Venables? Say it ain't so?

Mikeyt086 · 13-01-2008 08:55PM

event wrote: »

im a leeds fan and i can tell you that is 100% false, at least get statements right

Its just what ive been told from 4 of my Leeds supporting mates.

event · 13-01-2008 08:56PM

OPENROAD wrote: »

How do Leeds fans feel about O'Leary.

me personally, i dont blame him really

yeah he spent all the money, but he was given it and told i was alright.
ridsdale is the main culprit, blame lies squarely wit him

OPENROAD · 13-01-2008 09:02PM

event wrote: »

me personally, i dont blame him really

yeah he spent all the money, but he was given it and told i was alright.
ridsdale is the main culprit, blame lies squarely wit him

His book did not go down to well.

DaveH · 13-01-2008 09:48PM

Mikeyt086 wrote: »

Its just what ive been told from 4 of my Leeds supporting mates.

Well they dont know what there talking about. Rot had well and truly set in before El Tel took over. Ferdinand was sold before he started. Robbie Keane wanted out before el tel was appointed. Woodgate was sold by the chairman.

Sizzler · 13-01-2008 09:55PM

Big Sam as his assistant

Zaph · 14-01-2008 12:13AM

The problem with Venables at Leeds was that he was brought in to stop the rot and things went from bad to worse while he was there. He had a reputation as a top quality manager but he left the club in greater disarray than when he found it, and while not all of this was his fault, he does have to take his share of the blame. It was clear that he was only in it for the money, a fact borne out when he refused to defer the money the club owed him after he left, despite them being in a dire financial situation. Having said all that, his record was significantly better than Peter Reid who succeeded him.

Venables? Say it ain't so?

Comments