Parted-at-birth twins married

Terry · 11-01-2008 03:13PM

I don't know.

Wasn't there some dude called Noah who repopulated the world after the flood?
His kids would have had to done each other and we all turned out fine.

Tar.Aldarion · 11-01-2008 03:14PM

Meh, they are still going to get it on like Donkey Kong. Oh, and now for the husbands weird sister sexual fantasies to come out Some shock I would say.

Pye · 11-01-2008 03:14PM

Commander Vimes wrote: »

you'd think that the fact that they were both adopted and had the same birthday might set alarms bells off in their heads

Excellent point. I wonder if either of them knew their actual birth date. There's not really much information there so it could be that they knew all along.

aidan_walsh · 11-01-2008 03:15PM

Terry wrote: »

I don't know.

Wasn't there some dude called Noah who repopulated the world after the flood?
His kids would have had to done each other and we all turned out fine.

Not to mention the original Adam and Eve, whose sons would have had to hit their own mother to have children.

RxQueen · 11-01-2008 03:16PM

DesF wrote: »

So, no-one else here has looked at their sibling and thought "hmm, I'd probably hit that if I wasn't their bro/sis"?

Yeah, right. :rolleyes:

hahahahaha but no!

god that crazy, what are the odds.:eek:

Terry · 11-01-2008 03:18PM

aidan_walsh wrote: »

Not to mention the original Adam and Eve, whose sons would have had to hit their own mother to have children.

Yeah. It's all natural. People are too prudish these days.

18AD · 11-01-2008 03:19PM

D.T. Jesus wrote: »

Wow, that's crazy. How did they find out they were siblings I wonder.

First encounter with a mirror.

Reku · 11-01-2008 03:36PM

Ah well, better to have it annulled I guess than go through the eventual messy divorce....
As a wise man once said:
"ackh! It won't last, brothers and sisters are natural enemies; like Scots and English... and Scots and Welsh... and Scots and other Scots... damn Scots, they ruined Scotland.":D

emeraldstar · 11-01-2008 03:37PM

DesF wrote: »

So, no-one else here has looked at their sibling and thought "hmm, I'd probably hit that if I wasn't their bro/sis"?

Yeah, right. :rolleyes:

Um, no, ew

Tar.Aldarion · 11-01-2008 03:40PM

Why aren't the pix of Desf's hot sister up here yet?

moco · 11-01-2008 03:41PM

star-pants wrote: »

I feel so sorry for them - they'll need a lot of counselling.

Well - do you need your parents names on your marriage cert? Because I know my mother had to produce her parents death certs when she was getting married (she was 22 at the time I think).

They probably only had adoption certs which would do instead of birth certs.

11-01-2008 03:43PM

Terry wrote: »

we all turned out fine.

O RLY?

Cathmandooo · 11-01-2008 03:52PM

Mad!! That would be quite funny to see how they realised it but sad all the same

Sam Vimes · 11-01-2008 03:52PM

red_ice wrote: »

no, thats wrong, if they choose to raise a family it would come out very bad.

not necessarily. the problem with siblings having kids is that if there's a defect in their genes, there's more chance of it being passed on but its not a certainty. it could happen but the problems really only become apparent after generations of inbreeding.

so don't worry your incestuous heads all you donegal people

Pye wrote: »

Excellent point. I wonder if either of them knew their actual birth date. There's not really much information there so it could be that they knew all along.

i can't speak for all adoptive people but i was adopted and i have an adoption cert that has my birthday and i know the hospital i was born in. with that info i'd figure out fairly quickly if i was boning my sister. and then i'd have a tough choice to make

KTRIC · 11-01-2008 03:55PM

Commander Vimes wrote: »

with that info i'd figure out fairly quickly if i was boning my sister. and then i'd have a tough choice to make

If you found out while you were boning her would you stop or "finish up" ??

Sam Vimes · 11-01-2008 03:58PM

KTRIC wrote: »

If you found out while you were boning her would you stop or "finish up" ??

what a silly question. if i was in the middle of it a herd of wild horses couldn't pull me off. my dilemma would be whether its worth the mutants that woul be produced. i suppose i could sell them to the circus....

_blank_ · 11-01-2008 04:00PM

Tar.Aldarion wrote: »

Why aren't the pix of Desf's hot sister up here yet?

