution in Ukraine 2004 or the fall of the Berlin Wall 1989, now commonly known in politics as The Peaceful Revolution, for example?

    Thats three times you were wrong in one afternoon, nice hat-trick buddy.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31 Burko


    I do indeed, I've researched things for myself so I would be in a position to make such a statement. You should do the same. Hint; the internet is useful.

    So what your saying is you don't know.

    Sorry..."search the internet" isn't a valid answer. And a 'sure everyone knows what goes on over there' attitude only exacerbates things.

    If you have some info...out with it....making vague references to "the internet" is the tactic of someone who thinks what they believe is the truth....but doesn't actually have any interest in finding out the specifics of anything because the whole thing ties in so well with their moral compass.

    You've researched it yourself??:p My ass.



    RATM wrote: »
    Errrr change does come overnight, its called a revolution.

    You're right man....everything is sweet and dandy straight away after a revolution. I guess its pretty easy to have that perspective from an ivory tower.

    "common knowledge"??

    Common knowledge is what the media tells you.
    Its what tells Chinese people that the Japanese are evil and American people that Muslims hate everything.
    Common knowledge is what led you to jump to conclusions without bothering to invesgitage the matter.

    "common knowledge" is controlled in China right?...We all know that...its common knowledge.
    What about Ireland??.....nah...not possible.
    "perhaps you should educate yourself on China before joining this discussion"

    Loverrly, if you really want to be condescending and patronizing instead of having a rational debate I'm more than willing to play.

    Bah...but what the hell would I know about the place....I only live here.


Advertisement
Advertisement