I'm working on it...

aidan_walsh · 11-01-2008 04:01PM

DesF wrote: »

I'm working on it...

Ewwwwww...

Peared · 11-01-2008 04:01PM

Thing is though, anybody who is adopted could be with their brother/sister/half sibling/father/mother at any time and not know (sorry Commander Vines) The chances of finding out that information are slim and people have kids in different hospitals/counties etc. It must happen fairly regularly when you think about it.

KTRIC · 11-01-2008 04:05PM

Commander Vimes wrote: »

what a silly question. if i was in the middle of it a herd of wild horses couldn't pull me off. my dilemma would be whether its worth the mutants that woul be produced. i suppose i could sell them to the circus....

Are you admitting that you would bone your sister ?

Oooh the plot thickens :rolleyes:

Mena · 11-01-2008 04:09PM

18AD wrote: »

First encounter with a mirror.

Yeah, because twins of different sexes are identical... :rolleyes:

ScumLord · 11-01-2008 04:13PM

Commander Vimes wrote: »

i can't speak for all adoptive people but i was adopted and i have an adoption cert that has my birthday and i know the hospital i was born in. with that info i'd figure out fairly quickly if i was boning my sister. and then i'd have a tough choice to make

So what did you decide?

It's fairly creepy but as it's happened to someone else, hilarious. I bet everyone else knew long before they did too. Ye look the same, finish each others sentences, same birthday, that time you needed a liver transplant she just so happened to have a perfect match, alarms bells???

yaynay · 11-01-2008 04:13PM

DesF wrote: »

I'm working on it...

as in i)carrying out incestuous relations with your sister or ii)as in getting a picture uploaded.

_blank_ · 11-01-2008 04:16PM

yaynay wrote: »

as in i)carrying out incestuous relations with your sister or ii)as in getting a picture uploaded.

yes

yaynay · 11-01-2008 04:18PM

Hmmm. That was multiple choice... damn you!

Tar.Aldarion · 11-01-2008 04:26PM

Multitasking, hmm...

Sam Vimes · 11-01-2008 04:35PM

Peared wrote: »

Thing is though, anybody who is adopted could be with their brother/sister/half sibling/father/mother at any time and not know (sorry Commander Vines) The chances of finding out that information are slim and people have kids in different hospitals/counties etc. It must happen fairly regularly when you think about it.

i've thoroughly checked out my girlfriend's family history. none of them have given any children up for adoption. i really did check that because i know it can happen

i read a story a few months ago where a girl started in an office and after a few months was talking to one of the staff and it came up in conversation that she'd given a girl up for adoption years ago and she turned out to be her daughter. thankfully they weren't carrying on a lesbian relationship

KTRIC wrote: »

Are you admitting that you would bone your sister ?

Oooh the plot thickens :rolleyes:

i ain't admitting nothing

ScumLord wrote: »

Ye look the same

they wouldn't necessarily look the same. they'd be fraternal twins, ie from different eggs, so they wouldn't look any more alike than normal brothers and sisters, who often don't look very alike

ScumLord · 11-01-2008 04:47PM

Commander Vimes wrote: »

they wouldn't necessarily look the same. they'd be fraternal twins, ie from different eggs, so they wouldn't look any more alike than normal brothers and sisters, who often don't look very alike

Didn't it say they where Identical twins? Can't you have male/female identical twins? If not you should be it's only right.

Sam Vimes · 11-01-2008 04:54PM

ScumLord wrote: »

Didn't it say they where Identical twins? Can't you have male/female identical twins? If not you should be it's only right.

no you can't have male and female identical twins. for them to be identical, their genitals have to be identical too. but you're right, that would be weird to look at and i think its something scientists should look into. maybe we could make a third gender that has something like barbie and ken have, ie smooth

ScumLord · 11-01-2008 05:12PM

Commander Vimes wrote: »

no you can't have male and female identical twins. for them to be identical, their genitals have to be identical too. but you're right, that would be weird to look at and i think its something scientists should look into. maybe we could make a third gender that has something like barbie and ken have, ie smooth

I think that gender already exists thanks to the wonder of nature. I can't think of the name right now but they have both dangly bits and flappy bits.

Parted-at-birth twins married

Comments